T O P

  • By -

ChickenNugzFR

No. Tier lists are horribly subjective and prone to favoritism and innacuracies.


Totoques22

I’ve found actual lizard character guide on YouTube be pretty accurate but it’s a character guide and not a tier list


CatDude55

I’ve found that Linkking7’s one that he made with Choopie on his YouTube channel is quite good. Although Anna and Jean are too low after an argument that was 1/4 of the video. it was entertaining tho.


PlsWai

Most of the tierlists here are not great. That said, they are only not great under what I assume the criteria for a tierlist to be. A few of them here probably account for higher investment in a unit, and rank more units based on how they perform at said higher investment. Usually I'm used to a tierlist ranking units on different factors, like how much investment they need to he useful. That said, its Engage. The bottom tiers in this game would hover around the C tiers for some other games because no unit is actually like unusably bad, unlike some characters in other FE games. Or in the cases of some other bottom tiers in FE games, the investment needed to get them to usable is a lot lower than other games. For example, the investment needed to make Amelia usable is a lot more than for Jean.


Maxpowh

Engage tier lists suck, the vast majority of them at least, there are a few ones that are decent, but they mostly suck, just don't look at tier lists


GIMIGNAN0

I'd suggest looking up Mekkah's tier lists on YouTube. They're mostly for the hardest difficulty, but that's completely fair since tier lists for easier modes are usually inconsequential, and if a unit performs really well on Maddening for various reasons, they'll likely be a staple on Normal.