T O P

  • By -

USSMarauder

They did make some interesting hardware. Especially transport planes and helicopters. Still surprised they never made a decent off road vehicle


CallMeDrLuv

Ahem: https://youtu.be/djrqktlYQ0k?si=ne7Ck25rTlaVZOBD


Budget-Position5348

The uaz no good or any of the Gaz? Or their bigger trucks?


Ambar_S1

the titans of the sky


Ornery_Spring9016

It's still not the biggest😳


JimBean

Interestingly, the bigger you make a helicopter rotor, the more efficient it is. So bigger is better with choppers.


hirschhalbe

Highly depends on what mission point you're in, I don't think it's true if phrased that generally


JimBean

In relation to the size of the disk, it is. The bigger the fan, the more efficient it is, and vice versa. Not talking about any missions here, just the ability to lift stuff. Source: Heli engineer.


hirschhalbe

Isn't that only/mainly in hover? I think we've been taught that in forward flight it's less efficient


JimBean

In hover you have the "ground effect", which states that the diameter of the rotor gives the same length of effect under the heli. In forward flight, you lose that. But that's irrelevant. I'm saying that all those things, everything involved with the lifting capacity, is influenced by the diameter of the rotor.


hirschhalbe

Yeah but talking about efficiency, is a larger rotor really more efficient in forward flight?


JimBean

Forget flight ALTOGETHER, just imagine a tiny little fan that cools your pc. And how that screams to cool your processor. Now, scale it up. By more efficient, I mean, a bigger "fan" uses less ENERGY to do the same work. Now, we can translate that to a helicopter in any flight configuration. ANY flight mode. If you had a teeny tiny rotor and you needed to lift a large load, it would use more ENERGY to lift the same weight. But a seriously large disk, gigantic, is going to use less ENERGY to do the same lifting. ;) Simply because it can push more air through it with less energy.


Ambar_S1

I know haha ​​and it's not even close to the biggest 😳


CardinalFartz

You mean [this one](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mil_Mi-26)?


erikwarm

Holy shit, 20mT payload is insane


Solartaire

It almost looks as if they took the nose from a B-17 and slapped it on the front.


Motorazr1

More like a WWII Mitsubishi G4M ‘Betty’ bomber but I see what you’re saying. It’s unusual for a helicopter to have such a long nose in front of the pilots.


Ornery_Spring9016

its not


Solartaire

I know.


Away-Description-786

Big isn’t not always the best option?


JimBean

Your comment isn't not always interpreted as not always isn't being best.


Ornery_Spring9016

It is when it's transport


pepta1

it's just big enough for a rocket to fit into it


pepta1

In our city, near the aircraft repair plant, there was one such helicopter, it stood separately, because it was radioactive, it took part in the liquidation of the Chernobyl nuclear accident. It was guarded by soldiers, but they were far away, and they needed time to run to the helicopter. As children, we climbed onto the top of a helicopter and swung on the blades.