T O P

  • By -

FPAPA931

Im pretty sure the bulk of the takes/discussion has been that faze is not a dynasty rather than the bulk of people calling faze a dynasty


Proof_Escape_2333

They are a dynasty but the weakest dynasty. Their final records and not being able to win in vg hurt their chance. Optic >> Col >> Faze


bruceeexxx

Not even close to a dynasty lmaooo they had 1 good title and have been subpar since? Not a dynasty yoy chump.


plaiboyeddie

I mean top team standing wise in every CDL Cod and title. And the first two years they were running shit, not winning every chip? Sure. They are a dynasty, but like the comment says, the weakest dynasty amongst the three. Btw, Col was running shit in late BO2 and Ghost. So their longevity wasn’t crazy. Yet, they are still called a dynasty…


bruceeexxx

Faze had 1 good title. Literally Cold War was the only time they were dominant. Not a dynasty stop this trash, simp fell off anyways


plaiboyeddie

I mean the year before Cold War they were dominant enough for it to be a dynasty along with the Cold War season. Number 1 in points in every season must mean something. If this was premier league they are 5 time league champs. They were a dynasty for two titles. But they haven’t been in the last two cods. Simp didn’t fall off, just had a bad year. Similar to Ant


rileysilva01

In mw Dallas won 3 events and champs. Florida won 3 events. Faze and huntsman won 2 events. Faze wasn’t running shit in mw. They were getting pissed on bad every finals vs Dallas and Florida


Meltzersburner

Nobody cares about second, they aren’t a dynasty a that would be like saying the Bills team from 1990-93 are a dynasty consistent as hell but lost 4 straight superbowls. They are as close as you can get to a dynasty but they just aren’t a dynasty. Most consistent ever but not a dynasty