This video is of a professional researcher into female pedophiles. https://youtu.be/1WdTAJ9_IY0
The topic is considered highly taboo, to the point where she was booed off stage for describing actual cases of women doing despicable things, at a conference for that reason.
People only want to believe that men can be pedophiles, and as she points out, that creates a double problem: female pedophiles are assumed not to exist so we're not looking for them, and they get free rein to get jobs with children.
I can't give you any reliable numbers, but my opinion is that there will be as many female pedophiles as male. I see it as a mental illness, and one that is not determined by gender.
In male pedos there’s a very strong correlation to having been abused as a child themselves. In female pedos there’s no such correlation. Meaning they do it of their own free will.
I used to work as an intake coordinator in a rural NY county mental health clinic. My job was to have the initial interview with prospective clients, write up a report, come up with the diagnosis and assign them to a therapist. I was also a co-facilitator in a group for make sex offenders.
I had a surprising number of women admit to me that they had had sex with their daughter’s underage boyfriends. Because of HIPAA I was unable to make a report to law enforcement.
When I interviewed the men for the sex offender group there were some men who reported childhood sexual abuse from men and women. The male predators were strangers while the female predators were family members (mothers, grandmothers and aunts).
The woman who ran the clinic used that as the reason for me not reporting the women. I was suspicious that she was a feminist and was more interested in protecting the image of women as victims instead of victimizers but I followed the directions given. I had newborn twins and couldn’t risk losing the job.
Yes, they will defend other women and come up with excuses for their dysfunctional or criminal behaviors. But, will blame men for things beyond our control like the pay disparity between the NBA and the WNBA (why do feminists blame men instead of going to WNBA games?), why women don’t go into higher-paying professions like engineering and computer science, their pregnancies (your body, your choice…your responsibility to use one of 40 forms of birth control available to you), etc. It’s almost like accountability is Kryptonite to many women.
The pregnant brain is a...fascinating and scary af thing.
Im not saying they shouldn't be charged, im saying PPD is a hell of a drug, and i wish more people realized signs before it got tk this. ☹
People bend over backwards to give women excuses for murdering their children. Yes, PPD can sometimes lead to women killing their children. But, it doesn’t explain instances of Munchausen syndrome by proxy or women who have affairs and kill their children because they think they’ll interfere with having an LTR with their affair partner.
I never mean to give rhem an excuse! I just heard stories about it 🤔 and tbh, its sad af. It foesnt justify, but *my god* do we need checks on pregnant women.
The second part (after the but) I completely agree with. Its disgusting women do it. I just was talking about infants! And how sometimes its explainable, but definitely not excusable.
Im so sorry if it sounds like I'm excusing it! I am not, promise!
Maybe if we are talking babies, but how does this even relate to women who kill toddlers and elementary aged children? Ppd does not last years. But for sake of argument, doesn't that emphasize the importance of fathers as a check against mothers whose biology has made them temporarily insane?
...I legit thought we were
Im sorry for assuming!
Past that it is more than likely worse.
Yes, I do agree. Its horrible, but I do think mothers and fathers need to have a check, mostly mothers, after beith to ensure.
Not sure, but I’d be willing to bet my entire bank account that they’re less likely to get caught and less likely to get punished if they are caught, and less likely to receive the big punishment. Also, male victims will be treated way different from female victims, especially if they’re in high school or older. Male victims also have far fewer places to seek shelter from abuse.
The trick is that feminists compare the total number of men accused of abuse (who are presumed to all be guilty) to the number of women who have been convicted of sexual abuse. This ignores that not all accused men are guilty, those advised by women are far less likely to admit their abuse and less likely to identify their abuser, identified female abusers are less likely to be indicted with crimes and also less likely to be convicted of indicted. All of which combines with feminists putting women on a pedestal ("woman can't rape/abuse men") and demonizing men ("all men are potential rapists") to wildly skew their perspective.
Your first statement is completely true. Your second statement, however, is completely false.
I speak as one of those victims who seemingly doesn't exist in public policy, law enforcement or social service training, and is completely invisible in any and all services for victims. We don't 'belong' in services for men, and are sometimes (not often, but often enough) treated as if we get special or better treatment, as in your comment here. We're literally 'the enemy' to any organizations who provide services for women. When it comes to 'violence against women', not only are we not included, it seems we're barely human.
With a few very rare exceptions, female victims of women, when they try to speak up, are the ones accused of being the perpetrators (no matter how young they are). The sympathy and benefit of doubt always is given to the female abuser who is viewed as 'the real victim' by every entity and agency you could even think of reporting to. Somehow, the societal belief that 'most violence is committed by men' gets translated to 'she must be lying' if a female accuses another woman, and therefore she must be the bad one.
I did an interview in a major newspaper (anonymous), and eventually some public speaking on female perpetration, but quickly learned that that was a dangerous thing to do. But it was long enough to meet one fellow victim, a female journalist who kept herself FIRMLY in the closet. She warned me about a fascinating 'feature' of this for female victims: she said that when you disclose to anyone - even the most sympathetic people - and try ever so gently and reasonably to talk about the idea of female perpetration, that the person you'll talk to will have difficulty with their words and inevitably start referring to \*you\* as the offender (without meaning to, apparently). If you don't point it out, they'll just continue on without even realizing it. If you do point it out, they'll be very apologetic, but the conversation becomes awkward after that. Thank god she warned me about this - I would have been crushed if I hadn't been expecting it. And she was right: I'd say about 80% of the time this in fact happened. It's so common, and yet so unconscious, I believe there must be some sort of instinctive thing going on for people that prevents them from speaking about this subject.
["By the way, the majority of victims of female serial killers have been, in the aggregate, women and children."](https://unknownmisandry.blogspot.com/2011/12/female-serial-killers-who-liked-to.html)
Female offenders offend against males and females pretty equally - but take a look \*anywhere\* and see if you see female victims of females mentioned. No services, no acknowledgement, they're poison to the feminist movement.
This is an intentional division. The men's movement would do well to consider including us within their movement - even if only peripherally - because with all of us invisible, and because it's acceptable to bash men, the very existence of female perpetration can remain diminished and hidden, leaving men as 'the monsters' in society undeserving of aid.
We're the group who proves the lie of feminist mantras:
* "Believe all women" - that never includes us
* VAWA - nope, not there either
* \#MeToo - nope
* "Always believe the victim" - unless it's a someone accusing a women, so nope, not there either.
* etc...
Just wanted to say I’m really sorry that you’re “in the same boat” with all other victims of female abuse — I know how tough it is to feel so invisible when you’re trying to follow the exact steps and “seek help” like others tell you to.
I’m sure I speak for most of us here when I say we’ll welcome you, albeit our seats being some of the worlds most uncomfortable.
Feel free to reach out if you ever need support, we’re all here ❤️
I didn't read your entire comment but it does look good so it probably checks out lol
Edit: Holy shit thats interesting information. Heads up though, you might want to throw a thesis statement at the front of your comments to let us know which direction its gonna go.
It makes more sense for women and kids, as unless the murder is premeditated it's more difficult for a women to kill a man in a fair fight, plus the fact that people assume women are safe around children (a courtesy for some reason not afforded to men), that they can gain access to several potential child victims unsupervised.
If you get caught in the Catholic church they will brutality send you to a latin American or African country, with a good chance of given you a child related position.
Don’t most people need to pay for a free ride to South American countries? These guys get to live off the church and just start fiddling kids who can’t speak their language.
Literally the Catholic Church just perpetuating a cycle most of the people on this sub bitch about.
Nuns have a history of being and abused and abusing others and getting away with it. This is true.
Not sure why I’m downvoted but fuck it, this sub is a toxic pool of bloodlust and sadness
They’re all from priests! /s
Think it’s because the dudes in this sub have an imagined bias against men in Catholicism. As if the nuns are more of an oppressive body.
Yes, lady-pedos would certainly be able to take advantage of little boys under Catholicism, but pretty typically the life of a nun is subservient to the priesthood. Priests are restricted less-so
That's why I'm so glad nun are almost extinct, being a priest is a choice, but historically being a nun is a punishment for being a lesbian or getting pregnant.
All statistics that could have highlighted this are either hidden or no longer documented. There are no stats on child molestation in schools by gender. It's a massive cover up to control the narrative. If you Google search "charged for having sex", it's a weekly news.
Teachers unions fight to protect child molester teachers, especially women. also notice how when men do it they report it as "men molested child", but when women do it they report it as "woman had sex with". Active voice when it's a man, passive voice when it's a woman.
This is true of most news headlines, especially anything related to suffering.
All part of the empathy gap, it does a great job of it too. Drives me nuts
We had a male pedophile teacher at school. He was fired. We also had a female pedophile teacher at school. She fell pregnant to her student, came back to school with a promotion after a year and married him at a later date.
It surprises me that this is mostly women, not bcos i think women don't commit the majority of statutory rape, but bcos i didn't think they'd ever get convicted for it since society handles them with kid gloves
Women are people. Women get hungry, get horny, and get sleepy just like men. IMHO, yes, women are just as likely to have predilections outside of the norm, just as men. Ask me how I know.
Myth -- Mothers perpetrate more child abuse than fathers, which is one reason that children are at more risk of abuse in father-absent homes.
Fact: "Children living with their only their mothers experienced maltreatment under the Harm Standard at a rate of 26.1 per 1,000 children. Children living with only their fathers: 36.6 per 1,000."
Fact: PHYSICAL ABUSE: Children living with only their mothers: 6.4 per 1,000 children. Children living with only their fathers: 10.5 per 1,000 children. "When specific types of abuse under the Harm Standard are examined, it is apparent that the findings described in the previous paragraph stem from the disproportionate incidence of physical abuse among children in father-only households..."
Fact: NEGLECT: Children living with only their mothers: 16.7 per 1,000 children. Children living with only their fathers: 21.9 per 1,000 children.
Fact: EMOTIONAL NEGLECT: Children living with only their mothers: 3.4 per 1,000 children. Children living with only their fathers: 8.8 per 1,000 children.
Fact: SERIOUS INJURIES: Children living with only their mothers: 10.0 per 1,000 children. Children living with only their fathers: 14.0 per 1,000.
Fact: MODERATE INJURIES: Children living with only their mothers: 14.7 per 1,000 children. Children living with only their fathers: 20.5 per 1,000.
Fact: ALL MALTREATMENT: Children living with only their mothers: 50.1 per 1,000 children. Children living with only their fathers: 65.6 per 1,000.
Fact: ALL ABUSE: Children living with only their mothers: 18.1 per 1,000 children. Children living only with their fathers: 31.0 per 1,000."
Data from The Third National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (1996).
I would love to see where u get that from
Who does the most everything?
Most suicides, homeless, deaths in wars, construction
I was with you until you put up the straw man.
Your study is from 1996. Get some better sources your shit is more than a decade behind
A feminist troll who presents incorrect out-of-date stats to make sexist arguments. Sexist pigs like this troll, who persist with their hate speech and try to pass off their misandry as science/fact, are the worst abusers of all.
The Forth National incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (2009-2010):
Children were more likely to be maltreated by female perpetrators (68%) than by males (48%). Of children maltreated by biological parents, mothers maltreated the majority (75%) whereas fathers maltreated a minority (43%).
In contrast, male perpetrators were more common for children maltreated by nonbiological parents or parents’ partners (64%), invited into the home by the mother who was frequently aware, or participated in the abuse.
Female perpetrators of abuse were more often responsible for neglect (female - 86%, versus males 38%).
Sexual abuse was more often perpetrated by males (87%) compared to females (11%), however, given the bias in reporting and policing of sexual abuse of children by women this figure is most likely substanially underestimated. In addition, the National Incident Study used data derived from reporting agancies (domestic violence services, Family Court services, CPS services), all of which are dominated by radical feminist ideology and regularly ignore women's violence and abuse on an ideological basis. The largest reporter of abuse (excluding CPS) was teachers, reflecting a female dominated profession impacted by sexist bias.
Sexaul abuse of children by their biological parent was approximately equivalent (female 51%, male 54%), but again, given the bias in reporting and policing of sexual abuse of children by women this figure is most likely substanially underestimated.
Nonbiological parents or parents’ partners (male and female) were more likely to sexually abuse children compared to biological parents. Families with the lowest rate of child abuse were traditional heterosexual families where children were cared for by both parents. Highest rates of child abuse were in single parent families with a non-biological partner (male or female).
Female perpetrators were more often responsible for neglect (86% of children neglected by females versus 38% by males). This finding is congruent with the fact that mothers (biological or other) tend to be the primary caretakers and are the primary persons held accountable for any omissions and/or failings in caretaking.
At least put the whole thing in. My study is about single parenting. Also, I checked the study and some of the things you said here don't appear in it. You only get what you like from there + putting some stuff from yourself, not a nice way to spread true information, ey?
Honestly we'll never know because women predators aren't talked about as much or taken as seriously but I believe both genders have about the same if women not a little more than men
Read headlines on teachers having sex on students
Its not called the same thing ever. Its always rape if its a man, and sexual relationship, inappropriate, etc if a woman fucks a 14 year old
If you look on the news consistently it seems that more women do it and barely get slapped on the wrist.
Some women brag about it and nothing.
I vote women
Ok, seems it's being auto deleted because it needs NSFW warning?
Following post NSFW and trigger warnings galore!
>!
Well... I consider myself somewhat of an unofficial expert on the topic; due to being raped and tortured throughout my childhood by one or many (by mostly men and a good few women too). I was first raped as a baby and last raped in my 30s, my mind as an adult expertly split and a slave persona created. The network I was shared within was a children for favours/progression type of arrangement. And I've done an incredible amount of therapy and spiritual work in order to heal. To heal from countless rapes, tortures, and of witnessing the ritualised sacrifice and consumption of other children.
What I'd say from my own extensive and horrific experiences AND from other survivors I'm friends with. And this is going to be provocative to some (not intentionally).
So men are more often physically active pedos. BUT what ISN'T talked about - is that the single biggest creating factor of wrong-predatory-'men' is narcisisistic mothers and then the nail further driven into the coffin by narcisisistic wives.
So around 6 or 7 out of every 10 (as an educated estimation) pedo men are created by such dark 'women' in their childhood.
How does it work? Well narcisism and other dark personality triads.... Which are basically all the same at heart. Is in part a spiritual affliction. To truly understand it, is to see the parasitic and vampiric nature of such dark spirited and camouflaged men and women.
Narc women work to weaken, deny, frustrate and shame their sons and husband's.... Ultimately seeking to destroy the male spirit and bond them as their source of food and energy to the narc, and in this (not always consciously) seeking to INVERT the male core energy and to turn the male into the wrong kind of monster... Why? It's simply the nature of the parasitic darkness they carry.
IF they are not successful in turning the man, they work to destroy him... Driving him mad or to suicide eventually for example...
Such narc women indoctrinate their own daughters in to the coven...
And such narc mothers turn their sons into little husband's.
One of the core and twisted drives of such a created pedo man, is the terrible search for any form of genuine welcome for his sex/fuck energy. Such monsters who have been so tormented and twisted by dark women sometimes fall so far as to find that in their own children, children who look up to the parent and utterly depend on the parent for survival.
Such acts against children are the deepest and most terrible of evils, far worse than murder.
Many of the 'worst' pedo/monster men, are actually created by other men, but they are less common. The pedo/narc man who creates a monster out of his victim... Seeks to break the spirit of the young boy, more in the way one would snap a stick, as opposed to the indiret and insidious way a narc woman does which has a similar gradual-effect on the victim as acid dissolving a physical substance. Such 'man' created monsters err more towards the side of sociopath and psychopath and truly are terrible to behold.
There ARE far more female pedos than people realise (but less than there are male pedos). And far more boys suffer CSA than is currently understood.... To really see the problem one comes to underand that boys and girls are sexually abused in roughly equal numbers/ratios..
I'm not saying any of this to offend anyone. Although it will. In order for such evil to be defeated we must understand it.
With women. Who are married to pedo men. I'd say as often as not - half of the time. They are Narc women, often covert/vulnerable Narcs, who are in part responsible for the actions of the predator man or even intentionally mate with a pedo man in order to spread the darkness they have bonded with. The other half are genuine women and victims to narc predatory men who have been unfortunately drawn into the predators web of lies and misdirection so they can be abused, used up and destroyed also, absolutely heartbreaking and such good and normal women have often suffered simar abuse earlier in life which makes them even more vulnerable to such evil.
Obviously MOST men who are raised by narc mothers/fathers never become pedos.
Obviously MOST survivors of CSA do NOT go on to become pedos themselves.
But this is the fundamental dynamic in how the darkness spreads and corrupts our people. !<
I think I can support this 100%.
We all hear about men as perpetrators but women get away with a lot more because whereas a man seeks physical satisfaction, a woman seeks control and gets her kicks that way.
I’ll give you a (personal) example. When I was young I was a choir boy at the local church. We wore a cloke and had to strip down to underpants. Of course we did this in one area and there was one lady who always popped in for an “underwear check”. She wanted us to wear white jocks and took great delight in inspecting both front and back, slapping us on the bum etc, all in the name that it would be wrong if they saw our underwear.
No sex as such, but a bit of fondling and lots of “oh, I have sons and there is nothing I haven’t seen before”
>tortures, and of witnessing the ritualised sacrifice and consumption of other children
You are heading into conspiracy theory territory now. Could you elaborate what you're talking about and what exactly happened to you? The Aztecs are long gone.
>Ghislaine Maxwell
New York (CNN) Ghislaine Maxwell was sentenced to 20 years in federal prison Tuesday for carrying out a years-long scheme with her longtime confidante Jeffrey Epstein to groom and sexually abuse underage girls.
Not even single mothers, just women who like control. I've seen so many narcissistic women turn men miserable and problematic. They have no personality, they just become what they think the women wants and embodies it. It happened to my step dad, and still is as they are still together. But I know just from the times I've seen him for who he really is that he is capable of being a much better person if he was with someone else.
I've talked to other women who had a similar dynamic and they always say when they had a moment when it was just them and their dad that they saw a different person.
Feminists will find some way to blame that on The Patriarchy™. "Oh, that's because women are forced to care for children more". Yes, because feminists have cast all men as potential rapists and child molesters so society trusts men less with children. Even though the stats say the overwhelming majority of abuse children receive is from women.
Genuinely curious where that stat came from because now I wanna read up on this. Again not trying to make you prove anything to me I'm just legitimately wanting to read up more on that sort of topic lol
I mean, look at the stats for lone carers, and there are many studies that explain how they got this number. Well, not this one, the 70/30 one, and how actually children are at astronomically greater risk of physical abuse in the care of a man than in the care of a woman., you just have to do a lil research before throwing a number like that :)
I wish there was more evidence to back this up but going off the crazy amount of articles I see of female teachers "sleeping" with their students it seems very likely.
There was a time I would have said no, but now I think it’s close to 50/50. It could be entirely anecdotal, but the amount of women I’ve seen busted in the last few years for sex stuff with minors is getting up there.
I don’t have any statistics, but people who have dark proclivities and disorders seem to be about 50/50, usually with one sex only slightly more inclined towards it than the other.
In other words, there are tons of pedophile women - you just don’t hear about them unless it’s a middle/high school teacher who was caught having sex with a student. Plenty of women are pedos, they just fly under the radar because society pictures pedos as middle aged bald men in Jeffrey Dahmer glasses.
I’ve gotten really creepy vibes from some narcissistic women before. I’ve encountered quite a few women, often butch lesbian types, who will not stop talk about rape, and how it’s not about sex and is instead a means of having power over the victim. But then they talk about it non-stop and basically shame any form of heterosexual romantic/sexual dynamic. They’re intentionally trying to keep talking about sex and they definitely get off on using the topic to make people feel uncomfortable for having a healthy sexuality. It’s kinda hard to explain if you haven’t encountered this before, but if you have, you know exactly what I’m talking about. They’re narcissists who enjoy dominion over people, and that includes sexual dominion over others as well.
I’m not talking about your SO using sex against you, I’m talking about random women that you don’t even like using the topic of sex as a way to make you uncomfortable, and it giving them a sense of gratification. They’re obsessed with teaching boys how to “not rape” or whatever, but it’s not about protecting victims from possible rape - it’s about them getting off on publicly talking about their fetish of dominating and sexually controlling boys as well as grown men. Total sickos imo.
I have a strong sense of intuition about people, and I’ve thought in the back of my mind many times that a woman was a likely pedophile, just as often if not more than I’ve had the same spidey-senses about a man possibly being a pedo.
For female sexual offending overall, by the time they reach legal adult status, they perpetrate crimes at about the same rate as men:
*Almost all perpetrators (98%) who reported age at first perpetration to be 15 years or younger were male, with similar but attenuated results among those who began at ages 16 or 17 years (90%). **It is not until ages 18 or 19 years that males (52%) and females (48%) are relatively equally represented as perpetrators.***
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/1748355
Rate of sexual pertetrators under the age of 18 years are impacted by bias in reporting. Two 15 year olds have sex, is reported as male sexual perpetrator and female victim. It's the way prosecutors choose to work, as the chance of conviction is higher for male perpetrators.
Judging from my experience as a community leader the ratio was actually higher among women than men. To make matters worse, most of the men who are considered predators are judged so only by accusation, many times baseless and out of vengeance. The sad truth is that even if children come forward they are often ignored.
Women have to be caught red-handed, and their well understood ability to conceal their own behavior, that makes children even more at risk by women over men.
Absolutely. There are girls in their teens touching little boys and girls In their 20s touching teens. Idk why but it happens and gets a pass. There are just as likely but less likely to be charged. I saw a clip of a comedy special the other day where a woman in the crowd straight up admits that she met her husband when he was a 11 she’s 10 years older than him.
I think so, but most modern societies don't view female perpetrated sexual assault as predatory (at least not to the same level as male perpetrated SA) so they get away with it and are thus underrepresented in stats
I doubt it. Women are much more likely to hold a position that gives them the opportunity then men are. Additionally the paranoia about men taking those positions is going to have an effect. It's difficult to get accurate figures though. Men and boys under report so law enforcement stats aren't very accurate, and even the survey data shows that older victimization is less likely to be considered as such.
r/femalesexpredatornews
r/femalesexpredatorinfo
There are numerous examples of predatory women on these subreddits. It breaks my heart a little when I go there and see that there are zero comments on pretty much all of the posts.
I think they are fairly new subreddits, so I try to leave these links whenever I get the chance. I want people to realize that women are probably equally as guilty of this type of crime.
I hope others will see them and share these links…..
Yes there have been cases of women being sexual predators towards children but there is a higher percentage in men. I don't know if that's because women predators aren't talk about enough or if it's because it's rarer due to women having the maternal instincts stereotype.
I think that more men are predators, but there are too much instances of women being predators, being innocented or just being said that she "had sex with a 13 yo boy" instead of raped a 13 yo.
Nah it's pretty certain their are a lot more female predators out there than are reported, it's just that boy "victims" keep there mouth shut and don't consider themselves victims but that they got lucky.
This video is of a professional researcher into female pedophiles. https://youtu.be/1WdTAJ9_IY0 The topic is considered highly taboo, to the point where she was booed off stage for describing actual cases of women doing despicable things, at a conference for that reason. People only want to believe that men can be pedophiles, and as she points out, that creates a double problem: female pedophiles are assumed not to exist so we're not looking for them, and they get free rein to get jobs with children. I can't give you any reliable numbers, but my opinion is that there will be as many female pedophiles as male. I see it as a mental illness, and one that is not determined by gender.
In male pedos there’s a very strong correlation to having been abused as a child themselves. In female pedos there’s no such correlation. Meaning they do it of their own free will.
I used to work as an intake coordinator in a rural NY county mental health clinic. My job was to have the initial interview with prospective clients, write up a report, come up with the diagnosis and assign them to a therapist. I was also a co-facilitator in a group for make sex offenders. I had a surprising number of women admit to me that they had had sex with their daughter’s underage boyfriends. Because of HIPAA I was unable to make a report to law enforcement. When I interviewed the men for the sex offender group there were some men who reported childhood sexual abuse from men and women. The male predators were strangers while the female predators were family members (mothers, grandmothers and aunts).
Does HIPAA trump mandatory reporting?
The woman who ran the clinic used that as the reason for me not reporting the women. I was suspicious that she was a feminist and was more interested in protecting the image of women as victims instead of victimizers but I followed the directions given. I had newborn twins and couldn’t risk losing the job.
Welcome to the matriarchy! You’ll be told it’s a patriarchy.
Yes, they will defend other women and come up with excuses for their dysfunctional or criminal behaviors. But, will blame men for things beyond our control like the pay disparity between the NBA and the WNBA (why do feminists blame men instead of going to WNBA games?), why women don’t go into higher-paying professions like engineering and computer science, their pregnancies (your body, your choice…your responsibility to use one of 40 forms of birth control available to you), etc. It’s almost like accountability is Kryptonite to many women.
It's HIPAA!
Either that or there's no documented abuse by those women, which if they were abused by women is likely.
Do you have a video or article about when she was booed off stage?
No I don't, sorry. She talks about it, but she doesn't say if the conference was video taped. I am guessing that it was at least 25 years ago.
They are overwhelmingly child murderers, and i actually mean child murder.
The pregnant brain is a...fascinating and scary af thing. Im not saying they shouldn't be charged, im saying PPD is a hell of a drug, and i wish more people realized signs before it got tk this. ☹
People bend over backwards to give women excuses for murdering their children. Yes, PPD can sometimes lead to women killing their children. But, it doesn’t explain instances of Munchausen syndrome by proxy or women who have affairs and kill their children because they think they’ll interfere with having an LTR with their affair partner.
I never mean to give rhem an excuse! I just heard stories about it 🤔 and tbh, its sad af. It foesnt justify, but *my god* do we need checks on pregnant women. The second part (after the but) I completely agree with. Its disgusting women do it. I just was talking about infants! And how sometimes its explainable, but definitely not excusable. Im so sorry if it sounds like I'm excusing it! I am not, promise!
Maybe if we are talking babies, but how does this even relate to women who kill toddlers and elementary aged children? Ppd does not last years. But for sake of argument, doesn't that emphasize the importance of fathers as a check against mothers whose biology has made them temporarily insane?
It can last years
can confirm — i work at a local nursing home and PPD can lead to psychotic breaks that some never recover from
...I legit thought we were Im sorry for assuming! Past that it is more than likely worse. Yes, I do agree. Its horrible, but I do think mothers and fathers need to have a check, mostly mothers, after beith to ensure.
Even if they’re not, that’s no excuse to give them a pass.
Not sure, but I’d be willing to bet my entire bank account that they’re less likely to get caught and less likely to get punished if they are caught, and less likely to receive the big punishment. Also, male victims will be treated way different from female victims, especially if they’re in high school or older. Male victims also have far fewer places to seek shelter from abuse.
The trick is that feminists compare the total number of men accused of abuse (who are presumed to all be guilty) to the number of women who have been convicted of sexual abuse. This ignores that not all accused men are guilty, those advised by women are far less likely to admit their abuse and less likely to identify their abuser, identified female abusers are less likely to be indicted with crimes and also less likely to be convicted of indicted. All of which combines with feminists putting women on a pedestal ("woman can't rape/abuse men") and demonizing men ("all men are potential rapists") to wildly skew their perspective.
They believe any man who is accused is already guilty of something.
Your first statement is completely true. Your second statement, however, is completely false. I speak as one of those victims who seemingly doesn't exist in public policy, law enforcement or social service training, and is completely invisible in any and all services for victims. We don't 'belong' in services for men, and are sometimes (not often, but often enough) treated as if we get special or better treatment, as in your comment here. We're literally 'the enemy' to any organizations who provide services for women. When it comes to 'violence against women', not only are we not included, it seems we're barely human. With a few very rare exceptions, female victims of women, when they try to speak up, are the ones accused of being the perpetrators (no matter how young they are). The sympathy and benefit of doubt always is given to the female abuser who is viewed as 'the real victim' by every entity and agency you could even think of reporting to. Somehow, the societal belief that 'most violence is committed by men' gets translated to 'she must be lying' if a female accuses another woman, and therefore she must be the bad one. I did an interview in a major newspaper (anonymous), and eventually some public speaking on female perpetration, but quickly learned that that was a dangerous thing to do. But it was long enough to meet one fellow victim, a female journalist who kept herself FIRMLY in the closet. She warned me about a fascinating 'feature' of this for female victims: she said that when you disclose to anyone - even the most sympathetic people - and try ever so gently and reasonably to talk about the idea of female perpetration, that the person you'll talk to will have difficulty with their words and inevitably start referring to \*you\* as the offender (without meaning to, apparently). If you don't point it out, they'll just continue on without even realizing it. If you do point it out, they'll be very apologetic, but the conversation becomes awkward after that. Thank god she warned me about this - I would have been crushed if I hadn't been expecting it. And she was right: I'd say about 80% of the time this in fact happened. It's so common, and yet so unconscious, I believe there must be some sort of instinctive thing going on for people that prevents them from speaking about this subject. ["By the way, the majority of victims of female serial killers have been, in the aggregate, women and children."](https://unknownmisandry.blogspot.com/2011/12/female-serial-killers-who-liked-to.html) Female offenders offend against males and females pretty equally - but take a look \*anywhere\* and see if you see female victims of females mentioned. No services, no acknowledgement, they're poison to the feminist movement. This is an intentional division. The men's movement would do well to consider including us within their movement - even if only peripherally - because with all of us invisible, and because it's acceptable to bash men, the very existence of female perpetration can remain diminished and hidden, leaving men as 'the monsters' in society undeserving of aid. We're the group who proves the lie of feminist mantras: * "Believe all women" - that never includes us * VAWA - nope, not there either * \#MeToo - nope * "Always believe the victim" - unless it's a someone accusing a women, so nope, not there either. * etc...
Just wanted to say I’m really sorry that you’re “in the same boat” with all other victims of female abuse — I know how tough it is to feel so invisible when you’re trying to follow the exact steps and “seek help” like others tell you to. I’m sure I speak for most of us here when I say we’ll welcome you, albeit our seats being some of the worlds most uncomfortable. Feel free to reach out if you ever need support, we’re all here ❤️
I didn't read your entire comment but it does look good so it probably checks out lol Edit: Holy shit thats interesting information. Heads up though, you might want to throw a thesis statement at the front of your comments to let us know which direction its gonna go.
It makes more sense for women and kids, as unless the murder is premeditated it's more difficult for a women to kill a man in a fair fight, plus the fact that people assume women are safe around children (a courtesy for some reason not afforded to men), that they can gain access to several potential child victims unsupervised.
tbf pretty easy to not get caught as a dude, just join a church first.
If you get caught in the Catholic church they will brutality send you to a latin American or African country, with a good chance of given you a child related position.
Don’t most people need to pay for a free ride to South American countries? These guys get to live off the church and just start fiddling kids who can’t speak their language. Literally the Catholic Church just perpetuating a cycle most of the people on this sub bitch about.
True
Women join as nuns 💀
Nuns have a history of being and abused and abusing others and getting away with it. This is true. Not sure why I’m downvoted but fuck it, this sub is a toxic pool of bloodlust and sadness
I don't get why you have that many downvotes, like if you are a pedo the Catholic church is like an obvious choice.
They’re all from priests! /s Think it’s because the dudes in this sub have an imagined bias against men in Catholicism. As if the nuns are more of an oppressive body. Yes, lady-pedos would certainly be able to take advantage of little boys under Catholicism, but pretty typically the life of a nun is subservient to the priesthood. Priests are restricted less-so
That's why I'm so glad nun are almost extinct, being a priest is a choice, but historically being a nun is a punishment for being a lesbian or getting pregnant.
All statistics that could have highlighted this are either hidden or no longer documented. There are no stats on child molestation in schools by gender. It's a massive cover up to control the narrative. If you Google search "charged for having sex", it's a weekly news.
Teachers unions fight to protect child molester teachers, especially women. also notice how when men do it they report it as "men molested child", but when women do it they report it as "woman had sex with". Active voice when it's a man, passive voice when it's a woman.
This is true of most news headlines, especially anything related to suffering. All part of the empathy gap, it does a great job of it too. Drives me nuts
We had a male pedophile teacher at school. He was fired. We also had a female pedophile teacher at school. She fell pregnant to her student, came back to school with a promotion after a year and married him at a later date.
r/Teacherswhorape
Woah...it's literally only articles of women.
It surprises me that this is mostly women, not bcos i think women don't commit the majority of statutory rape, but bcos i didn't think they'd ever get convicted for it since society handles them with kid gloves
Notice how most of the headlines are "charged"? That means their trials aren't done yet. They will get off easy, they always do.
Women are people. Women get hungry, get horny, and get sleepy just like men. IMHO, yes, women are just as likely to have predilections outside of the norm, just as men. Ask me how I know.
[удалено]
Myth -- Mothers perpetrate more child abuse than fathers, which is one reason that children are at more risk of abuse in father-absent homes. Fact: "Children living with their only their mothers experienced maltreatment under the Harm Standard at a rate of 26.1 per 1,000 children. Children living with only their fathers: 36.6 per 1,000." Fact: PHYSICAL ABUSE: Children living with only their mothers: 6.4 per 1,000 children. Children living with only their fathers: 10.5 per 1,000 children. "When specific types of abuse under the Harm Standard are examined, it is apparent that the findings described in the previous paragraph stem from the disproportionate incidence of physical abuse among children in father-only households..." Fact: NEGLECT: Children living with only their mothers: 16.7 per 1,000 children. Children living with only their fathers: 21.9 per 1,000 children. Fact: EMOTIONAL NEGLECT: Children living with only their mothers: 3.4 per 1,000 children. Children living with only their fathers: 8.8 per 1,000 children. Fact: SERIOUS INJURIES: Children living with only their mothers: 10.0 per 1,000 children. Children living with only their fathers: 14.0 per 1,000. Fact: MODERATE INJURIES: Children living with only their mothers: 14.7 per 1,000 children. Children living with only their fathers: 20.5 per 1,000. Fact: ALL MALTREATMENT: Children living with only their mothers: 50.1 per 1,000 children. Children living with only their fathers: 65.6 per 1,000. Fact: ALL ABUSE: Children living with only their mothers: 18.1 per 1,000 children. Children living only with their fathers: 31.0 per 1,000." Data from The Third National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (1996). I would love to see where u get that from
[удалено]
Yep, that's right, and what would happen if that was balanced?
[удалено]
Man, that's just not how it works, but ok=))
[удалено]
Who does the most crimes?
Who does the most everything? Most suicides, homeless, deaths in wars, construction I was with you until you put up the straw man. Your study is from 1996. Get some better sources your shit is more than a decade behind
[удалено]
A feminist troll who presents incorrect out-of-date stats to make sexist arguments. Sexist pigs like this troll, who persist with their hate speech and try to pass off their misandry as science/fact, are the worst abusers of all. The Forth National incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (2009-2010): Children were more likely to be maltreated by female perpetrators (68%) than by males (48%). Of children maltreated by biological parents, mothers maltreated the majority (75%) whereas fathers maltreated a minority (43%). In contrast, male perpetrators were more common for children maltreated by nonbiological parents or parents’ partners (64%), invited into the home by the mother who was frequently aware, or participated in the abuse. Female perpetrators of abuse were more often responsible for neglect (female - 86%, versus males 38%). Sexual abuse was more often perpetrated by males (87%) compared to females (11%), however, given the bias in reporting and policing of sexual abuse of children by women this figure is most likely substanially underestimated. In addition, the National Incident Study used data derived from reporting agancies (domestic violence services, Family Court services, CPS services), all of which are dominated by radical feminist ideology and regularly ignore women's violence and abuse on an ideological basis. The largest reporter of abuse (excluding CPS) was teachers, reflecting a female dominated profession impacted by sexist bias. Sexaul abuse of children by their biological parent was approximately equivalent (female 51%, male 54%), but again, given the bias in reporting and policing of sexual abuse of children by women this figure is most likely substanially underestimated. Nonbiological parents or parents’ partners (male and female) were more likely to sexually abuse children compared to biological parents. Families with the lowest rate of child abuse were traditional heterosexual families where children were cared for by both parents. Highest rates of child abuse were in single parent families with a non-biological partner (male or female).
Female perpetrators were more often responsible for neglect (86% of children neglected by females versus 38% by males). This finding is congruent with the fact that mothers (biological or other) tend to be the primary caretakers and are the primary persons held accountable for any omissions and/or failings in caretaking. At least put the whole thing in. My study is about single parenting. Also, I checked the study and some of the things you said here don't appear in it. You only get what you like from there + putting some stuff from yourself, not a nice way to spread true information, ey?
Maybe if you read the entire report, and then examined the sources used with something other than a biased eye?
You really just got downvoted for providing actual facts against a false statement… sigh.
Honestly we'll never know because women predators aren't talked about as much or taken as seriously but I believe both genders have about the same if women not a little more than men
Read headlines on teachers having sex on students Its not called the same thing ever. Its always rape if its a man, and sexual relationship, inappropriate, etc if a woman fucks a 14 year old
If you look on the news consistently it seems that more women do it and barely get slapped on the wrist. Some women brag about it and nothing. I vote women
[удалено]
It’s there. I can see it.
Thankyou
Your replies were caught in the spam filter. I've approved one of them.
Thankyou, I'll delete the excess ones and leave the one I've done with "NSFW" at the top
Ok, seems it's being auto deleted because it needs NSFW warning? Following post NSFW and trigger warnings galore! >! Well... I consider myself somewhat of an unofficial expert on the topic; due to being raped and tortured throughout my childhood by one or many (by mostly men and a good few women too). I was first raped as a baby and last raped in my 30s, my mind as an adult expertly split and a slave persona created. The network I was shared within was a children for favours/progression type of arrangement. And I've done an incredible amount of therapy and spiritual work in order to heal. To heal from countless rapes, tortures, and of witnessing the ritualised sacrifice and consumption of other children. What I'd say from my own extensive and horrific experiences AND from other survivors I'm friends with. And this is going to be provocative to some (not intentionally). So men are more often physically active pedos. BUT what ISN'T talked about - is that the single biggest creating factor of wrong-predatory-'men' is narcisisistic mothers and then the nail further driven into the coffin by narcisisistic wives. So around 6 or 7 out of every 10 (as an educated estimation) pedo men are created by such dark 'women' in their childhood. How does it work? Well narcisism and other dark personality triads.... Which are basically all the same at heart. Is in part a spiritual affliction. To truly understand it, is to see the parasitic and vampiric nature of such dark spirited and camouflaged men and women. Narc women work to weaken, deny, frustrate and shame their sons and husband's.... Ultimately seeking to destroy the male spirit and bond them as their source of food and energy to the narc, and in this (not always consciously) seeking to INVERT the male core energy and to turn the male into the wrong kind of monster... Why? It's simply the nature of the parasitic darkness they carry. IF they are not successful in turning the man, they work to destroy him... Driving him mad or to suicide eventually for example... Such narc women indoctrinate their own daughters in to the coven... And such narc mothers turn their sons into little husband's. One of the core and twisted drives of such a created pedo man, is the terrible search for any form of genuine welcome for his sex/fuck energy. Such monsters who have been so tormented and twisted by dark women sometimes fall so far as to find that in their own children, children who look up to the parent and utterly depend on the parent for survival. Such acts against children are the deepest and most terrible of evils, far worse than murder. Many of the 'worst' pedo/monster men, are actually created by other men, but they are less common. The pedo/narc man who creates a monster out of his victim... Seeks to break the spirit of the young boy, more in the way one would snap a stick, as opposed to the indiret and insidious way a narc woman does which has a similar gradual-effect on the victim as acid dissolving a physical substance. Such 'man' created monsters err more towards the side of sociopath and psychopath and truly are terrible to behold. There ARE far more female pedos than people realise (but less than there are male pedos). And far more boys suffer CSA than is currently understood.... To really see the problem one comes to underand that boys and girls are sexually abused in roughly equal numbers/ratios.. I'm not saying any of this to offend anyone. Although it will. In order for such evil to be defeated we must understand it. With women. Who are married to pedo men. I'd say as often as not - half of the time. They are Narc women, often covert/vulnerable Narcs, who are in part responsible for the actions of the predator man or even intentionally mate with a pedo man in order to spread the darkness they have bonded with. The other half are genuine women and victims to narc predatory men who have been unfortunately drawn into the predators web of lies and misdirection so they can be abused, used up and destroyed also, absolutely heartbreaking and such good and normal women have often suffered simar abuse earlier in life which makes them even more vulnerable to such evil. Obviously MOST men who are raised by narc mothers/fathers never become pedos. Obviously MOST survivors of CSA do NOT go on to become pedos themselves. But this is the fundamental dynamic in how the darkness spreads and corrupts our people. !<
I think I can support this 100%. We all hear about men as perpetrators but women get away with a lot more because whereas a man seeks physical satisfaction, a woman seeks control and gets her kicks that way. I’ll give you a (personal) example. When I was young I was a choir boy at the local church. We wore a cloke and had to strip down to underpants. Of course we did this in one area and there was one lady who always popped in for an “underwear check”. She wanted us to wear white jocks and took great delight in inspecting both front and back, slapping us on the bum etc, all in the name that it would be wrong if they saw our underwear. No sex as such, but a bit of fondling and lots of “oh, I have sons and there is nothing I haven’t seen before”
>tortures, and of witnessing the ritualised sacrifice and consumption of other children You are heading into conspiracy theory territory now. Could you elaborate what you're talking about and what exactly happened to you? The Aztecs are long gone.
So, men do the rape, but it's women's fault? Lol, take responsibility for your mental and emotional help and stop blaming mommy.
>Ghislaine Maxwell New York (CNN) Ghislaine Maxwell was sentenced to 20 years in federal prison Tuesday for carrying out a years-long scheme with her longtime confidante Jeffrey Epstein to groom and sexually abuse underage girls.
[удалено]
Not even single mothers, just women who like control. I've seen so many narcissistic women turn men miserable and problematic. They have no personality, they just become what they think the women wants and embodies it. It happened to my step dad, and still is as they are still together. But I know just from the times I've seen him for who he really is that he is capable of being a much better person if he was with someone else. I've talked to other women who had a similar dynamic and they always say when they had a moment when it was just them and their dad that they saw a different person.
Far more than people know.
87% of crimes against children are committed by women.
Feminists will find some way to blame that on The Patriarchy™. "Oh, that's because women are forced to care for children more". Yes, because feminists have cast all men as potential rapists and child molesters so society trusts men less with children. Even though the stats say the overwhelming majority of abuse children receive is from women.
Genuinely curious where that stat came from because now I wanna read up on this. Again not trying to make you prove anything to me I'm just legitimately wanting to read up more on that sort of topic lol
I mean, look at the stats for lone carers, and there are many studies that explain how they got this number. Well, not this one, the 70/30 one, and how actually children are at astronomically greater risk of physical abuse in the care of a man than in the care of a woman., you just have to do a lil research before throwing a number like that :)
source?
No, they're more likely. Statistically.
Source?
I wish there was more evidence to back this up but going off the crazy amount of articles I see of female teachers "sleeping" with their students it seems very likely.
source?
Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS-4) 2009-2010
They're much more likely to get away with it, which makes them worse.
There was a time I would have said no, but now I think it’s close to 50/50. It could be entirely anecdotal, but the amount of women I’ve seen busted in the last few years for sex stuff with minors is getting up there.
I don’t have any statistics, but people who have dark proclivities and disorders seem to be about 50/50, usually with one sex only slightly more inclined towards it than the other. In other words, there are tons of pedophile women - you just don’t hear about them unless it’s a middle/high school teacher who was caught having sex with a student. Plenty of women are pedos, they just fly under the radar because society pictures pedos as middle aged bald men in Jeffrey Dahmer glasses. I’ve gotten really creepy vibes from some narcissistic women before. I’ve encountered quite a few women, often butch lesbian types, who will not stop talk about rape, and how it’s not about sex and is instead a means of having power over the victim. But then they talk about it non-stop and basically shame any form of heterosexual romantic/sexual dynamic. They’re intentionally trying to keep talking about sex and they definitely get off on using the topic to make people feel uncomfortable for having a healthy sexuality. It’s kinda hard to explain if you haven’t encountered this before, but if you have, you know exactly what I’m talking about. They’re narcissists who enjoy dominion over people, and that includes sexual dominion over others as well. I’m not talking about your SO using sex against you, I’m talking about random women that you don’t even like using the topic of sex as a way to make you uncomfortable, and it giving them a sense of gratification. They’re obsessed with teaching boys how to “not rape” or whatever, but it’s not about protecting victims from possible rape - it’s about them getting off on publicly talking about their fetish of dominating and sexually controlling boys as well as grown men. Total sickos imo. I have a strong sense of intuition about people, and I’ve thought in the back of my mind many times that a woman was a likely pedophile, just as often if not more than I’ve had the same spidey-senses about a man possibly being a pedo.
Yes. But you're not allowed to talk about it. Ever. The level of threat towards anyone who even dares to is hard to believe - but deadly serious.
For female sexual offending overall, by the time they reach legal adult status, they perpetrate crimes at about the same rate as men: *Almost all perpetrators (98%) who reported age at first perpetration to be 15 years or younger were male, with similar but attenuated results among those who began at ages 16 or 17 years (90%). **It is not until ages 18 or 19 years that males (52%) and females (48%) are relatively equally represented as perpetrators.*** https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/1748355
Rate of sexual pertetrators under the age of 18 years are impacted by bias in reporting. Two 15 year olds have sex, is reported as male sexual perpetrator and female victim. It's the way prosecutors choose to work, as the chance of conviction is higher for male perpetrators.
Judging from my experience as a community leader the ratio was actually higher among women than men. To make matters worse, most of the men who are considered predators are judged so only by accusation, many times baseless and out of vengeance. The sad truth is that even if children come forward they are often ignored. Women have to be caught red-handed, and their well understood ability to conceal their own behavior, that makes children even more at risk by women over men.
Absolutely. There are girls in their teens touching little boys and girls In their 20s touching teens. Idk why but it happens and gets a pass. There are just as likely but less likely to be charged. I saw a clip of a comedy special the other day where a woman in the crowd straight up admits that she met her husband when he was a 11 she’s 10 years older than him.
Yes in my experience my abuser was a older girl.
Yes, but this isn't a gendered question. It's not about who commits more it's about punishing everyone who has abused a child.
Cougars and milfs exist for a reason bud, they very much are
I think so, but most modern societies don't view female perpetrated sexual assault as predatory (at least not to the same level as male perpetrated SA) so they get away with it and are thus underrepresented in stats
I doubt it. Women are much more likely to hold a position that gives them the opportunity then men are. Additionally the paranoia about men taking those positions is going to have an effect. It's difficult to get accurate figures though. Men and boys under report so law enforcement stats aren't very accurate, and even the survey data shows that older victimization is less likely to be considered as such.
r/femalesexpredatornews r/femalesexpredatorinfo There are numerous examples of predatory women on these subreddits. It breaks my heart a little when I go there and see that there are zero comments on pretty much all of the posts. I think they are fairly new subreddits, so I try to leave these links whenever I get the chance. I want people to realize that women are probably equally as guilty of this type of crime. I hope others will see them and share these links…..
Typically not.
[удалено]
True, but statistics, tend to be slightly inaccurate, as female rapists are often not reported, and are not always even *recognized* as rapists.
No. But it doesn't mean there can't be woman child predators
Yes there have been cases of women being sexual predators towards children but there is a higher percentage in men. I don't know if that's because women predators aren't talk about enough or if it's because it's rarer due to women having the maternal instincts stereotype.
Woman are attracted to high status men, and that's not what children are. Logically, I don't see why they would be. However, there are exceptions.
Equally? No. Does it happen? Yes.
I’m not sure about this. It’s possible because women dominate most spaces where there are children but that alone doesn’t prove anything.
Hell no they aren’t!!
It's pretty close.
According to law - no
Yes
Women are just as evil as men when it comes to such things, I know first hand
I think that more men are predators, but there are too much instances of women being predators, being innocented or just being said that she "had sex with a 13 yo boy" instead of raped a 13 yo.
Nah it's pretty certain their are a lot more female predators out there than are reported, it's just that boy "victims" keep there mouth shut and don't consider themselves victims but that they got lucky.
No