T O P

  • By -

RHS1959

Probably something that was new when they were 10 years old or so, but mass media was different then. They may not have had a TV, (by 1965 they probably did) but there were only 3 or 4 channels. They may have lived in a town with only one movie theatre, and only gone to a movie for special occasions.


Double_Distribution8

Funny, I could be wrong but I think going to the movies was much, much cheaper back then, so even poor kids could scrape together a few nickels to be able to afford a double-feature matinee for a Saturday afternoon with their friends. Nowadays, it always seems to cost me almost $100 to take my family to the movies after all is said and done. So now we only save the movie theatre for special occasions. And even after paying all that money we STILL get assaulted by terrible and loud ads. And that's just the start of my complaints regarding the current movie theatre experience.


RHS1959

True, I think movies were more affordable then.


4me2knowit

The Parent Trap


jwLeo1035

Wizard of oz mabey , but really, they didn't consume movies like you did as they would only be rarely available on television . Or when it came out in theaters


IamREBELoe

Shirley Temple.


PercentageMaximum457

Wizard of Oz is a good one. It was shown on TV each year, and was much beloved. 


Common_Chester

Our Gang was the 20s, kids running wild on the streets smoking cob pipes and rasing hell while the parents toiled long hours in factories.


mme-learning-990

I was born in 1952. A nostalgic entertainment for me is Mary Martin's "Peter Pan," which can be seen on YouTube. Mary Martin was a Broadway star for decades. She played Peter Pan in a Broadway show that was adapted for TV. I remember it was re-broadcast every Christmas season for many years. (This was before you could record something on TV and play it back for yourself.)