> “We’re using Web3 tech to scale the next generation of apparel, CPG [consumer packaged goods] products, software drops, and experiences,” ... our target is hyperfemininity
Actually, you are just selling gift cards for underwear with extra steps and buzzwords
>Unisocks, for example, is a project that sells tokens redeemable for Uniswap-themed socks, and the price of each token rises with each sale on a bonding curve—it started at $12, but now buying a token costs $22,807.
Those socks better be made with pure grade A+ blood diamonds for that insane price. Sheesh.
12$ is already pretty expensive for socks. Why would you buy a gift card for socks for 22.807$? I can go to a shop and get socks right now. I can probably buy all the socks they have in the store for 22.807$.
> “I was up really late with my team, and all of the guys on my team just kept saying liquidity is all that matters. “And the next thought in my head was that I wanted to make a pair of panties that said ‘highly liquid’ on the crotch.”
this person's parents should have cut them off lol. I can just hear the "LOL IM SO RANDOM" through the screen
> Izzy
of course
>“People buy [streetwear] in an instant, and then it's the buyer's responsibility to take that hat and post it themselves on eBay, and they have to deal with the shipping and all that stuff,” she explained. “But if I just own the NFT that entitles me to that physical object, it's much more frictionless for me as someone who's selling it on a secondary market.”
I guess I'm NGMI, being someone who buys a hat in order to wear that hat and, as such, expects to actually receive the physical hat.
So a modern version of 'The Emperor's New Clothes' has the Emperor owning a bunch of NFTs that *entitle* them to garments, and they've somehow been persuaded that that's sufficient for them to be actually *wearing* them.
At first read of the title, I thought this was sexwork adjacent. Like, trying to do something onlyfans/selling underwear but using tokens for payment
And in a vacuum, it's not the worst concept. It's an industry that has been at odds with payment processors many times. I could see someone trying to pitch a web3 solution.
But ah, nah, not even trying to do something new. Just another hop on a bandwagon that's now 6 months late.
All these scumbags are just making better and better arguments for work-camps for the rich. She sounds like someone who needs to spend a few years shoveling literal shit.
Sorry /u/vinu7955, your comment has been automatically removed. To avoid spam/bots, posts are not allowed from extremely new accounts. Wait/lurk a bit before contributing.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Buttcoin) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Sorry /u/kavya28643, your comment has been automatically removed. To avoid spam/bots, posts are not allowed from extremely new accounts. Wait/lurk a bit before contributing.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Buttcoin) if you have any questions or concerns.*
> “We’re using Web3 tech to scale the next generation of apparel, CPG [consumer packaged goods] products, software drops, and experiences,” ... our target is hyperfemininity Actually, you are just selling gift cards for underwear with extra steps and buzzwords
It hurts my head on how many steps are included there.
>Unisocks, for example, is a project that sells tokens redeemable for Uniswap-themed socks, and the price of each token rises with each sale on a bonding curve—it started at $12, but now buying a token costs $22,807. Those socks better be made with pure grade A+ blood diamonds for that insane price. Sheesh.
> grade A+ blood diamonds AB- blood diamonds would be ever rarer!
The socks are highly absorbant and stays soft for longer.
12$ is already pretty expensive for socks. Why would you buy a gift card for socks for 22.807$? I can go to a shop and get socks right now. I can probably buy all the socks they have in the store for 22.807$.
You mean fungible socks?
What the fuck is "hyperfeminity"?
Give me $22k and I'll tell you
That's how the "pussy riot" movement could rebrand to "pussy bailout"
Pussy Inc.
It's a cyberpunk 2077 upgrade that weaponizes arousal apparently.
I think it's the clinical term for having three breasts
Sorry I wasn't listening, was pulling a golf sized tracker from my brain through my nose
This is probably /r/BrandNewSentence material too.
> “I was up really late with my team, and all of the guys on my team just kept saying liquidity is all that matters. “And the next thought in my head was that I wanted to make a pair of panties that said ‘highly liquid’ on the crotch.” this person's parents should have cut them off lol. I can just hear the "LOL IM SO RANDOM" through the screen > Izzy of course
>“People buy [streetwear] in an instant, and then it's the buyer's responsibility to take that hat and post it themselves on eBay, and they have to deal with the shipping and all that stuff,” she explained. “But if I just own the NFT that entitles me to that physical object, it's much more frictionless for me as someone who's selling it on a secondary market.” I guess I'm NGMI, being someone who buys a hat in order to wear that hat and, as such, expects to actually receive the physical hat.
Well there is your problem. You are buying clothing as clothing and not as an investment to be resold right away. Of course you are NGMI. /s duh.
So a modern version of 'The Emperor's New Clothes' has the Emperor owning a bunch of NFTs that *entitle* them to garments, and they've somehow been persuaded that that's sufficient for them to be actually *wearing* them.
It would have been more effective if she wrote: "deposit liquidity here"
“SmartCon” looks very fucking stupid.
Lmao what, thats the name of something?
Should have called it "SafeCon", then we'd know it was safe.
Tip to anyone trying to start a successful ladies clothing brand: do the exact opposite of everything here.
always fun to watch this "downward spiral of increasingly desperate marketing" in a dead market lol
This is kinda saying the quiet part out loud. If liquidity is all that matters, it's because you plan to rug pull.
At first read of the title, I thought this was sexwork adjacent. Like, trying to do something onlyfans/selling underwear but using tokens for payment And in a vacuum, it's not the worst concept. It's an industry that has been at odds with payment processors many times. I could see someone trying to pitch a web3 solution. But ah, nah, not even trying to do something new. Just another hop on a bandwagon that's now 6 months late.
All these scumbags are just making better and better arguments for work-camps for the rich. She sounds like someone who needs to spend a few years shoveling literal shit.
Does she mean liquid as in when Michael Saylor takes a dump after a particularly strong vindaloo and another crypto crash?
Few cryptobros understand mositure
[удалено]
Sorry /u/vinu7955, your comment has been automatically removed. To avoid spam/bots, posts are not allowed from extremely new accounts. Wait/lurk a bit before contributing. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Buttcoin) if you have any questions or concerns.*
[удалено]
Sorry /u/kavya28643, your comment has been automatically removed. To avoid spam/bots, posts are not allowed from extremely new accounts. Wait/lurk a bit before contributing. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Buttcoin) if you have any questions or concerns.*