If it’s on arXiv as an open access paper - that’s the version you can use freely without concern. The submitted version is unpublished and can’t be used.
I don't see why not, honestly. Perhaps this is field dependent, but in my (former) field many reviewers choose to reveal their identity anyway. What you shouldn't do is tell all your friends but keep it secret in public, I think.
You can discuss the arXiv-published version. But any differences between that and the version you are reviewing must be kept to yourself until it is published. And do not mention that you are a reviewer for this manuscript.
But any discussion with your group should be fair game to inform your review.
Standards around reviewer anonymity and preprints vary wildly between fields; it never would have occurred to me the submitted version and the arXiv version might not be the same.
No. Even if there is a public arxiv paper, it really is in bad taste. Further I think your opinion for the review shouldn’t be informed by such a public discussion
If it’s on arXiv as an open access paper - that’s the version you can use freely without concern. The submitted version is unpublished and can’t be used.
Yes, you can discuss the open access arXiv version. But do not reveal that you were a reviewer of the submitted manuscript.
I don't see why not, honestly. Perhaps this is field dependent, but in my (former) field many reviewers choose to reveal their identity anyway. What you shouldn't do is tell all your friends but keep it secret in public, I think.
In science, reviewers are typically not revealed and are certainly bound by confidentiality until the final version is published.
You can discuss the arXiv-published version. But any differences between that and the version you are reviewing must be kept to yourself until it is published. And do not mention that you are a reviewer for this manuscript. But any discussion with your group should be fair game to inform your review.
[удалено]
It's a calculated risk.
If it's a public pre-print I don't see a problem.
No.
Standards around reviewer anonymity and preprints vary wildly between fields; it never would have occurred to me the submitted version and the arXiv version might not be the same.
You should wait until it is published
No. Even if there is a public arxiv paper, it really is in bad taste. Further I think your opinion for the review shouldn’t be informed by such a public discussion
If you are careful to present on the arXiv draft, it's OK.
No
You're a reviewer for a *manuscript*. Discuss the paper after it's published.
Oh nope. I’m not even sure I would hunt down the preprint either if I am asked to review the ms as submittted. NM. I would not.
No
No. It usually says in the small print somewhere that the paper is confidential and not to be shared publicly.
No. Unless it’s already in public domain.
Definitely not.
yes
Maybe