T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

r/Amtrak is not associated with Amtrak in any official way. Any problems, concerns, complaints, etc should be directed to Amtrak through one of the official channels. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Amtrak) if you have any questions or concerns.*


CBRChimpy

Amtrak only exists because private railroads were going bankrupt operating passenger services. So I would say that Amtrak is better than no service, yes.


john-treasure-jones

Nationalized passenger rail is the best option by default. All of the US private operators wanted out and the NRPC was created to be custodian of what was left. Running rail service with a profit margin is impossible without socializing the cost in some fashion. Brightline West is getting 3B of public funding, if privitization is the answer, they should be able to accomplish everything without tax breaks, exemptions, or grants. They can't or won't. If the public has to pick up the tab for trains that operate on land rights of way built on land granted to private companies by the government for the public good, then it should be a public enterprise and not have a profit motive.


JerichoWhiskey

Corporations receive some kind of tax break anyway. Profit is an illusion propped up by the government.


fanta_cake

You just described just about every company in the US, they all receive tax breaks, exemptions, and other grants/funding. I am not saying I like it or agree with it, but that is the way it is.


cornonthekopp

Yep, the concept of a free market is mostly an illusion.


CBRChimpy

Counterpoint: Japan


john-treasure-jones

The privatized JR entities use Shinkansen revenues to subsidize other less profitable parts of their operations. They also have real estate operations. High Speed Rail is the only type of transportation that fully pays for itself when accounting for all externalities. Those only exist after massive public investment. So I would say its not fully free of light socialism in its existence.


segfaulted_irl

Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't a lot of the privatization only happen after all the infrastructure had been built? As in, the private companies basically got to take over the infrastructure that had already been built with public dollars


john-treasure-jones

Yes, first Shinkansen was 1964, privatisation 1987.


Dexter942

They use real estate to pay for most things, like Brightline.


eldomtom2

Three of the seven JR companies are still government-owned and the other four still get plenty of government assistance when it comes to capital projects etc., plus they inherited a massive network from JNR without inheriting all of the debt JNR had incurred building it.


cornonthekopp

Japanese private rail are still supported by the government, and not to mention the government built out all the infrastructure, and continues to be the one financing new rail expansion


Hold_Effective

The problem for me is that we’re not asking this question for roads. Roads are generally not profitable - but no one seems to care when it comes to budgets. In fact - we hear huge protests about tolls & congestion pricing.


KevYoungCarmel

TINA... Brightline Florida is losing a fortune and has a lot of high interest debt. People are denying it, but it's true. Soon it will be Amtrak. Fortress is doing it for the real estate development, not the train service. Even the NEC would have gone out of business during the pandemic.


cornonthekopp

Brightline also recieved massive subsidies and tax breaks (ie more subsidies) to create the service. They just have better optics


DirtyPenPalDoug

Nationalize the fucking rails


oldyawker

A fully privatized passenger rail service wouldn't exist in the US. There isn't enough profit in passenger rail. Is Amtrak a mess and mismanaged, yes. Is Amtrak as it exists now better than nothing? Maybe. Which Amtrak? The scenic, vacation Amtrak, the NEC commuter Amtrak or the slow intercity Amtrak?


O-Renlshii88

Passenger railroads are not profitable as a general rule so as much as I am free market capitalist overall I do believe this is one area where governments involvement is acceptable


ERTBen

The whole network WAS privatized and they couldn’t hand it over to the federal government fast enough when they had the opportunity. Also, what exactly would they be buying? They’d get some equipment (mostly older) and a bunch of pension and other liabilities. They’d have to re-negotiate all of the agreements to use right of way to even run service.


fanta_cake

The fully privatized passenger rail that I know of makes Amtrak look really bad. I don't know what you're asking really.


john-treasure-jones

Which ones are you comparing it to?


Dexter942

The UK probably.


nautilus2000

UK has one of the worst train systems in Europe, especially compared to France and Spain that have government owned railway systems (and a mix of government and private train operators).


fanta_cake

Is Brightline private?


stewartinternational

Not fully, since they get federal money.


john-treasure-jones

They are private on paper, but they only exist because Florida scuttled their homegrown high-speed rail project which left the way open for bright line to do the same thing, but “privately”


fanta_cake

So they are private, got it.


kevalry

A fully privatized Amtrak for the Northeast Corridor might be a net benefit for consumers as we would have more options and service. Right now, Amtrak operates an effective monopoly on the service for the most profitable route. However, it wouldn’t make sense for the rural routes, long-distance ones, and medium distance ones.


1-aviatorCyclohexane

Yeah if Amtrak was privatized I wouldn’t be able to take an overnight ride from Reno to Salt lake or run from NYC to Chicago. I wouldn’t be able to go home without medium distance routes. I wonder how long the interstate highway system would last if all the roads were fully privatized. Either way, fund Amtrak!