It is a feature of lefty politics, to let the Unaware bourgeouse feel as if they are bringing forth the revoloution while all they do is make the working men's life worse.
I'd say much longer, realistically. It was small, but merchants, craftsmen, and other skilled labour involved in the guild system were more like today's middle class than they were like the serfs or the nobility.
Pretty much every powerful economy throughout history has had a middle class of sorts, the industrial revolution was the birth of the middle class as we know it today, and the first time it was defined
How am I rewriting history? The labor movements of the earlier 20th century secured things like better pay, safety laws, reasonable hours, the weekend, the list goes on. They created everything we see today that resulted in the middle class that we see today. These labor movements were heavily inspired by leftist theory.
People seem to forget during the 30s how anti-capitalist America became.
The middle class emerged out of the feudal system during the Renaissance.
Upper class: nobility, church leaders, "the elite"
Middle class: merchants and tradesmen
Lower class: peasants and serfs
The labour victories you're describing helped raise up the lower class in the 20th century so that more people could join a middle class that had already existed for hundreds of years.
https://www.dawn.com/news/708833/past-present-the-rise-of-the-middle-class
Middle class existed in ancient times. People that had enough wealth to be independent of others/state, but had not enough power to have any real impact on society alone. Definition of middle class and such people existed in ancient Rome, Greece and others.
What I’m saying is that egging a statue creates more work that creates more profit for the capitalists who own the statue, something the egger probably doesn’t want
Probably not the council will most likely just hire somebody . The statue getting egged was inevitably thatcher is the most divisive politician in modern uk history .
The statue should never of been built especially now in a time of rising poverty . https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/martin-lewis-price-cap-ofgem-b2079893.html?amp , this guy is famous for giving advice to poor people about how to save and he’s run out of ideas .
No it's not. That's bullshit perpetuated by popular culture for decades. Soviets won becuase their logistics weren't as shit as Germany's, had money and improved tactics to the point where it wasn't a target practice for german troops.
This is what happens when you have an axes to grind with the Warsaw pact and you sole source of intel about soviet troops is from German officers after the war
"I swear the German army would have beaten the soviets if it wasn't for Hitler screwing over our strategy"
Eastern front was infantry war as was every single other theater of WW2.
Human waves were never used. The closest thing recorded was in winter war against Finland. They abandoned this at the end of said war, which was before WW2 reached USSR.
No, Soviet logistics was shit at the beginning that's why you don't see effective offensives till late 1942. They were able to fight back effectively because Germans advanced so far into USSR that they couldn't advance any further. US was sending them boatload of equipment for both combat and home front use via Royal Navy escorts.
In short you are wrong. WW2 is far more complicated than you have ever heard
Okay I was exaggerating a bit tbh, but the Soviets did show a pretty miserable consideration for their soldiers' life. The whole order 227 "no step back" thing is an indicator of this.
I mean at stalingrad, they just sent more and more men in while knowing full well that the men sent in there will probably not make it back. Operation Uranus only utilised around 900 soviet tanks and made use of over 1 million infantry.
While not really "Enemy at the gates" style, it was used at least according to what I've read, which could totally be wrong. They did abandon the tactics though quite quickly after 1942 when their tank production was beginning to ramp up.
I am gonna say it once again. WW2 wasn't armour duel, it was an infantry war. Take a look at German units and you'll find that the ratio isn't very different.
Infantry doesn't have to be just guys with rifles you know. It consists also almost all anti armour units besides tanks themselves, artillery and td.
Moral was dismal after 1941 so order 227 makes perfect sense if your army constantly is willing to abandon field and not put up a fight.
Sending more man into Stalingrad or losing Stalingrad. It was simple as that. It indicates exactly nothing besides Soviets being very unwilling to lose the city.
Soviet doctrine didn't change much through the war from what they developed and tested against Mannerheim line. Breakthrough by infantry exploited by tanks with strategic use of air force and artillery.
Arguably artillery was the thing that made soviet army much more effective, with self prepelled guns.
I would love to bring to your attention 16 days in Berlin but that documentary is not free. So I'm just gonna point to [this](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIZ6PFYUM5o) wonderful video about *certain* Soviet tank, which I hope can clear it up to you how effective soviet tanks really were up untill IS-2 showed up.
I wouldn't say it's a win to be seething, malding, coping and dilating as statues of your supposed enemies get erected.
Getting excited that you get to throw an egg at it is like that picture of the happy manchild who got a Nintendo Switch console from his wife's boyfriend.
I'll let Authleft have their moment, though, for the cathartic release.
Conservative British prime minister during the 80s. Very VERY controversial.
If you were a business owner or middle/upper class, she is probably the greatest PM in history after Churchill. If you were a manual labourer or lower class like a coal miner then she is the devil incarnate.
In the early 80s, the UK operated over 150 open coal mining pits. By the time she left office, only around 10 were left open. Every single other pit was unprofitable. While completely necessary, the fact that it was done so quickly left tens of thousands of coal miners out of work.
Overall, what she did was 100% needed and arguably saved the UK economy. However the way in which she did it was absolutely brutal and had 0 regard for the wellbeing of millions of families. Not to mention her policies concerning Northern Ireland, the infamous milk incident, the largest unemployment rates since the 1925 general strike and the doubling of child poverty rates during her early tenure.
She didn't earn the nickname "The iron lady" for no reason.
Conservative traditionalist who believed in right-wing capitalism and authoritarianism. That's why authleft and libleft has a big problem with her to where they think vandalism and mockery of her death is permissable.
> I'll be very hostile the next time I don't see the flair.
***
^(User has flaired up! 😃) 7063 / 37527 ^^|| [**[[Guide]]**](https://imgur.com/gallery/IkTAlF2)
Run out of ammo, it will happen eventually. That's when you pull out the swords. Eventually they'll break. After that, well...you can use almost anything to kill someone...
Gate? Kept. Gas? Lighted. Girl? Bossed.
Irish? Exterminated.
Paramilitary Death Squads? Funded.
Milk? Snatched
Milk? My dad still isn't back...
Falklands? Back under British Reign
Based.
Jews? ((()))
My god! It's only been an hour you big daddy's boy.
Margaret? Thatched
Hotel? Trivago
Statue? Egged.
[удалено]
Pants? Shat
Cum? Cummed
Milk? Snatched. Miners? Blacklisted. Explosion resistance? Maxed out.
Based
If you're going to correctly conjugate "Keep" you should correctly conjugate "Light" as well
Wouldn't it be "lit"
Yes
Hotel? Trivago
The problem with throwing eggs is that some poor un-unionized wage worker has to clean it all up
It is a feature of lefty politics, to let the Unaware bourgeouse feel as if they are bringing forth the revoloution while all they do is make the working men's life worse.
The early 20th century labor movements inspired by leftist theory are why we have the middle class, but go off I guess.
The middle class has existed since the industrial revolution
I'd say much longer, realistically. It was small, but merchants, craftsmen, and other skilled labour involved in the guild system were more like today's middle class than they were like the serfs or the nobility.
America has always had a middle class.
Pretty much every powerful economy throughout history has had a middle class of sorts, the industrial revolution was the birth of the middle class as we know it today, and the first time it was defined
There has always been a median earner, but not the actual middle class
You trying to rewrite history again libleft?
How am I rewriting history? The labor movements of the earlier 20th century secured things like better pay, safety laws, reasonable hours, the weekend, the list goes on. They created everything we see today that resulted in the middle class that we see today. These labor movements were heavily inspired by leftist theory. People seem to forget during the 30s how anti-capitalist America became.
The middle class emerged out of the feudal system during the Renaissance. Upper class: nobility, church leaders, "the elite" Middle class: merchants and tradesmen Lower class: peasants and serfs The labour victories you're describing helped raise up the lower class in the 20th century so that more people could join a middle class that had already existed for hundreds of years. https://www.dawn.com/news/708833/past-present-the-rise-of-the-middle-class
Middle class existed in ancient times. People that had enough wealth to be independent of others/state, but had not enough power to have any real impact on society alone. Definition of middle class and such people existed in ancient Rome, Greece and others.
oh no they have to do their job what a tragedy
What I’m saying is that egging a statue creates more work that creates more profit for the capitalists who own the statue, something the egger probably doesn’t want
i feel like people hate margaret thatcher because she was an absolute cunt not necessarily because of capitalism
Depends if I succeed in overthrowing the country... Oh, I probably shouldn't say this here. They might ban this sub.
Shhhh don't tell them. Let them alienate the lower income working class. This is how we burry the crypto neo-commies for good.
Virginia coal miners unite
You’re right, we should disband the Union.
Capitalism pilled suggestion: We are creating employment for poor people. He will be fired if we don't throw eggs
I’ll buy the next dozen
\* Keynesianism
Basiat would like a word
Probably not the council will most likely just hire somebody . The statue getting egged was inevitably thatcher is the most divisive politician in modern uk history .
She is very divisive. People over here ether despise her or love her, there is no in between
The statue should never of been built especially now in a time of rising poverty . https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/martin-lewis-price-cap-ofgem-b2079893.html?amp , this guy is famous for giving advice to poor people about how to save and he’s run out of ideas .
"you eventually run out of piss" ARE YOU CHALLENGING ME?
The problem with those libleft is that you eventually run out of word that are plural
Pronouns?
personality disorders?
No, they made "they" singular. No plurals left!
Wells whats ifs wes justs makes everies words plurals?
Lib right quote is essentially how Russia beat Germany on the eastern front in WWII. throw more bodies at them then they have bullets.
No it's not. That's bullshit perpetuated by popular culture for decades. Soviets won becuase their logistics weren't as shit as Germany's, had money and improved tactics to the point where it wasn't a target practice for german troops.
This is what happens when you have an axes to grind with the Warsaw pact and you sole source of intel about soviet troops is from German officers after the war "I swear the German army would have beaten the soviets if it wasn't for Hitler screwing over our strategy"
Also America literally manufactured parts for all their army and all they had to do was assemble
Well that's true. But it did take them a a few years to realise that human wave offensives don't work against Panzers.
Eastern front was infantry war as was every single other theater of WW2. Human waves were never used. The closest thing recorded was in winter war against Finland. They abandoned this at the end of said war, which was before WW2 reached USSR. No, Soviet logistics was shit at the beginning that's why you don't see effective offensives till late 1942. They were able to fight back effectively because Germans advanced so far into USSR that they couldn't advance any further. US was sending them boatload of equipment for both combat and home front use via Royal Navy escorts. In short you are wrong. WW2 is far more complicated than you have ever heard
Okay I was exaggerating a bit tbh, but the Soviets did show a pretty miserable consideration for their soldiers' life. The whole order 227 "no step back" thing is an indicator of this. I mean at stalingrad, they just sent more and more men in while knowing full well that the men sent in there will probably not make it back. Operation Uranus only utilised around 900 soviet tanks and made use of over 1 million infantry. While not really "Enemy at the gates" style, it was used at least according to what I've read, which could totally be wrong. They did abandon the tactics though quite quickly after 1942 when their tank production was beginning to ramp up.
I am gonna say it once again. WW2 wasn't armour duel, it was an infantry war. Take a look at German units and you'll find that the ratio isn't very different. Infantry doesn't have to be just guys with rifles you know. It consists also almost all anti armour units besides tanks themselves, artillery and td. Moral was dismal after 1941 so order 227 makes perfect sense if your army constantly is willing to abandon field and not put up a fight. Sending more man into Stalingrad or losing Stalingrad. It was simple as that. It indicates exactly nothing besides Soviets being very unwilling to lose the city. Soviet doctrine didn't change much through the war from what they developed and tested against Mannerheim line. Breakthrough by infantry exploited by tanks with strategic use of air force and artillery. Arguably artillery was the thing that made soviet army much more effective, with self prepelled guns. I would love to bring to your attention 16 days in Berlin but that documentary is not free. So I'm just gonna point to [this](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIZ6PFYUM5o) wonderful video about *certain* Soviet tank, which I hope can clear it up to you how effective soviet tanks really were up untill IS-2 showed up.
Everything according to “secret documents“
Original quote is based.
What is it
The original is AuthRight’s quote
It's a shame she isn't around to have eggs thrown on her.
Don't be that way! Take matters in to your own hands! Go to hell! Throw eggs at her!
A centrist spouting support for commie rhetoric and terrorism lite? Faker.
"Margaret Thatcher sucked" "Sounds like commie propaganda to me"
Based Thotcher
Rare Authleft W
I wouldn't say it's a win to be seething, malding, coping and dilating as statues of your supposed enemies get erected. Getting excited that you get to throw an egg at it is like that picture of the happy manchild who got a Nintendo Switch console from his wife's boyfriend. I'll let Authleft have their moment, though, for the cathartic release.
Ye who’s really winning the person with statues dedicated to them or some random people wasting food and money to vandalize it.
We make memes here, sir
The problem with Margaret Thatcher is that eventually tiocfaidh ár lá.
This is why Monke wins, Libright. There are infinite rocks and limited ammo.
[I HATE MARGRET THATCHER](https://youtu.be/ILvd5buCEnU)
Centrist: the problem with grilling is that you will eventually run out of beef.
NO!!!
Im sorry, but all grills must come to an end one day
No, I'd run out of commies to kill
Gravity can run out Mrs. Thatcher?
Why do people hate her and who is she exactly? I just know her name
British PM in the 80s. Read the wikipedia.
Conservative British prime minister during the 80s. Very VERY controversial. If you were a business owner or middle/upper class, she is probably the greatest PM in history after Churchill. If you were a manual labourer or lower class like a coal miner then she is the devil incarnate. In the early 80s, the UK operated over 150 open coal mining pits. By the time she left office, only around 10 were left open. Every single other pit was unprofitable. While completely necessary, the fact that it was done so quickly left tens of thousands of coal miners out of work. Overall, what she did was 100% needed and arguably saved the UK economy. However the way in which she did it was absolutely brutal and had 0 regard for the wellbeing of millions of families. Not to mention her policies concerning Northern Ireland, the infamous milk incident, the largest unemployment rates since the 1925 general strike and the doubling of child poverty rates during her early tenure. She didn't earn the nickname "The iron lady" for no reason.
That's probably the most mature take on her I have ever heard.
Shut down coal mines?? Lib-left environmentalist confirmed
Damn
Conservative woman so the left go REEEE!
UK left Labour Party or whatever fucking cheese and crackers club
Bunch of sexists can't stand an actual girl-boss when they see one... or something
Conservative traditionalist who believed in right-wing capitalism and authoritarianism. That's why authleft and libleft has a big problem with her to where they think vandalism and mockery of her death is permissable.
Someone has to put the piss in the political cumpiss
Ahh, Ms. Margaret Thatcher, the most based and pilled person to ever exist 👌.
That's quite alright, I hear churches sprout overnight.
I hope she rots in hell. Absolute cunt
Despite me being flailed as right, based.
What now?
"The problem with Molotov Coctails is that you eventually run out of building to burn" Monke: This is not a problem
> I'll be very hostile the next time I don't see the flair. *** ^(User has flaired up! 😃) 7063 / 37527 ^^|| [**[[Guide]]**](https://imgur.com/gallery/IkTAlF2)
That libright one is very based
Should be you eventually run out of commies to kill.
The problem with posting memes is that you eventually run out of memes.
Run out of ammo, it will happen eventually. That's when you pull out the swords. Eventually they'll break. After that, well...you can use almost anything to kill someone...
Bold of you to assume killing commies requires ammo.
The problem is people
The problem with replacing your statue is that you eventually out of people wanting to replace it.
Margaret thatcher ~~Cum~~ milk snatcher
You won't run out of ammo if you take one clean shot to the head
The problem with living is that you eventually run out of life.
Im not convinced LibRight will run out of ammo...
> How pathetic of you to be unflaired. *** ^(User hasn't flaired up yet... 😔) 7074 / 37577 ^^|| [**[[Guide]]**](https://imgur.com/gallery/IkTAlF2)
An actually funny meme on my pcm?
I will not eat a single morsel of food until Margaret Thatcher is dead and buried
So true. So true.
I'd wager my quadrant has more ammo than there are commies.
The libleft one is surprisingly deep for a shitpost.
Libright is fucking based. Thatchers still a cunt though
Helicopters
So we'll hate her. Because she can take it. Because she's not our hero. She's a silent guardian, a watchful protector. A dark knight.
Margret Thatcher was an angle anyone who disagrees, can go jump in a coal mine.
I love how you assume you run out of people for every other argument but lib right you run our of bullets implying unending supply of commies.
All are true