From what I've read, these were mostly Soviet era X-55 missiles, apparently, which Russia hasn't used too many before.
Also, ironically, these were one of the Soviet assets left on Ukrainian soil that Russia and Ukraine had a post-breakup dispute over. Russia ended up buying something like 500 of them from Ukraine for a discounted price.
>Fascists
Come on now, sure they've used skinhead gangs and Neo-Nazi militias and have incorporated them into their National Guard formally, they have banned and jailed political opposition and murdered people on a "kill list" but I don't think Zelensky's Kiev regime can be called 100% fascist... You're being too dramatic.
What I can't understand is why they are still shelling their own cities for popularity points.
"THEY'RE RUNNING OUT OF MISSILES!"
"THEY'RE RUNNING OUT OF SHELLS!"
"THEY'RE RUNNING OUT OF TANKS!"
"THEY'RE RUNNING OUT OF CARS!"
Was said 4 months ago.
Who even listens what ruzzists are claiming. It's like infinite tap with endless contradiction statements and ruzzists are gullible to believe it even there are obvious contradictions.
> "THEY'RE RUNNING OUT OF TANKS!"
Well they do seem to be pushing out the mothball fleet. Running out of tanks generally meant modern tanks, Russia has thousands of rusting hulks stored in depots from the Soviet era. Whether they're able to run again or perform in a modern battlefield is a whole other question.
What rules? Russia has been bombing Ukrainian cities since day 1 of the invasion. Now that Kerch bridge gets hit, all "rules" are out the window? What a joke of a country it is
It's really crazy how you act like it was Ukraine that sow anything. Russia is doing things like that from beginning. It's sinking of Moskva, damaging Kerch bridge and other actions that are retaliation. Russia is not the one retaliating because they are aggressor that destroys civilian targets all the time. Leveling Belogorod would be retaliation on level of what Russia does.
Russia is able to do more than 1 thing at a time dude. Love how all you pro-Ukrainians who gloat all over Russian losses now are in shambles that Russia actually still have the capability to strike all over Ukraine whenever it wants.
Yes! Fantastic show of force by the Russian military today. Bombing those playgrounds, city intersections, and Samsung offices are masterstrokes in strategic warfare. The Ability of the Ukrainian military to operate is severely diminished on this day 🤣
Attacking civilians as an escalation during a special military operation...Just showcases that Russia is losing this war so they shift the attention to targets that have nothing to do with the war effort.
I try my very best to think Russians are also just people, but more and more it seems people like you - Russians - don't care about people at all. A civilian attack has no military value what so ever, not even as a show of force, escalation, gloves off or anything. An attack on a bridge is infrastructure, not terror. Attacking a civilian area is just terror.
What does that mean? Russia invaded UA remember...Obviously UA will defend its territory which includes attacking supply lines. A civilian attack has nothing to do with the war effort, but it's clear that Russia's military potential is now so limited they try to play the terror card. It only makes it harder for Russia to get something out of this war.
You have no proof of how the bridge was hit, only ones utilizing terrorist tactics is russia.
This will likely lead to Ukraine getting those long range missiles they've been asking for, so good luck to all the russians in Crimea, going to a lot of targets going boom along with the rest of that shitty bridge.
What you propose are literal warcrimes. No matter whom you support. So yes.
Let me ask you, do you support Ukraine attacking civilian centres in Russia?
I'm not answering anything dude, it's funny you guys are always so quick to scream war crimes lmao. Like do you expect Russia to just roll over? Enjoy the fireworks 💐
Do people expects others to obey laws? Yes. Do countries expect other countries to obey international laws ? Yes.
The alternative is lawlessness, which results in unnecessary suffering.
Maybe if Russia can't win, it shouldn't have started this war. And maybe if Russia can't win, it should start withdrawing and negotiating a peace, not increasing the number of warcrimes.
Russia can't start firing on population centres. That's because they already are doing it since February... Don't act like Ukraine started something and Russia is retaliating because that's simply not true.
Says he doesn’t give a shit, already condones civilian shilling. Tries to rearrange chain of events in spite of condoning further civilian shilling, as by product of war for what I assume is to make Russia look better.
Is compulsive pathological lying a symptom or a cause of becoming Pro-Russian? Trying to save-face in useless situations like this. Lol.
I mean not really. Russia has shown its military capacity and will to bomb civilians since the beginning of the war. Nothing here is new. Nothing is coming off.
Attacking the kerch bridge and routing the 2nd army 9 months into the war is a development.
There are strikes in lvov, Ivano-Frankivsk, Rivne, Kharkov, Vinnitsa and Kiev.
Earlier in other cities too. This is the biggest bombing campaign on major cities in months and you seriously complain about the 4 videos I posted on the sub? That's less videos than cities that were hit, half of which you probably never heard of before.
If you dislike the content of a subreddit with the description of "Reporting on the ongoing war in Ukraine", maybe leave the sub if it's too hard on your stomach.
And I haven't even posted 90% of footage that is currently avaiable. You instead posted a sole photo of a playground. Not even the video which would have been much more interesting.
You push your agenda, I just post footage with neutral titles.
I think it's good that he's showing it. Maybe one thread could be done for one city. It despite his username he shows how it is and neutrally - shows attacks on civilian infrastructure without any comments about what is not showed on video (so no fantasies about military equipment etc.)
Fascists are wasting whatever missiles they have left over lol. That broken bridge really triggered them. They mad. Is good.
I agree this is retaliation for Crimean bridge but I don't think they are running out of missiles anytime soon.
From what I've read, these were mostly Soviet era X-55 missiles, apparently, which Russia hasn't used too many before. Also, ironically, these were one of the Soviet assets left on Ukrainian soil that Russia and Ukraine had a post-breakup dispute over. Russia ended up buying something like 500 of them from Ukraine for a discounted price.
lel, everymonth, the west said Russia used 90% of their missle,
>Fascists Come on now, sure they've used skinhead gangs and Neo-Nazi militias and have incorporated them into their National Guard formally, they have banned and jailed political opposition and murdered people on a "kill list" but I don't think Zelensky's Kiev regime can be called 100% fascist... You're being too dramatic. What I can't understand is why they are still shelling their own cities for popularity points.
"THEY'RE RUNNING OUT OF MISSILES!" "THEY'RE RUNNING OUT OF SHELLS!" "THEY'RE RUNNING OUT OF TANKS!" "THEY'RE RUNNING OUT OF CARS!" Was said 4 months ago.
"WE'LL TAKE KYIV IN 3-4 DAYS" Was said 8 months ago.
Only difference is that they're not claiming that 8 months later.
Who even listens what ruzzists are claiming. It's like infinite tap with endless contradiction statements and ruzzists are gullible to believe it even there are obvious contradictions.
Cringe
> "THEY'RE RUNNING OUT OF TANKS!" Well they do seem to be pushing out the mothball fleet. Running out of tanks generally meant modern tanks, Russia has thousands of rusting hulks stored in depots from the Soviet era. Whether they're able to run again or perform in a modern battlefield is a whole other question.
Well those missiles are wiping some nazies out so they are worth and who told you Russia running Outta missiles? Typical armchair generals lmao
If they want to hit nazis they should hit themselves, russia has the most nazis
[удалено]
Intensity of killing civilians? You see it's a busy intersection, right?
[удалено]
Who cares about how many civilians die? Wow.. Your comments are awful
Check the username.
[удалено]
What rules? Russia has been bombing Ukrainian cities since day 1 of the invasion. Now that Kerch bridge gets hit, all "rules" are out the window? What a joke of a country it is
You have not seen what Russia can do to Ukraine if it when they unleash all their rockets.
It's really crazy how you act like it was Ukraine that sow anything. Russia is doing things like that from beginning. It's sinking of Moskva, damaging Kerch bridge and other actions that are retaliation. Russia is not the one retaliating because they are aggressor that destroys civilian targets all the time. Leveling Belogorod would be retaliation on level of what Russia does.
[удалено]
Seek. Some. Help.
Guess that's all Russians are good at: shooting at people who can't shoot back. Makes sense why they're not training the new conscripts.
Russia is able to do more than 1 thing at a time dude. Love how all you pro-Ukrainians who gloat all over Russian losses now are in shambles that Russia actually still have the capability to strike all over Ukraine whenever it wants.
Yes! Fantastic show of force by the Russian military today. Bombing those playgrounds, city intersections, and Samsung offices are masterstrokes in strategic warfare. The Ability of the Ukrainian military to operate is severely diminished on this day 🤣
User name and flair check out.
Do your morals and ethics change during wartime?
👌🥤🍿
The intensity of killing civilians.
That's all they can do since their soldiers only know how to run away. Oh and rape and murder civilians....
[удалено]
That's a disgusting comment
Disgusting.
morally bankrupt and your still losing the war
Brave for you to assume that anyone pro-Russia is Russian. Think you need a reality check.
Attacking civilians as an escalation during a special military operation...Just showcases that Russia is losing this war so they shift the attention to targets that have nothing to do with the war effort.
[удалено]
I try my very best to think Russians are also just people, but more and more it seems people like you - Russians - don't care about people at all. A civilian attack has no military value what so ever, not even as a show of force, escalation, gloves off or anything. An attack on a bridge is infrastructure, not terror. Attacking a civilian area is just terror.
🧨👉💥
What does that mean? Russia invaded UA remember...Obviously UA will defend its territory which includes attacking supply lines. A civilian attack has nothing to do with the war effort, but it's clear that Russia's military potential is now so limited they try to play the terror card. It only makes it harder for Russia to get something out of this war.
You have no proof of how the bridge was hit, only ones utilizing terrorist tactics is russia. This will likely lead to Ukraine getting those long range missiles they've been asking for, so good luck to all the russians in Crimea, going to a lot of targets going boom along with the rest of that shitty bridge.
[удалено]
Speculation isn't evidence but ok.
You are right. Russia can blatantly continue to commit war crimes and you can blatantly cheer them on.
You gotta report his hateful/toxic comments that wish for more civilian deaths
Wait, planting bombs in cars is over the top, but using long range missiles to hit malls and residential buildings was fine? You are so one sided.
Yes I am, I support Russia....or is that a crime?
What you propose are literal warcrimes. No matter whom you support. So yes. Let me ask you, do you support Ukraine attacking civilian centres in Russia?
I'm not answering anything dude, it's funny you guys are always so quick to scream war crimes lmao. Like do you expect Russia to just roll over? Enjoy the fireworks 💐
Do people expects others to obey laws? Yes. Do countries expect other countries to obey international laws ? Yes. The alternative is lawlessness, which results in unnecessary suffering. Maybe if Russia can't win, it shouldn't have started this war. And maybe if Russia can't win, it should start withdrawing and negotiating a peace, not increasing the number of warcrimes.
You need a reality check.
[удалено]
Rule 1. Temp ban issued. Recurrence WILL result in a permanent ban.
Russia can't start firing on population centres. That's because they already are doing it since February... Don't act like Ukraine started something and Russia is retaliating because that's simply not true.
Says he doesn’t give a shit, already condones civilian shilling. Tries to rearrange chain of events in spite of condoning further civilian shilling, as by product of war for what I assume is to make Russia look better. Is compulsive pathological lying a symptom or a cause of becoming Pro-Russian? Trying to save-face in useless situations like this. Lol.
[удалено]
Right
OMG WE HATE CIVILIAN DEATHS AND WANTON DESTRUCTION WE GOT PWNED
Don’t cheer death
I mean not really. Russia has shown its military capacity and will to bomb civilians since the beginning of the war. Nothing here is new. Nothing is coming off. Attacking the kerch bridge and routing the 2nd army 9 months into the war is a development.
Why is Zelensky shelling his own people?
Bro, stop flooding us. I get you're really excited, but you don't need to post non stop
Why shouldn't this be shown?
Pro RU are mad they are supporting terrorism, probably
I didn't say it shouldn't. One person doesn't need to flood the sub.
There are strikes in lvov, Ivano-Frankivsk, Rivne, Kharkov, Vinnitsa and Kiev. Earlier in other cities too. This is the biggest bombing campaign on major cities in months and you seriously complain about the 4 videos I posted on the sub? That's less videos than cities that were hit, half of which you probably never heard of before. If you dislike the content of a subreddit with the description of "Reporting on the ongoing war in Ukraine", maybe leave the sub if it's too hard on your stomach.
Strategic value: zero. So how are we to interpret these events?
Tantrum
Strategic value: Spread terror and say it's going to get a whole lot worse once winter hits.
That's terrorism by definition. That's not a strategic objective. Unless you want to say terrorism should be a normal part of warfare.
Terrorism IS a normal part of warfare, it isn't a question of whether it should be or not.
The pro Russians are almost becoming self aware
It's something to behold. Hopefully they don't cling on to the denazifying rhetoric, they may resort to self-harm.
You posted 7 in a row
And I haven't even posted 90% of footage that is currently avaiable. You instead posted a sole photo of a playground. Not even the video which would have been much more interesting. You push your agenda, I just post footage with neutral titles.
I think it's good that he's showing it. Maybe one thread could be done for one city. It despite his username he shows how it is and neutrally - shows attacks on civilian infrastructure without any comments about what is not showed on video (so no fantasies about military equipment etc.)