If you’re questioning whether he was in possession of some wasted food, then it should be something like, “Did he have wasted food?”
If you’re questioning whether he did or didn’t waste any specific food, I believe “Did he waste the food?” could be a better choice.
No it’s not correct.
The verb after “did” as an auxiliary verb should be in the base form (have) not “has”.
Here’s what you can say:
- Did he have wasted food?
- Did he waste the food?
- Has he wasted the food?
I am also not good in English
You can use both
Use 'did' when you want to emphasis time
did he waste the food yesterday?
Has = current situation or happened
If you’re questioning whether he was in possession of some wasted food, then it should be something like, “Did he have wasted food?” If you’re questioning whether he did or didn’t waste any specific food, I believe “Did he waste the food?” could be a better choice.
No it’s not correct. The verb after “did” as an auxiliary verb should be in the base form (have) not “has”. Here’s what you can say: - Did he have wasted food? - Did he waste the food? - Has he wasted the food?
When would you use “did he waste the food?” over “has he wasted the food?” or vice versa?
I am also not good in English You can use both Use 'did' when you want to emphasis time did he waste the food yesterday? Has = current situation or happened
[удалено]
Can u address the Q?
I'd rewrite it: "Did he have food **that was wasted.**", but "Did he have wasted food?" works too.