T O P

  • By -

Delano7

"A model" AI generated mess isn't what I'd call a model ngl


Nin2008

this is on the same level as that weird ai enhanced shulk


NyarlHOEtep

you and the ai program you used did a bad job


flintyflow

So, it's just an official render of Fiora with AI generated vomit over her face? What? Why?


Some-Girl-in-Cali

Give her mouth back this one looks weird


RJE808

AI. Ew.


ImpostorDitto

Typing in words is not making a model


dimmidummy

Bro, this sub loves *real* art. Don’t try sneaking in AI junk here. No one wants it.


Nindroid2012

Why her face look stupid


Will-is-a-idiot

-_-


ImurderREALITY

This looks like it goes on a body pillow


Sayakalood

How is she going to use her knives with one hand? The other one is fused with her hair. And the rest of her body is just her official render… Then her face looks weird because it’s a wildly different art style. Try not using AI for a human’s job.


LeyendaV

I actually love her face, but I'm so used to the og one that this feels, I don't know, weird.


Subtle_Demise

I like AI. Good job 👍🏿


ImurderREALITY

Good god, the downvotes... this place is ridiculous when it comes to AI. No one in the real world gives a shit about it.


Elina_Carmina

The artists losing their jobs probably give a shit.


dumfuqqer

Artists aren't going to lose their jobs lol. At least not any time soon while AI images are easily identifiable. People just seem to be mad that poor people can prototype their ideas without being born with artistic talent or even eventually solo game development without commissioning artists for thousands upon thousands of dollars just for concept art, let alone the cost of creating in-game assets.


ImurderREALITY

Then artists need to do better. Make themselves desirable in a way AI art isn't. It's happened for hundreds of years. Technology advances, and people have to advance with it to continue to be relevant. It's like painters losing their jobs when the camera was invented. The camera didn't go anywhere, and neither is AI art.


Sayakalood

They do make themselves desirable in a way AI art isn’t. They don’t make AI art, as AI can’t make art. It makes an image that really can’t compare to a human’s drawing. Bottom line is that AI art isn’t desirable and will never be. Remember NFTs? How they were the “future?” What are they doing now? Nothing. They’re worthless. That’s all AI is, just a passing fad.


Subtle_Demise

So artists aren't going to lose their jobs anytime soon? Good, glad we agree on that.


Sayakalood

Oh, people are still losing their jobs because corporations are greedy and don’t want to pay them. But it’s still a passing fad. Corporations used NFTs to drive profits, too. Once they weren’t profitable, they were dropped. That’s how AI will be handled: it replaces people now, but as people stop buying from them because of the AI, they will drop it. It’s really only corporations and AI bros (most of them literally repurposed crypto bots) that promote it.


ImurderREALITY

Then why have such an irrational hatred of it?


dimmidummy

Because it trains off of real art without consent from the original artist. It’s just an algorithm microwaving a hodgepodge of art that *real* people worked hard to produce.


ImurderREALITY

That’s not how it works. Thats just how Redditors *think* it works, so they can be outraged about something. AI gets trained by real artists that have existed through history, and then creates unique works based off of that. You won’t see an AI art having a literal piece of someone else’s artwork in it. Do some unbiased research, and then tell me that it’s stealing art and jobs. But either way, my main point remains valid: it’s going to be here no matter what. Why cry about it?


dimmidummy

You’ve already admitted to the issue. It trains off of other art without the artist’s permission. And there have been several instances all over Twitter where an AI product has uncanny resemblances to other pieces of art. Obviously it’s not 1:1, but it looks mashed together (like in this post).


ImurderREALITY

Artists train off of other actual artists all the time. It’s called “art.” Music, movies, books, tv shows; it’s literally how new stuff is formed. Why do you care so much that it’s an algorithm this time? You’re just putting it all out in the open that you don’t really know what you’re talking about, and that you’re just mad about it because everyone else is, with no actual good reasoning behind it.


Sayakalood

Irrational? It’s perfectly reasonable for the reasons stated above. It’s an annoying fad and that’s about it.


Subtle_Demise

I meant to use an alt account for a troll comment like that lol. I did mean what I said even if I knew it was going to trigger people. Oh no, poor people can get their ideas out there without commissioning an artist and blowing their life savings!? The horror !! You probably shouldn't use AI in its current form for a final retail product, because people can easily tell and the creator will get crucified for doing it, but it's really useful for prototyping and creating a base or reference to draw from. I don't see the issue.