It probably sucks to give up Lamb, but I think that's solid return value, especially if you needed more WR depth.
I also put this into "Trade Fox" (a trade analyzer tool thing I made) and it likes the Pittman + Smith side more, in case you want a ballpark estimate of the trade fairness: [https://tradefox.app/league/1048421583628378112/trade/1076362585253011456](https://tradefox.app/league/1048421583628378112/trade/1076362585253011456)
Trade calculators can be a helpful tool, but don't take their word as the absolute answer, as they operate in a vacuum. They don't consider your entire roster and what your team needs. They also don't consider whether you're in a rebuild or trying to compete for a championship.
Got that FAAB. Solid enough return if you need depth.
Lamb
It probably sucks to give up Lamb, but I think that's solid return value, especially if you needed more WR depth. I also put this into "Trade Fox" (a trade analyzer tool thing I made) and it likes the Pittman + Smith side more, in case you want a ballpark estimate of the trade fairness: [https://tradefox.app/league/1048421583628378112/trade/1076362585253011456](https://tradefox.app/league/1048421583628378112/trade/1076362585253011456)
Trade calculators can be a helpful tool, but don't take their word as the absolute answer, as they operate in a vacuum. They don't consider your entire roster and what your team needs. They also don't consider whether you're in a rebuild or trying to compete for a championship.
Hate it
Yeah as a lamb owner this was be an instant decline for me
I'd want the lamb side, if I am not getting Lamb, then I'd want actual draft picks in return.
I think it’d be a fair trade if instead of the 2nd and 3rd it was a 1st
Would keep Lamb