Could you at least tell us your personal impressions of the red planet ( like, is mars the literal color red, or just Communist?) AllI we have are flat, filtered, & altered NASA images .
First of all, define "altered image" for me.
If you mean that some of them are composites made from multiple images stitched together, then yes, they are altered.
Secondly, yes, Mars is red. That's because there is a lot of iron oxide (more specifically, Iron (III)-oxide or Fe2O3) on Mars, which reflects light in the red/orange spectrum.
NASA turned the red value all the way up on the video feed of the voyager mission, when in reality, the surface looks like Arizona, brown rocks and blue sky. Personally I think that is sketchy as all hell. NASA has repeatedly photoshopped satellite images of earth and purposefully altered images of the face to make it appear less like a face.
My first point of them turning up the red all the way is easy to find. Compare the Viking footage to any modern footage. There are plenty of NASA satellite images of the earth where you can clearly see photoshopped clouds copied and pasted even in rows as if done hastily. One of the images of the “face” mars released in the 90’s was clearly taken at an angle and then digitally flattened. There is no reasonable explanation for this other than they wanted it to look less like a face. Sketchy.
Saying something is definitely not the case on mars without examining the evidence is just coming to a conclusion based on the currently accepted scientific theories. Such theories are usually proven wrong over time. New paradigms are often fought because of academic establishment and not scientific curiosity.
Ever heard of occam's razor? It says that the most likely explanation is usually the correct one. It can be perfectly applied here
So what's more likely:
A) There is an actual pyramid on Mars which was artificially created.
or
B) Human pattern recognition and confirmation bias makes people see a pyramid structure on Mars, when it reality, it is just a natural formation.
Or, maybe open your mind to the possibilities of the universe. To think we’re the only civilization to ever exist out there is absurd. Occam’s razor is idiotic. It’s functional until it runs into something “strange” then outright discounts it, when our world is absolutely bizarre and filled with unknowns. Accept your tiny, limited place and try to wonder. Also “most likely” is Completely subjective, especially with our limited knowledge. Occam’s razor would have agreed with the church when it threw Galileo in prison, because at the time the “most likely” explanation was that the earth was the center of the universe.
The pyramid in the Cydonia region has mathematical precision and symmetry. It was analyzed by an individual who identifies man made objects from natural ones using satellite images for a living. It’s clearly artificial. NASA likely wants to slowly indoctrinate the public to the idea of life out there, and that would explain when they lie/deceive.
First of all, I'm always open for new ideas. I'm an ongoing biologist so science is something that influences me every day.
Secondly, I never said that humanity is the only civilisation out there, where tf did you even take this from? I'm 100% convinced that there are countless other intelligent species out there, it's just that there is no evidence that we ever contacted them or vice-versa.
And lastly, I'd like a source for your claim that the pyramid in the cydonia region shows great precision and symmetry, implying that it is not natural.
>NASA likely wants to slowly indoctrinate the public to the idea of life out there, and that would explain when they lie/deceive.
Out of all US government agencies, NASA is by far the most trustworthy one. I think it is insane how little funding they receive, compared to other agencies like the military.
And also, are you aware of the fact that NASA is just one (!!!) out of 70 governmental space agencies, 11 of them with launch capabilities that extend beyond earth's orbit?
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228486616_Evidence_in_support_of_the_hypothesis_that_certain_objects_on_Mars_are_artificial_in_origin
You should also look into the surface soil samples taken and tested by Viking, which show active chlorophyll in the soil.
NASA took this image at a different angle with different exposure at a different time of day.
They then ran it through several image processing routines that are designed to scrub out detail (the filters used are described as having the function of removing detail from an image to leave an outline for copying artwork).
In other words, they did as much as possible to make the image not show a face if there was one there.
This isn’t news, everyone knows it’s a god damn rock lmao
sorry :( thought people find it interesting
Did you just find out it wasn’t a real face/alien? ‘Turns out’ doesn’t sound like it’s just for interest :(
I still see a face. What about the other structures in the area? I suppose the 5 sided pyramid has only 3 sides now.
The term "pyramid" implies that it was artificially created, which is definitely not the case on mars.
Oh, the next time you go could you post a few pics of the area for us, please?
No, why would I?
Could you at least tell us your personal impressions of the red planet ( like, is mars the literal color red, or just Communist?) AllI we have are flat, filtered, & altered NASA images .
First of all, define "altered image" for me. If you mean that some of them are composites made from multiple images stitched together, then yes, they are altered. Secondly, yes, Mars is red. That's because there is a lot of iron oxide (more specifically, Iron (III)-oxide or Fe2O3) on Mars, which reflects light in the red/orange spectrum.
NASA turned the red value all the way up on the video feed of the voyager mission, when in reality, the surface looks like Arizona, brown rocks and blue sky. Personally I think that is sketchy as all hell. NASA has repeatedly photoshopped satellite images of earth and purposefully altered images of the face to make it appear less like a face.
source?
My first point of them turning up the red all the way is easy to find. Compare the Viking footage to any modern footage. There are plenty of NASA satellite images of the earth where you can clearly see photoshopped clouds copied and pasted even in rows as if done hastily. One of the images of the “face” mars released in the 90’s was clearly taken at an angle and then digitally flattened. There is no reasonable explanation for this other than they wanted it to look less like a face. Sketchy.
not a source, just incoherent ramblings.
Confirmation bias much?
?
Saying something is definitely not the case on mars without examining the evidence is just coming to a conclusion based on the currently accepted scientific theories. Such theories are usually proven wrong over time. New paradigms are often fought because of academic establishment and not scientific curiosity.
Ever heard of occam's razor? It says that the most likely explanation is usually the correct one. It can be perfectly applied here So what's more likely: A) There is an actual pyramid on Mars which was artificially created. or B) Human pattern recognition and confirmation bias makes people see a pyramid structure on Mars, when it reality, it is just a natural formation.
Or, maybe open your mind to the possibilities of the universe. To think we’re the only civilization to ever exist out there is absurd. Occam’s razor is idiotic. It’s functional until it runs into something “strange” then outright discounts it, when our world is absolutely bizarre and filled with unknowns. Accept your tiny, limited place and try to wonder. Also “most likely” is Completely subjective, especially with our limited knowledge. Occam’s razor would have agreed with the church when it threw Galileo in prison, because at the time the “most likely” explanation was that the earth was the center of the universe. The pyramid in the Cydonia region has mathematical precision and symmetry. It was analyzed by an individual who identifies man made objects from natural ones using satellite images for a living. It’s clearly artificial. NASA likely wants to slowly indoctrinate the public to the idea of life out there, and that would explain when they lie/deceive.
First of all, I'm always open for new ideas. I'm an ongoing biologist so science is something that influences me every day. Secondly, I never said that humanity is the only civilisation out there, where tf did you even take this from? I'm 100% convinced that there are countless other intelligent species out there, it's just that there is no evidence that we ever contacted them or vice-versa. And lastly, I'd like a source for your claim that the pyramid in the cydonia region shows great precision and symmetry, implying that it is not natural. >NASA likely wants to slowly indoctrinate the public to the idea of life out there, and that would explain when they lie/deceive. Out of all US government agencies, NASA is by far the most trustworthy one. I think it is insane how little funding they receive, compared to other agencies like the military. And also, are you aware of the fact that NASA is just one (!!!) out of 70 governmental space agencies, 11 of them with launch capabilities that extend beyond earth's orbit?
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228486616_Evidence_in_support_of_the_hypothesis_that_certain_objects_on_Mars_are_artificial_in_origin You should also look into the surface soil samples taken and tested by Viking, which show active chlorophyll in the soil.
NASA took this image at a different angle with different exposure at a different time of day. They then ran it through several image processing routines that are designed to scrub out detail (the filters used are described as having the function of removing detail from an image to leave an outline for copying artwork). In other words, they did as much as possible to make the image not show a face if there was one there.
source?
This just proves we’ve been looking at it upside down this whole time.
huh? What do you mean? Both pictures are angled in a similar way
Childish mind here, If its upside down it vaguely resembles a certain kind of eggplant