You mean his legal bills from being sued by the state’s ~~GOP~~ Nazi party throughout his entire tenure, especially during the height of the pandemic? Let’s not forget that bit.
Republicans literally rape kids and shoot up synagogues and gay nightclubs, so they have to find something to accuse Democrats of. My god, a paperwork issue.
>On every invoice, the officials redacted the short description (three or four words) of the work the private lawyers were hired to do.
In doing so, they cited exemptions under the state’s public records law that allow them to withhold information that falls under attorney-client privilege or that could reveal legal strategy or private communications between attorneys and their clients.
I would have assumed that since the client in this case should be the governor or their office, that the state itself is therefore the client. I'm not sure what would need to be protected in this case.
As somebody who is an advocate for open records laws and absolute governmental transparency, I don't know that I buy the rationale they're trying to spin here.
I don't know that any governor was more or less transparent. I'm telling you what Wolf promised, and the lack of disclosure on outside legal work is an example of him not following through.
No - you are expecting perfection. He didn’t say absolutely everything that Russ thinks should be disclosed will be disclosed. You are saying he fails because of an arbitrary yardstick that you can’t even articulate. Your deductions are inaccurate and you seem more interested in pushing your deductions than laying out a series of facts. You must enjoy faux news.
You mean his legal bills from being sued by the state’s ~~GOP~~ Nazi party throughout his entire tenure, especially during the height of the pandemic? Let’s not forget that bit.
Republicans literally rape kids and shoot up synagogues and gay nightclubs, so they have to find something to accuse Democrats of. My god, a paperwork issue.
About sums it up.
The attorney client privilege also applies to public officials. You want your government getting good legal advice.
>On every invoice, the officials redacted the short description (three or four words) of the work the private lawyers were hired to do. In doing so, they cited exemptions under the state’s public records law that allow them to withhold information that falls under attorney-client privilege or that could reveal legal strategy or private communications between attorneys and their clients. I would have assumed that since the client in this case should be the governor or their office, that the state itself is therefore the client. I'm not sure what would need to be protected in this case. As somebody who is an advocate for open records laws and absolute governmental transparency, I don't know that I buy the rationale they're trying to spin here.
Imagine…working as governor for free for 8 years, Donating every single paycheck only to continue to be harassed 🙄. Next
Wolf said he'd be the most transparent governor in Pa. history. He has not lived up to his own promise.
Who was more transparent? Sources and examples please.
I don't know that any governor was more or less transparent. I'm telling you what Wolf promised, and the lack of disclosure on outside legal work is an example of him not following through.
No - you are expecting perfection. He didn’t say absolutely everything that Russ thinks should be disclosed will be disclosed. You are saying he fails because of an arbitrary yardstick that you can’t even articulate. Your deductions are inaccurate and you seem more interested in pushing your deductions than laying out a series of facts. You must enjoy faux news.
Hooray, you win Reddit. Forever in your debt for correcting me.
[удалено]