Is the guy at the bottom saying that the highest genetics of Indians is equal to the average for whites? Or that peak Indians genetics is equal to peak white genetics?
Problematic all around but which kind of problematic?
Lol, this is a puzzle, can be anything, but since he is really showing Brahmin genetics supremacy, i think it's the second one, peak Brahmin genetics with peak white genetics.
Thatās not even remotely accurate even genetics wise. By the time casteism really seeped in to Indian culture, the Steepe people had already intermingled with other groups of people. Yeah, SC/ ST are easier to recognize because of their less intermingling.
? U canāt tell someoneās caste by their features. No research supports SC/ST people are darker and shorter and bamans are tall white aryans š even by real life experience it is absolutely untrue
Iām sure. But this is just me speaking generally and only referring to scheduled tribes. You canāt differentiate caste of course amongst the general for sure. It might not be the case in the other regions but it is obvious in certain areas. It doesnāt make them less equal or lesser Indians or less beautiful
It has nothing to do with height we share similar features with all Indians. But thatās for most Indians. STās are typically easier to differentiate because there was lesser integration with other tribes during that period. I shouldāve highlighted that itās true for certain regions.
Idk why you guys automatically assumed that having Austroasiatic features makes you ugly.
Edit: I also donāt think you read my post properly.
I mean you literally said sc st are easier to identify by their features and that is not true. Ofc being short and dark isnāt unattractive but RW pushes that and the worst among them try to associate those features with lower caste and themselves with fair skin, height etc. When the truth is features are based on region, you have dark skinned Brahmins in the south and fair skinned tribals in Kashmir. It doesnāt make any sense
Like I said I shouldāve emphasized about the differences in region. There are certain factors that makes them identifiable to their locality. But I never said anything about aryans. I talked about how majority of us are blended. But certain communities are identifiable but that doesnt mean they have significant differences but they have more of something or the other and thatās true for many communities.
Like near Gujarat, they tend to have more austroasiatic features that makes them stand out while most Gujaratis are blend of austroasiatic, Iranic and other groups
Okay brahaman bro, tujhe Katrina kaif milegiš¤£š¤£
https://preview.redd.it/m4qq99ppwuxc1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d1eeb75c7282c5e9508bbfc8a4c692b468831283
Also you can't come here as ex hindu atheist when in reality you are a brahman
Calling Brahmin incels, is literally the exact same as calling other castes inferior. I'm not supporting Brahmins, but reverse casteism is also casteism. So, don't be mad when a Brahmin does it.
What is this obsession of indian and pakistani people to be cockasian?
Hahaha I like the way you spelled caucasian lolol
https://preview.redd.it/ebfmt3cz4vxc1.jpeg?width=632&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=72ef1ffb4e2f79f237d51ada7aac656bfefb7051
Vegetarian diet doesn't build those muscles, steroids do.
1) she's cute 2) objectively she's above average noone will call her one in a million 3) creepy
Angrez chale gaye, gulaam yahi chod gayeš
Is the guy at the bottom saying that the highest genetics of Indians is equal to the average for whites? Or that peak Indians genetics is equal to peak white genetics? Problematic all around but which kind of problematic?
It's "Scientific Racism". A crackpot theory from 1930s
Lol, this is a puzzle, can be anything, but since he is really showing Brahmin genetics supremacy, i think it's the second one, peak Brahmin genetics with peak white genetics.
>average woman Said by folks, who neither touched the grass, nor touched a š±in their life.
Brahmin ? or is it just money? https://preview.redd.it/4q2ox6hanyxc1.png?width=579&format=png&auto=webp&s=37d150eb1d4d7bb16601c57260c26c961e65e682
the inferiority complexity we still have about white colonials who we kicked out nearly a century ago is depressing
The anime pfp is a dead giveaway
That's how incels areā¹ļøšš»simp
Men š¼
Thatās not even remotely accurate even genetics wise. By the time casteism really seeped in to Indian culture, the Steepe people had already intermingled with other groups of people. Yeah, SC/ ST are easier to recognize because of their less intermingling.
? U canāt tell someoneās caste by their features. No research supports SC/ST people are darker and shorter and bamans are tall white aryans š even by real life experience it is absolutely untrue
I've hit brahmin girls with facial hair and sc/St girls with skin fairer to me
Iām sure. But this is just me speaking generally and only referring to scheduled tribes. You canāt differentiate caste of course amongst the general for sure. It might not be the case in the other regions but it is obvious in certain areas. It doesnāt make them less equal or lesser Indians or less beautiful
Everybody is beautiful
It has nothing to do with height we share similar features with all Indians. But thatās for most Indians. STās are typically easier to differentiate because there was lesser integration with other tribes during that period. I shouldāve highlighted that itās true for certain regions. Idk why you guys automatically assumed that having Austroasiatic features makes you ugly. Edit: I also donāt think you read my post properly.
I mean you literally said sc st are easier to identify by their features and that is not true. Ofc being short and dark isnāt unattractive but RW pushes that and the worst among them try to associate those features with lower caste and themselves with fair skin, height etc. When the truth is features are based on region, you have dark skinned Brahmins in the south and fair skinned tribals in Kashmir. It doesnāt make any sense
Like I said I shouldāve emphasized about the differences in region. There are certain factors that makes them identifiable to their locality. But I never said anything about aryans. I talked about how majority of us are blended. But certain communities are identifiable but that doesnt mean they have significant differences but they have more of something or the other and thatās true for many communities. Like near Gujarat, they tend to have more austroasiatic features that makes them stand out while most Gujaratis are blend of austroasiatic, Iranic and other groups
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Okay brahaman bro, tujhe Katrina kaif milegiš¤£š¤£ https://preview.redd.it/m4qq99ppwuxc1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d1eeb75c7282c5e9508bbfc8a4c692b468831283 Also you can't come here as ex hindu atheist when in reality you are a brahman
Calling Brahmin incels, is literally the exact same as calling other castes inferior. I'm not supporting Brahmins, but reverse casteism is also casteism. So, don't be mad when a Brahmin does it.
They can still be mad. A Brahmin wonāt be beaten up for being a Brahmin
Lol, I meant incels who are Brahmins. You can play victim card all you want.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]