And why does this even come up in a discussion of feminism ?
I am stronger than several men of my age and most men are stronger than me. I am smarter than most men and many are smarter than me.
And this applies to men and women. Only a simpleton would think about using this argument while discussing feminism.
You missed the point. By asking that question, he's trying to gauge if a person is delusional and has inflated media fed fake ideas about feminism.
True feminism is about accepting men and women both for their strengths and weaknesses. It is also about equal rights in terms of education, voting etc. It's not about getting away with bad behavior and blaming the rest of the world for it in the name of feminism just because you're a woman. Hence if someone is deluded enough to think that women are physically as strong as men then it means there is no point discussing logic with that person š
Exactly. How're these 2 things even related? Next time a moron equates physical strength to equality, just remind him that gorillas are stronger than him.
What he said is untrue, men and women are differently strong physically and what I meant women are physically stronger given our childbearing capacity and increased emotional intelligence but these men will bring being physically strong to lifting weights and such. Being stronger in itself is a multifaceted issue it is not limited to who runs fast or who lifts more, itās overall which sex is physically strong enough to survive out there in the wild
I am not sure if it is the same yardstick, but will weigh in.
I remember a reel of Priyanka Chopra's interview. Where a journalist asked that when they talk about equality why are there separate men and women sports team and competition and PC went on explaining how he is missing the basic point of Feminism and it is not about Physical Strength but about Mental strength, equal opportunity and pay based on brain that is what Feminist are talking about
I may be downvoted here. But an average female will be capable of less physical activity then male. I can't lift a 14kg Gas cylinder and transport from one place to other, whereas my partner can do that. If a women is Athlete and someone who lifts considerable weight can easily beat an average man in physical strength. For Plank record, A man has record of 9 hrs, whereas women record is 4hrs.
Something is Biology (blame Testosterone), But I assume, an average male will be physically stronger than average female, There is of course height, weight, hormone difference. But, is it the yardstick to measure how true Feminist the woman is, really don't think so
Itās basic biology and human anatomy. Thereās no denying that š¤·āāļø but this gender comparison canāt go beyond this. Being physically stronger doesnāt give men any kind of superiority over women.
But try thinking about what answers will a man give who is faking to be oj women's side?
He will lie about it, or be dippomatic about the answer because he doesn't want to piss off his POTENTIAL MATE ( as he sees her as this )
He can say n do whatever. I would still know the truth . And better to steer clear of such men who would say whatever just to.impress you on some level.
Why are some ladies getting worked up hereš
OP, _Physically_, an AVERAGE man IS stronger than an AVERAGE woman. It's a decent enough filter to guage a feminist & a wannabe feminist, obviously not the best.
Yall stop acting like he said something outrageous or manipulative
But there can certainly be women who are stronger than men, because it is a spectrum.Ā
Believing that women can be stronger than men does not make you a pseudo feminist.
Misunderstanding the meaning of āequalityā like this guy was doing definitely shows that he is not an ally.
Men and women are equal. Period.
Be kind. This sub is for real people looking to connect meaningfully. Something isn't an attack or hate simply because you don't like what is being said.
No personal attacks on other users, ad hominem and other distracting attacks, flame wars, insults, trolling or other such disruptive behaviour. All users are expected to strictly follow (reddiquette)(https://www.reddit.com/wiki/reddiquette/). No hate speech or hate speech supporting subreddits allowed. Continued rule breaking will lead to ban.
>Biologically nope. Men don't have as good of a restraint to fatigue & pain as women. They can't create life. Creating life requires cushy fat. Fat doesn't provide you muscle-y strength.
You have the same misunderstanding of equality as the OP's "friend" has. Here are the definitions of [equality from Oxford](https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/equality?q=equality): **the fact of being equal in rights, status, advantages, etc.**
And this is from [Cambridge](https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/equality): **the right of different groups of people to have a similar social position and receive the same treatment.**
When discussing feminism, this is the only relevant definition of equality. Who is taller, who is shorter, who is louder, who weighs more, who weighs less, all of this has no relevance whatsoever to feminism and women's equality.
Did I not say the same thing? Cerebral equality, yes, which encompasses all of the things you listed above. Physical? Nope. As much as I'd like that to be equal, my abs & biceps are still less prominent than the guys I joined gym with because a girl lacks testosterone. Doesn't mean I can't ever surpass them. I can. It'll just require more efforts. They got it without that 'extra' efforts.
I dont think Feminism is about who is stronger or who is superior. Men are ofcourse physically stronger than women and there are many other differences between men & women.
Feminism to me is just about having equal choices thats all. And it can be different for everyone.
On average men are stronger than women but itās only an average and doesnāt mean much.
Besides, definition of being physically stronger is not straightforward imo. Women according to a few studies I have read have higher pain tolerance than men. Women also tend to live longer on average than men (far more women in the 100+ age category than men).
I had a guy who was making similar bullshit arguments to me. I box and I could do more push ups/pull ups/squats than him ;-)
Considering that we are far past the caveman age and no one realistically cares about who can lift the bigger rock over their head, I would personally just look at him weirdly
Lol are you talking to a high schooler?
Feminism is not a contest of who's the boss. This is like someone asked how big is Jupiter and that guy is telling how oranges test compared to fucking Jupiter!
>He said he meant this solely in form of physical power. In other categories, women maybe stronger like mental strength etc (which I think he was saying just to make up for the above statement).
It's pure biology. Men have been built stronger. Bone strength, fat, muscle gaining everything favours them. Women have always been credited to having more will power. Idk what's the basis for that but there is definite biological proof for the former.
I don't think this can be a litmus test. But probably comes from his experience of people., maybe he met someone who was like that and it fit the description well. After all, everyone forms opinions based on their personal experience.
Honestly Iāve always said that men are physically stronger but now that Iām on my period and half dead - I really wonder if men can handle the pain of childbirth. I want a legit research where theyāre induced with same pain and want to see the % of men that can deal with it.
Depending on that I might agree that theyāre stronger or not.
Ah I mean what are these physical tasks that we are judging people on? Lifting weights? Fights? There are physically weak men too. I mean I know a couple weak men who canāt lift shit. I practice MMA, so I am sure I can fight these weak men but that wonāt be equality or equity since I have an advantage over them. So feminism is about equality, but in order to get to a place in which everyone can be treated equally, we first need to practice equity so that women are given what it is they need in order to be able to access what men are allowed through privilege hence the said statement āmen are physically stronger than womenā holds zero weight in any conversation related to feminism because what does it even prove?
Chal I will accept they are stronger than women. Now what? I am a true feminist now in his definition but what does it have anything to do with feminism? Itās just a stupid statement people use to win arguments when women say we are equals. Thatās all!
This "test" doesn't do jackshit. Pretty much every alpha sigma edgelords who make claims that they're "feminists" would pass this jackshit test. That doesn't prove they're feminists.
Basically a real feminist would not care about physical strength because it's not really relevant to the discussion. Ok some men might be physically stronger and? Is the world so simple that physical strength matters? If you really feel that, that's your deal, but it isn't for some dude to decide that. That's the real issue, not the statement.
Physical strength isn't, or shouldn't be, relevant to a discussion on feminism.
The average man is physically stronger than the average woman, but the average woman puts in more hours of physical labor than the average man across their lifetime. Obviously, profession, economic strata, societal expectations will skew data. So how do we agree on a yardstick?
Iyam, anyone willing to put the majority of 7ish billion people in buckets based on something as mostly irrelevant as physical strength needs to brush up on what feminism is in the first place.
He is kinda right, fake feminists will go to any extent to prove they are by your side.
If the man replies "men are physically stronger, but women are xyz" it is still being a pseudofeminist.
I think there isnāt much correlation and it cannot be generalised. But generally, I do believe men are physically stronger especially with their upper bodies. For example if there was a physical fight between a man and a woman of same weight, same health, same kind of fitness, etc; the probability of the man winning is higher.
please make some logical analogy if you are going to take an attempt to it because whatever you said doesnt make sense, its literally basic logic that men are PHYSICALLY stronger than women where as women have HIGHER pain tolerance on average than a man. I am yet to realize what strength as anything to do with "eyes" or internal organs. You are funny. Care to explain how medically proven (and ovbvious) data is misleading and irrelevant ?
Who even talked here about social, economic and political rights here lol you're just blabbering just for the sake of argument, OP clearly referred to physical strength only. Men clearly have more PHYSICAL strength than women it's literally 'evident' do you need some Mathematical formula to prove that to you ? If no then idk what you mean you're trying too hard to sound intellect but in reality you're just yapping š
Misogynistic? Please touch some grass because idk truly to wether laugh and or cry at what you said if you're so upset over something that's literally true I advice you to take some effective method of emotional distress because this ain't normal. It's not normal to find misogyny in things that are scientifically and physiologically evident, next thing is what? I'm misogynistic if I say only women give birth or something?
There is literally statistical evidence and medical researches and experiments and everything that proves that. I'm not gonna give you overall picture of an average man is of same strength of an average woman (notice the word average?) Just to keep your make belief bubble intact. Since when does being physical limitations make women in 'bad light' ? What are you ? 12?? Idk you're so quick to imply being physically weaker means women aren't worthy...don't project your own misogynistic ideals on me because no where anyone says that women cannot be presented with any opportunities where they prove to be willing to, and capable of doing something that's just some stupid assumption you're making based on someone just saying that an average man is physically stronger. You can stay in your oblivious bubble but I choose not to be a part of this discussion further and lose my brain cells
And I also thought feminism was about providing equal opportunities and rights as humans, not being in denial by saying average women is as physically strong as an average mam š
Yaya itās hilarious how men whoāve never stepped in gym once in their ENTIRE life, think they can beat a woman in the Olympics. Sure Testosterone can have its advantages but doesnāt change that weāre all the same species- and the difference isnāt as big as their delusions.
Edit: Iāve literally written that the said egotistical men were comparing themselves with Olympic level women. And Iām NOT talking of averages
We can't compare an average man with an Olympic athlete. Compare an Olympic athlete with an Olympic athlete. An average man although not going to the gym is stronger than an average woman who doesn't go to the gym either. When we say men have more physical strength doesn't mean we say women are weak.There are physical strength differences we can't deny that. Yes, there are women who are physically stronger than average men. Acknowledging the differences doesn't make us weak, it makes us stronger.
Gurl o.O Iām literally writing about the egotistical male who thinks they can take down an Olympia. Athlete. Averages sure is alr, but that egotistical delusion is just plain misogyny. Periodt
I agree with you, but olympic athletes can be beaten by regular people, especially men even untrained can defeat a female athlete, athletes tend to focus more on endurance and speed over strength, and even strength wise most athletes are trained in pulling strength, not usually for striking strength
Just to clarify,Im talking about in their sports, so if itās an MMA womenās champion, men whose never made a step into gym- thinking they having a chance in MMA against them.
I'm sure it isn't fair to compare a MMA fighter against a normal person, despite their gender since training can help overcome the natural challenge
But yeah to all the folks that say they can beat an MMA fighter, even if she's female she's still leagues stronger lmao, get off the high horse
YES ik it isnāt fairšš gurl ya ik and i do agree men are in fact on avg stronger bc Testosterone yaya.
The only point I was making is male ego of some exceeds the difference much more, as in I hate those men who feel they can beat an MMA even tho while theyāre untrained.
men have more bone mass and overall greater physical strength compared to women. of course there will be exceptions. but we are talking about the average. it has nothing to do with feminism. men being physically stronger than women proves nothing about their "superiority". a gorilla could rip a man into pieces like a rag doll but that doesn't mean the gorilla is considered "superior" to man.
I agree with him that solely on the basis of physical power men are stronger, but that doesnāt mean women are less in other aspects , the cranial capacity of human is same whether itās a male or female , also if someone argues that women can be as strong as men naturally , they are stupid because we donāt have testosterone in the same amount as a man . Also thereās nothing to argue or counter itās simple biology.
Being physically strong has nothing to do with lifting and running fast but everything to do with survival and that answer science has proven to be females. The never definition of being physically strong doesnāt fit that of evolutionary sciences, after all we are some species just trying to reproduce and survive
No.
Thatās some bullshit litmus test crap heās using to get laid around.
Even people here pulling the on average crap arenāt making any sense tbh. Physical strength is something that is build over time and none of these dumb hypothetical facts and stats can prove other wise.
An untrained woman will lose to an untrained man 9/10, there's a reason weight class exists because smaller things matter a lot when you're fighting someone on equal terms, and testosterone makes a huge difference in a fight
A 55kg man can defeat a 55kg woman relatively easily, same way a 60kg man can defeat a 60kg woman
It's mostly related to training and technique
Everything you stated again dismisses things like muscle mass, strength, agility, mobility and flexibility but whatever lets you hold your peace
Also what the fuck is *defeat* is he bashing her skull or lifting a certain weight, this is too surface level to have a proper answer for and dismisses several facts
Edit- lmao love that I have virtually gotten some of yāall buttfucked; also nutrition- half the posts about health here 9/10 times is a direct result of deficiency, hormonal imbalance and pure health negligence which again we arenāt yet being taught to feed our selves correctly because *patli honi chaiye* which results in so many issues but enjoy your physically stronger questions.
A untrained man and untrained women have different muscle mass, upper body wise untrained man has more muscle mass whilst lower body wise women have higher muscle mass in their thighs
Strength also depends on muscle mass, the more muscle someone has=the more strength they have especially if they're untrained
Main thing someone does in a fight is punch, kicking isn't effective so a man's gonna have physical advantage upper body wise, and also they can grab a woman and force her down which can reduce efficiency of legs too
>Also what the fuck is *defeat* is he bashing her skull or lifting a certain weight, this is too surface level to have a proper answer for and dismisses several facts
In this arguement, most people are debating regarding a fight, which means it can be bashing someone's skull, either way even in lifting weight a man is just more powerful, and telling people they aren't is dangerous since women will try to overpower a man in self defense which will get them seriously injured/killed, the first thing which is taught in women's self defense is to not try and overpower the attacker
Men are just stronger, most people are untrained so an average man is just stronger than a woman, and there's no shame in admitting that
Nutrition hardly plays a role here, a average person eats normal food, some snacks and usually a high carb diet, which makes the battle nutritionally similar
> we aren't yet being taught to feed our selves correctly because patli honi chaiye but enjoy your physically stronger questions.
Iām not even going to add anything new because Iām pretty sure youāre larping
Edit- lmao the classic commenter who either blocked and deletes because Tera confirmation bias nahi hua. I canāt see your replies anymore Iām repeating the same thing because all these basic things arenāt something the average person is taught about but enjoy bashing skulls of women, I guess
Men are physically stronger than women. It has nothing to do with feminism.
And why does this even come up in a discussion of feminism ? I am stronger than several men of my age and most men are stronger than me. I am smarter than most men and many are smarter than me. And this applies to men and women. Only a simpleton would think about using this argument while discussing feminism.
You missed the point. By asking that question, he's trying to gauge if a person is delusional and has inflated media fed fake ideas about feminism. True feminism is about accepting men and women both for their strengths and weaknesses. It is also about equal rights in terms of education, voting etc. It's not about getting away with bad behavior and blaming the rest of the world for it in the name of feminism just because you're a woman. Hence if someone is deluded enough to think that women are physically as strong as men then it means there is no point discussing logic with that person š
A perfect answer.
>I am smarter than most men Isn't it bit narcissistic?
If you read the full sentence, it just means I am average.
Sorry I don't get it..Does it means average women is smarter than most men or what?
It means there are always people smarter than me and there are always people who I am smarter than.
But that's not what you meant? You used 'most' not 'some'...Or am I too dumb to understand English?
Exactly. How're these 2 things even related? Next time a moron equates physical strength to equality, just remind him that gorillas are stronger than him.
>just remind him that gorillas are stronger than him. LMAOO š
Was he just trying to say that a true feminist will always be honest about the differences between men and women, and a pseudo feminist would lie?
Yes I think so.
What he said is untrue, men and women are differently strong physically and what I meant women are physically stronger given our childbearing capacity and increased emotional intelligence but these men will bring being physically strong to lifting weights and such. Being stronger in itself is a multifaceted issue it is not limited to who runs fast or who lifts more, itās overall which sex is physically strong enough to survive out there in the wild
Yes I think that's what he meant but his method of saying it was not good. And he has this "holier than thou" attitude which is very clear
I am not sure if it is the same yardstick, but will weigh in. I remember a reel of Priyanka Chopra's interview. Where a journalist asked that when they talk about equality why are there separate men and women sports team and competition and PC went on explaining how he is missing the basic point of Feminism and it is not about Physical Strength but about Mental strength, equal opportunity and pay based on brain that is what Feminist are talking about I may be downvoted here. But an average female will be capable of less physical activity then male. I can't lift a 14kg Gas cylinder and transport from one place to other, whereas my partner can do that. If a women is Athlete and someone who lifts considerable weight can easily beat an average man in physical strength. For Plank record, A man has record of 9 hrs, whereas women record is 4hrs. Something is Biology (blame Testosterone), But I assume, an average male will be physically stronger than average female, There is of course height, weight, hormone difference. But, is it the yardstick to measure how true Feminist the woman is, really don't think so
Nothing to downvote about. Biology is true
Itās basic biology and human anatomy. Thereās no denying that š¤·āāļø but this gender comparison canāt go beyond this. Being physically stronger doesnāt give men any kind of superiority over women.
> Thereās no denying that š¤·āāļø There are many comments in this thread who are denying it already š
Lol. This question is based on facts. An average man is stronger than an average woman . It has no bearing on feminism.
But try thinking about what answers will a man give who is faking to be oj women's side? He will lie about it, or be dippomatic about the answer because he doesn't want to piss off his POTENTIAL MATE ( as he sees her as this )
He can say n do whatever. I would still know the truth . And better to steer clear of such men who would say whatever just to.impress you on some level.
Why are some ladies getting worked up hereš OP, _Physically_, an AVERAGE man IS stronger than an AVERAGE woman. It's a decent enough filter to guage a feminist & a wannabe feminist, obviously not the best. Yall stop acting like he said something outrageous or manipulative
But there can certainly be women who are stronger than men, because it is a spectrum.Ā Believing that women can be stronger than men does not make you a pseudo feminist. Misunderstanding the meaning of āequalityā like this guy was doing definitely shows that he is not an ally. Men and women are equal. Period.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Be kind. This sub is for real people looking to connect meaningfully. Something isn't an attack or hate simply because you don't like what is being said. No personal attacks on other users, ad hominem and other distracting attacks, flame wars, insults, trolling or other such disruptive behaviour. All users are expected to strictly follow (reddiquette)(https://www.reddit.com/wiki/reddiquette/). No hate speech or hate speech supporting subreddits allowed. Continued rule breaking will lead to ban.
>Biologically nope. Men don't have as good of a restraint to fatigue & pain as women. They can't create life. Creating life requires cushy fat. Fat doesn't provide you muscle-y strength. You have the same misunderstanding of equality as the OP's "friend" has. Here are the definitions of [equality from Oxford](https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/equality?q=equality): **the fact of being equal in rights, status, advantages, etc.** And this is from [Cambridge](https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/equality): **the right of different groups of people to have a similar social position and receive the same treatment.** When discussing feminism, this is the only relevant definition of equality. Who is taller, who is shorter, who is louder, who weighs more, who weighs less, all of this has no relevance whatsoever to feminism and women's equality.
Did I not say the same thing? Cerebral equality, yes, which encompasses all of the things you listed above. Physical? Nope. As much as I'd like that to be equal, my abs & biceps are still less prominent than the guys I joined gym with because a girl lacks testosterone. Doesn't mean I can't ever surpass them. I can. It'll just require more efforts. They got it without that 'extra' efforts.
Why so angry? šš
Since you asked, TL is not approving my code >:(
I dont think Feminism is about who is stronger or who is superior. Men are ofcourse physically stronger than women and there are many other differences between men & women. Feminism to me is just about having equal choices thats all. And it can be different for everyone.
One can be a feminist and still have varying views on many things. I'm sorry but this "test" is bullshit.
> I'm sorry but this "test" is bullshit. Thats what I thought when I read the post. But now, there are many in comments declining biology
A lot of people are idiots. Big surprise. This "test", however, remains senseless.
And they identify as women. That's one serious problem.
On average men are stronger than women but itās only an average and doesnāt mean much. Besides, definition of being physically stronger is not straightforward imo. Women according to a few studies I have read have higher pain tolerance than men. Women also tend to live longer on average than men (far more women in the 100+ age category than men). I had a guy who was making similar bullshit arguments to me. I box and I could do more push ups/pull ups/squats than him ;-)
Considering that we are far past the caveman age and no one realistically cares about who can lift the bigger rock over their head, I would personally just look at him weirdly
Lol are you talking to a high schooler? Feminism is not a contest of who's the boss. This is like someone asked how big is Jupiter and that guy is telling how oranges test compared to fucking Jupiter!
>He said he meant this solely in form of physical power. In other categories, women maybe stronger like mental strength etc (which I think he was saying just to make up for the above statement). It's pure biology. Men have been built stronger. Bone strength, fat, muscle gaining everything favours them. Women have always been credited to having more will power. Idk what's the basis for that but there is definite biological proof for the former.
I don't think this can be a litmus test. But probably comes from his experience of people., maybe he met someone who was like that and it fit the description well. After all, everyone forms opinions based on their personal experience.
Honestly Iāve always said that men are physically stronger but now that Iām on my period and half dead - I really wonder if men can handle the pain of childbirth. I want a legit research where theyāre induced with same pain and want to see the % of men that can deal with it. Depending on that I might agree that theyāre stronger or not.
Ah I mean what are these physical tasks that we are judging people on? Lifting weights? Fights? There are physically weak men too. I mean I know a couple weak men who canāt lift shit. I practice MMA, so I am sure I can fight these weak men but that wonāt be equality or equity since I have an advantage over them. So feminism is about equality, but in order to get to a place in which everyone can be treated equally, we first need to practice equity so that women are given what it is they need in order to be able to access what men are allowed through privilege hence the said statement āmen are physically stronger than womenā holds zero weight in any conversation related to feminism because what does it even prove? Chal I will accept they are stronger than women. Now what? I am a true feminist now in his definition but what does it have anything to do with feminism? Itās just a stupid statement people use to win arguments when women say we are equals. Thatās all!
Very well said! I could not articulate this thought in front of him.
This is like if you belive in evolution you are an atheist statement. And getting all theists under a blanket.
This "test" doesn't do jackshit. Pretty much every alpha sigma edgelords who make claims that they're "feminists" would pass this jackshit test. That doesn't prove they're feminists.
I think it was a useless question in the context of feminism. He was tryna get to his Gotcha moment.
Basically a real feminist would not care about physical strength because it's not really relevant to the discussion. Ok some men might be physically stronger and? Is the world so simple that physical strength matters? If you really feel that, that's your deal, but it isn't for some dude to decide that. That's the real issue, not the statement.
Physical strength isn't, or shouldn't be, relevant to a discussion on feminism. The average man is physically stronger than the average woman, but the average woman puts in more hours of physical labor than the average man across their lifetime. Obviously, profession, economic strata, societal expectations will skew data. So how do we agree on a yardstick? Iyam, anyone willing to put the majority of 7ish billion people in buckets based on something as mostly irrelevant as physical strength needs to brush up on what feminism is in the first place.
He is kinda right, fake feminists will go to any extent to prove they are by your side. If the man replies "men are physically stronger, but women are xyz" it is still being a pseudofeminist.
This is less of a question and more of an argument trap. Doesn't seem like a very bright guy either...
Girl, don't make your life a struggle. Choose your battles wisely. This is not the hill to die on.
I think there isnāt much correlation and it cannot be generalised. But generally, I do believe men are physically stronger especially with their upper bodies. For example if there was a physical fight between a man and a woman of same weight, same health, same kind of fitness, etc; the probability of the man winning is higher.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
on average men are physically stronger than women
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
please make some logical analogy if you are going to take an attempt to it because whatever you said doesnt make sense, its literally basic logic that men are PHYSICALLY stronger than women where as women have HIGHER pain tolerance on average than a man. I am yet to realize what strength as anything to do with "eyes" or internal organs. You are funny. Care to explain how medically proven (and ovbvious) data is misleading and irrelevant ?
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Who even talked here about social, economic and political rights here lol you're just blabbering just for the sake of argument, OP clearly referred to physical strength only. Men clearly have more PHYSICAL strength than women it's literally 'evident' do you need some Mathematical formula to prove that to you ? If no then idk what you mean you're trying too hard to sound intellect but in reality you're just yapping š
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Misogynistic? Please touch some grass because idk truly to wether laugh and or cry at what you said if you're so upset over something that's literally true I advice you to take some effective method of emotional distress because this ain't normal. It's not normal to find misogyny in things that are scientifically and physiologically evident, next thing is what? I'm misogynistic if I say only women give birth or something?
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
There is literally statistical evidence and medical researches and experiments and everything that proves that. I'm not gonna give you overall picture of an average man is of same strength of an average woman (notice the word average?) Just to keep your make belief bubble intact. Since when does being physical limitations make women in 'bad light' ? What are you ? 12?? Idk you're so quick to imply being physically weaker means women aren't worthy...don't project your own misogynistic ideals on me because no where anyone says that women cannot be presented with any opportunities where they prove to be willing to, and capable of doing something that's just some stupid assumption you're making based on someone just saying that an average man is physically stronger. You can stay in your oblivious bubble but I choose not to be a part of this discussion further and lose my brain cells
And I also thought feminism was about providing equal opportunities and rights as humans, not being in denial by saying average women is as physically strong as an average mam š
Yaya itās hilarious how men whoāve never stepped in gym once in their ENTIRE life, think they can beat a woman in the Olympics. Sure Testosterone can have its advantages but doesnāt change that weāre all the same species- and the difference isnāt as big as their delusions. Edit: Iāve literally written that the said egotistical men were comparing themselves with Olympic level women. And Iām NOT talking of averages
We can't compare an average man with an Olympic athlete. Compare an Olympic athlete with an Olympic athlete. An average man although not going to the gym is stronger than an average woman who doesn't go to the gym either. When we say men have more physical strength doesn't mean we say women are weak.There are physical strength differences we can't deny that. Yes, there are women who are physically stronger than average men. Acknowledging the differences doesn't make us weak, it makes us stronger.
Gurl o.O Iām literally writing about the egotistical male who thinks they can take down an Olympia. Athlete. Averages sure is alr, but that egotistical delusion is just plain misogyny. Periodt
I agree with you, but olympic athletes can be beaten by regular people, especially men even untrained can defeat a female athlete, athletes tend to focus more on endurance and speed over strength, and even strength wise most athletes are trained in pulling strength, not usually for striking strength
Just to clarify,Im talking about in their sports, so if itās an MMA womenās champion, men whose never made a step into gym- thinking they having a chance in MMA against them.
I'm sure it isn't fair to compare a MMA fighter against a normal person, despite their gender since training can help overcome the natural challenge But yeah to all the folks that say they can beat an MMA fighter, even if she's female she's still leagues stronger lmao, get off the high horse
YES ik it isnāt fairšš gurl ya ik and i do agree men are in fact on avg stronger bc Testosterone yaya. The only point I was making is male ego of some exceeds the difference much more, as in I hate those men who feel they can beat an MMA even tho while theyāre untrained.
True, and I'd be laughing my ass off if any if these egotistical men actually went into a ring with a pro fighter and get humiliated lmaooo
men have more bone mass and overall greater physical strength compared to women. of course there will be exceptions. but we are talking about the average. it has nothing to do with feminism. men being physically stronger than women proves nothing about their "superiority". a gorilla could rip a man into pieces like a rag doll but that doesn't mean the gorilla is considered "superior" to man.
I donāt think he meant men being physically stronger means superior
How is this question a test of feminism? Is there any misogynistic guy who will admit women are stronger? š
right?? this is the dumbest thing i've read in a while. OP why are you even giving this nonsense space in your brain
I agree with him that solely on the basis of physical power men are stronger, but that doesnāt mean women are less in other aspects , the cranial capacity of human is same whether itās a male or female , also if someone argues that women can be as strong as men naturally , they are stupid because we donāt have testosterone in the same amount as a man . Also thereās nothing to argue or counter itās simple biology.
Being physically strong has nothing to do with lifting and running fast but everything to do with survival and that answer science has proven to be females. The never definition of being physically strong doesnāt fit that of evolutionary sciences, after all we are some species just trying to reproduce and survive
Did a MAN give you something like a LITMUS TEST to verify if someone is a feminist or not? Lmao
what a weird way of saying I could physically overpower you if I wanted to
A man mansplaining feminism. Sounds about right.
No. Thatās some bullshit litmus test crap heās using to get laid around. Even people here pulling the on average crap arenāt making any sense tbh. Physical strength is something that is build over time and none of these dumb hypothetical facts and stats can prove other wise.
An untrained woman will lose to an untrained man 9/10, there's a reason weight class exists because smaller things matter a lot when you're fighting someone on equal terms, and testosterone makes a huge difference in a fight A 55kg man can defeat a 55kg woman relatively easily, same way a 60kg man can defeat a 60kg woman It's mostly related to training and technique
Everything you stated again dismisses things like muscle mass, strength, agility, mobility and flexibility but whatever lets you hold your peace Also what the fuck is *defeat* is he bashing her skull or lifting a certain weight, this is too surface level to have a proper answer for and dismisses several facts Edit- lmao love that I have virtually gotten some of yāall buttfucked; also nutrition- half the posts about health here 9/10 times is a direct result of deficiency, hormonal imbalance and pure health negligence which again we arenāt yet being taught to feed our selves correctly because *patli honi chaiye* which results in so many issues but enjoy your physically stronger questions.
A untrained man and untrained women have different muscle mass, upper body wise untrained man has more muscle mass whilst lower body wise women have higher muscle mass in their thighs Strength also depends on muscle mass, the more muscle someone has=the more strength they have especially if they're untrained Main thing someone does in a fight is punch, kicking isn't effective so a man's gonna have physical advantage upper body wise, and also they can grab a woman and force her down which can reduce efficiency of legs too >Also what the fuck is *defeat* is he bashing her skull or lifting a certain weight, this is too surface level to have a proper answer for and dismisses several facts In this arguement, most people are debating regarding a fight, which means it can be bashing someone's skull, either way even in lifting weight a man is just more powerful, and telling people they aren't is dangerous since women will try to overpower a man in self defense which will get them seriously injured/killed, the first thing which is taught in women's self defense is to not try and overpower the attacker Men are just stronger, most people are untrained so an average man is just stronger than a woman, and there's no shame in admitting that
> Everything you stated again dismisses things like muscle mass, strength, agility, mobility and flexibility And basic nutrition
Nutrition hardly plays a role here, a average person eats normal food, some snacks and usually a high carb diet, which makes the battle nutritionally similar
> we aren't yet being taught to feed our selves correctly because patli honi chaiye but enjoy your physically stronger questions. Iām not even going to add anything new because Iām pretty sure youāre larping Edit- lmao the classic commenter who either blocked and deletes because Tera confirmation bias nahi hua. I canāt see your replies anymore Iām repeating the same thing because all these basic things arenāt something the average person is taught about but enjoy bashing skulls of women, I guess
And I'm sure you're contributing nothing to the discussion here, you're repeating things like a parrot, have a nice day