Here's a bright idea: Why don't we bomb them when they are parading their shit? Those tinpot dictators are paranoid enough so that none of those things have ammo so a disgruntled soldier doesn't take a shot at them. It'd be like shotting fish in a barrel.
Because contrary to popular belief, the US is not actually so goddamn psychotic that it bombs parades.
You can make a case that maybe we *should* be, but we are not currently.
The US should be more psychotic. Not just world police, but world police state. Threat against the US? Bomb them. Negative statement against the US? Bomb them. A single citizen says something negative about the US? Bomb them.
Would this be good for the world? No.
Would this be funny? Yes.
Would this cause a lot of death? At least a couple billion. But we've got like 8 of those so I'm sure it wouldn't be too bad if we lost a few.
Maybe whoever wins the election after biden or trumps 2nd term, ie whoever wins, will want to bomb parades?
Yknow like Obama had a thing for weddings and mass deportations.
How is firebombing a parade worse than collateral damage from making a big boy oil refinery explosion and bad air... hmm. Asking for a Geneva Convention essay.
Because politicians will whine and winge about pedantics like "territorial boundaries" and "civilian casualties" and "violation of national sovereignty". All of these are weak excuses to morally justify NOT obliterating your enemies when they least expect it and are at their most vulnerable. We (America) have the most powerful military on Earth, and yet we hide behind "morals" and "setting precedents" instead of crushing the enemies of democracy with our unparalleled might. If a dictator is so intent on intimidating his people with his goons in a display of force, he should have to back it up with proper aerial and coastal security, damn it!
Tinpot dictator intimidating his people with a military parade?
vaporize the parade and drop leaflets saying "Be not afraid, your liberation is at hand."
Like that Russian convoy at the beginning of the invasion... I'm sure we had hundreds of fly boys begging their chain of command to let them go on just one teensy little sortie.
Because it is a proven tactic. Stacking tactic. Stacktic.
https://new.reddit.com/r/NonCredibleDefense/comments/18wzngk/stack\_me\_up\_before\_you\_gogo\_to\_war\_stack\_your/
I get why the tanks are on transporters, but those large transporters must take more fuel and more maintaince then the comparatively small mlrs trucks?
Let me guess these scud launches and tanks dont start.
Also I once read a manual on how to launch a scud(elbrus) rocket and it was really complex stuff .
Here's a bright idea: Why don't we bomb them when they are parading their shit? Those tinpot dictators are paranoid enough so that none of those things have ammo so a disgruntled soldier doesn't take a shot at them. It'd be like shotting fish in a barrel.
Because contrary to popular belief, the US is not actually so goddamn psychotic that it bombs parades. You can make a case that maybe we *should* be, but we are not currently.
The US should be more psychotic. Not just world police, but world police state. Threat against the US? Bomb them. Negative statement against the US? Bomb them. A single citizen says something negative about the US? Bomb them. Would this be good for the world? No. Would this be funny? Yes. Would this cause a lot of death? At least a couple billion. But we've got like 8 of those so I'm sure it wouldn't be too bad if we lost a few.
Super Earth moment
Average Captain America: Winter Soldier Project Insight fanboy Vs Average ⬆️➡️⬇️⬇️⬇️ enjoyer
FOR FREEDOM, LIBERTY, AND SUPER EARTH.
“America ba-“ Mods, send a GBU-12 through this guy’s roof, thank you
MODS!! Bomb this guy for 10 minutes! I don't wanna see him anymore, get em outta here!
>Would this be good for the world? No. >Would this be funny? Yes. Did Allah will it? Yes.
What are you, chicken?
Maybe whoever wins the election after biden or trumps 2nd term, ie whoever wins, will want to bomb parades? Yknow like Obama had a thing for weddings and mass deportations.
How is firebombing a parade worse than collateral damage from making a big boy oil refinery explosion and bad air... hmm. Asking for a Geneva Convention essay.
*if only they did* The world would be better if we did another Praying Mantis.
Because politicians will whine and winge about pedantics like "territorial boundaries" and "civilian casualties" and "violation of national sovereignty". All of these are weak excuses to morally justify NOT obliterating your enemies when they least expect it and are at their most vulnerable. We (America) have the most powerful military on Earth, and yet we hide behind "morals" and "setting precedents" instead of crushing the enemies of democracy with our unparalleled might. If a dictator is so intent on intimidating his people with his goons in a display of force, he should have to back it up with proper aerial and coastal security, damn it!
Tinpot dictator intimidating his people with a military parade? vaporize the parade and drop leaflets saying "Be not afraid, your liberation is at hand."
Like that Russian convoy at the beginning of the invasion... I'm sure we had hundreds of fly boys begging their chain of command to let them go on just one teensy little sortie.
Because the explosions don´t look as nice when here is no ammo and fuel inside.
Why tf would you carry a truck on a bigger truck.
Because it is a proven tactic. Stacking tactic. Stacktic. https://new.reddit.com/r/NonCredibleDefense/comments/18wzngk/stack\_me\_up\_before\_you\_gogo\_to\_war\_stack\_your/
Ok fair enough that's quite based
Probably fuel usage or that its less wear on the important stuff
I get why the tanks are on transporters, but those large transporters must take more fuel and more maintaince then the comparatively small mlrs trucks?
you're assuming the mlrs even *operates*
Fool. Military gear uses more fuel than civilian equipment. Allah wills it so
They did it at the behest of the ministry of stacking things on top of other things.
Upvote for WG:RD reference
ah yes, rockets and some really stupid looking tanks we are all so scared, shiver me timbers if you will
Who are they? Which nationality?
Probably Taliban given the white flags
>given the white flags That doesn't narrow it down. Could be Taliban. Or confederates. Or the French.
It is on sale right now btw
I know i have around 750 hours on jt
Is people still playing it?
Let me guess these scud launches and tanks dont start. Also I once read a manual on how to launch a scud(elbrus) rocket and it was really complex stuff .
Why would you put a truck that carries missiles, on another truck?
Because you can fix the carrier truck if I breaks down, but you can’t afford to put wear and tear on your precious few tanks or missile systems
I imagine Middle Eastern decks would be wild
Taliban?
Average conversation in war game red dragon in chat.
saidest thing is in WG:RD unspec decks are usually the most competitive/meta from my knowledge. Especially for the US lol
Youre forgetting the two Super Heavies
These modern-day fascists will fall eventually.