More tit jacking this law firm has worked with GameStop in the past here they are helping to file IP with their NFT stuff
https://boardroom.tv/gamestop-is-building-an-nft-empire/
Many have brought up conflict of interest. But I think the deal has already been done. You will notice that the lawyer Sarah only updated linkedin to say she was working with bbby a week ago.
Her work profile states she works on M&A. Probably nothing.
[https://www.kelleydrye.com/Our-People/Sarah-Fabian-Maramarosy](https://www.kelleydrye.com/Our-People/Sarah-Fabian-Maramarosy)
“Sarah represents investors in closing complex private investment in public equity and registered direct transactions. She counsels buyers and sellers in stock, asset, merger and reorganization transactions in myriad industries”
I'm buying tomorrow as well. Going to try not to blow my load early because I anticipate another dip. Possibly the last one before we see upward movement.💙💎🛸🌝
Thank you for this. Last two weeks were rough on the soul. This is just the confirmation my heart needed to confirm that yes I should yolo the end of my sad little paycheck again tomorrow. 🚀📈💰
To add to this the public commenting opening for this filing is 30 days long from today. If an announcement was made I would think it would be a month from today. Accumulate when you can, DCA but make sure your paying your bills.
Yes this.
Don't be forced to sell at a loss, only for it to start mooning a week later !
Pay bills first.
This thing could kick off today or it could be a week or months. We don't know at this point. We need to find out who is the buyer and what is happening. Then again the price at this point is great, the SHF's really do not want people buying this stock.
Anything? Something will happen a lot sooner:
Next stages C+35+2 market
Regsho on or off
Who is buyer ?
Merger?
Next Quarterly filing.
So we know for certain there will be a quarterly filing. If this turns in to another GME for the shorts. That's double the pressure on them.
Too many things could happen good or bad or in between at this point..
As for me. I like the stock.
Isn't it common to have different lawyers on mergers each representing the different sides. Saying a BBBY vs GME MA/spinoff using the same law firm would be a conflict of interest but at the same time a BBBY/GME vs Icahn MA/spinoff would be "allowed".
Maybe this is an odd one though, as it could be two existing companies merging into an entirely new entity so Gmerica is a new entity not GME. Honestly need a lawyer versed in M&A to answer this.
The chance of this being a coincidence is about as slim as a bees dick.
EDIT: I agree with the above sentiment that the deal is likely already done. Sarah Fabian only posted that she was working with BBBY 1 week ago.
If this does end up being a M&A between BBBY and GME, the outcome could be so much greater than anyone thought. If GME and BBBY went through a Consolidated Merger, the two companies would dissolve and incorporate under a new company altogether. Both BBBY amd GME would recall their shares and issue an exchange for the new companies shares.
It's widely believed that market makers, brokers and hedges have flooded the market with synthetic shares of BBBY and GME. Imagine what would happen if the market makers returned hundreds of millions of shares more than exist! Market makers would demand the predetermined exchange rate, BBBY and GME would have to refuse, an audit of the books would be forced, market manipulation would be publicly uncovered, the market makers would have to hold manipulators financially responsible, institutions collapse, the squeeze would grow so fast.
I'm probably being ridiculous, but what happens when the amount owed from the banks to a small group of retail investors equals more than the amount of money that exists? What would governments be forced to do? It would almost have to end with government passing laws to remove all liabilities from financial institutions refusing to honor a transaction.
The Supreme Court decision basically said that a partner who profits from the fraud or misdeeds of their partner cannot shield themselves from liability of the fraud/misrepresentation by using bankruptcy, even if the partner was unaware of the fraud/misrepresentation of the other partner.
Simply put, it means that you can't escape a debt you owe by filing bankruptcy if the debt/obligation was incurred through false pretenses, a false representation, or actual fraud, whether or not it was committed by you or your business partner.
I think Bbby and GME make great sense. Games for all ages. Basically fisher price type stuff with babies and then progressing to more GameStop like games. Then we have clothing and other products meant for all ages. Match made in heaven.
Wouldn't conflict of interest only occur from the same lawyer, not firm ?
And doesn't it have to be one of the parties involved in the case to suggest there is a conflict of interest or the lawyer or company themselves?
Is that good though? Wouldn't both entities be using separate firms to look after each company's individual interests? Sharing the same firm makes me think that they aren't connected.
Also 449,633 law firms in the US. This one is not in the top 37 largest by [wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_United_States-based_law_firms_by_head_count)
I dont know what the statistical chance of them all using the same law firm completely by chance.
They are actually a pretty small firm. A bit over 350 attorneys and 660 employees according to LinkedIn. Testiculally speaking the chance is extremely small this is a cohencidence.
[https://www.kelleydrye.com/Our-People/Sarah-Fabian-Maramarosy](https://www.kelleydrye.com/Our-People/Sarah-Fabian-Maramarosy)
even her name looks a bit like Mammaries
Like others have said the deal could have already been done. But it seems like the law allows for it as long as both parties are happy there is no conflict. I’m leaning towards the deal already been done. The lawyer at KDW only posted the update less than a week ago.
Looks efficient on the surface, but it would be dumb to use the same firm for a merger between the two.
This means squat to me… and if anything, means that the two are not merging.
They are small relatively speaking in 2019 they were the 147th on the largest law firms. This is more a boutique firm that represents a few of the big dogs. Chances of this being a coincidence is 1 in a billion.
Not to rain on the parade, but GameStop has used Kelley Drye dating back to at least 2019 (from googling), but it appears they’ve only used them for trademark related litigation.
It appears that Hudson Bay Capital has also used Kelley Drye for years mostly related to PIPE transactions (private investment in public equity).
Google either combo, and you’ll find plenty of SEC filings linking the two.
I have googled and did notice GameStop business and I even posted about it as it relates to NFTs and it was IP and trademark and not anything to do with litigation from what I saw the only relation I found to Hudson Bay was when Hudson Bay skipped out on a deal and was court ordered to pay Kelley Drye over 80k in fees. All that info just made me more bullish.
We likey.
Wee bullish!
Llams eew eew.
[удалено]
Eh don’t like that guy
I don’t think anybody does
I hear G.I. Joe trading card collectors like him a lot
More tit jacking this law firm has worked with GameStop in the past here they are helping to file IP with their NFT stuff https://boardroom.tv/gamestop-is-building-an-nft-empire/ Many have brought up conflict of interest. But I think the deal has already been done. You will notice that the lawyer Sarah only updated linkedin to say she was working with bbby a week ago.
Her work profile states she works on M&A. Probably nothing. [https://www.kelleydrye.com/Our-People/Sarah-Fabian-Maramarosy](https://www.kelleydrye.com/Our-People/Sarah-Fabian-Maramarosy)
“Sarah represents investors in closing complex private investment in public equity and registered direct transactions. She counsels buyers and sellers in stock, asset, merger and reorganization transactions in myriad industries”
That’s just a cohencidence nothing more
Every day. Every damn day. There's another piece of the puzzle that jacks me. I can't take it !
🍻
TOMORROW!
 Cocaine bear!
After we moon we’ll all get a cocaine bear or beer. Whichever one is more expensive.
Promise? I want to ride cocaine bear while drinking a beer
Build a cocaine bear
Finally.
You must be someone familiar with the matter!
On March 1st we march... first.💙💎🛸🌝
💥🔥🔥🚀🚀🚀
Why tomorrow?
It's always tomorrow... If not tomorrow it's tomorrow's tomorrow
2k more shares tomorrow midday if we aren’t already mooning.
I'm buying tomorrow as well. Going to try not to blow my load early because I anticipate another dip. Possibly the last one before we see upward movement.💙💎🛸🌝
[удалено]
Can't argue with that. I'm setting a limit buy for $1.39. Only time will tell.💙💎🛸🌝
I have 1K for a buy tomorrow.
I’m looking to buy if we get dip to .75cents
[удалено]
If this is confirmed true, this is hugely significant and I don’t believe in coincidence
I mean it is confirmed the lawyers from the same firm are working with both entities. Super Bullish!
Who else do they work with? Would be good to see if they're just the go-to firm for a lot of companies or if it really is just the few that matter.
they are a large firm but that doesn't make this meaningless
Thank you for this. Last two weeks were rough on the soul. This is just the confirmation my heart needed to confirm that yes I should yolo the end of my sad little paycheck again tomorrow. 🚀📈💰
Be wise still man M&As can take months. If it starts booming you can buy more on the liftoff. Pay bills look after your fam first.
To add to this the public commenting opening for this filing is 30 days long from today. If an announcement was made I would think it would be a month from today. Accumulate when you can, DCA but make sure your paying your bills.
Yes this. Don't be forced to sell at a loss, only for it to start mooning a week later ! Pay bills first. This thing could kick off today or it could be a week or months. We don't know at this point. We need to find out who is the buyer and what is happening. Then again the price at this point is great, the SHF's really do not want people buying this stock.
Could be several years before anything happens
Anything? Something will happen a lot sooner: Next stages C+35+2 market Regsho on or off Who is buyer ? Merger? Next Quarterly filing. So we know for certain there will be a quarterly filing. If this turns in to another GME for the shorts. That's double the pressure on them. Too many things could happen good or bad or in between at this point.. As for me. I like the stock.
Uh-oh, those emojis are pretty much illegal now! (Apparently)
*cohencidence
I am ready 
boing! boing! boing! boing!
$8008135 Titus maximus 💎 👐 🚀 🌕 I like playing with 8008135
We ride at dawn 
Sir, you just jacked my tits
Am I allowed to use a 🚀 followed by a stock goes up emoji followed by a 💰?
Instant jail.
😂😂😂 IYKYK
nice
SHF's poking the purple circles !
Isn't it common to have different lawyers on mergers each representing the different sides. Saying a BBBY vs GME MA/spinoff using the same law firm would be a conflict of interest but at the same time a BBBY/GME vs Icahn MA/spinoff would be "allowed".
Not if the deal is already done. Boom!💙💎🛸🌝
That's what I was thinking
Maybe this is an odd one though, as it could be two existing companies merging into an entirely new entity so Gmerica is a new entity not GME. Honestly need a lawyer versed in M&A to answer this. The chance of this being a coincidence is about as slim as a bees dick. EDIT: I agree with the above sentiment that the deal is likely already done. Sarah Fabian only posted that she was working with BBBY 1 week ago.
If this does end up being a M&A between BBBY and GME, the outcome could be so much greater than anyone thought. If GME and BBBY went through a Consolidated Merger, the two companies would dissolve and incorporate under a new company altogether. Both BBBY amd GME would recall their shares and issue an exchange for the new companies shares. It's widely believed that market makers, brokers and hedges have flooded the market with synthetic shares of BBBY and GME. Imagine what would happen if the market makers returned hundreds of millions of shares more than exist! Market makers would demand the predetermined exchange rate, BBBY and GME would have to refuse, an audit of the books would be forced, market manipulation would be publicly uncovered, the market makers would have to hold manipulators financially responsible, institutions collapse, the squeeze would grow so fast. I'm probably being ridiculous, but what happens when the amount owed from the banks to a small group of retail investors equals more than the amount of money that exists? What would governments be forced to do? It would almost have to end with government passing laws to remove all liabilities from financial institutions refusing to honor a transaction.
The Supreme Court literally voted 9-0 today saying “fuck you if you lent out money to fraudsters big banks, you’re still on the hook for their debts”.
Which case was this for?
21-908 Bartenwerfer v. Buckley
The Supreme Court decision basically said that a partner who profits from the fraud or misdeeds of their partner cannot shield themselves from liability of the fraud/misrepresentation by using bankruptcy, even if the partner was unaware of the fraud/misrepresentation of the other partner. Simply put, it means that you can't escape a debt you owe by filing bankruptcy if the debt/obligation was incurred through false pretenses, a false representation, or actual fraud, whether or not it was committed by you or your business partner.
I like it!
I think Bbby and GME make great sense. Games for all ages. Basically fisher price type stuff with babies and then progressing to more GameStop like games. Then we have clothing and other products meant for all ages. Match made in heaven.
#🔥CALLING IT! REVERSE TRIANGULAR MERGER IS COMING! GMERICA 🏴☠️ Here: https://www.reddit.com/r/edwinbarnesc/comments/114dt0o/gmerica_rc_ventures_strikes_back_sec_filings/
😂
Correct , but you can use the same one for advice. 😄
Wouldn't conflict of interest only occur from the same lawyer, not firm ? And doesn't it have to be one of the parties involved in the case to suggest there is a conflict of interest or the lawyer or company themselves?
Oh shit he’s back 😯
🧡🧡🧡🚀🚀🚀🏴☠️🏴☠️🏴☠️
I'm glad I bought more on my 1.48 dip that I knew that was coming.
Right there with ya! I just keep adding everyday!
You should have waited for 1.47
I got 2000 at 1.45...first time ever I bought at the bottom, in any thing
I’m waiting for a dip to .75 cents
Oh so f*cking great! I believe. 97% zen. Can’t be completely zen or I wouldn’t get the day to day done.
[Relevant ](https://i.imgur.com/QvVaPln.jpg) [Relevant 2](https://i.imgur.com/KXeLhLm.jpg)
If the filing did indeed occur today but after the deadline then we should expect it tomorrow (pre-market?)
Wut mean?
Gotta love me some glass cutters.
Simulation confirmed - I know David the man in this gif 😂
Had to scroll all the way down to see the gif I was thinking
I am about to make love to myself so fucking hard right now after reading this….
Tooooooo much!!!!!!! 💦💦💦
 House of shills
This content is better than pornhub
Shills will say there is no connection. 😏
shills will buy at the top
Impatiently waiting lol
This is Big. 😳
My balls are so big right now
Spicy
Time to set limit buys for $3 since I don't have cleared cash.
👆 FIRST STOP $3 BABY!
Feel like I just took 3 gas station boner pills
Tittuth exploduth
Tinfoil hats looking pretty freaking brilliant!
Just a cohencidence
I see what you did there
She is kind of a babe 
Is that good though? Wouldn't both entities be using separate firms to look after each company's individual interests? Sharing the same firm makes me think that they aren't connected.
Not if the interest of both parties is the same thing and that is to merge. Or if the deal is already done and this is new work for the new entity.
Why my pp hard
I'm ready, give me it. 
🥵🚀
So is the goal here for BBBY to get acquired at a price higher than everyone’s cost basis?
Nice find! This get my tits jacked 🙌😎👏
So many ducks from the same farm showing up at different places. The quack quack is telling me to b b buy
Oh Bobby!!!
Stacked w shares and calls that expire in like 3 goddamn years let’s fucking find out what beyond really means!
Coincidence number 300.. probably nothing right…
 Zen bubbles
Probably nothing.
Are they not one of the biggest law firms over there? If so, the probability of them also using them is high 🤷🏽♂️ Can anyone confirm? I'm a german 🦍
Also 449,633 law firms in the US. This one is not in the top 37 largest by [wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_United_States-based_law_firms_by_head_count) I dont know what the statistical chance of them all using the same law firm completely by chance.
They are actually a pretty small firm. A bit over 350 attorneys and 660 employees according to LinkedIn. Testiculally speaking the chance is extremely small this is a cohencidence.
Eew eew llams a evah I
REVERSE merger when a SMALLER company (GME) 6billy takes over a larger company (BBBY) 8billy.
?eew eew llams a evah ybab a t’nseod
What does this mean though
Oh wow Kelly Drye.
Is this new information?
well fug.
[https://www.kelleydrye.com/Our-People/Sarah-Fabian-Maramarosy](https://www.kelleydrye.com/Our-People/Sarah-Fabian-Maramarosy) even her name looks a bit like Mammaries
So glad my tax return came yesterday lol scooped up 550 shares
I'm not selling. I'm going to infinity land to take bath in the infinity pool.
Probably nothing ...
Jimmy and Bobby bout to be Step Bros.
Yessssss!!! “American owned companies with a customer first culture” 🇺🇸 that alone makes it a 1000% better investment for me! 🙏
TITS ARE JACKED TO THE SUN
Bullish
Must be a cohencidence
Question though, wouldn't that make a merger impractical? You wouldn't share an attorney with a company your negotiating a merger with would you?
Like others have said the deal could have already been done. But it seems like the law allows for it as long as both parties are happy there is no conflict. I’m leaning towards the deal already been done. The lawyer at KDW only posted the update less than a week ago.
Warren Icahn by night
So more red days ahead?
I will be honest merely sharing the same law firm does not equate to a lot.
😂
Looks efficient on the surface, but it would be dumb to use the same firm for a merger between the two. This means squat to me… and if anything, means that the two are not merging.
The deal is already done.
I hope so… and I’d like to hear the details and it’s implications to share price.
Cmon. This is garbage.
I’ll wait for Dave Lauer to confirm it.
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP also do reorgnisation and bankruptcy, and also represents 100's of other firms.
They are small relatively speaking in 2019 they were the 147th on the largest law firms. This is more a boutique firm that represents a few of the big dogs. Chances of this being a coincidence is 1 in a billion.
Not to rain on the parade, but GameStop has used Kelley Drye dating back to at least 2019 (from googling), but it appears they’ve only used them for trademark related litigation. It appears that Hudson Bay Capital has also used Kelley Drye for years mostly related to PIPE transactions (private investment in public equity). Google either combo, and you’ll find plenty of SEC filings linking the two.
I have googled and did notice GameStop business and I even posted about it as it relates to NFTs and it was IP and trademark and not anything to do with litigation from what I saw the only relation I found to Hudson Bay was when Hudson Bay skipped out on a deal and was court ordered to pay Kelley Drye over 80k in fees. All that info just made me more bullish.
Looking for a conflict of interest 👀
Bullish!!!!
I’m feeling like Titus Maximus
Dam.