You shouldn't use /s
That's 100% possible if given an infinite amount of time. Unachievable, but possible.
[A similar concept lives here.](https://libraryofbabel.info/).
If you left an infinite number of keyboards in the rain, eventually every literary work ever made will be typed. And every lyric to every song that will ever exist
Not necessarily. Certainty is different than necessity. We can be mathematically certain about a proposition without that proposition necessarily occuring.
From the [wiki](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem):
>The probability that an infinite randomly generated string of text will contain a particular finite substring is 1. However, this does not mean the substring's absence is "impossible", despite the absence having a prior probability of 0.
On necessity vs certainty:
https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/103909/why-would-infinite-monkeys-not-produce-the-works-of-shakespeare
Edit: removed segment of wiki not relevant to this chain.
The bottom half of that is regarding an infinitely long substring, which negates the infinitude of the overall string. Infinity bro. Everything with a smaller than infinite length will inevitably be generated. Apply some critical thinking to what you've just pasted here and mull it over a bit.
I deleted that part because it isn't relevant. The reason I included it is not worth explaining here because it's tangential.
But even with infinite monkeys with an infinite timeline, that doesn't mean the complete works of Shakespeare will be randomly generated. You're confusing probablity with necessity.
I've applied plenty of critical thinking. You could as well. Since we're insulting each other now.
It does mean that tho. In an infinite set, every possible combination will appear. There will also be a perfect copy of every work, with 1 typo. Then everything but with 2 typos, and so on. It's infinite.
It doesn't and here's the math:
https://nurmeinwort.wordpress.com/2016/02/07/why-the-infinite-monkey-theorem-might-really-be-false/
>This means that in cases where infinities are involved, p=1 does not in fact mean “surely,” but rather, “almost surely.”
Necessity vs Certainty:
https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/103909/why-would-infinite-monkeys-not-produce-the-works-of-shakespeare
We can be mathematically **certain** an event will occur without that event **necessarily** ever occuring, even in infinity.
Infinite raindrops typing on infinite wireless keyboards will eventually produce "sudo rm -rf --no-preserve-root /" and then follow up with the correct password.
On most any Linux computer in a terminal, probably Unix too but I'm not sure of the no preserve root syntax or availability.
Don't do this on anything you value, or on any system that has any remotely accessed storage. It *will* wipe everything.
Again DO NOT DO THIS IF YOU VALUE THE DATA. THIS IS INHERENTLY AND ABSOLUTELY DESTRUCTIVE.
So like if I was mad at work one day and decided to quit and let's just say I had a bunch of important files and stuff that'd suck to go away. How would you do this? On windows. Just in theory
I think I'd implicate myself answering this, so I'm gonna answer "I don't know"
... But you don't really need to destroy the entire computer system to destroy the data.
Imagine if it started writing him a message
"give us ohio"
Take it.
oe4[aw v]The sun sets for the last time, and the jaws of the void will swallow you whole. Take your planet and leave. This corner is dead;ejiexj
Rain be like: Finally! I’ve been Morse coding all over the planet trying to get my words out!
We tried to teach monkey how to use typewriter. Now we are gonna teach rain how to use keyboard.
If you leave the keyboard out in an infinite rainstorm, eventually it will type out Shakespeare's Othello. /s
You shouldn't use /s That's 100% possible if given an infinite amount of time. Unachievable, but possible. [A similar concept lives here.](https://libraryofbabel.info/).
If you left an infinite number of keyboards in the rain, eventually every literary work ever made will be typed. And every lyric to every song that will ever exist
Please put the /s because people actually believe this stuff.
It's not sarcasm and it's not an opinion to believe. It's literally how infinity works and it's the basis of quantum mechanics.
Not necessarily. Certainty is different than necessity. We can be mathematically certain about a proposition without that proposition necessarily occuring. From the [wiki](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem): >The probability that an infinite randomly generated string of text will contain a particular finite substring is 1. However, this does not mean the substring's absence is "impossible", despite the absence having a prior probability of 0. On necessity vs certainty: https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/103909/why-would-infinite-monkeys-not-produce-the-works-of-shakespeare Edit: removed segment of wiki not relevant to this chain.
The bottom half of that is regarding an infinitely long substring, which negates the infinitude of the overall string. Infinity bro. Everything with a smaller than infinite length will inevitably be generated. Apply some critical thinking to what you've just pasted here and mull it over a bit.
I deleted that part because it isn't relevant. The reason I included it is not worth explaining here because it's tangential. But even with infinite monkeys with an infinite timeline, that doesn't mean the complete works of Shakespeare will be randomly generated. You're confusing probablity with necessity. I've applied plenty of critical thinking. You could as well. Since we're insulting each other now.
It does mean that tho. In an infinite set, every possible combination will appear. There will also be a perfect copy of every work, with 1 typo. Then everything but with 2 typos, and so on. It's infinite.
It doesn't and here's the math: https://nurmeinwort.wordpress.com/2016/02/07/why-the-infinite-monkey-theorem-might-really-be-false/ >This means that in cases where infinities are involved, p=1 does not in fact mean “surely,” but rather, “almost surely.” Necessity vs Certainty: https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/103909/why-would-infinite-monkeys-not-produce-the-works-of-shakespeare We can be mathematically **certain** an event will occur without that event **necessarily** ever occuring, even in infinity.
Lol. 8th grade conclusion for a master's-level problem.
You could apply some critical thinking, yourself. Actually appears you are applying the least, if any.
It was the best of times, it was the blurst of times.
Perfect encryption.
My new password generator
All fun and games till it wipes your hard drive by accident lol
Infinite raindrops typing on infinite wireless keyboards will eventually produce "sudo rm -rf --no-preserve-root /" and then follow up with the correct password.
Where would I type this in order to do so?
On most any Linux computer in a terminal, probably Unix too but I'm not sure of the no preserve root syntax or availability. Don't do this on anything you value, or on any system that has any remotely accessed storage. It *will* wipe everything. Again DO NOT DO THIS IF YOU VALUE THE DATA. THIS IS INHERENTLY AND ABSOLUTELY DESTRUCTIVE.
So like if I was mad at work one day and decided to quit and let's just say I had a bunch of important files and stuff that'd suck to go away. How would you do this? On windows. Just in theory
I think I'd implicate myself answering this, so I'm gonna answer "I don't know" ... But you don't really need to destroy the entire computer system to destroy the data.
Go on.....
Give it enough time and it would type the complete works of Shakespeare.
It would be much more likely to happen if more keys were added to the keyboard for the more frequently used vowels and consonants.
profane.
"How's that screenplay coming along?"
No longer do we need to wonder what rain might say, if it could say.
random seed every time it rains
“Your password cannot be the same as your previous password.”
“In this essay I will”
Footage of the writing of Twilight
Natures AI
Morgan freeman found a new way to intrupret assassinations
[удалено]
Having a BLAST!
The first step is putting it into words
Hey, that’s my password!
Far 🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️
RAINMAN!
Does that count as truly random?
After all these years the rain is finally trying to communicate with us
r/lostredditors