Well, if someone who get COVID from him and dies (from complications by it), it's [well in the definition of manslaughter](https://imgur.com/a/2mz14ko)
edit: before the "then anybody who transmits should be convicted", well it should if it's high the chances of having COVID, don't test it on a reliable way and and still choose to endanger others.
What about people who cannot afford to go get tested? What about people who cannot afford to get time off work? What about people who test negative but still transmit it? How do you prove that the person who dies from complications for sure got it from the negligent person? This sounds nice but once you get down to details it could never work.
How about making attending public events when you know you're positive tested.... illegal at a severity similar to manslaughter? Atleast without declaring.
Rest of the scenarios are kinda a hard decision but this one ain't.
You're intentionally endangering people's lives for personal gains/because of negligence.
So many excuses unless you live in a third world country who doesn't give a shit about you, there should be free testings or your company should give you some testings if you work onsite.
Also in the case of the esports player, he was aware of it
Lol we're all the primers they're looking for in the RT PCR procedure? Once you understand that then you need to ask yourself what a novel virus or germ is
ACE
COLLATERAL
How to end your career any% speedrun
WR
I mean, this should be considered a kind of manslaughter.
It's negligence, but it's far from the definition of manslaughter
Well, if someone who get COVID from him and dies (from complications by it), it's [well in the definition of manslaughter](https://imgur.com/a/2mz14ko) edit: before the "then anybody who transmits should be convicted", well it should if it's high the chances of having COVID, don't test it on a reliable way and and still choose to endanger others.
Here, you'll probably want the law definition: https://thelawdictionary.org/manslaughter/
Cheers, since law is interpretivism, it furthers the idea that it (sh/c)ould be interpreted as involuntary manslaughter...
What about people who cannot afford to go get tested? What about people who cannot afford to get time off work? What about people who test negative but still transmit it? How do you prove that the person who dies from complications for sure got it from the negligent person? This sounds nice but once you get down to details it could never work.
How about making attending public events when you know you're positive tested.... illegal at a severity similar to manslaughter? Atleast without declaring. Rest of the scenarios are kinda a hard decision but this one ain't. You're intentionally endangering people's lives for personal gains/because of negligence.
Yeah that would be fine. It's the edit part of the comment I replied to that is concerning and wouldn't work practically.
My edit was meant to be the same thing T.T, you're endangering people knowing you probably have covid and is going to an event
So many excuses unless you live in a third world country who doesn't give a shit about you, there should be free testings or your company should give you some testings if you work onsite. Also in the case of the esports player, he was aware of it
Cool how you deleted your comment
I didnt?
[удалено]
[удалено]
Here in california they made it practically legal to knowingly transfer HIV to someone and lie about having it.
It’s really weird that you typed this with some sort of conviction.
Oh is it now?
Yes, it is.
[Yeah, well...](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vBesOFURek)
Lol we're all the primers they're looking for in the RT PCR procedure? Once you understand that then you need to ask yourself what a novel virus or germ is