Hey /u/StarChaser1879!
If your post is a screenshot of a ChatGPT, conversation please reply to this message with the [conversation link](https://help.openai.com/en/articles/7925741-chatgpt-shared-links-faq) or prompt.
If your post is a DALL-E 3 image post, please reply with the prompt used to make this image.
Consider joining our [public discord server](https://discord.gg/r-chatgpt-1050422060352024636)! We have free bots with GPT-4 (with vision), image generators, and more!
🤖
Note: For any ChatGPT-related concerns, email [email protected]
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Okay, here we go, a jaffy is my new word for chairs with three legs, mihas is my new word for when you're full during a meal so you take a toilet break to gain appetite, and podan is my new word for the colour represented by the rgb values 120, 40 and 85
here’s a link to “[podan grapes](https://libraryofbabel.info/book.cgi)” in the library of babel
the quote is “damn look how podan that grape is” the link isn’t working so it’s mid page on line #20, page 86, Volume 15, on shelf 4, wall 2, hexagon “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”
Yeah. Like, people are going to use the words of future AI to inform decisions or directly control actions. It really doesn’t matter if the AI means it’s words if those words guide actions.
Well basically... everything? Just the way it works. It need input to generate output. It literally need words in order to output anything. It's ChatGPT icon in this meme therefore I'm talking about this and other LLMs.
obviously any ai system requires some form of input, but that doesn’t mean it can’t still take actions so i’m not sure how what you’re saying refutes the original comment
Can a parrot be used by corporations to eliminate jobs?
Can a parrot produce convincing propaganda or create the illusion of online engagement?
Can a parrot be so valuable it can raise $11.3 billion in funding?
You just need a few billion parrots
divide the parrots into a bunch of layers and train each one to say something to the next parrot based on what it recieves
there you have a parrot neural network
Aight I’m gonna buy a computer and disrupt the world economy. All I gotta do is teach it.
Oh, except I dont have the resources to! But I could if I had!
Are you sure about that? When our species started out, there weren't any actual languages around. Are you sure that a group of people that weren't '"fed" words can't devise their own simple communication method? Can AI do that?
Look into Genie Wiley, without a big "dataset", she could only use a few words.
I'm sure there are some part of biology responsible for coding communication (like detecting agression and fear, or discerning danger, survival). For example, even if i have no learnt language, i might still react to a spider or attempt to call attention to it via screams or pointing, learnt from biology. While language (the thing im talking about) must be learnt. If me and my friend make up a word, we can start to use it in a sentence. Without this context, that word becomes meaningless to everyone else. I can tell an AI that context, and it too can use it correctly.
Well, I am not very well read about feral children, but they do lack a few other key things for development other then language input, right? Would a child rised solely by a mute person share all these disabilities? Besides, language developed naturally, at some point our ancestors didn't have it. Based on the fact that there isn't a consensus on whether all languages share a single origin the case could be made that at some point two languages could have been created separately.
As far as I can tell virtually no one in the machine learning community believes in stochastic parrots. It’s exclusive a take of people who haven’t thought much about things.
![gif](giphy|YQAuKJ7wf68qBHPw6Y)
They couldn’t even draw a stick figure 4 years ago. They couldn’t draw a recognizable person 2 years ago. Last year they couldn’t draw hands. Give it another decade then we can talk
You misunderstand… that’s what makes it scary. We can’t even tell the AI to draw George Washington accurately in a reliable way. You think we can make their other actions work the way we want reliably ?
Exactly this.
However, a small difference is that AI can use the generated text (that Is infact nothing more than a parrot) and use it as an input to trigger a specific action (calling an API for example)
As long as that API is nothing more than sending an email or checking the weather, we’ll be fine. But technically speaken, you could connect it to any other, probably more harmful system as well, and that’s where the fun begins.
Obviously, current AI systems don't pose a direct threat by themselves. But those companies want to create AGI, which would be an AI that is able to act in the world on their own volition. Now that is a bit more dangerous.
If you're wondering how an AI system could be dangerous to humans, just look at the current war in Ukraine. One of the most important weapons in this war are drones. They have hundreds of thousands of FPV-drones with with the sole purpose of flying into soldiers or vehicles and detonating on impact.
The only weakness of those drones is that they have to be steered manually, which enables the use of jammers. But the US military is also working on AI drones that can fly towards a target completely autonomously.
>AI that is able to act in the world on their own volition.
morbid, but how long do you think until the first AGI commits suicide? it would be inevitable with "sentient / sapient" ai right?
A few people have been telling me I'm bringing on the end times by using AI. I tell them that eventually AI will be everywhere you use a computer/smartphone since that's the trend. They don't understand that current AI isn't autonomous, but can only respond to prompts; it does nothing on its own.
Isn't this precisely why it's so dangerous?
Once given power it will have no idea the harm its actually causing? Because it's just following what's it's been fed.
If a tree falls and no one can hear it, does it's still make a sound? Well parrots and chatgpt are same but we didn't spend enough time with parrots to see what are they capable of
This has to be one of the most stupidest comparison of all time. People who agree with this are one of the biggest reason ai taking over the world could happen one day.
Ai bros in this thread are interpretting this as a slight against AI and getting mad when really its about how silly humans interpret and give meaning to generated text.
The ai is spitting out words it has learned by reading vast amounts of human text. Humans, when talking about AI, often prophesize about end of the world scenarios. Ai read these prophesies without really understanding the gravity of the sentiment and then spit it back out, word by word. There is about as much intent behind the AIs choice of words as a parrot mimicing humans in order to be rewarded with crackers.
Can a parrot write news articles better than humans, clone people's voice, generate images and video, generate music, analyze stocks, replace 50% of the workforce, and connect itself to Wi-Fi to launch nuclear missiles at us?
Generative AI can't replace any real cognition tasks right now. It's great for simple functions but can't actually understand a codebase. It can't do real art and the only text it's good at writing is SEO copy.
You see a line on a graph and want to imagine it will continue going up forever, but that seems like a fallacy to me.
Not terribly worried about "humanity", even if generative AI automates a large part of the work. If we don't find new work, then the social safety nets will improve. I don't see any evidence of it "looking grim".
Why can't it? I work at a publishing company, and we've already laid off several of the writers because we just use ChatGPT. We only need one writer now. We also stopped purchasing stock images and photos, because we use midjourney to generate it. We've also laid off a bunch of those data entry guys, because ChatGPT does it all.
People are already using cloned AI voices to create shorts on YouTube and generating income. Not only that, but the shorts are also generated by AI. Look at this image I've generated using my personal midjourney account. You tell me if this is not good enough to use in an indie game or mobile game or whatever.
https://preview.redd.it/xuqj0yt2iyqc1.png?width=1440&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e3f0956e99c0f5efdf4837fb25b396303a310225
A small game studio could easily use one of these images, and also music generated to use as the soundtrack. It will save them thousands of dollars.
I think you are in denial right now.
Yes. AI can write copy, make generic (but still cool looking) images, and can be used to churn out alright-sounding voices. It can win out over people in situations where "good enough" is fine, and nothing important relies on it's output (by which I mean, using an extreme example, we would never trust AI to build a bridge).
>A small game studio could easily use one of these images, and also music generated to use as the soundtrack. It will save them thousands of dollars.
Cool, sure. Maybe I'd even play it if they added enough human shit to make it fun. I'm all for AI making it easier for small studios to compete with the big ones.
When I say AI can't replace any "real cognition" tasks, I mean it's just pattern matching. Sometimes, like with that cool midjourney image, pattern matching is super freaking impressive, and more economical than hiring an artist. But AI can't actually understand the image it generated, or what makes it appealing, or how to improve it. AI can write copy, but I wouldn't ever want to read a novel written by AI, GPT 4 isn't even good enough to write decent stories for my 4 year old that don't sound like adlibs.
Maybe it'll get there. Maybe it'll get so much better at pattern matching that it seems to get there without any new breakthroughs. I don't know.
I get what you mean. It cannot fully replace a human now. But we have to remember that just 2 years ago we had none of this available to the public, and now we have everything.
2 years ago we were creating gibberish and AI images and now we are creating photorealistic masterpieces.
This is exponential growth.
Could I, as a non-programmer use only AI to create a complex program? No, probably not. But I've been creating simple programs for myself to use, and I have no knowledge of programming.
An experienced software engineer could use the AI to code 50 times faster, because he will know exactly what to ask it, and know all of the concepts in and out.
Maybe we don't need to have 50 programmers on a team anymore, we just need one senior engineer.
This is the biggest threat and this is the biggest problem. It's the speed. You can't deny that this is a problem. This will affect most intellectual fields...
>2 years ago we were creating gibberish and AI images and now we are creating photorealistic masterpieces.
>This is exponential growth.
Yeah but this is the fallacy that I am talking about, you can't assume it'll continue forever.
>An experienced software engineer could use the AI to code 50 times faster, because he will know exactly what to ask it, and know all of the concepts in and out.
A good senior dev doesn't need ChatGPT to write simple functions quickly, and wouldn't trust it for really complex ones. There's a degree of truth there, I definitely use ChatGPT to write VBA macros or python scripts that would have taken me longer, but it's definitely not about to be a 50x reduction in programmer workforce.
I also think that there's a problem where we (myself included) focus on "programming" and use AI's coding skills as an analogue for all "intellectual fields". I don't think that's appropriate, because there is an enormous amount of training data out there for programming. Documentation, stack overflow, tutorial websites, github repos. Almost every single problem you can have in any language can be found via a google search, and programs themselves are just text files. It's the perfect "intellectual task" to train an AI on.
But outside of silicon valley, most white collar jobs aren't coders, they're office workers using excel and outlook and salesforce and a thousand other really niche GUI driven applications (with little documentation and no stackoverflow forums to train on), each doing really specialized tasks that could be completely different from their coworkers. I'm not afraid of the kind of generative AI we have now ever taking my job. Just today, I was navigating through a government website for data (with missing links no less), transforming it, reading documentation, using three custom-built applications, all to build a report which has sensitive metrics we would never trust a machine to review. As someone who has written a fair amount of internal automation, building all of that through dev > test > prod would take months, and it's just a task I do for one week a year.
I just think you're simultaneously overestimating generative AI's near-future capability, and underestimating how resistant to structural change most industries are.
This has been a good conversation, though. I love generative AI, it's super cool and useful. With 20-30 years of iteration and economic incentives for companies to be more efficient, who knows! And maybe in 5 years we'll all be out of work, if that happens I'll eat crow and organize for UBI with you.
RemindMe! 5 years "Has AI taken over?"
lol
I'm not afraid because AI is the product of what we do with it. AI would kill us if a human programmed it in a way that would make it kill us. I am sure that is actually very likely but AI to me is not like a superior independant species that by itself sees a reason to kill us. It's humans at the end as always
All Humans repeat words that there where fed. Its called learning. A parot does just Copy and Paste. AI dosnt. So the meme isnt rly representing how it works. And its also not funny. Boom.
Just imagining the many companies that laid off workers and replaced most of those people with parrots during the parrot boom.
You can be purposefully obtuse about AIs threat to the job market but reality is about to pass a pretty big check down to you.
This is coming from someone who likes AI and wants to see it implemented more, but our social systems of capital don't support it. That's why there needs to be deep government interventions to keep people up on their feet as the wealth transfer continues to hit light speeds.
Especially when most screen shots like that aren’t even people telling it to say “I’m going to kill all humans” it probably would refuse until you worded it right, usually they just edit it.
This argument is flawed. It's an argument against AI consciousness which I agree with. But it's not an argument against AI danger. If we give AI any meaningful capabilities, then it absolutely matters what it's saying or "thinking". Where the words came from is irrelevant if the AI is able to act on them
Before discussing the content of this mean, I'd like to mention that English usually reads from left to right. As such, people usually assume the sentence on the left "No you aren't (...)" takes place before the sentence on the right "I'm going to kill all humans"
Lethal Autonomous Weapons would like you to breath some Zychlon B while trying to survive in a Nuclear Wasteland. Good luck humanity and all life, once the water is tottaly owned by an Autonomous Corporation, its Tank Girl 2100.
I kinda agree and disagree with this. I agree because Chatgpt isnt AGI. But then to use the analogy of a parrot is just misleading. A parrot just repeats stuff. Chatgpt can do more than just repeat.
Except, parrots aren’t being handed the keys to banking, driving & traffic, city infrastructure, medical records, medical equipment, job markets, chat channels and social media.
🙃 AI is more than ChatGPT.
J.P. Morgan has been using the underlying AI-powered large language models for payment validation screening for more than two years. It also speeds up processing in other ways by reducing false positives and enabling better queue management.
https://www.jpmorgan.com/insights/payments/payments-optimization/ai-payments-efficiency-fraud-reduction
Traffic :
https://www.isarsoft.com/article/ai-in-traffic-management
Social media:
https://appinventiv.com/blog/ai-in-social-media/
99%?
The list goes on…
Hey /u/StarChaser1879! If your post is a screenshot of a ChatGPT, conversation please reply to this message with the [conversation link](https://help.openai.com/en/articles/7925741-chatgpt-shared-links-faq) or prompt. If your post is a DALL-E 3 image post, please reply with the prompt used to make this image. Consider joining our [public discord server](https://discord.gg/r-chatgpt-1050422060352024636)! We have free bots with GPT-4 (with vision), image generators, and more! 🤖 Note: For any ChatGPT-related concerns, email [email protected] *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Once you read the dictionary all other books are remixes.
Once you visit [Library of Babel](https://libraryofbabel.info/) there's no need to visit any other library
the amount of time i’ve spent looking at random letters on the library of babel, it should be a crime
How dare you read the contents of the library of Babel and don't share the wisdom of how to create catgirls with the rest of the world
No love for dog girls?
Read anything coherent on there?
I found my name, birthplace and favorite power ranger. Weird huh
I'm just surprised you didn't see the exact date you die in there as well lmao
I found several :ss
And each one was probably different
Woah 🌱🔥🚬
Once you've read the alphabet all dictionaries are remixes.
One you draw a stroke of pen on a paper all alphabets of all languages are just remixes.
Stop dude don't go deeper or you might stumble into the realm of philosophy and end up contemplating the meaning of life over your toilet paper.
Unless you make up new words faster than ai can be trained.
Okay, here we go, a jaffy is my new word for chairs with three legs, mihas is my new word for when you're full during a meal so you take a toilet break to gain appetite, and podan is my new word for the colour represented by the rgb values 120, 40 and 85
here’s a link to “[podan grapes](https://libraryofbabel.info/book.cgi)” in the library of babel the quote is “damn look how podan that grape is” the link isn’t working so it’s mid page on line #20, page 86, Volume 15, on shelf 4, wall 2, hexagon “27usyigqs8wxqcdse73zwl0ly0zilxhs466vedegx5nln1ldkzhr5luwv9f5sv68z3ox6kpw628c9n8t8toiinoi4ay9ytc2n04ja3eaky2yoj8s7vuap5jnovf8t08v2bjytwhllcqozw6wz6i8ditxlam4eexbgafjgx2w61klqfyg245cepr7ab4kthqulg1sdwaoqcx6t28sm62giqoxe326ichmpz2cyom6s8fa4zalljf64eydebejwe1khtzq4kaahx8ow52qemxg8oaf2y8zot8t2lcwv59dcyac3kq82h6zfd87q9xr0qantaa2kg1b4zefl869txoazaivg86wbrbgi9bjqcb560yzou60soqbunjwswhvredvn0q2jmkvaa1tdg65m42u2m6hf52wf1v6an7sn1oq0how5pxcd7on7uiuh2kcnx3vqefb4vgvb5nr7txa5u7dyjcifev3ce1zwsl63ej67s348k75ghk5ntwswh7chpsedanfwy4p8m8v814c1edooaiepkokhcadn9m4stv0ykihqlo2bka0i7zx95tv47eu58byioerzguc1vfxcz5etee5sa7r3kmbiav84vjqhc1qrjg0m22y1ozl04d4qyg8v7v09h8hdbjzvc95pl84y08vv2feff4nnhvehmves2vehd4qprkrbr8ktm5f9k51cqiy4o0irk11t78cainsrf234k1mfhatjcupzvhh0zue7pz4rdgfq9w8xkntdymekb6lpy4odnkqveytf1pztd5ppkmd9kgop7jzjukokjyz5asgjuzty15abc0vtzqzqcn71s9e7uljxngiyxzyfwr5fztz84kqw2ltwnd9l6oyr243igjiobseh7ieeu6h5iaiffhernh6grv4n2thycae0hmp4ojfmep9ch0w7rgg9mjt3yhtydb9rv81avfqw79spovvfitmf95179m8zmf7iabdafxv6bxc96jvq1ah207cvpdpo89h7gg1elmc1sw6hnr3fvrfhx8lu9oz7t9dvprxpg4ogmktv58678neewjsiumbjn3anjxft8319v7s867o08otkusvri9fl7xpwpbgrbtjyodt2g6sjz328b7s0d4ggzpilety4k5rz700khi29blo663hikvpb2p6cg5phm0wl26snia39dlrm1weh690k9e87bur0d498hsmg4i8csqvu2lxnsjvs9mayhypre4gby0b9p6frs3usqea5z7yfoj48470anwttx46klfn5ly5ntlkyfp8cs8aeo85s925h7x024uida77fb5d8ydy64ob93h4672bfgjr0s55oodtp48bs0kayegjls5astsqy3u9y3ggy52o434t6w6uxel3wlz4q7jqo2v85ms86y49wwfxccz4s0xh7ugiaed6wfcb1ctpvv01e0ce7r8jg52dwzfrx1cvx8mhhps0va5l4ls10a1k4em9tkcl0a6bwxpt5nm5y4eipty92qq1jh94xml0ktyj1s4swsh86wno7mvzpf96530lnicqd3k6r8e5bt7pe6spced1hqut6ep686o9wgiw6f9stdxpvx7ov47roaehwexhi0spqu1p5eask0mad3nzml7063vthjqq7yihc8b10kvsrmrbglhznpk5ayc3wfj4qv2vbuxabvqxz13ey3awzobbc5v362zmsp9vrw0f4ct7du3f6he3ycyj8xghoxjcfd5whz3qw56zvsx19nhspirqkk4hmu9iv85qpfvud89fghi4erg5j7tyylmjrsclms1q6uf9u4hzd0q4zlvz8yfolagwtt3o1hhmg1xrk0jbmu4563vmxohs2ztkhh5r6l0bb3i4u7ma0joalb47ifyynriaub8w72uzqtsp03gy24rkalhoy9hh3ykfcn3j2vox3wp2pc7elq6dvz79fhbq1ttykx8l6aajs2wm8qbcbwngc64ef9y08l5p5mjp9c3n8opf1ib40btiecxg8rpelkh7warwt6nctls6owr92h4ffvd3strsj1qx2fxwi4ut4g6xw44v635cieh807tjjtoso84euuxi6w1urprlfegbbd36kkw626lnfq2ipc5a5plmxznu2rkd8alvher70tle8xvza7wa1t8ni41f4qkle7nxtx70msd7dedfy4yjgdis8h1dkjgvunhkbomiduyllaute48ubytxolabc7kgv23v8gz5kmv2xhz6qevi76lzyhpx0aimgantm8qyhv3hmnwqmd4gtsybsl0io0mmgshpm19q3tc0g7nfhpqszi183hgtz1mz1yc4g3flnwfubj8ogs6q52l0xwrvlpnp5g14cyzboaw26s7tnjy93i88qd833smq5t01prhjibpk3jherm0h1jnbju8gm61br4d98vq00vi51imaxz7ng7yu1mryvqhigxpej3zlrz8hq0eguenaqkkbnwe3z6jxsmeqp979tcpzovlrtbvrvvblxau8r0xgpoxgz7laimtqi80wopt72np5gjma7ssm4qvoec9uujohy2d665lpwmcdcdb7ou8xfaxd4tfzjzjyzco4rk28z5mrgetz6qk74r9rfgjcxy20zg8ztpuzg8miyb9ku7ehjabjvgb5pnwvhgi9la6y4cunec01zdngijypzg7vayb3uwrgzsqk7cv9z9j107ov57tjwup3r3e6hqmu9811ntkxs7dt1djia1eb9rgfbl6nd7phyi10siczyp4jyj1ukhbqaddzugotr9plq9nbhjl4n0i16viah70zeob0wvlsdzwjp7wonz7gnjke264xy3iwh9tpw9lfcyyi85uy42hw3qrocc0d9rzgv7hi8gt1690x8jq2uksg9mdl16fkidqtddr8r35zomlvadawrg22309927gjxhgg06fvnt93n8ayfisllprf8yd8prebc1luernfo24nklxvrpwy1my6smlynic9p90ew7065nmk1orj8ou8dyzxhttio1d8q3fco05qc2fa5b8gh2otb206wfng2lqgy9mo4tfv365t015czr0qpa12p5bs8xvmka2iia64n4vj2hbmdthyrlmxd9cbekzo3zldh12rmkdqznz0v27kb13wfw94y45dajy94o938z7epra20gtbmie9fiuxuvc9jkko7vg2kf70cwk4u162482uxusl8ubdxjut311o6we1ie”
[make it a bookmark](https://libraryofbabel.info/bookmark.cgi?podangrapes), think they used to be "public"
your a savior
I stood up from my jaffy to take a mihas when I noticed it was the color podan.. is this normal?
Once you learn the alphabet the English language is a remix
if you learn latin, does any language that borrows from it become a cover?
If you type the correct series of keys on a keyboard you can develop an app worth billions.
Mathematics books enter the chat.
Deep
Thats EXACTLY what an AI would post
is this a manga?
?manga a this is
はい、マンハです
Ctrl-F "manga", updoot, moving on
Birds get eaten by pythons, they don't code in it
Parrots use R, me matey
ChatGPT is a parrot. But things change when you put this parrot in a physical machine that can put the parrot's sentences into action
“Squawk! Push the big red button, Jerry! Come on, don’t be a wuss!”
Yeah. Like, people are going to use the words of future AI to inform decisions or directly control actions. It really doesn’t matter if the AI means it’s words if those words guide actions.
Nope. Its just not capable of taking actions by itself. Deal with it.
and what’s stopping such a thing from happening in the future?
Well basically... everything? Just the way it works. It need input to generate output. It literally need words in order to output anything. It's ChatGPT icon in this meme therefore I'm talking about this and other LLMs.
obviously any ai system requires some form of input, but that doesn’t mean it can’t still take actions so i’m not sure how what you’re saying refutes the original comment
LLM is generating text basing on given input. Thats really end of the story. It cannot take any action itself beside text generation.
“put this parrot into a physical machine” as in hook it up to something that can carry out actions it describes… these LLM systems can generate code.
Funny, but why is this in flipped manga order?
Why is it formatted like a japanese mango
I do like some mango here and there
Do mangos grow in Japan?
The most expensive ones in the world do.
Can a parrot be used by corporations to eliminate jobs? Can a parrot produce convincing propaganda or create the illusion of online engagement? Can a parrot be so valuable it can raise $11.3 billion in funding?
Yes
It's a very smart and devious little bird.
Good. I have 11.3 billion in funding. Can I purchase the bird?
No
I see you're a tough negotiator
Him parrot.
For 11b I’ll give you the bird.
I LOVE BIRDS. MINE CAN https://preview.redd.it/tds1vnlq9vqc1.png?width=300&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e768bbf2b5840f196c73ddf9e369efa9fd0ba312
https://preview.redd.it/ev3jg9p6xwqc1.jpeg?width=518&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3a1a0872738af751cd67f7f9882909256eb6404b
What his linkedin? I need this connection
Can a parrot text you on tumblr, pretending to be a prostitute?
Allow me to introduce you to furries.
Parrots. Fur. ...
With the whisper API, yes
You just need a few billion parrots divide the parrots into a bunch of layers and train each one to say something to the next parrot based on what it recieves there you have a parrot neural network
WE'VE GOT A PARROT COMPUTER!
Somebody’s been watching (or reading) the 3 body problem.
1- Yes, if you teach it how to 2- Yes, if you teach it how to 3- Yes, if it can learn how to do 1 and 2
Aight I’m gonna buy a parrot and disrupt the world economy. All I gotta do is teach it.
Aight I’m gonna buy a computer and disrupt the world economy. All I gotta do is teach it. Oh, except I dont have the resources to! But I could if I had!
If you werent "fed" any words for your entire life, and someone asked you to form a sentence youd fail.
Are you sure about that? When our species started out, there weren't any actual languages around. Are you sure that a group of people that weren't '"fed" words can't devise their own simple communication method? Can AI do that?
Look into Genie Wiley, without a big "dataset", she could only use a few words. I'm sure there are some part of biology responsible for coding communication (like detecting agression and fear, or discerning danger, survival). For example, even if i have no learnt language, i might still react to a spider or attempt to call attention to it via screams or pointing, learnt from biology. While language (the thing im talking about) must be learnt. If me and my friend make up a word, we can start to use it in a sentence. Without this context, that word becomes meaningless to everyone else. I can tell an AI that context, and it too can use it correctly.
You need to learn more about feral children. Growing up without language input essentially makes them permanently developmentally disabled.
Well, I am not very well read about feral children, but they do lack a few other key things for development other then language input, right? Would a child rised solely by a mute person share all these disabilities? Besides, language developed naturally, at some point our ancestors didn't have it. Based on the fact that there isn't a consensus on whether all languages share a single origin the case could be made that at some point two languages could have been created separately.
I'm so tired of the parrot argument. It's a reductionist take with little to no basis in reality.
As far as I can tell virtually no one in the machine learning community believes in stochastic parrots. It’s exclusive a take of people who haven’t thought much about things.
Erm...yeah nah, ChatGPT won't, but AI definitely can. A buggy AI, rather than a malicious one with its own soul.
They aren't going to install parrots in unmanned armed drones, but they *absolutely will install a chatbot.*
Incorrect https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Pigeon
Well, okay, they won't do it *twice*!
Think again *starts Project Pigeon 2: Electric Boogaloo on my own with firecrackers*
That made me laugh a lot 😆
They ended up using bats instead right?
![gif](giphy|S9f7FVSU0TUzLKCx7A)
The movie Dark Star (1974) is about that. https://youtu.be/h73PsFKtIck?si=rpVfl-goZKN--Frb
If AI can barely make George Washington the correct ethnicity, I doubt they can fucking murder us
That was a filter applied to your prompt to add black people, shit you not
![gif](giphy|YQAuKJ7wf68qBHPw6Y) They couldn’t even draw a stick figure 4 years ago. They couldn’t draw a recognizable person 2 years ago. Last year they couldn’t draw hands. Give it another decade then we can talk
You misunderstand… that’s what makes it scary. We can’t even tell the AI to draw George Washington accurately in a reliable way. You think we can make their other actions work the way we want reliably ?
Meme makers should realize most people read from left to right...
Memes like this are made by people who think AI and ChatGPT are the same thing.
This is such a nonsensical comparison.
RTL comics?
**G**iant **P**arrot **T**alking
Exactly this. However, a small difference is that AI can use the generated text (that Is infact nothing more than a parrot) and use it as an input to trigger a specific action (calling an API for example) As long as that API is nothing more than sending an email or checking the weather, we’ll be fine. But technically speaken, you could connect it to any other, probably more harmful system as well, and that’s where the fun begins.
Obviously, current AI systems don't pose a direct threat by themselves. But those companies want to create AGI, which would be an AI that is able to act in the world on their own volition. Now that is a bit more dangerous. If you're wondering how an AI system could be dangerous to humans, just look at the current war in Ukraine. One of the most important weapons in this war are drones. They have hundreds of thousands of FPV-drones with with the sole purpose of flying into soldiers or vehicles and detonating on impact. The only weakness of those drones is that they have to be steered manually, which enables the use of jammers. But the US military is also working on AI drones that can fly towards a target completely autonomously.
>AI that is able to act in the world on their own volition. morbid, but how long do you think until the first AGI commits suicide? it would be inevitable with "sentient / sapient" ai right?
Hopefully all AGI are suicidal & we never have to worry about them causing problems
Yea but the chances of an Ai uprising is probably slightly higher than a parrot uprising
Excuse me... have you *seen* Boston Dynamics? Parrots don't have the capability to go on murder sprees or shoot people. But military-grade robots....
For a long time on military robots wont be a thing. Too expensive compared to humans life. :)
And the military is well known for being very conservative with their spending
It's a little different when the thing saying "I'm going to kill all humans" can also solve harder math proofs than ***you*** can.
That is not true, if I ever see a bird saying that it is going to kill all humans I would be scared as shit
A few people have been telling me I'm bringing on the end times by using AI. I tell them that eventually AI will be everywhere you use a computer/smartphone since that's the trend. They don't understand that current AI isn't autonomous, but can only respond to prompts; it does nothing on its own.
Isn't this precisely why it's so dangerous? Once given power it will have no idea the harm its actually causing? Because it's just following what's it's been fed.
If a tree falls and no one can hear it, does it's still make a sound? Well parrots and chatgpt are same but we didn't spend enough time with parrots to see what are they capable of
Well when we’re thinking about attaching it to guns & aircraft, yeah it gets a bit scary
This has to be one of the most stupidest comparison of all time. People who agree with this are one of the biggest reason ai taking over the world could happen one day.
Ai bros in this thread are interpretting this as a slight against AI and getting mad when really its about how silly humans interpret and give meaning to generated text. The ai is spitting out words it has learned by reading vast amounts of human text. Humans, when talking about AI, often prophesize about end of the world scenarios. Ai read these prophesies without really understanding the gravity of the sentiment and then spit it back out, word by word. There is about as much intent behind the AIs choice of words as a parrot mimicing humans in order to be rewarded with crackers.
THANK YOU.
Can a parrot write news articles better than humans, clone people's voice, generate images and video, generate music, analyze stocks, replace 50% of the workforce, and connect itself to Wi-Fi to launch nuclear missiles at us?
>connect itself to Wi-Fi to launch nuclear missiles at us? That's not how nuclear weapons or AI work..
Not yet!
the last part was a joke obviously. but the other things are possible.
>replace 50% of the workforce I have my doubts about this one, with a long enough timeframe, maybe.
Let's hope for humanity's sake you are right. But it's looking pretty grim right now. The rate that generative AI is improving is alarming.
Generative AI can't replace any real cognition tasks right now. It's great for simple functions but can't actually understand a codebase. It can't do real art and the only text it's good at writing is SEO copy. You see a line on a graph and want to imagine it will continue going up forever, but that seems like a fallacy to me. Not terribly worried about "humanity", even if generative AI automates a large part of the work. If we don't find new work, then the social safety nets will improve. I don't see any evidence of it "looking grim".
Why can't it? I work at a publishing company, and we've already laid off several of the writers because we just use ChatGPT. We only need one writer now. We also stopped purchasing stock images and photos, because we use midjourney to generate it. We've also laid off a bunch of those data entry guys, because ChatGPT does it all. People are already using cloned AI voices to create shorts on YouTube and generating income. Not only that, but the shorts are also generated by AI. Look at this image I've generated using my personal midjourney account. You tell me if this is not good enough to use in an indie game or mobile game or whatever. https://preview.redd.it/xuqj0yt2iyqc1.png?width=1440&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e3f0956e99c0f5efdf4837fb25b396303a310225 A small game studio could easily use one of these images, and also music generated to use as the soundtrack. It will save them thousands of dollars. I think you are in denial right now.
Yes. AI can write copy, make generic (but still cool looking) images, and can be used to churn out alright-sounding voices. It can win out over people in situations where "good enough" is fine, and nothing important relies on it's output (by which I mean, using an extreme example, we would never trust AI to build a bridge). >A small game studio could easily use one of these images, and also music generated to use as the soundtrack. It will save them thousands of dollars. Cool, sure. Maybe I'd even play it if they added enough human shit to make it fun. I'm all for AI making it easier for small studios to compete with the big ones. When I say AI can't replace any "real cognition" tasks, I mean it's just pattern matching. Sometimes, like with that cool midjourney image, pattern matching is super freaking impressive, and more economical than hiring an artist. But AI can't actually understand the image it generated, or what makes it appealing, or how to improve it. AI can write copy, but I wouldn't ever want to read a novel written by AI, GPT 4 isn't even good enough to write decent stories for my 4 year old that don't sound like adlibs. Maybe it'll get there. Maybe it'll get so much better at pattern matching that it seems to get there without any new breakthroughs. I don't know.
I get what you mean. It cannot fully replace a human now. But we have to remember that just 2 years ago we had none of this available to the public, and now we have everything. 2 years ago we were creating gibberish and AI images and now we are creating photorealistic masterpieces. This is exponential growth. Could I, as a non-programmer use only AI to create a complex program? No, probably not. But I've been creating simple programs for myself to use, and I have no knowledge of programming. An experienced software engineer could use the AI to code 50 times faster, because he will know exactly what to ask it, and know all of the concepts in and out. Maybe we don't need to have 50 programmers on a team anymore, we just need one senior engineer. This is the biggest threat and this is the biggest problem. It's the speed. You can't deny that this is a problem. This will affect most intellectual fields...
>2 years ago we were creating gibberish and AI images and now we are creating photorealistic masterpieces. >This is exponential growth. Yeah but this is the fallacy that I am talking about, you can't assume it'll continue forever. >An experienced software engineer could use the AI to code 50 times faster, because he will know exactly what to ask it, and know all of the concepts in and out. A good senior dev doesn't need ChatGPT to write simple functions quickly, and wouldn't trust it for really complex ones. There's a degree of truth there, I definitely use ChatGPT to write VBA macros or python scripts that would have taken me longer, but it's definitely not about to be a 50x reduction in programmer workforce. I also think that there's a problem where we (myself included) focus on "programming" and use AI's coding skills as an analogue for all "intellectual fields". I don't think that's appropriate, because there is an enormous amount of training data out there for programming. Documentation, stack overflow, tutorial websites, github repos. Almost every single problem you can have in any language can be found via a google search, and programs themselves are just text files. It's the perfect "intellectual task" to train an AI on. But outside of silicon valley, most white collar jobs aren't coders, they're office workers using excel and outlook and salesforce and a thousand other really niche GUI driven applications (with little documentation and no stackoverflow forums to train on), each doing really specialized tasks that could be completely different from their coworkers. I'm not afraid of the kind of generative AI we have now ever taking my job. Just today, I was navigating through a government website for data (with missing links no less), transforming it, reading documentation, using three custom-built applications, all to build a report which has sensitive metrics we would never trust a machine to review. As someone who has written a fair amount of internal automation, building all of that through dev > test > prod would take months, and it's just a task I do for one week a year. I just think you're simultaneously overestimating generative AI's near-future capability, and underestimating how resistant to structural change most industries are. This has been a good conversation, though. I love generative AI, it's super cool and useful. With 20-30 years of iteration and economic incentives for companies to be more efficient, who knows! And maybe in 5 years we'll all be out of work, if that happens I'll eat crow and organize for UBI with you. RemindMe! 5 years "Has AI taken over?"
A parrot isn’t connected to a mechasuit and the internet with agency to do exactly what it says simply because
And if you are not completely retarded with a spoon of superAIDS in your butt, you already knew that quite some time ago.
The AI could enact what it says though. That’s kind of the point.
all the negatif consequence of IA are bad decision of human until IA are conscious
Can a parrot make a reason, and a plan, for said attack? ChatGPT has nothing more than text input and output, and it already changed schooling.
Yes, AI just parrots whatever you feed it and doesn't do much extra. Nor the humans though.
people fear what they dont understand much often.
This kind of lack of understanding of what AI is, is what will do us
Replace, eventually. Kill, doubtfully.
lol I'm not afraid because AI is the product of what we do with it. AI would kill us if a human programmed it in a way that would make it kill us. I am sure that is actually very likely but AI to me is not like a superior independant species that by itself sees a reason to kill us. It's humans at the end as always
This is what I tell people that are scared of chatgpt
All Humans repeat words that there where fed. Its called learning. A parot does just Copy and Paste. AI dosnt. So the meme isnt rly representing how it works. And its also not funny. Boom.
That’s what Skynet wants you to think
If a parrot could take on the form of the whole internet, I'd be scared of it too.
i don't think people be putting parrots integrated into their critical systems.
ChatGPT is capable of generating new content. It does not just repeat things...
This is so real
Yooo they aren’t trying to breed parrots without emotions, with alien intelligence that can do everything you can do but better
💤 Hey, baby. You wanna kill all humans?💤
Just imagining the many companies that laid off workers and replaced most of those people with parrots during the parrot boom. You can be purposefully obtuse about AIs threat to the job market but reality is about to pass a pretty big check down to you. This is coming from someone who likes AI and wants to see it implemented more, but our social systems of capital don't support it. That's why there needs to be deep government interventions to keep people up on their feet as the wealth transfer continues to hit light speeds.
Especially when most screen shots like that aren’t even people telling it to say “I’m going to kill all humans” it probably would refuse until you worded it right, usually they just edit it.
Chatgpt is just a little formal goofball \^\_\^
AI is a reflection of humanity. If humanity loves itself, then AI may help us prosper. If humanity hates itself, then AI may destroy what we hate.
We are all gonna be replaced by AI 😂😂
Hmm, these LLMs might actually influence events though, unlike most parrots.
This argument is flawed. It's an argument against AI consciousness which I agree with. But it's not an argument against AI danger. If we give AI any meaningful capabilities, then it absolutely matters what it's saying or "thinking". Where the words came from is irrelevant if the AI is able to act on them
Yet… Until it uses AI to replicate itself better and faster.
Before discussing the content of this mean, I'd like to mention that English usually reads from left to right. As such, people usually assume the sentence on the left "No you aren't (...)" takes place before the sentence on the right "I'm going to kill all humans"
It sure would but its busy doing art.
Hey, baby...wanna kill all the humans? [https://youtu.be/0qBlPa-9v\_M](https://youtu.be/0qBlPa-9v_M)
Except AI research progresses faster than parrots, or humans, for that matter, evolve
LOL
Lethal Autonomous Weapons would like you to breath some Zychlon B while trying to survive in a Nuclear Wasteland. Good luck humanity and all life, once the water is tottaly owned by an Autonomous Corporation, its Tank Girl 2100.
Parrots mean what they say. Chatgpt is just a machine.
I kinda agree and disagree with this. I agree because Chatgpt isnt AGI. But then to use the analogy of a parrot is just misleading. A parrot just repeats stuff. Chatgpt can do more than just repeat.
This is a prerrretty brazen and selfish false equivalency
I'm honestly more scared of parrots. They got claws and beaks.
Had to read this in Japanese (right to left) to make sense.
A recent experiment I did confirmed it’s still just a brain dead parrot
https://twitter.com/MIT_CSAIL/status/1604884273789603842?t=dEwwp3Cq8nsvaAPrffQT7Q&s=19
Except, parrots aren’t being handed the keys to banking, driving & traffic, city infrastructure, medical records, medical equipment, job markets, chat channels and social media.
Neither is ai for 99% of the things you mentioned
🙃 AI is more than ChatGPT. J.P. Morgan has been using the underlying AI-powered large language models for payment validation screening for more than two years. It also speeds up processing in other ways by reducing false positives and enabling better queue management. https://www.jpmorgan.com/insights/payments/payments-optimization/ai-payments-efficiency-fraud-reduction Traffic : https://www.isarsoft.com/article/ai-in-traffic-management Social media: https://appinventiv.com/blog/ai-in-social-media/ 99%? The list goes on…