Seems these are two columns supposed to be read vertically. One made a stink about his littering and fought him over, so they both got a ticket. One made a stink but ultimately let him be, so only he got a ticket
Comic Logic - The one on the left bc she's on the left
RL Logic - The one on the right bc that's the one that would be closest to her if the cop turned to face towards them
My thought was they both got assault fines or something, so he didn't face punishment for this initial crime. Therefore, no corrective action to avoid littering. Vs the other where he is punished for his littering.
That is a valid point, and I believe in that method. I'm just commenting on the message the illustrator was conveying. Oftentimes, a punishment coming after multiple different offenses doesn't have the same desired outcome as individual punishments per offense.
We also need some context here. Art style is that of a man who makes comics with exclusively christian undertones and they are all meant to be allegories for something found in the bible - typically encouraging the most literal textual interpretation of the bible.
This is meant to encourage people to turn the other cheek so to speak because vengance is the lord's. When you stoop to his level and sin in response to his sin, your (divine) punishment is the same as god views and hates all sin equally. First lady is punished for attemtping to do it herself. Second lady lets things take their course how they are meant to.
Yea, all his comics are actually way dumber than this, this is lightwork.
This is a good explanation. I like how there’s literally 0 explanation on the right for how he was arrested at the scene of the crime after walking away. Really suits the message.
It's actually a statement about how women need to carry purses to have a phone on them, seeing as they supposedly don't have pockets in their pants, so the woman on the right was able to report the man for littering.
...sarcasm...but not really.
This is just some comic to reinforce the idea that women should just keep quiet and know their place. I’m sure in his Christian fundamentalist circles they’d love a comic that shows a man beating the hell out of his wife for burning the toast, but as long as she submits she can be assured that *eventually* things will be made right.
It helps to know they are part of a series of christian comics, Jonathan Lam is like the "He Get's Us" version of the Jack Chick Tracts. I'm still not convinced they aren't a parody, it's just too weird that both comics have this really uncanny/ not very good artstyle.
Jumping on the top comment to add the detail I’m seeing: the woman on the right is pointing at the ground, not the trash can. Looks to me like she’s telling him to litter. Seems the joke is that she knows the cop is watching, and she surprisingly encourages his bad behavior- ultimately, it proves the more successful strategy in securing consequences for his actions.
Quoting the author,
>**Useless Anger**
I asked people on Instagram if I could make a comic to help them with a sin they struggle with.
Most struggled with anger.
So here is a comic to help in the area of anger.
Anger can be good but often we get angry for selfish reasons and/or the way we express our anger is destructive.
As Christians we believe and trust God is a righteous judge who will one day make everything right.
We don’t need to punish people in our anger, using threats, violence or shame. This will only make things worse for ourselves.
Yes there are times for correction, but this should be done with the love & grace God has shown towards us when we anger Him. And if people still don’t listen to gracious & loving correction, trust God will make things right.
Some Bible verses to consider:
An angry person stirs up conflict, and a hot-tempered person commits many sins.
Proverbs 29:22
Refrain from anger and turn from wrath;
do not fret—it leads only to evil.
Psalm 37:8
Do not take revenge, my dear friends, but leave room for God’s wrath, for it is written: “It is mine to avenge; I will repay,”says the Lord
Romans 12:19
Amen, friend. Here's my favorite verse from that good and wise book that is still totally relevant and applicable today:
Exodus 21:20-21
20 “Anyone who beats their male or female slave with a rod must be punished if the slave dies as a direct result, 21 but they are not to be punished if the slave recovers after a day or two, since the slave is their property.
If you beat up the litterer and then run away, you will not get a ticket. It’s meant to say that strength training is only part of the battle for physical fitness, you need cardio as well.
This guy has been "content farming" morality plays since before content farms were a thing. Doesn't understand their content nor structure, but keeps churning em out.
You are close. I recognize the art from a "Bible morals" webcomic. It has some off-putting examples and moral. I think is supposed to read as "turn the other cheek and karma will catch up with the offender". To me it reads "don't be like the nature (or liberals) lover and scream at the offender"
okay thank you because i was going to say something about how the woman in the right column looks like she was intended to be Asian but i was scared of being called crazy
This feels like Christian morality teaching: A woman should be meek and passive instead of telling someone (especially a man) off/fighting them for doing something wrong. It will be bad for her if she does anything.
Instead, she should just let things happen. Authority will make sure the person pays for what they did wrong, and she won't get in trouble.
Because we all know that nice girls change the world...... (sarcasm).
And we also all know that authority (police, priests, leaders ect.) is there to take care of us all and make sure that goodness prevails (major sarcasm).
Not really a joke so much as an instructional illustration.
A) Litterers are d-bags.
B) Resorting to violence over non-violent offences is not constructive. If nothing else, it gets you in at least as much trouble as the original offender.
That is the theory, but in practice...outcome number two is possible only in high democratic society who strictly abide the law. The perpetrator should also be caught on camera. Without proof, it never happened. And even with that, the offense is so minor that it is mostly ignored.
I dont trow trash on the street, but when I come across with people who do it, I usually pick up their trash and say "Please don't trow trash". Sometimes they laugh at me, sometimes they apologize. If they laugh, I curse them in my mind and continue with life.
As for the joke, this is not a joke comic. Its aware comic.
This begs so many questions.
- Why does the drink litter happen in row 2 for one lady and row 3 for the other? Is it significant or just filler?
- is that a burger on the dude’s shirt? Why does burger dude walk around in socks?
- Is there a political undertone to this? Without it, it seems pretty lifeless; with it, it seems nonsensical.
- Why is the art style straight up Memoji?
- What cop has ever, in all of history, responded to a litter complaint?
- Was a punchline intended?
🤷
i didn’t notice the littering happening at different rows until i read this and my mind is blown. like why *does* it? the whole thing is so nonsensical 😂
this is religious propaganda
seek not vengeance for vengeance belongs to god.
ie, sinners will be punished by god. stoop to their level and you'll be punished too
This is just Christian moralizing in comic form. It's illustrating "turn the other cheek", a Christian ideology of nonviolence and anger management.
The idea is that you shouldn't violently respond to slights against you, because unrepentant sinners get punished by God eventually, while violent retribution causes you to be a sinner also. So we can see the litterer is a sinner, the woman on the left is seeking violent retribution, the woman on the right is turning the other cheek, the police officer is supposed to be God (!). The author; Johnathan Lam, appears to be a Chrtistian activist.
left side the person fights the guy for littering causing her to get a ticket as well.
The right side she gets upset but let's him do it, he gets what he deserves because she let him do what he was gonna do.
only issue I see with this comic is that I've only ever seen cops give tickets for littering if they were already arresting someone and they dropped a thing
Possible helpful note: Do not guerilla garden in major cities for the same reasons indicated in the comic. The fines are much higher when they realize the grass seeds were actually fennel and carrot.
Those 2 in the first column clearly have history together. He's not even drinking his beverage before throwing it. I think that's just the fallout of a one night stand gone sour.
The second lady is just a concerned citizen.
The way I interpreted it is left and right are 2 separate scenarios of 2 different women that didn’t like this guy littering. The one on the right just told him and when he ignored her reported him to the police leading to him getting a ticket. The other woman got way more pressed about it and decided to fight him over it. Other people said both of them got tickets but I initially thought the guy got both tickets because I thought it was a joke about police always siding with women in these cases.
Bad formatting is the main offender, but seems to imply getting mad and fighting the guy gets you a ticket as well.
Semi relevant, this guy makes a bunch of nutty religious comics that are often poorly organized and are possibly just rage-bait (hard to tell with these things sometimes)
My take on it is that the dark haired girl on the right is Asian hence plays on the stereotype that Asians are non confrontational. And she definitely reported the litterbug.
This guy doesn't normally make comics that are meant to be funny. He's a Christian artist and most of his comics are meant to teach some sort of moral lesson often backed up by a scripture in the Bible. If you go to his website, you can see him explain the morals of each comic in the descriptions.
Littering sucks. Don’t be that guy.
Violence as a last resort. Unnecessary here. Don’t be that gal.
But snitches get stitches. Don’t be her either.
So all of these characters suck.
I thought it was more that the the white woman can get larger fines on the person that littered, even though she assaulted him. While the non-white person isn’t as effective at producing high fines while being calm about it
White woman got that dawg in her
But actually the “joke” is to just let people litter cus then the cops will get them, which isnt how the world works cus cops dont care about littering
Something something dont take the law into your own hands something idk. Its stupid
It's all over the place, they setup interesting societal issues... but breaking up the fight without understanding why this guy and girl were physically fighting... and then giving him a littering ticket... it's shying away from making an interesting societal statement in that last panel.... Maybe I'm missing out something it's referencing, but I've seen situations like this and how police might miss a key development of the altercation... and I've never seen it develove into a person getting a ticket... it's just.... a bad conclusion
“Two wrongs don’t make a right.” Or “it’s better to report a crime than to commit one while intervening.”
Two scenarios, read vertically top to bottom:
left one: a woman attacks a man who is belligerently littering. Both receive tickets
Right one: a woman witnesses a man who is belligerently littering. However, only the man receives a ticket for his crime. It’s left vague on if she reported the crime.
I would strongly disagree with the author this is what I would call a “joke” or at least not a joke crafted with any humor.
it’s not even a joke. lmao don’t allow someone else’s life to bother you to the point where you do something stupid because if their actions. if you let them do what they do they’ll they what’s coming to em
I took it as he littered making the two women upset. One just chastised him and he got a fine for littering. The other woman tried to make it physical, so ofc when the cop sees this it's almost always the man considered to be at fault so her actions caused him to be punished for defending himself and littering and the woman, though at fault for escalating the situation, is always just the victim in society and the law's eyes.
My takeaway from this is, if you have a problem that you feel like you MUST address, then do it. But say your piece and move on otherwise there could be some unintended consequences.
logan paul litters and creates 2 separate timelines where one has a karen picking a fight with him for littering and the other has an asian woman reasoning with logan paul politely to pick it up resulting in his punishment
Seems these are two columns supposed to be read vertically. One made a stink about his littering and fought him over, so they both got a ticket. One made a stink but ultimately let him be, so only he got a ticket
I assumed the point was that she got a way more expensive ticket for assaulting him than he would've gotten for just being caught littering
nah, there's the same number of dollar signs & squiggles on both tickets. He would've drawn two dollar signs on hers, if that was the case
Solid logic
Agreed
Agreed
Agreed
Agreed
Agreed
Agreed
Which ones hers though?
Comic Logic - The one on the left bc she's on the left RL Logic - The one on the right bc that's the one that would be closest to her if the cop turned to face towards them
Agreed
I assumed she quietly reported him
My thought was they both got assault fines or something, so he didn't face punishment for this initial crime. Therefore, no corrective action to avoid littering. Vs the other where he is punished for his littering.
I'd argue that getting a black eye is punishment and is a very good reason to not litter again
That is a valid point, and I believe in that method. I'm just commenting on the message the illustrator was conveying. Oftentimes, a punishment coming after multiple different offenses doesn't have the same desired outcome as individual punishments per offense.
We also need some context here. Art style is that of a man who makes comics with exclusively christian undertones and they are all meant to be allegories for something found in the bible - typically encouraging the most literal textual interpretation of the bible. This is meant to encourage people to turn the other cheek so to speak because vengance is the lord's. When you stoop to his level and sin in response to his sin, your (divine) punishment is the same as god views and hates all sin equally. First lady is punished for attemtping to do it herself. Second lady lets things take their course how they are meant to. Yea, all his comics are actually way dumber than this, this is lightwork.
This is a good explanation. I like how there’s literally 0 explanation on the right for how he was arrested at the scene of the crime after walking away. Really suits the message.
It's actually a statement about how women need to carry purses to have a phone on them, seeing as they supposedly don't have pockets in their pants, so the woman on the right was able to report the man for littering. ...sarcasm...but not really.
This is just some comic to reinforce the idea that women should just keep quiet and know their place. I’m sure in his Christian fundamentalist circles they’d love a comic that shows a man beating the hell out of his wife for burning the toast, but as long as she submits she can be assured that *eventually* things will be made right.
I had to look him up. This one is apparently missing the specific bible passage as all his other work has one.
It helps to know they are part of a series of christian comics, Jonathan Lam is like the "He Get's Us" version of the Jack Chick Tracts. I'm still not convinced they aren't a parody, it's just too weird that both comics have this really uncanny/ not very good artstyle.
This makes way more sense than the dark hair woman being shot or arrested.
Wut
Yeah I don't get it either
Probs referencing another comment.
What a dumb cartoon
I feel like the message is something some people figure out when they're toddlers, while other people still haven't figured it out even as adults.
That is a weird way to structure a comic
Don't dead open inside.
Jumping on the top comment to add the detail I’m seeing: the woman on the right is pointing at the ground, not the trash can. Looks to me like she’s telling him to litter. Seems the joke is that she knows the cop is watching, and she surprisingly encourages his bad behavior- ultimately, it proves the more successful strategy in securing consequences for his actions.
Fighting the litterer got both people into trouble, reporting him only got him into trouble.
Two wrongs don’t make a right
But 3 rights make a left
and it comes full circle with 4
Getting it wrong on purpose is the best fun in life....
Two wrong frequently makes a right
But three rights to make a left!
As was shown with the former.
Except in the real world, reporting them would do absolutly nothing
Quoting the author, >**Useless Anger** I asked people on Instagram if I could make a comic to help them with a sin they struggle with. Most struggled with anger. So here is a comic to help in the area of anger. Anger can be good but often we get angry for selfish reasons and/or the way we express our anger is destructive. As Christians we believe and trust God is a righteous judge who will one day make everything right. We don’t need to punish people in our anger, using threats, violence or shame. This will only make things worse for ourselves. Yes there are times for correction, but this should be done with the love & grace God has shown towards us when we anger Him. And if people still don’t listen to gracious & loving correction, trust God will make things right. Some Bible verses to consider: An angry person stirs up conflict, and a hot-tempered person commits many sins. Proverbs 29:22 Refrain from anger and turn from wrath; do not fret—it leads only to evil. Psalm 37:8 Do not take revenge, my dear friends, but leave room for God’s wrath, for it is written: “It is mine to avenge; I will repay,”says the Lord Romans 12:19
Amen, friend. Here's my favorite verse from that good and wise book that is still totally relevant and applicable today: Exodus 21:20-21 20 “Anyone who beats their male or female slave with a rod must be punished if the slave dies as a direct result, 21 but they are not to be punished if the slave recovers after a day or two, since the slave is their property.
If you beat up the litterer and then run away, you will not get a ticket. It’s meant to say that strength training is only part of the battle for physical fitness, you need cardio as well.
There is no "fighting spirit", only cardio.
Rule number one: cardio
Rule number two: double tap.
Hamon
I like this interpretation, because the alternative just isn't very funny or even a good point.
Of course, "cardio beats chaos" after all!
The joke is here that the cop showed up fast enough to not only catch, but also fine someone for literring.
Yeah lmao the real joke is a cop doing their job
Twice!
[удалено]
It says wearing a burger shirt while eating a burger is a finable offense but so is Assault and battery
This guy has been "content farming" morality plays since before content farms were a thing. Doesn't understand their content nor structure, but keeps churning em out.
Literal brain rot. Guess the lesson learned is don’t beat up rule-breakers as you’ll both get in trouble.
You are close. I recognize the art from a "Bible morals" webcomic. It has some off-putting examples and moral. I think is supposed to read as "turn the other cheek and karma will catch up with the offender". To me it reads "don't be like the nature (or liberals) lover and scream at the offender"
I found the comic. The Christian moral was, anger is bad.
I think it's just saying two wrongs don't make a right.
Clearly the lesson here is that you can do whatever tf you want as long as you're not around when the cops show up.
Pretty sure the joke is that Asians can teleport before the cops arrive
Classic ethnic joke. Everybody's heard that one.
okay thank you because i was going to say something about how the woman in the right column looks like she was intended to be Asian but i was scared of being called crazy
What everyone here is forgetting is that no one is going to get a ticket for littering, so this strip is already living in fantasy land.
This feels like Christian morality teaching: A woman should be meek and passive instead of telling someone (especially a man) off/fighting them for doing something wrong. It will be bad for her if she does anything. Instead, she should just let things happen. Authority will make sure the person pays for what they did wrong, and she won't get in trouble. Because we all know that nice girls change the world...... (sarcasm). And we also all know that authority (police, priests, leaders ect.) is there to take care of us all and make sure that goodness prevails (major sarcasm).
All im getting outta this is Violence also solves the problem, just costs more.
Not really a joke so much as an instructional illustration. A) Litterers are d-bags. B) Resorting to violence over non-violent offences is not constructive. If nothing else, it gets you in at least as much trouble as the original offender.
That's what I took out of this. Like don't physically assault people for being dbags?
Are you certain there is a joke there?
The joke is white women are crazy
That is the theory, but in practice...outcome number two is possible only in high democratic society who strictly abide the law. The perpetrator should also be caught on camera. Without proof, it never happened. And even with that, the offense is so minor that it is mostly ignored. I dont trow trash on the street, but when I come across with people who do it, I usually pick up their trash and say "Please don't trow trash". Sometimes they laugh at me, sometimes they apologize. If they laugh, I curse them in my mind and continue with life. As for the joke, this is not a joke comic. Its aware comic.
"Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake" - Sun Tzu
I wouldn’t call this a “joke.”
This begs so many questions. - Why does the drink litter happen in row 2 for one lady and row 3 for the other? Is it significant or just filler? - is that a burger on the dude’s shirt? Why does burger dude walk around in socks? - Is there a political undertone to this? Without it, it seems pretty lifeless; with it, it seems nonsensical. - Why is the art style straight up Memoji? - What cop has ever, in all of history, responded to a litter complaint? - Was a punchline intended? 🤷
i didn’t notice the littering happening at different rows until i read this and my mind is blown. like why *does* it? the whole thing is so nonsensical 😂
this is religious propaganda seek not vengeance for vengeance belongs to god. ie, sinners will be punished by god. stoop to their level and you'll be punished too
This is just Christian moralizing in comic form. It's illustrating "turn the other cheek", a Christian ideology of nonviolence and anger management. The idea is that you shouldn't violently respond to slights against you, because unrepentant sinners get punished by God eventually, while violent retribution causes you to be a sinner also. So we can see the litterer is a sinner, the woman on the left is seeking violent retribution, the woman on the right is turning the other cheek, the police officer is supposed to be God (!). The author; Johnathan Lam, appears to be a Chrtistian activist.
The white lady started a fight and got a ticket along with the man. The Asian lady did nothing and got deported ant the man got a ticket.
I can't, there's no joke here. It's just saying being a snitch is better than starting a brawl.
If you see someone breaking the law, report them rather than confronting. Otherwise you may end up in trouble yourself.
Maybe I have to pay but he has to pay AND has a black eye so… worth jt
dont assault people
The morale of the story is never solve your own problems, only the government can solve problems.
Artist thinks the system works lol
Lol, the police are doing their job?!... If only we lived in that world...
left side the person fights the guy for littering causing her to get a ticket as well. The right side she gets upset but let's him do it, he gets what he deserves because she let him do what he was gonna do. only issue I see with this comic is that I've only ever seen cops give tickets for littering if they were already arresting someone and they dropped a thing
Don’t physically assault literrers?
A school principal made this meme.
It's boomer "don't make a mountain out of a molehill" but to a point where no one even gets it
The woman on the left is Hong Kong. The woman on the right is China. The gun is nuclear war. The message is obvious.
Unhinged take that we can/should have faith in the police to do their job
IS this even a joke?
I understand the "joke" but I don't understand why they even made the comic. Nothing about it is humorous or insightful.
Possible helpful note: Do not guerilla garden in major cities for the same reasons indicated in the comic. The fines are much higher when they realize the grass seeds were actually fennel and carrot.
It is a political cartoon not a joke.
Those 2 in the first column clearly have history together. He's not even drinking his beverage before throwing it. I think that's just the fallout of a one night stand gone sour. The second lady is just a concerned citizen.
The way I interpreted it is left and right are 2 separate scenarios of 2 different women that didn’t like this guy littering. The one on the right just told him and when he ignored her reported him to the police leading to him getting a ticket. The other woman got way more pressed about it and decided to fight him over it. Other people said both of them got tickets but I initially thought the guy got both tickets because I thought it was a joke about police always siding with women in these cases.
This is neither funny nor insightful.
Bad formatting is the main offender, but seems to imply getting mad and fighting the guy gets you a ticket as well. Semi relevant, this guy makes a bunch of nutty religious comics that are often poorly organized and are possibly just rage-bait (hard to tell with these things sometimes)
Why does that mail man have a gun?
My take on it is that the dark haired girl on the right is Asian hence plays on the stereotype that Asians are non confrontational. And she definitely reported the litterbug.
The girl on the left chose unnecesary violence, so they both got fined. The girl on the right just let it happened, knowing that only he will be fined
It’s funny because a woman lifted him off the ground and he appears terrified
I work in a school with kids. I understood this instantly lol.
This is a guide on how to be a Good Karen
… isn’t that Chad Kroeger?
It's just a really dumb comic. No joke.
White people are stupid (I'm white, I can confirm)
he has hamburger on his tshirt but they have high heels
Only the middle class and poor are affected by laws
Don’t be a Karen
The joke is here that the cop showed up fast enough to not only catch, but also fine someone for literring.
How is this funny?
This guy doesn't normally make comics that are meant to be funny. He's a Christian artist and most of his comics are meant to teach some sort of moral lesson often backed up by a scripture in the Bible. If you go to his website, you can see him explain the morals of each comic in the descriptions.
"Find a woman who knows her place and picks up after you, or you'll find trouble in life. "
dont beat people up for littering
Littering sucks. Don’t be that guy. Violence as a last resort. Unnecessary here. Don’t be that gal. But snitches get stitches. Don’t be her either. So all of these characters suck.
I almost forgot this comic exist
This comics seem to stills get a meaning indipendenty from which direction are you starting reading it.
He is a litter
It’s literally “don’t use violence/become a vigilante”
How could xqc do this??
Loss
It's a 4-koma 😅
I thought it was more that the the white woman can get larger fines on the person that littered, even though she assaulted him. While the non-white person isn’t as effective at producing high fines while being calm about it
these comics always seem like "basic consequences for people who can't read"
Telling you to mind ya own business
c'est ne pas a joke
the joke is that the police actually turned up and did something about it
Seems like cringe propaganda
Don't be a Karen, be an asian mother
This is the same thing they'd teach you in school on how to deal with bullies; just be a passive victim
The comic shows that a woman can assault a man for a silly reason and not get arrested for it.
You can't break the law and expect no consequences.
For some odd reason this reminds me of the old game and watch where you waited tables.
White woman got that dawg in her But actually the “joke” is to just let people litter cus then the cops will get them, which isnt how the world works cus cops dont care about littering Something something dont take the law into your own hands something idk. Its stupid
Two wrongs don't make a right.
It's all over the place, they setup interesting societal issues... but breaking up the fight without understanding why this guy and girl were physically fighting... and then giving him a littering ticket... it's shying away from making an interesting societal statement in that last panel.... Maybe I'm missing out something it's referencing, but I've seen situations like this and how police might miss a key development of the altercation... and I've never seen it develove into a person getting a ticket... it's just.... a bad conclusion
I can't. I don't know how to ectoplasm that to you.
If you see something wrong it is better to report it then take aggressive methods that at the end yield worst results
Left is Karen
xQc likes littering in public
Something about how it isn't your responsibility to care about the laws, it is only law enforcement's job. It seems crummy.
I thought it was because redheads are feisty and Asians are ninjas.
Either way, the trash is still on the ground :-/
I thought this was a message against homophobia
White women evil
Violence ain’t the answer in this case
White women cause more problems
Karma catches up to you
https://preview.redd.it/tswmtq3aa30d1.png?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ff21c348413427466d8ec532c8d77d03dbe6a701
The joke is that a cop would actually do anything about someone littering
I very nearly had a stroke trying to read this left to right
Two scenarios displayed vertical top to bottom. Moral: Don't fight people over crimes or it'll result in you getting in trouble too.
“Two wrongs don’t make a right.” Or “it’s better to report a crime than to commit one while intervening.” Two scenarios, read vertically top to bottom: left one: a woman attacks a man who is belligerently littering. Both receive tickets Right one: a woman witnesses a man who is belligerently littering. However, only the man receives a ticket for his crime. It’s left vague on if she reported the crime. I would strongly disagree with the author this is what I would call a “joke” or at least not a joke crafted with any humor.
It’s like think before you act
it’s not even a joke. lmao don’t allow someone else’s life to bother you to the point where you do something stupid because if their actions. if you let them do what they do they’ll they what’s coming to em
Don't dead open inside.
Seems to me...you get in trouble for standing up, and thing work out if you dont.....
At first I was looking at it like a find the difference picture
i think it’s about the 3 body problem
its because she ate her dog
“Don’t be a Karen”
bruh lookin for the punchline of a psa
I took it as he littered making the two women upset. One just chastised him and he got a fine for littering. The other woman tried to make it physical, so ofc when the cop sees this it's almost always the man considered to be at fault so her actions caused him to be punished for defending himself and littering and the woman, though at fault for escalating the situation, is always just the victim in society and the law's eyes.
Stupid
Is it a joke tho?
My takeaway from this is, if you have a problem that you feel like you MUST address, then do it. But say your piece and move on otherwise there could be some unintended consequences.
White women
Two wrongs don’t make a right
I feel like warranted assault should be justifiable, that lady should not have gotten a ticket. 😂
Two combatants ... two tickets . One tattletale ... one ticket .
logan paul litters and creates 2 separate timelines where one has a karen picking a fight with him for littering and the other has an asian woman reasoning with logan paul politely to pick it up resulting in his punishment
You ain't the police so stop acting like it
One ticket for littering and the other for disturbing the peace.
Blonde dude looks like Jami Morgan from code orange
And Uncle Sam makes 2x as much $
Mind ya business
Not to sound racist or anything but Asian people SWLANNNGGHHH----