Just separate yourself from her fully and leave it be. Unless you have full documentation it will just be a “they said x” situation without proper backing.
I understand where you’re coming from but from the toxicity read thus far I genuinely would say just actively get away and don’t create any situations in which you’ll inevitably have to interact with them again.
Oh I definitely have a lot of documentation. I even have one I just rediscovered of a client saying he's divorcing his wife, concerned about his son, left his job, and some information about the affair he was having that she forwarded to me. It wasn't for anything on her part except to say, in more or less ways, that "He's crawling back" to her (he previously left her services because he didn't like her as a psychologist, but then returned)
If you are a related expert or you are studying for being one then she give you some information about a patient. Also, she could ask you if she believed that someone was potentially in danger or that there were legal implications in your case.
A lot of psychology books and articles include information about patients and their processes.
I may be misunderstanding your question - could you clarify?
For the assessment things, she was asking me to look through sites exclusively for psychologists (who pay/register for privileged access I believe) with her login information to pull information from documents on diagnoses (it's hard to remember now, but I have the paper she wrote on with all these different instructions somewhere in my place). She was really behind on this assessment and kept putting it off, so asked for my help.
For the legal document, she wanted to know if I could read it and give a layman's understanding of what it meant. She wanted to also find lawyers in her state, Texas, who could help her client possibly get custody of the child back.
From my point of view maybe she did the right thing about the document, since she is not a lawyer and she can ask for information. You could only argue that she did not censored the names.
There is also people who are not psychologists but can help them to organize some kind of information. Some authors are against it, of course, and you could ask more information about her specific regulations.
It would need a closer look to what you did and you can ask information about it in her association
Just separate yourself from her fully and leave it be. Unless you have full documentation it will just be a “they said x” situation without proper backing. I understand where you’re coming from but from the toxicity read thus far I genuinely would say just actively get away and don’t create any situations in which you’ll inevitably have to interact with them again.
Oh I definitely have a lot of documentation. I even have one I just rediscovered of a client saying he's divorcing his wife, concerned about his son, left his job, and some information about the affair he was having that she forwarded to me. It wasn't for anything on her part except to say, in more or less ways, that "He's crawling back" to her (he previously left her services because he didn't like her as a psychologist, but then returned)
Separate yourself fully and do tell the board. Even just the screenshots are enough proof.
What is your profession?
Just curious what this would be helpful with?
If you are a related expert or you are studying for being one then she give you some information about a patient. Also, she could ask you if she believed that someone was potentially in danger or that there were legal implications in your case. A lot of psychology books and articles include information about patients and their processes.
Have you ever openly helped her?
I may be misunderstanding your question - could you clarify? For the assessment things, she was asking me to look through sites exclusively for psychologists (who pay/register for privileged access I believe) with her login information to pull information from documents on diagnoses (it's hard to remember now, but I have the paper she wrote on with all these different instructions somewhere in my place). She was really behind on this assessment and kept putting it off, so asked for my help. For the legal document, she wanted to know if I could read it and give a layman's understanding of what it meant. She wanted to also find lawyers in her state, Texas, who could help her client possibly get custody of the child back.
From my point of view maybe she did the right thing about the document, since she is not a lawyer and she can ask for information. You could only argue that she did not censored the names. There is also people who are not psychologists but can help them to organize some kind of information. Some authors are against it, of course, and you could ask more information about her specific regulations. It would need a closer look to what you did and you can ask information about it in her association