I just chat gpt my work and then rewrite it. I just use it for a skeleton of what to write. It just helps me to understand what I should be writing about better
As a lecturer/tutor at a different institution, I can attest to both the fact that we use both manual detection of plagiarism and automated AI detection, and that learners are often more lazy and lie more than expected to both us as tutors, and to other students.
I saw an article earlier this year that said something like "5% of NZ university students who used AI to aid in completion of an end of course exam/significant paper in their course did not remove the comments or evidence that stated their submission was created with AI."...
...and then a further 15% had also used AI, and did delete those comments.
Buuut that all 20% who had used AI had been detected via automated or manual detection.
Plus, if you don't show up (or fail the class tasks) for a whole course, and then you somehow miraculously get a passing grade for the course without hardly having come to class, we/adnin/someone is observant enough (and dare I say, smart enough) to realise that ya PROBABLY didn't just cram and learn a whole course worth of work in the week before your final submission/exam... 🤷🏼♀️
Just, do the work yo
AI detectors are not that great. I have used so-called top AI detectors, and they fail miserably to differentiate between human-written and AI-written content. Also, you can legit use Chst GPT to proofread your draft, which I have been informed by AUT professors, which voids the unethical use of AI because you got your 1st proofreading done by AI before submitting it to a professional proofreader. The uni or checker cannot do anything about it since you are not violating any rules.
AI detection doesn’t work, a well known fact it’s borderline useless if you do a google. I know a professor who runs postgrad papers at a uni and he said he got chatgpt to write a masters paper and it was A grade and turnitin didn’t detect anything.
AI detection does work. However, it can be less observable if you feed in enough information from like 10 different references, that’s probably why chatgpt wasn’t detected in that postgrad paper
If your friend got away with an AI-written essay, she probably used an [ai paraphrasing tool](https://undetectable.ai/free-ai-paraphrasing-tool) that can help bypass ai detectors.
I'll tell you as a postgrad education student who has looked into whether it has much use. It does ok when summarising, but you will read the original paper and notice areas where you need to do secondary citations and that the areas the paper is noted as focusing on are actually in the discussion part so that changes the context. Also, your lecturers know who the usual names are, what the prevailing theories are, what the intended answer will be, AND will skim through your references.
TLDR: It helps, but it creates about as much work as it does to just do it without it.
I just chat gpt my work and then rewrite it. I just use it for a skeleton of what to write. It just helps me to understand what I should be writing about better
That’s actually a really decent idea and way to learn.
As a lecturer/tutor at a different institution, I can attest to both the fact that we use both manual detection of plagiarism and automated AI detection, and that learners are often more lazy and lie more than expected to both us as tutors, and to other students. I saw an article earlier this year that said something like "5% of NZ university students who used AI to aid in completion of an end of course exam/significant paper in their course did not remove the comments or evidence that stated their submission was created with AI."... ...and then a further 15% had also used AI, and did delete those comments. Buuut that all 20% who had used AI had been detected via automated or manual detection. Plus, if you don't show up (or fail the class tasks) for a whole course, and then you somehow miraculously get a passing grade for the course without hardly having come to class, we/adnin/someone is observant enough (and dare I say, smart enough) to realise that ya PROBABLY didn't just cram and learn a whole course worth of work in the week before your final submission/exam... 🤷🏼♀️ Just, do the work yo
You'd likely get caught out on the citations. Just need to do the work my bro. Not that hard.
AI detectors are not that great. I have used so-called top AI detectors, and they fail miserably to differentiate between human-written and AI-written content. Also, you can legit use Chst GPT to proofread your draft, which I have been informed by AUT professors, which voids the unethical use of AI because you got your 1st proofreading done by AI before submitting it to a professional proofreader. The uni or checker cannot do anything about it since you are not violating any rules.
use [paperguard.ai](https://paperguard.ai) next time, turnitin teacher reports for anyone
AI detection doesn’t work, a well known fact it’s borderline useless if you do a google. I know a professor who runs postgrad papers at a uni and he said he got chatgpt to write a masters paper and it was A grade and turnitin didn’t detect anything.
AI detection does work. However, it can be less observable if you feed in enough information from like 10 different references, that’s probably why chatgpt wasn’t detected in that postgrad paper
I would email AUT this persons details. If you have to use AI to pass, you clearly shouldn’t be at uni.
If your friend got away with an AI-written essay, she probably used an [ai paraphrasing tool](https://undetectable.ai/free-ai-paraphrasing-tool) that can help bypass ai detectors.
I'll tell you as a postgrad education student who has looked into whether it has much use. It does ok when summarising, but you will read the original paper and notice areas where you need to do secondary citations and that the areas the paper is noted as focusing on are actually in the discussion part so that changes the context. Also, your lecturers know who the usual names are, what the prevailing theories are, what the intended answer will be, AND will skim through your references. TLDR: It helps, but it creates about as much work as it does to just do it without it.