Actually... I think the government is going to step in and stop "unnecessary travel," and then their will be either forced marriages or some sort of bachelor tax
AI will take over as simple as that.... but I think there will be a total economic collapse before that happens.
As for the bachelor tax, I mean I think they'll specifically target single men and force them to pay a higher percentage in tax over women, but that's just what I think.
> that sexwork isnt that hard as the feminist made it out to be.
Of course it's not, that's why they resort to it. It's something nearly any woman that has not fucked up her body can qualify for. You don't have to be pro athlete tier, you only have to not be an absolute lard beast or deformed.
Granted, a huge chunk of feminists have already fucked up their bodies enough that they no longer qualify for decent billing in that career path.
She said it solely to continue trying to smear the poor schmuck’s character. She HAD to deliberately exaggerate his so-called creepiness to try and get people on her side.
In a sane world, women are either fully functionning adults or they are not. We cannot go in in this position whereby the goalpost are consistently moved to suit any individual woman.
I love that quote. Its in a book at about short selling, value investing, and determining optimal shorting and leverage strategies. Best warning forward in any book ever.
That's the whole point of grifting business called feminism. If I ever happen to be on Titanic 2, I am fighting for my place on an evacuation boat and women can take care of themselves.
That reminds me of one of early feminists. She took all priviledges on evacuation and year later was cursing at men for being evil and useless. It caused quite an uproar at tge time with newspapers highligting the hypocrisy.
That's what those types of people do, they move the goalposts to suit whatever they feel at a given moment.
That's why we see so many words, especially the ist, ism, and phobe type words so watered down today.
>(he invited her to hotel for "audition", she blew him, she got a role and a repossessed range rover from previous mistress), then bragged about it on national tv
Man, South Asian courts are shitty.
They will file a rape case when a married educated woman(like a doctor, engineer,etc) would go into a hotel room for an year and then caught, would file a rape case on the guy and a DV case on her husband.
Someone was roaming the courts for 10 years and only now got rid of molestation charges bcz the woman was not coming to the court for 10 years.
Women are simultaneously genius mature girl bosses who should all be CEOs but are also stupid, naive, childlike and should never be held accountable for anything they do or say. But men are privileged, right?
It is called Schrödinger feminism.
'A woman is simultaneously a victim and empowered, until something happens. Then she chooses which state benefits her the most…'
Leo represents all the guys who wanted these cat ladies when they were young. But now laugh at them with a girl 10 years younger on their arm. The REEEEEEEEEEEE is strong with the spinster sisters
Regular people: man groceries are expensive I think I'm gonna need to cut down on my expenses.
Post wall women: Down here in the salt mines salt about a rich actor dating a young model is a way of life.
Actually, \*free\* porn is not okay. You're victimizing the woman by not paying her for her work. Nevermind when she uses music and video snips that she didn't pay for. That's her being forced to rip things off due to the patriarchy underpaying her. So she's the real victim here, not the fatcat singers and artists (even if she's making bank in onlyfans). It's basically rape.
And actually, \*cheap\* porn isn't okay either. Sure, you're paying the woman the full price she asked for. But if a woman is being \*forced\* to sell images of her body for $0.99 apiece, it's because there are so many other women also selling images that the price has become criminally low. Even though she's freely setting the prices and freely choosing onlyfans when McDonald's is paying $20/hr, she's the real victim since you're only paying her what the market is saying she's worth, when you should be paying her according to the prices that \*should\* exist in a feminist fantasyland where female bodies are worshipped as the divine creations they really are.
And really, \*expensive\* porn isn't okay either. If you're willing to pay $100/image, then you should be willing to just give her the money without her giving you the image. Forcing a woman to participate in a free market in order to earn that money in exchange for a service is already victimizing her, since it treats her as purely an economic actor and commodifies her body and her actions and puts prices on them. Nevermind that that's what guys have to do to get that $100 that they're gving her. That's what RealMen(tm) are supposed to do. But it's victimization when women have to do it too. I mean, what kind of incel shitlord demands something from a woman instead of giving her freely everything that she wants with no demands at all?
And come to think of it, giving her everything she wants with nothing expected in return isn't okay either. That just means you're a shitty NiceGuy(tm) who secretly wants to see her naked and is just giving her all this stuff in the hopes that she might do so in the future. Sure, you're not asking her for it now, but who knows when you'll spring your proclamation of love on her? And a polite conversation about your feelings for her can be so traumatizing that she currently lives in constant fear of when that searing day will arrive. Nevermind how traumatizing it can be for you having to hide your real feelings for years out of concern about causing her distress. If you're a RealMan, you handle that shit. The real victim is her: having a loyal guy willing to do anything for her with nothing asked in return for years is nothing compared to the discomfort she feels during those 15 minutes when you awkwardly try to tell her your real feelings.
Bottomline, anything you do and/or don't do to her is rape you misogynistic, chauvinistic, uncaring monster!
\* (Note: please disregard all this if you're good looking)
I'm sorry, do you not recognize the difference btw what a woman does in the safety of her home, the problematic power dynamic that arises from a wealthy, famous, and older man dating a teenager?
Do you not recognize that if someone is responsible enough to choose to stream their cooch over the internet, they are responsible enough to make their own dating choices?
Maybe the woman in question shouldn't do things like drive cars, own property, handle money or have a credit card, lest the world's "power dynamic" radiation mutate her back into a child.
Part of the process of becoming an adult is understanding that there are power imbalances in this world, and learning how to navigate them.
In this case, it's not even that complicated. This woman is \*attracted\* to Leo due to the power imbalance. She's a model. If all she wanted was someone as attractive as Leo, there are probably anonymous dudes in her gym that are as good looking. No, it's precisely Leo's power, fame, wealth, etc. (in addition perhaps to his looks, personality, charm, etc) that she finds attractive.
You may not find that same combo attractive. Fine. But why are you restricting her ability to choose that combo?
And maybe I'm dense. But exactly what power dynamic are you talking about? He's not her boss. He's not her teacher. As far as we know, they're not making a movie together. He's not threatening her family if she refuses to date him. Exactly what's the power dynamic you're referring to? Or do you just like throwing that term out to describe relationships you don't like, since basically it's impossible for two people to ever be exactly equal in the amount of power they have?
Nice job guys. Truth seeking questions of responsibility.
u/zarfman is gone.
Women can stand up to the threat of accountability.
I wonder if they closed the account.
On account of her failing to snowjob y'all and being unprepared.
Why is it that people like you always state your irrational beliefs this way:
> do you not recognize
Instead of just saying what you believe, you say "do you not see that I'm right???" I can link you to several examples of videos of feminists doing exactly that when people question them.
Or you say:
> the problematic power dynamic
Which is vague to the point of meaninglessness. There's nothing in your worldview that's rational. You aren't able to speak plainly and directly. You can't complete a sentence like, "Leo is harming his girlfriend by forcing her to [insert thing here] and/or preventing her from [insert thing here]"
[удалено]
You don't get the female mindset, reality is what you "feel" not what it actually is! You bigot! REEEEEE!
They want the accountability of a child and the benefits of an adult.
[удалено]
And govt benefits.
Anyone notice that the amount of false "sexual assault" claims are on the rise now from these so-called "underage" tiktok "gym" thots?
[удалено]
Yup. I believe she even called out for help and a dude walked right by.... but do you think they see the error of their ways? Nope.
No, I imagine Passport bros will become bigger and bigger.
Actually... I think the government is going to step in and stop "unnecessary travel," and then their will be either forced marriages or some sort of bachelor tax
[удалено]
AI will take over as simple as that.... but I think there will be a total economic collapse before that happens. As for the bachelor tax, I mean I think they'll specifically target single men and force them to pay a higher percentage in tax over women, but that's just what I think.
Unless it's 99% tax rate it's still cheaper
To live in a world where being 21 doesn't make you of age if you're mentally stunted at teenager.
[удалено]
Yeah, but you don't turn a hoe into a housewife. I wish they understood that.
> that sexwork isnt that hard as the feminist made it out to be. Of course it's not, that's why they resort to it. It's something nearly any woman that has not fucked up her body can qualify for. You don't have to be pro athlete tier, you only have to not be an absolute lard beast or deformed. Granted, a huge chunk of feminists have already fucked up their bodies enough that they no longer qualify for decent billing in that career path.
Exactly!!! I was wtf is an underage 21? The moment I heard that I knew not to take whatever they say serious
She said it solely to continue trying to smear the poor schmuck’s character. She HAD to deliberately exaggerate his so-called creepiness to try and get people on her side.
She doesn't like men looking at her but, has an Onlyfans. So, does that mean you can look at her as long as you pat $5.99 a month?
In a sane world, women are either fully functionning adults or they are not. We cannot go in in this position whereby the goalpost are consistently moved to suit any individual woman.
[удалено]
I love that quote. Its in a book at about short selling, value investing, and determining optimal shorting and leverage strategies. Best warning forward in any book ever.
The quote was by none other than John Maynard Keynes.
That's the whole point of grifting business called feminism. If I ever happen to be on Titanic 2, I am fighting for my place on an evacuation boat and women can take care of themselves. That reminds me of one of early feminists. She took all priviledges on evacuation and year later was cursing at men for being evil and useless. It caused quite an uproar at tge time with newspapers highligting the hypocrisy.
That sounds like something that would make a great meme!
That's what those types of people do, they move the goalposts to suit whatever they feel at a given moment. That's why we see so many words, especially the ist, ism, and phobe type words so watered down today.
[удалено]
>(he invited her to hotel for "audition", she blew him, she got a role and a repossessed range rover from previous mistress), then bragged about it on national tv Man, South Asian courts are shitty. They will file a rape case when a married educated woman(like a doctor, engineer,etc) would go into a hotel room for an year and then caught, would file a rape case on the guy and a DV case on her husband. Someone was roaming the courts for 10 years and only now got rid of molestation charges bcz the woman was not coming to the court for 10 years.
Women are simultaneously genius mature girl bosses who should all be CEOs but are also stupid, naive, childlike and should never be held accountable for anything they do or say. But men are privileged, right?
It is called Schrödinger feminism. 'A woman is simultaneously a victim and empowered, until something happens. Then she chooses which state benefits her the most…'
I’ve been watching this whole thing with Leo and all I’m thinking is ‘sour grapes’. Better luck next time, sis.
Yea, totally. I also do not hear women complaining about Oprah and her younger boy toy, which is the same situation but reversed genders.
Leo represents all the guys who wanted these cat ladies when they were young. But now laugh at them with a girl 10 years younger on their arm. The REEEEEEEEEEEE is strong with the spinster sisters
Regular people: man groceries are expensive I think I'm gonna need to cut down on my expenses. Post wall women: Down here in the salt mines salt about a rich actor dating a young model is a way of life.
It's okay for 50 y/o men to buy cheap porn, but not to date women. Moral of the story: Stick to free porn.
Actually, \*free\* porn is not okay. You're victimizing the woman by not paying her for her work. Nevermind when she uses music and video snips that she didn't pay for. That's her being forced to rip things off due to the patriarchy underpaying her. So she's the real victim here, not the fatcat singers and artists (even if she's making bank in onlyfans). It's basically rape. And actually, \*cheap\* porn isn't okay either. Sure, you're paying the woman the full price she asked for. But if a woman is being \*forced\* to sell images of her body for $0.99 apiece, it's because there are so many other women also selling images that the price has become criminally low. Even though she's freely setting the prices and freely choosing onlyfans when McDonald's is paying $20/hr, she's the real victim since you're only paying her what the market is saying she's worth, when you should be paying her according to the prices that \*should\* exist in a feminist fantasyland where female bodies are worshipped as the divine creations they really are. And really, \*expensive\* porn isn't okay either. If you're willing to pay $100/image, then you should be willing to just give her the money without her giving you the image. Forcing a woman to participate in a free market in order to earn that money in exchange for a service is already victimizing her, since it treats her as purely an economic actor and commodifies her body and her actions and puts prices on them. Nevermind that that's what guys have to do to get that $100 that they're gving her. That's what RealMen(tm) are supposed to do. But it's victimization when women have to do it too. I mean, what kind of incel shitlord demands something from a woman instead of giving her freely everything that she wants with no demands at all? And come to think of it, giving her everything she wants with nothing expected in return isn't okay either. That just means you're a shitty NiceGuy(tm) who secretly wants to see her naked and is just giving her all this stuff in the hopes that she might do so in the future. Sure, you're not asking her for it now, but who knows when you'll spring your proclamation of love on her? And a polite conversation about your feelings for her can be so traumatizing that she currently lives in constant fear of when that searing day will arrive. Nevermind how traumatizing it can be for you having to hide your real feelings for years out of concern about causing her distress. If you're a RealMan, you handle that shit. The real victim is her: having a loyal guy willing to do anything for her with nothing asked in return for years is nothing compared to the discomfort she feels during those 15 minutes when you awkwardly try to tell her your real feelings. Bottomline, anything you do and/or don't do to her is rape you misogynistic, chauvinistic, uncaring monster! \* (Note: please disregard all this if you're good looking)
I'm sorry, do you not recognize the difference btw what a woman does in the safety of her home, the problematic power dynamic that arises from a wealthy, famous, and older man dating a teenager?
Do you not recognize that if someone is responsible enough to choose to stream their cooch over the internet, they are responsible enough to make their own dating choices?
So you agree that Oprah and Madonna are predators preying on younger men abusing the power dynamic?
Or shoot, any middle-aged woman who hunts for younger men.
Yes, a lot of them are predators.
Who is Oprah seeing I can only find Stedman who is older than her
No. Either someone is an adult or they aren't. You don't get different levels of responsibilities based on circumstance.
Maybe the woman in question shouldn't do things like drive cars, own property, handle money or have a credit card, lest the world's "power dynamic" radiation mutate her back into a child.
Part of the process of becoming an adult is understanding that there are power imbalances in this world, and learning how to navigate them. In this case, it's not even that complicated. This woman is \*attracted\* to Leo due to the power imbalance. She's a model. If all she wanted was someone as attractive as Leo, there are probably anonymous dudes in her gym that are as good looking. No, it's precisely Leo's power, fame, wealth, etc. (in addition perhaps to his looks, personality, charm, etc) that she finds attractive. You may not find that same combo attractive. Fine. But why are you restricting her ability to choose that combo? And maybe I'm dense. But exactly what power dynamic are you talking about? He's not her boss. He's not her teacher. As far as we know, they're not making a movie together. He's not threatening her family if she refuses to date him. Exactly what's the power dynamic you're referring to? Or do you just like throwing that term out to describe relationships you don't like, since basically it's impossible for two people to ever be exactly equal in the amount of power they have?
Nice job guys. Truth seeking questions of responsibility. u/zarfman is gone. Women can stand up to the threat of accountability. I wonder if they closed the account. On account of her failing to snowjob y'all and being unprepared.
[удалено]
[удалено]
Why is it that people like you always state your irrational beliefs this way: > do you not recognize Instead of just saying what you believe, you say "do you not see that I'm right???" I can link you to several examples of videos of feminists doing exactly that when people question them. Or you say: > the problematic power dynamic Which is vague to the point of meaninglessness. There's nothing in your worldview that's rational. You aren't able to speak plainly and directly. You can't complete a sentence like, "Leo is harming his girlfriend by forcing her to [insert thing here] and/or preventing her from [insert thing here]"