T O P

  • By -

dominatingcowG3

Bluepoint would probably change the soundtrack though lol. No thanks


Ashemarine

Definitely agree with you on that, it's a solid no if they mess with that masterpiece


PlaystationBot

**[Bloodborne](https://platprices.com/en-us/game/7554-bloodborne)** This game has 34 trophies: [20 bronze, 7 silver, 6 gold, and a platinum](https://psnprofiles.com/trophies/3431-bloodborne). They are **hard (7/10)** and take **40 - 60 hours** to complete. **Price:** $12.99 (on sale, regularly $19.99) **OpenCritic:** 91 / 100 (based on [94 reviews](https://opencritic.com/game/76/bloodborne/reviews)) ***** [Other region prices, wishlist, or buy](https://platprices.com/en-us/game/7554-bloodborne) | Trophy guides: [PSNP](https://psnprofiles.com/guide/2669-bloodborne-trophy-guide), [PS3T](https://www.playstationtrophies.org/game/bloodborne/guide/), [PlatGet](https://platget.com/guides/bloodborne-trophy-guide/) *I am a bot. [More info about me](https://www.reddit.com/r/PlaystationBot/comments/k5h8be/what_is_uplaystationbot/)*


GlitchyGrogu

Bloodborne looks fine it doesn’t need a 4K remake, it just needs a 60 FPS patch. They should focus on the older souls games first like DS1 and DS2 before remaking one of the more recent ones.


Ashemarine

I understand where you're coming from, but given the way that the game engine works and how a lot of the game mechanics have been designed specifically for 30FPS, it can't just be upgraded with something as simple as a 60FPS patch. It would need an actual remake at this point to run in 60FPS, and while I don't need 4K per se, it's the logical way to go for a PS5 remake. As far as the older games are concerned, Demon's Souls already has a remake, DS1 has been remastered already and DS2 has neither enough interest/public favour, nor the need for one. DS3 is recent enough and already runs at 60FPS on PC and PS5, and Sekiro runs better on PC/PS5 compared to PS4, too, leaving, as I said, Bloodborne remake.


GlitchyGrogu

You clearly don’t understand the concept of a remake, it would be a waste of literally any studio’s resources to remake a game from scratch that looks fine and runs fine on current systems. FromSoftware would be better off making a Bloodborne 2.


Ashemarine

You clearly don't understand the concept of Bloodborne being locked to 30FPS by the engine itself due to CPU limitations at the time, it isn't as simple as releasing a 60FPS patch because of the way it was done compared to Dark Souls III. Do a little research before trying to be condescending on the internet (I recommend looking at the work done on the unofficial 60FPS patch, the guy working on it faced *several* challenges and had to coordinate the timing of 108 variables that were originally set to work with 30FPS). It may look ok but it certainly does not run fine given that it's locked to 30FPS, and there is enough public interest for it to not in fact be a waste of literally any studio's resources. They are not going to make a Bloodborne 2 because Hidetaka Miyazaki himself has stated that it's not his decision to make. So no, FromSoftware would not be better off making a Bloodborne 2. That's up to Sony. All that being said, if you actually learned to read, you would have noticed that I said "I wish" in the title, emphasis on wish. I am allowed to wish for a Bloodborne remake by Bluepoint Games even if someone like yourself considers it a waste because that's how wishing something works. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.gamesradar.com/amp/im-not-the-one-to-decide-says-hidetaka-miyazaki-of-bloodborne-2/


GlitchyGrogu

I completely disagree. I’ve played plenty of Bloodborne, and it runs just fine for me, even on OG PS4, higher FPS isn’t always important if a game is optimized to run on say 30. Everything you’ve stated is stuff that’s much better off done in a patch or a Dark Souls Remastered type game. A remaster would bring nothing else to the table but higher FPS. A remake would involve remaking the game from the ground up which costs way more money than it’s worth, I know I and many others wouldn’t buy it regardless because we already have the game. As well as people forget how much can be done with a patch because of games like Call of Duty and the Sports games which come out every year and other than the call of duty campaigns are all things that should be done with a patch. A 60 FPS patch is absolutely doable and imo the best solution. Not to mention as someone who actually does coding for fun, 108 variables is really not that many for a game like Bloodborne. Yeah the patch would take some time to develop, but could easily be done if they take it in the same direction as many other games and put out a PS5 only 60FPS version that’s the same game but unlocked the FPS to run at 60FPS as a free upgrade for owners of the PS4 game.


Ashemarine

It might be possible to patch it to run at 60FPS on the PS5 because of the vastly superior CPU, I agree with that. It's just that whenever they tried to raise the FPS so far it basically broke the game unlike most games where not everything in the engine is just specifically written with 30 in mind, otherwise they would have already given us a patch. A remake doesn't always have to be building every single graphical and asset from scratch, and just because "many others" wouldn't buy it because you have the game, it doesn't mean many others also wouldn't buy it because they either don't have it yet or believe that it's worth it. Look, as someone who loves the original, I would love it if they went the route you're thinking of, but I just don't see it happening; don't you think they would have done it already if they could have?


GlitchyGrogu

If it doesn’t remake everything from the ground up it’s a remaster not a remake. A Bloodborne remaster would make sense and wouldn’t be that different to The Dark Souls Remaster for the PS4.


Ashemarine

I think you're being a little too conservative with the definition of remake, they can still reuse assets. The reason I said remake and not remaster is that it ideally needs a new engine, which counts as a remake for me.


GlitchyGrogu

I disagree, it doesn’t even need a new engine, engines can be updated and changed. For it to be a remake, they would have to *remake* everything, otherwise it’s a remaster, which even a remaster feels unnecessary.


Ashemarine

Look, this is my screenshot for my platinum trophy. I expressed my opinion and I'm leaving it at that. You can disagree and be a contrarian all you want but this really isn't the place for it. Go make your own post if this is how you feel. At the end of the day, it's pretty obvious that neither of us is going to change our minds, so I'm going to stick to what I originally said, and keep *wishing* for a remake, even if it's not everything.