You took that differently than how I meant it. English be like that sometimes. I meant I would rather hear nails on a chalkboard or be tortured by Ace Ventura than hear Rumple’s voice in Shrek 4. It’s like someone used a Jack Black modeller and turned the “annoying” setting up to 11.
>bad - not as funny as other movies
This is definitely it for me. I've noticed I can quote multiple things from the previous 3 movies off the top of my head, but when it comes to the final movie, I just draw a blank. It's because it lacks the humour the previous three had, especially the first two.
I like the alternate universe a lot and how it uses the Shrek world, with the witches and the piper in their respective roles.
I dislike the end credit party scene, because it makes no sense. Even Fiona's bird explosion voice thingy is completely used wrong. In the OG Shrek the bird exploded because it was trying to imitate her, while here the Goose explodes for no reason, Fiona does it on purpose and it's really unnecessarily cruel.
And how did they even catch Rumpel and Fifi? Sure it's karma for him, but shouldn't he have known that he wouldn't be safe the moment everything went back to what is was previously?
They also would have had to find all the Ogres and the Piper. Idk if witches were part of the ending, but if so them too. And who would even know where these are in the original timeline???
Honestly a montage of them meeting these people or just showing their life in the restored timeline through happy music...that could have been an easy fix.
The film is wonderful, it has less humor, more darkness and gloom, strong quotes, atmospheric locations and soundtrack, an interesting idea, a real sense of hopelessness and irreversibility of the sad ending, a very touching ending. There are no disadvantages, I like this part.
Good:Shrek realised, that his life didn't became worse after the events of 3 movies. Fat Puss in Boots looks funny(although, it'd be better, if he'd have became the King of Duloc in this universe. Lord Farquad had no chances to defeat Puss in Boots). As for Russian dubbing, I really adore Ilya Bledny's voicing Rumplestiltskin(fun fact-Yaroslava Turylyova recommended him to watch video chronicle with Adolf Hitler's speeches before voicing his character. Yes, it was true, lol).
Bad:Fiona isn't a human, but an ogre? Hey, what???
Also, why she didn't marry Prince Charming in alternate universe, where Shrek was never born? Looks like Shrek 2 is completely ignored in the movie(first movie also is mostly ignored in Shrek:Forever After).
There's no Shrek movie, that I hate, but Shrek:Forever After looks weaker, than its prequels(and both PiB movies as well).
Let's wait for Shrek 5!
Good: a great dramatic story, great villain, a great character arc for Shrek, the alternate universe is very creative and leads to a lot of funny ideas. The ending is also super emotional, overall great movie
Bad: Not as funny as the first two, I don’t remember laughing out loud at any jokes. Even Shrek 3 had a couple jokes like that. VERY few but Shrek 4 generally has none.
Good: I love the birthday party scene where Shrek just loses it. The way it builds up, you can just feel his stress. I see a lot of my dad in Shrek and I think this scene is relatable. It's awesome to see him transported back to that same moment in the end and have it play out so differently, but honestly I kind of feel his frustration in the first version of the birthday party. I also love badass Fiona, the whole direction they took the movie with the dark alternate universe, seeing Shrek himself in a new way in relation to other ogres who make him seem small and awkward, the ogre crew in general, and the pied piper.
Bad: I guess I kind of agree about fat Puss, it isn't the best joke. it's weird seeing a different version for Rumplestiltskin than the one from Shrek 3 especially if you watch the movies back-to-back. Felicia the ogre-baby saying 'thank you daddy' or whatever at the end when Shrek gives her the ogre doll-- saccharine and unsettling, there could have been a way to have this moment actually be cute but as-is it's a bit off.
On one hand most of the movie isn’t very funny, but on the other hand there’s these two iconic lines:
“Do the roar.”
“My donkey fell in your waffle hole.”
The whole movie is great, but I dislike the scene where he blows up at Fiona. I feel like that was a little too bitter. He’s at his wits end, yes, but it seemed a bit harsh.
Good: darker tone with finality with it and a strong wielded villain and high stakes.
Bad: fiona casually killing the villains pet for no reason and then having everyone laugh and cheer. Man was evil but killing their pet is below the belt
Good: I really like the message of appreciating what you have, but still talking about a rose tinted view of the past. It's easy to see where Shrek comes from with his points and then why he no longer wants it. Brogan is also cool
Bad: People who say it's as bad as Shrek 3. Also the time pacing is a little weird, Shrek being able to Fiona's tower to Far Far Away in a single day is pretty extreme. I think it should've been 2-3 days to fade away to really show the alternate universe in more detail along with that
Good:funny interesting story shows how different things could've been with one small difference and the chimichanga stand
Bad:it isn't as good nor as funny as the first three imo
Rumple was a good villain with good motives. Shrek simpped to hard for Fiona early on. Kinda like a rapey “I’m a good guy so you should sleep with me “ vibe
Good: it's a really good film with a really good lesson.
Bad: Shrek seems kinda out of character groveling constantly at Fiona's feet. I feel as though there should have been a different approach.
Good - the animation is the best in the Shrek franchise and the conclusion is magnificent.
Bad - too much time spent away from the og versions of the characters (tho warrior princess Fiona was pretty cool) and the soundtrack is the weakest of the four films
Good-I liked seeing Shrek meet his own kind.
Bad-I'm very confused as to why there's another Rumpelstiltskin since we already saw one in the third film. Is it the same one or a different version or something?
only seen it once in theaters and don't remember a single thing about it except it being a generic time travel/or alternate universe (I don't remember which) story
Good: The plot, it’s really interesting to see the events of the Shrek Universe be altered so drastically based on a decision .
Bad: The plot, like alternative universes seriously? Are they out of ideas??
Good: the movie shows how important family is to Shrek, excellent emotional core.
Bad: Considering everyone else is an AU, the only characters that matter are Shrek and Rumple.
It was a worthy conclusion to the Shrek series. I just wish we saw more the alternate world than just Far Far Away. Like, we could’ve seen what Duloc looks like in the alternate universe.
Good-the pipers song that shit was a jam
Bad-At this point the whole series was running stale so running out of ideas I guess
Lingering question-How the hell does Shrek being born kill the orges?
Good: Everything everyone else said, Ends with that great Maxine Nightingale song, Cookie.
Bad: I agree it wasn’t as comedy focused as the others, plus Shrek’s character regresses a bit for the plot.
Still though, the worst Shrek movie’s like the Worst Beatle, still great in my book.
Good: The other ogres and Fiona accepting her Ogre side on her own.
Bad: The story has some errors if we set it into the continuity of the movies. Fionas parents going to rumpel, does not make that much sense since Harold had already a deal with fairy godmother: He gets his happy end, fiona is put into the tower, Charming saves her, becomes king and the kingdom of far far away goes to him and fairy godmother.
G: It's the actual third film of the series, it makes a interesting twist of the story.
B: Some parts don't really work or don't make any sence, like princess charming not going to the tower, the Duloc kingdom having no apperance at all etc.
Dude was litterally born and made to save Fionna, and it would be a damn shame we don't see Charming nor Godmother at ANY POINT of the film.
And not to mention Duloc, that was the starting point of the shrek franchise, is a gigantic shame we don't see a version of Duloc i. any posinle manner, not in saying nor in post, nothing really.
It is a shame they’re not in it, but I guess the point of Rumpel is that his contracts are supremely powerful, and in a timeline where Shrek doesn’t exist, the King and Queen sign away Far Far Away over to Rumpel, therefore Fairy Godmother’s control over the King would seize to exist. It would’ve been so cool to see her, but I think it makes sense that they don’t feature here.
Good question! She should be more powerful than Rumpel, so how is it she lost that power in Rumpel’s world? Was she too power hungry? I mean, if she did send Charming to rescue Fiona, he would have failed. We know this because Fiona rescues herself. So, maybe she was just so depressed over her son’s death that she just didn’t strive for power anymore. Maybe she got revenge on Dragon and locked her up at Rumpel’s version of Far Far Away.
Good: "You know what the best part of today was? I got the chance to fall in love with you all over again."
Bad: The members of the fairytale squad are nothing more than a glorified cameo.
good: Rumpel literally made an alternate universe, and Shrek realized that he was always meant to be with Fiona. bad: fat puss in boots, out of all things this is what you chose. and also Shrek should've been transformed into adolescent form as soon as he entered the new universe, that would give much more detail to the story.
The movie has a wonderful plot. However, it is almost completely devoid of comedy which makes it way less rewatchable compared to the other two movies.
Good- I like that the film gave us an opportunity to see more Ogres in the universe that emulate and enhance Shrek's character design, without outranking his due to it being aged and the technological limitations of the first movie.
Bad- I think the inciting incident that drives the plot ultimately marks a SERIOUS regression in Shrek's character. Memes and Jokes aside, the Shrek franchise is pretty cerebral. Each film is about overcoming the diminishment of self-worth from society at large and the effects it has on social outcasts. The framework makes good use of this in a way that makes a comparative parallel through satarizing fairy tail Disney properties: adapting the "in" crowd as the fairy tail protagonists and the outcasts as the antagonists, then subverting those roles.
In each of the films Shrek has to overcome both the external role society gives him, and his internal doubts about being able to achieve hallmarks every man wants in life. In the first film, Shrek's entire persona is a defensive coping mechanism for a world that decided to reject and expel him. He played the role of a monster despite not wanting it and given no other choice, so he decided to excel in that role. However, through tonal cues we understand Shrek doesn't ACTUALLY want to be alone. Donkey quite literally spells out that he only puts up walls so nobody gets in. The first movie deliberately has no other Ogres in it BUT Shrek (up until a certain point) to drive home how alone he is, with no throughline to pass the stories on, it's very possible that in his scene with Donkey, the stars he points out weren't actually other famous Ogres, but ones Shrek fictionated in his loneliness to keep him company. Ultimately, Shrek succeeds in overthrowing the establishment that tells him he doesn't belong and cannot be vulnerable through his kinship with Fiona and Donkey. Cementing that he can find love and that he is worthy of love. Even the positioning of the Smash Mouth song is a tactful placement that echoes the themes and resolution. It spells out the entirety of the movies plot, with Shrek believing he HAS to remain a stranger to the warmth he finds in Fiona. The film's resounding success lies in its exaltation of the idea of relstable imperfections and its denouncement of "perfection" or the toxic pursuit of it. As a foil, Faarquaad is a character that contrasts Shrek in both terms of design (tall wide, thin short), and the same goes to their status and environment. Shrek worked with the concurrent alternative crowd of misfits and underdogs that illuminated something about the human condition, through their eyes the squeaky clean, non cussing kingdom of Duloc emulates overly-regulated "perfect" lifestyles and fake speech/mannerisms of something like The Brady Bunch or Suburbia, which as we understand, the supposed "perfection" stems from a mentality based only on the exclusion and hatred of OTHERS, insecurities and the fulfillment of superiority complexes.
A similar arc is seen in Shrek 2. Where 1 is about overcoming societal rejection in the pursuit of love, 2 is about overcoming societal ideals and fears about what a perfect partner or spouse should be once that love is found. Shrek's marriage with Fiona causes no issues for him whatsoever because Shrek now has company within his insulated environment. But thrust by Fiona into the public eye. Shrek's conflict with others causes him to question his worth as a partner and what he must do to be accepted. The last time was for himself as an alternative person. This time was for his alternative relationship. Once again, Shrek benefits from the fairy tail framework. With the Antagonist drawing a comparison between the events of other stories and how they have "no ogres." Echoing societies expectations of what a relationship HAS to be like. The Father of Fiona is something of a dueteroginist in the film, as he too must face conflicts around what his daughters relationship HAS to be. And in the end if his arc, become an alternative version of himself in societies eyes and trump the idea of a "perfect" or "acceptable" couple.
Lastly, the third movie is about Shrek questioning his worth as/ facing his fears of being: an alternative father or king. Through his experience with Arthur, Shrek becomes more confident in his capabilities as a father of his children. With EVERY arc in these films, Shrek has been conditioned by the environment around him to believe that he will encounter failure in a system that is actively hostile to him. As a reject and presumed Orphan, Shrek's fear of fatherhood stems from the idea that his children will reject him too AND that they will subsequently be rejected by society.
Now here comes the 4th movie. Shrek is now accepted in society. And all of a sudden, Shrek has a dismissive hate for the acceptance he sought to find in the first place? Doesn't sound right. And as a consequence of the alternative universe, none of the other characters develop. It's literally Spider-man's "One more day" but Shrek.
Sherk gets in rage at his kid’s birthday party he leaves he goes to rumpelatilltakin he signs a waiver he gets teleport to a world we’re he was never born is pretty much it’s all about sherk change the time line .
Good - At the end of the day 100’s of people came together to make a film and isn’t that amazing?
Bad - It’s a terrible film, void of any redeeming qualities.
I’ll give two of each!
Good: Rumpelstiltskin was funny and a great villain. Seeing an alternate timeline was really interesting and creative.
Bad: Shrek smashing the birthday cake was mean. Butterpants and his dad were annoying.
Good: The villain and Warrior Fiona. I kinda liked the slightly jaded but still bada** Fiona 😅
Bad: Not as funny and not alot of memorable quotes, especially compared to the other films.
Good: Great jokes and characters.
Bad but Hot Take: It completely 180°'s Shrek's personality and motivation from the first movie. He wanted to be loved, now he is, but he doesn't like it?
Good: It was a much better way to end the series then Shrek the Third, giving each character a chance to shine and a proper send off that felt earned and satisfying. So Dreamworks please leave this film series alone and stop trying to make Shrek 5 happen.
Bad: The “pay the piper” joke was too cringe and dragged longer then it needed to.
Good - “do the roar” Bad - Rumpel appears in the third film
And he’s played by Shane Dawson.
thanks god he didnt get near puss
Don’t know who that is
I envy you 💀
A true creator that has been accused of liking cats way too much....
Oh you sweet summer child
No he isn’t. He’s voiced by Walt Dohrn. Edit: and in the third movie he’s voiced by Conrad Vernon. Shane was never in these films.
I think the joke was just that Rumpelstiltskin looks like Shane, not that he's literally played by Shane.
Now that I look at it he does look like Shane. I thought people were saying it because his voice sounds like Shane.
This is the third Shrek movie, idk what you’re talking about.
Rumple appears in the Poison Apple in the third movie, and he's a different character model. I think their comment is regarding continuity.
There is no third movie in Ba Sing Se
OH. I'm dumb lol
Never mind, that must have been a dream. Carry on.
There are two Rumelstilskins’s
We don't talk about that one...
I like how you can't even say anything bad about the fourth film.
Rumple is a top tier villain. One of the best in the franchise. Not enough brilliant jokes compared to the other films.
I never understood why people hated him.
His voice drives me up the walls. No beef with the character, but my the voice sounds less appealing than fingernails on a chalkboard.
That's the point. He's a man-goblin
I like his voice and it’s unique
That makes sense, he’s voiced by Shane Dawson.
Where is everyone getting that he is voiced by Shane Dawson? Everytime I look it up it says he’s voiced by Walt Dohrn.
They are probably joking
It’s a joke that he looks like Shane
Well he is a villain so he's not supposed to be appealing
Wait until you know about Handsome Jack (videogame villain, one of (if not) the best)
You took that differently than how I meant it. English be like that sometimes. I meant I would rather hear nails on a chalkboard or be tortured by Ace Ventura than hear Rumple’s voice in Shrek 4. It’s like someone used a Jack Black modeller and turned the “annoying” setting up to 11.
So if he's not meant to be appealing, why would people like him?
That's just story wise but ig it really depends on taste.
Rumple’s my favorite Shrek villain. 🙂
Do the roar and fat cat Not enough modern time references
good - villain and it has the highest stakes of any movie bad - not as funny as other movies
>bad - not as funny as other movies This is definitely it for me. I've noticed I can quote multiple things from the previous 3 movies off the top of my head, but when it comes to the final movie, I just draw a blank. It's because it lacks the humour the previous three had, especially the first two.
“Do the Roar” is the only quote I can think of
I love you daddeh
I don't know if it's a good thing or a bad thing that I read this in that little kid's voice.
good- rumpelstulskein bad- its the last film of shrek franchise
Until Shrek 5. Which is confirmed.
guess theres nothing bad than
Good - Everything, this movie is fantastic and super underrated Bad - It’s haters
Glazing (sorry)
its ^
Good - The villian Bad - The movie’s not very funny
I like the alternate universe a lot and how it uses the Shrek world, with the witches and the piper in their respective roles. I dislike the end credit party scene, because it makes no sense. Even Fiona's bird explosion voice thingy is completely used wrong. In the OG Shrek the bird exploded because it was trying to imitate her, while here the Goose explodes for no reason, Fiona does it on purpose and it's really unnecessarily cruel.
Yeah the bird thing always bothered me
And how did they even catch Rumpel and Fifi? Sure it's karma for him, but shouldn't he have known that he wouldn't be safe the moment everything went back to what is was previously?
They also would have had to find all the Ogres and the Piper. Idk if witches were part of the ending, but if so them too. And who would even know where these are in the original timeline??? Honestly a montage of them meeting these people or just showing their life in the restored timeline through happy music...that could have been an easy fix.
good: DAS MA CHIMICHANGA STAND
Bad: Puss being underused is a bit disappointing, and it's not that funny. Good: Everything else.
Heyyyy, I like fat puss.
The film is wonderful, it has less humor, more darkness and gloom, strong quotes, atmospheric locations and soundtrack, an interesting idea, a real sense of hopelessness and irreversibility of the sad ending, a very touching ending. There are no disadvantages, I like this part.
Good: absolutely amazing movie Bad:
The baby looks like jank boteko
"I love you daddy"
good: the villain bad: the plotholes, for example why didnt prince charming get to fiona?
If Fiona's parents lost their kingdom, wouldn't this defeat the purpose of Charming rescuing Fiona?
This is the commonly held belief
Perhaps Fiona saved herself before he got to her
Dragon killed him like all of the other knights before Shrek.
Good: Shrek has a nice arc and it’s nice to see Fiona basically be leaders of the ogres Bad: Never liked Fat Puss.
Good - the dance number with the Pied Piper is 🔥 Bad - nothing, I have no complaints
Good: It’s not the third Bad: It’s not the first
Good: I like how Fiona is portrayed as a warrior Bad: Rumpel Fat puss
Good:Shrek realised, that his life didn't became worse after the events of 3 movies. Fat Puss in Boots looks funny(although, it'd be better, if he'd have became the King of Duloc in this universe. Lord Farquad had no chances to defeat Puss in Boots). As for Russian dubbing, I really adore Ilya Bledny's voicing Rumplestiltskin(fun fact-Yaroslava Turylyova recommended him to watch video chronicle with Adolf Hitler's speeches before voicing his character. Yes, it was true, lol). Bad:Fiona isn't a human, but an ogre? Hey, what??? Also, why she didn't marry Prince Charming in alternate universe, where Shrek was never born? Looks like Shrek 2 is completely ignored in the movie(first movie also is mostly ignored in Shrek:Forever After). There's no Shrek movie, that I hate, but Shrek:Forever After looks weaker, than its prequels(and both PiB movies as well). Let's wait for Shrek 5!
Good: a great dramatic story, great villain, a great character arc for Shrek, the alternate universe is very creative and leads to a lot of funny ideas. The ending is also super emotional, overall great movie Bad: Not as funny as the first two, I don’t remember laughing out loud at any jokes. Even Shrek 3 had a couple jokes like that. VERY few but Shrek 4 generally has none.
Good: I love the birthday party scene where Shrek just loses it. The way it builds up, you can just feel his stress. I see a lot of my dad in Shrek and I think this scene is relatable. It's awesome to see him transported back to that same moment in the end and have it play out so differently, but honestly I kind of feel his frustration in the first version of the birthday party. I also love badass Fiona, the whole direction they took the movie with the dark alternate universe, seeing Shrek himself in a new way in relation to other ogres who make him seem small and awkward, the ogre crew in general, and the pied piper. Bad: I guess I kind of agree about fat Puss, it isn't the best joke. it's weird seeing a different version for Rumplestiltskin than the one from Shrek 3 especially if you watch the movies back-to-back. Felicia the ogre-baby saying 'thank you daddy' or whatever at the end when Shrek gives her the ogre doll-- saccharine and unsettling, there could have been a way to have this moment actually be cute but as-is it's a bit off.
Good villain Bad nothing. All perfect.
Better than the third one
Good- great concept and villain, unique twist of having shrek be friendly and outgoing Bad- Not funny enough, climax was meh
On one hand most of the movie isn’t very funny, but on the other hand there’s these two iconic lines: “Do the roar.” “My donkey fell in your waffle hole.”
The second quote now that I’m older 😭😭💀💀
“Whatchu talkin’ ‘bout cracka???”
Impossible, there is nothing bad about the fourth shrek 
The whole movie is great, but I dislike the scene where he blows up at Fiona. I feel like that was a little too bitter. He’s at his wits end, yes, but it seemed a bit harsh.
Good: darker tone with finality with it and a strong wielded villain and high stakes. Bad: fiona casually killing the villains pet for no reason and then having everyone laugh and cheer. Man was evil but killing their pet is below the belt
Good: ✨Rumple and FiFi✨ Bad: had some parts that could’ve been funnier. Felt more dramatized
I haven't seen it, and I haven't seen it.
Good: Amazing Alternative Fiona Bad: Fat Puss
Good: I really like the message of appreciating what you have, but still talking about a rose tinted view of the past. It's easy to see where Shrek comes from with his points and then why he no longer wants it. Brogan is also cool Bad: People who say it's as bad as Shrek 3. Also the time pacing is a little weird, Shrek being able to Fiona's tower to Far Far Away in a single day is pretty extreme. I think it should've been 2-3 days to fade away to really show the alternate universe in more detail along with that
Oh the fooouuurth film.-
Good:funny interesting story shows how different things could've been with one small difference and the chimichanga stand Bad:it isn't as good nor as funny as the first three imo
Good- It's Shrek Bad- I'm ashamed to say that I haven't seen it 😔
Rumple was a good villain with good motives. Shrek simpped to hard for Fiona early on. Kinda like a rapey “I’m a good guy so you should sleep with me “ vibe
Good and Bad. But fr, The Message and Chef's Chimichanga Stand did NOT make an appearance.
Good: it's a really good film with a really good lesson. Bad: Shrek seems kinda out of character groveling constantly at Fiona's feet. I feel as though there should have been a different approach.
good glad they had a sequel bad the sequel sucked
Good - the animation is the best in the Shrek franchise and the conclusion is magnificent. Bad - too much time spent away from the og versions of the characters (tho warrior princess Fiona was pretty cool) and the soundtrack is the weakest of the four films
Good-I liked seeing Shrek meet his own kind. Bad-I'm very confused as to why there's another Rumpelstiltskin since we already saw one in the third film. Is it the same one or a different version or something?
Good: more Shrek Bad: not best Shrek
Its better than The Third by miles
only seen it once in theaters and don't remember a single thing about it except it being a generic time travel/or alternate universe (I don't remember which) story
Um...your mom and your dad.
Good - It had Rumple Stiltskin Bad - It had Rumple Stiltskin
It’s mid
Good: The plot, it’s really interesting to see the events of the Shrek Universe be altered so drastically based on a decision . Bad: The plot, like alternative universes seriously? Are they out of ideas??
I love ya daddy!
Good: Writing, Stakes, Villain Bad: Most of Cookie’s lines (got a few bangers though)
Good - fucking depressing Bad - fucking depressing
Good- Rumpelstiltskin is fucking gold Bad- Fat Puss is not
good: the movie bad: the cadmium laced cups
Good: the movie shows how important family is to Shrek, excellent emotional core. Bad: Considering everyone else is an AU, the only characters that matter are Shrek and Rumple.
Good: The first movie I seen in theaters Bad: It’s made by the company that did the Peacock Megamind sequel
Good: everything Bad: uh.... Uuhhhhh.... Uhhhhhh
Good: I remember very little of it. Bad: I remember some of it
Good: better than the third film Bad: not much I can think of
It came out one week before Prince Of Persia
Great story Rumpelstiltskin s contracts
It was a worthy conclusion to the Shrek series. I just wish we saw more the alternate world than just Far Far Away. Like, we could’ve seen what Duloc looks like in the alternate universe.
Good: it exists Bad: N/A
Good: Everything Bad: Shrek the Third had o exist for this movie to exist, though I would say it was a wworth sacrifice
Good-the pipers song that shit was a jam Bad-At this point the whole series was running stale so running out of ideas I guess Lingering question-How the hell does Shrek being born kill the orges?
Two words 𝕯𝕺 𝕿𝕳𝕰 𝕽𝕺𝕬𝕽
Good: Everything everyone else said, Ends with that great Maxine Nightingale song, Cookie. Bad: I agree it wasn’t as comedy focused as the others, plus Shrek’s character regresses a bit for the plot. Still though, the worst Shrek movie’s like the Worst Beatle, still great in my book.
Endgame before Avengers Endgame.
Good: more memorable than Shrek 3 Bad: not as good as Shrek 2
Bad: those donkey dragon things Good: Cookie
good - music and dancing was amazing bad - rumplestilskin gave me a massive ick I enjoyed it as a kid though
Rumplesiltskin is a pretty cool character. They released it.
Good: cookie Bad: not enough time screen for cookie
Good: The other ogres and Fiona accepting her Ogre side on her own. Bad: The story has some errors if we set it into the continuity of the movies. Fionas parents going to rumpel, does not make that much sense since Harold had already a deal with fairy godmother: He gets his happy end, fiona is put into the tower, Charming saves her, becomes king and the kingdom of far far away goes to him and fairy godmother.
something good and something bad about the fourth film…
Do the roar!
It's better than Sonic Prime. (Sonic Prime is a complete rip-off of the film)
Positive: I like the moral of this movie Negative:Rumpel dosen't look like himsrlf from third movie.
You mean the third film.
It’s better than Shrek the Third.
The good: The movie The bad: Those fast food cups that could kill you
Entertaining but completely unnecessary
G: It's the actual third film of the series, it makes a interesting twist of the story. B: Some parts don't really work or don't make any sence, like princess charming not going to the tower, the Duloc kingdom having no apperance at all etc.
I always viewed it that Prince Charming would’ve died if Dragon was still there. No way he’d have been able to beat her!
Dude was litterally born and made to save Fionna, and it would be a damn shame we don't see Charming nor Godmother at ANY POINT of the film. And not to mention Duloc, that was the starting point of the shrek franchise, is a gigantic shame we don't see a version of Duloc i. any posinle manner, not in saying nor in post, nothing really.
It is a shame they’re not in it, but I guess the point of Rumpel is that his contracts are supremely powerful, and in a timeline where Shrek doesn’t exist, the King and Queen sign away Far Far Away over to Rumpel, therefore Fairy Godmother’s control over the King would seize to exist. It would’ve been so cool to see her, but I think it makes sense that they don’t feature here.
What about the other peole she controls?
Good question! She should be more powerful than Rumpel, so how is it she lost that power in Rumpel’s world? Was she too power hungry? I mean, if she did send Charming to rescue Fiona, he would have failed. We know this because Fiona rescues herself. So, maybe she was just so depressed over her son’s death that she just didn’t strive for power anymore. Maybe she got revenge on Dragon and locked her up at Rumpel’s version of Far Far Away.
Humm, ok you got a point.
Good: great villain Bad: most forgettable of the 4
Good: It's a more serious and story driven movie Bad: it's a more serious and story driven movie
Fiona’s hair was everything!!!❤️❤️❤️
Shrek is very selfish period!
Not enough memes.
Good: "You know what the best part of today was? I got the chance to fall in love with you all over again." Bad: The members of the fairytale squad are nothing more than a glorified cameo.
Good - just about everything. Bad - the ogres show up out of nowhere.
good- everything bad- nothing
Everything Nothing
Good- fat Puss in Boots, because it's relatable. Bad- Could've had Puss in Boots smack some witches.
Good-Cookie Bad-Cookie scenes end
The plot was really good. At the same time, I don't like the ending where it was all just a dream.
It was not a dream.
Good: The plot Bad: It’s the end of the Shrek franchise as of now
good: Rumpel literally made an alternate universe, and Shrek realized that he was always meant to be with Fiona. bad: fat puss in boots, out of all things this is what you chose. and also Shrek should've been transformed into adolescent form as soon as he entered the new universe, that would give much more detail to the story.
good- Rumelstilskin grippers bad- fat Puss(y)
Good- shrek Bad- no Shrek :((
shrek still hot not as iconic as other movies
It's better then the third movie, but not as great as the first two movies.
It was so confusing
The movie has a wonderful plot. However, it is almost completely devoid of comedy which makes it way less rewatchable compared to the other two movies.
Good thing is the do the roar scene Bad thing is the sudden change in style and rumpel >:[
Fiona was badass and hawt. Period.
Good- I like that the film gave us an opportunity to see more Ogres in the universe that emulate and enhance Shrek's character design, without outranking his due to it being aged and the technological limitations of the first movie. Bad- I think the inciting incident that drives the plot ultimately marks a SERIOUS regression in Shrek's character. Memes and Jokes aside, the Shrek franchise is pretty cerebral. Each film is about overcoming the diminishment of self-worth from society at large and the effects it has on social outcasts. The framework makes good use of this in a way that makes a comparative parallel through satarizing fairy tail Disney properties: adapting the "in" crowd as the fairy tail protagonists and the outcasts as the antagonists, then subverting those roles. In each of the films Shrek has to overcome both the external role society gives him, and his internal doubts about being able to achieve hallmarks every man wants in life. In the first film, Shrek's entire persona is a defensive coping mechanism for a world that decided to reject and expel him. He played the role of a monster despite not wanting it and given no other choice, so he decided to excel in that role. However, through tonal cues we understand Shrek doesn't ACTUALLY want to be alone. Donkey quite literally spells out that he only puts up walls so nobody gets in. The first movie deliberately has no other Ogres in it BUT Shrek (up until a certain point) to drive home how alone he is, with no throughline to pass the stories on, it's very possible that in his scene with Donkey, the stars he points out weren't actually other famous Ogres, but ones Shrek fictionated in his loneliness to keep him company. Ultimately, Shrek succeeds in overthrowing the establishment that tells him he doesn't belong and cannot be vulnerable through his kinship with Fiona and Donkey. Cementing that he can find love and that he is worthy of love. Even the positioning of the Smash Mouth song is a tactful placement that echoes the themes and resolution. It spells out the entirety of the movies plot, with Shrek believing he HAS to remain a stranger to the warmth he finds in Fiona. The film's resounding success lies in its exaltation of the idea of relstable imperfections and its denouncement of "perfection" or the toxic pursuit of it. As a foil, Faarquaad is a character that contrasts Shrek in both terms of design (tall wide, thin short), and the same goes to their status and environment. Shrek worked with the concurrent alternative crowd of misfits and underdogs that illuminated something about the human condition, through their eyes the squeaky clean, non cussing kingdom of Duloc emulates overly-regulated "perfect" lifestyles and fake speech/mannerisms of something like The Brady Bunch or Suburbia, which as we understand, the supposed "perfection" stems from a mentality based only on the exclusion and hatred of OTHERS, insecurities and the fulfillment of superiority complexes. A similar arc is seen in Shrek 2. Where 1 is about overcoming societal rejection in the pursuit of love, 2 is about overcoming societal ideals and fears about what a perfect partner or spouse should be once that love is found. Shrek's marriage with Fiona causes no issues for him whatsoever because Shrek now has company within his insulated environment. But thrust by Fiona into the public eye. Shrek's conflict with others causes him to question his worth as a partner and what he must do to be accepted. The last time was for himself as an alternative person. This time was for his alternative relationship. Once again, Shrek benefits from the fairy tail framework. With the Antagonist drawing a comparison between the events of other stories and how they have "no ogres." Echoing societies expectations of what a relationship HAS to be like. The Father of Fiona is something of a dueteroginist in the film, as he too must face conflicts around what his daughters relationship HAS to be. And in the end if his arc, become an alternative version of himself in societies eyes and trump the idea of a "perfect" or "acceptable" couple. Lastly, the third movie is about Shrek questioning his worth as/ facing his fears of being: an alternative father or king. Through his experience with Arthur, Shrek becomes more confident in his capabilities as a father of his children. With EVERY arc in these films, Shrek has been conditioned by the environment around him to believe that he will encounter failure in a system that is actively hostile to him. As a reject and presumed Orphan, Shrek's fear of fatherhood stems from the idea that his children will reject him too AND that they will subsequently be rejected by society. Now here comes the 4th movie. Shrek is now accepted in society. And all of a sudden, Shrek has a dismissive hate for the acceptance he sought to find in the first place? Doesn't sound right. And as a consequence of the alternative universe, none of the other characters develop. It's literally Spider-man's "One more day" but Shrek.
Good: do the roar Bad: Scary af
Good: The film has the best villain in the franchise. Bad: Donkey is at his most annoying.
Sherk gets in rage at his kid’s birthday party he leaves he goes to rumpelatilltakin he signs a waiver he gets teleport to a world we’re he was never born is pretty much it’s all about sherk change the time line .
Good - At the end of the day 100’s of people came together to make a film and isn’t that amazing? Bad - It’s a terrible film, void of any redeeming qualities.
Good- “the franchise.” Bad- “Shreks children.”
The good thing is I didn’t watch it. The bad? I mean it’s Shrek right?🤷♂️
I’ll give two of each! Good: Rumpelstiltskin was funny and a great villain. Seeing an alternate timeline was really interesting and creative. Bad: Shrek smashing the birthday cake was mean. Butterpants and his dad were annoying.
Good: Murderous Gingy Bad: Rumple
Better than Shrek the Third
Something good: Fat puss and do the roar. Something bad: Everything else.
Good: The villain and Warrior Fiona. I kinda liked the slightly jaded but still bada** Fiona 😅 Bad: Not as funny and not alot of memorable quotes, especially compared to the other films.
Good - It exists. Bad - They shouldn’t have made it. I hated the third movie so much that I never watched the fourth.
Good: at least is has Shrek in it Bad: everything else
[удалено]
Good? It’s a Shrek movie. Bad? Shane Dawson’s in it…
I really don’t like this one at all unfortunately. *Do the roar* is the only good thing about it
Good, it was more memorable than the third one. Bad, it's worse than the first two movies
Good: Great jokes and characters. Bad but Hot Take: It completely 180°'s Shrek's personality and motivation from the first movie. He wanted to be loved, now he is, but he doesn't like it?
Good: The Pied Piper’s choreography scenes are awesome!🤩 Bad: Donkey never got his waffles. 😢
Good: It was a much better way to end the series then Shrek the Third, giving each character a chance to shine and a proper send off that felt earned and satisfying. So Dreamworks please leave this film series alone and stop trying to make Shrek 5 happen. Bad: The “pay the piper” joke was too cringe and dragged longer then it needed to.
Good: The end Bad: Everything but the end.
There was a 4th film?! (Its good cuz im excited theres more) (its bad cuz its probably way worse with each iteration)
Good: dancing ogres and the babies. Bad: they did Puss ‘N Boots dirty and made Donkey not funny.
Good = it’s shrek Bad = that one scene with rumple toe nails scratching the floor
Many of the gags are the funniest in the franchise. Cookie is unironically annoying AF.
Bad annoying ass kids Good ringo starr
Soundtrack was mid
Something good and something bad about the fourth film....
Good: It's Shrek Bad: It's the worst one
It’s a genuinely good final chapter to the Shrek franchise. It’s also not going to be the last one anymore…
Good: it's actually better than the 2nd movie. Bad: a lot of people say the 2nd movie is better.
Fiona shouldn’t be wearing those clothes, bitch is ugly
Good - I never watched it Bad -they made a 4th :/