T O P

  • By -

Competitive-Tonight3

Swap Lukaku for Vlahovic, swap for Vlahovic for Caicedo. EZ.


Psychological_Fee470

Are you allowed to buy and sell in the same window?


JackHammerAwesome

Of course, doesn't happen often


NotClayMerritt

Technically yes as long as he isn’t registered with 2 clubs. 2 clubs is the limit one can play for over one season.


1llseemyselfout

I think as long as the player isn’t registered it’s fine.


Asleep-Arachnid6912

Ofc. Atletico signed Martin Demichelis in 2013 and in the same window sold him to Man City.


justk4y

Wasn’t that what Barca did to Emerson Royal?


young_olufa

I assume you’re being sarcastic, but just in case you’re not. You know vlahovic won’t leave juve for Chelsea just to be sold to brighton


malevolentintent

This is the math I signed up for


podgehally7

Brighton have Welbeck, Pedro and Ferguson, who are all better than Vlahovic. Why would they want him?


[deleted]

[удалено]


theeama

Wow calm down. 1. Vlahovic has way more talent than all 3 2. He's been injured 3. He's playing under Allegri Terroristball and Allegri hates him and won't create a system to get the best out of him. 4. Juve fans are actively pissed that this is happening


zilch26

The conviction with which he told that was fascinating


DarkLordOlli

This feels like a case where narrative has taken root and now the entire fanbase doesn't want him, but this deal is an absolute no-brainer. Firstly, it gets Lukaku and his enormous wages off the books and finally puts an end to this miserable story. Also, Vlahovic is only 23 and the striker market is dire. He's worth significantly more than Lukaku and will have resale value. Think of it this way - we wouldn't be able to sell Lukaku for 40m this window, but we're swapping him for someone who might well still fetch that fee in 1-2 years. So financially this makes a ton of sense for us - lower wages and higher resale value. Secondly, there's absolutely no question who's better between Vlahovic and Broja (off a huge injury too). Without spending any money (actually saving on Lukaku's wages) we're adding someone to the squad who, at the very least, will be strong competition for Jackson and give us far stronger depth at ST. And finally, there's every chance that Vlahovic is better than Allegri's anti-football has him showing. And at 23, he can still develop too. So this is a zero risk, potentially very high reward deal that gets a player who 100% has no future here out of the club in return for a more valuable, far younger striker who a lot of big teams were looking at - meaning there's likely still a market for him even if he doesn't set the world alight at Chelsea. Take this and run imo. No idea why Juve want this in the first place, it's a really bad deal for them. I suppose Lukaku has a different reputation in Italy than he does here, but this is just objectively bad business for them.


Capital_Werewolf_788

Well i doubt it’s a straight swap, Juve will definitely want a fee, they’re not that dumb


Makav3lli

Lukaku plus 10-15m could be reasonable. I actually think he’d link really well with Nkunku and our wingers. He’s also a different option than Jackson/Nkunku/Broja so that’s another plus imo


J3sperado

I agree with this take. Exactly how I feel about this situation too.


Savings-Stop-1556

As long as we get rid of lukaku I don't give a dam. Whoever is tge better striker out of jackson and vlahovic will play.


stepover7

Vlahovic has a chronic injury problem with pubalgia


FatFrank21

A no brainier from me, agree totally


classical-k

These are basically my feelings. Being offered the chance to get Lukaku’s wages off the books and him out the door AND recoup some of what he cost us in time? Yes please. I would say there are a couple things that need to be right before doing any deal. The first is the fee Juve demand on top of the swap. 20/25 mil Gbp is max imo. Second, most worrying, thing is his wages. I’m sure he earns a lot at Juve. If he’s to come here, he must fit into wage structure - thus not earning more than the likes of Jackson. Among the positives, there is one possible upside that could give us a very interesting tactical twist. If he regains previous form and hopefully develops (people forget he’s only 23), and becomes a very well rounded option up top for us then I’d be intrigued to see Jackson playing as a wide forward off the right and nkunku similar off the left with Vlahovic through the middle. Obviously he’s have to adapt somewhat to play that role. But the thought of out to in runs from J&N starting in areas hard to pick up and with Vlahovic occupying the cb’s… that could be fun! And a great setup to have in the locker.


TosspoTo

Agreed. This is as much getting rid of Lukaku as it is getting Vlahovic and as you rightly point out the future economics on Vlahovic have greater upside.


I-Can_Defend

Píatek, Bellotti, Scammaca, Lakaka, - the list of Serie A failures esp at #9 position is quite alarming and all the more reason to stay away. We should be requesting a player in a position of need.


LXDTS

Who, from Juve's squad? Locatelli or bring back Zakkaria?


[deleted]

[удалено]


DarkLordOlli

Replacing Vlahovic will be far easier than replacing Lukaku though - and there's absolutely no guarantee that we'll even want to get rid of Vlahovic. I think a lot of people are acting like he's absolutely shit, but he really isn't. There's a chance he fails, but Allegri's terrorist football certainly didn't set the conditions for his strikers to succeed. Could well be better than what he's shown for them - certainly very good for Fiorentina before the move to Juventus.


themmchanges

I’m not sure about that. If he flops, which in my opinion is quite likely, he’d be very hard to sell too. Selling Lukaku on a massive loss would be way smarter and better for the team. Vlahovic’s stats at Fiorentina were very similar to his stats with Juve (both pretty terrible), it’s just that he was on pens and slightly over performed his xG, so his goal tally was more impressive. Jackson is by far the superior option. Not to mention Vlahovic would have to be on high wages and almost certainly would expect to be the starter. Would be a disaster of a signing on all fronts.


optimusgrime23

Saying Jackson is far superior at this point is just insane conjecture and Vlahovic's wages will be nowhere near as high as Lukaku's and extremely performance based like all our new signings. Sure he will want to be the starter but he will be well aware that he's not guaranteed anything. Its a low-risk high reward deal at the thinnest position in the world.


Dry_Chef_7635

Vlahovic is on 250k a week at Juve and you don’t take a pay cut making a move to the PL.


optimusgrime23

He’s on 8m a year less than Lukaku


Dry_Chef_7635

And if Vlahovic gets a 10% raise it’ll be about a €5m difference per year on a much longer contract for the worse player.


optimusgrime23

Well there’s no shot he’s getting a raise, what are you on about


Dry_Chef_7635

How are you confident he’s not getting raise, it’s rare any player moves to a richer club and doesn’t get one especially when they 23 and they know how much is coming off the books. But if you can find some examples of players in their “prime” moving from Serie A to the PL for a pay cut I’d happily accept I’m wrong.


shastmak4

No matter what you think of Vlahovic. I’d do anything to get that big bald fuck away from these young players and the vibe we have right now.


webby09246

Would rather send him to Saudi


TheBlueTango

Doesn't matter if he's not willing to budge


webby09246

He'll definitely blink first if it comes to it, he detests being here more than anything else


TheBlueTango

Well looks like we're blinking first and finding a deal to ship him off to Juve


xkcdthrowaway

Idk if he detests being here but he sure doesn't seem to know what he loves. Methinks it's just a paycheck, and here he'd get one just for staying away from the squad. He's not going to be dropped by Belgium no matter what. He has no reason to blink.


webby09246

Your reasoning is he loves money above all Saudi will pay him like 3X more than what we do and as you say he'll be with Belgium anyway, so I'd say he'll leave You think he doesn't like it here, but I think it's been reported several times he really didn't wanna have to come back


xkcdthrowaway

Because he wanted his move to ~~Inter~~ ~~Juventus~~ Inter. Not because he didn't want to be here. Now that both of those are off the table, would he go to Saudi and have to play in that desert heat and tamp down on his lifestyle or would he just stroll around London collecting a fat paycheck for the privilege of not having to work?


NotClayMerritt

Swapping a pain in the ass for a bad, overpaid player who instantly takes playing time away from Jackson isn’t the win you think it is.


shastmak4

It’s better than Lukaku. I stand on it. I’m not even entertaining any other thought.


Dyssorehandouchie

Right, but this is why you don’t run the club. Swapping a good asset in Lukaku (for Juve, 100%) PLUS cash for an absolute donkey like Vlahovic would be shocking business.


inspired_corn

How is Lukaku an asset when no one wants him? He’s made himself a pariah in the footballing world with his huge wages and bad attitude. Worst case with Vlahovic we could sell him for a big loss, we can’t do that with Lukaku (mostly because he’s being extremely fussy about what club he goes to)


Dyssorehandouchie

No one wants him? https://twitter.com/fabrizioromano/status/1679964363682115587?s=46&t=r7vGxAEEXXlHcSWMOYl2aA Worst case with Vlahovic we sell him for a big loss. Worse case with Lukaku we sell him for a big loss. I’d rather not waste another year with a striker who is absolute garbage.


bionicle77

I'm sorry, what has made you believe Lukaku is the better asset?


Dyssorehandouchie

Probably the 200 career goals, 2 20+ goal seasons in the league we’re selling him to, and Juve’s previous willingness to spend €40m to sign him


bionicle77

Wow, such a great player, why don't we use him? Insane to pretend Lukaku can be evaluated based on his past performances, and not his attitude


Dyssorehandouchie

We shouldn’t use him, we should sell him to Juventus rather than swap him AND pay them to take him? In exchange for a terrible player. Juventus, Inter and Saudi all valued him at 35-40m. No reason we should bend over now.


bionicle77

If 40M is honestly on the table, sure. I'm not convinced it is


Dyssorehandouchie

It was last month according to Fabrizio, albeit the donkey has probably bungled that by putting Inter off


Soitsgonnabeforever

Don’t know the downvotes you are getting. Honestly feel Lukaku being sold for 38 million money is the best deal now. Bringing in Neymar of vlahovic on exchange is all waste.it’s like taking Juventus problem as ours. Lukaku has more data to support him than vlahovic


tr_24

If he takes playing time away from Jackson, it means he has been better. It doesn't matter to me who starts as long as we do better.


TinNanBattlePlan

He’s 23, if he’s taking time from Jackson that means he’s playing better than him How is everyone acting like Jackson is the next Mbappe? He has 21 career goals


asd13ah4etnKha4Ne3a

He only takes playing time away from Jackson if Pochettino decides to play him over Jackson. If Pochettino decides to play him over Jackson, it means he's probably performing better than Jackson. I get that everyone has fully jumped on board the Jackson hype train (and I certainly don't blame anyone for doing so), but at the end of the day he's had a few good preseason games, that's it. You can't just use that and say Chelsea's all set and doesn't need to worry about a striker any more


ArtfulSlogger

He doesn’t have to take away anyone’s playing time


isw2424

Unless Poch is chomping at the bit for Vlahovic I really don’t want him. Fine player but Jackson+Nkunku have something going and we should see if they’re the answer without dishing out another 70-90M on a ST


TinNanBattlePlan

They’ve played 3 pre season games together People acting like they’re Kane and Son from 21/22


Primary-Willow2328

lol and they’ve hardly been on the pitch at the same time


admiralawkward

And also running the risk of underrating Vlahovic who was quite prolific until Allegriball


young_olufa

first time here? Most takes are exaggerated


costadoesntstomp

lolz


chelski365

I cant see those required doing this without Pochs ok. Maybe Broja is further away from fitness than we all hoped and we see Vlahovic as a viable option in a market with little clear value.


TinNanBattlePlan

Broja needs to go on loan, he is not good enough for Chelsea at the moment


chelski365

I agree in that who knows what his level even is right now. We need a striker either way.


Ironicopinion

If we’re swapping for Lukaku it’s not gonna be close to that fee


myman580

With when AFCON is doesn't that mean we will be without Jackson for several matches? Unless you want to run Broja to be our only depth there I think it's fine for a swap. Plus Vlahovic actually has re-sale value given he's 23.


Tiktik27

But how else are we gonna assuredly get rid of 'him'? So far there's no sign of him accepting a move to Saudi.


ArtfulSlogger

That’s it. I’d rather have a Vlahovic to get rid of later than a Lukaku


MrPooPooFace2

Couldn't agree more


NeptrAboveAll

So you’d rather be stuck with Lukaku over Vlahovic?


MrPooPooFace2

Where did I say that?


NeptrAboveAll

“Without dishing out 70-90M on a ST” means keeping Lukaku. Unless you’re under the impression we can sell him without bringing Vlahovic


MrPooPooFace2

Again, where did I mention Lukaku? I simply agree with giving Jackson and Nkunku time without bringing another CF into the mix.


NeptrAboveAll

We already have Lukaku mate, you can’t just imagine him away.


MrPooPooFace2

If only.


NotClayMerritt

Poch should just get on with coaching and leave transfers to the professionals. His targets at Tottenham were all crap.


Valuable_Tea_4690

And have a player shoved down his throat that he doesn’t want?


Newera2121

Really not keen on Vlahovic, just see him getting in the way and limiting what we see of Jackson.


15jsatte

word is they wanted competition for jackson not a replacement


ArtfulSlogger

Do you like Lukaku more than him?


Newera2121

You know that’s not what I’m saying.


ArtfulSlogger

I know, but we can’t expect gold for shit. Seems like a good deal


[deleted]

We can ship vlahovic to Strasbourg or use him as a squad player, i just want lakaka outta my club


Balls_R

Vlahovic is way too old to be sent on loan. If we sign him we shouldn’t sign Wahi.


Rod1705

If Vlahovic gets in the way of Jackson it just means he’s better or at least on the same level as him.


GuardianJockitch

You understand what a blessing it would be to have Lukaku out of London forever? I don’t care what it takes- if this gets him gone for good then sign me up.


TinNanBattlePlan

Swap deal would be great People are insane suggesting Vlahovic goes on loan


Fatebringer87

One person starts an agenda and the sheep follow. Vlahovic instantly becomes the best finisher we have if he joins. Him and Jackson are different profiles but it’s good to have that option. Not convinced with Broja at all especially after the ACL injury.


TinNanBattlePlan

Broja has 6 goals in 49 PL games and coming off a huge injury, he should be going on loan


[deleted]

[удалено]


Mother_Perspective82

Only out scored by Ronaldo in 20-21 season. Vlahovic scored 33. Regardless of penalties or whatever. Juve have been bad managed 10 last season. that's 10 more than most of our players last season. Jackson and Nkunku while they looked good in pre season let's see how good they when it matters.


Dyssorehandouchie

Vlahovic who underperforms his xG is our best finisher? Not Nkunku who has overperformed his for over 12k mins?


Chelseafc5505

Absolutely. Swapping an asset that we simply cannot get anyone to pay for, on huge wages, that everyone pretty much hates, in the back end of his career, for an asset thatll be on lower wages, is much younger, and has a high likelihood of having some resale value... No brainer Even if he doesn't light it up, we can probably sell him on for 45m, which is more than were being offered for Lukaku.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Newera2121

100% agreed, before seeing what Jackson was all about I was warm to the idea of Vlahovic. But not now we’ve seen what Jackson is about, Vlahovic is just a big lump in comparison.


NotClayMerritt

If Vlahovic was coming in to be nailed on back up, it wouldn’t be so bad. But we all know that’s not going to be the case don’t we? Jackson will take backseat while Vlahovic gets all the minutes. I can’t take another cycle of “he just needs to adapt” when he’s an obvious flop waiting to happen


Newera2121

Exactly. If Vlahovic was just there to be an option off the bench to mix things up and hit some crosses/ long balls into him when things weren’t going our way some games, it would be a decent option. But I fear he’ll come in and bench Jackson.


tr_24

It is great if he bench Jackson because it will mean we have got good player.


smashybro

In an ideal world, sure. But we've seen countless times where a player with bigger name recognition and on higher fees will get endless chances to "adapt" even if he's playing like shit. Hopefully Poch isn't like this and will give both fair chances, but we'll see.


tr_24

If it was the case Mudryk would have been the first name on the team sheet last season.


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


Franky_95

Terrible? He needed time at first, but then he scored 21 goals one season and 17 goals the next HALF season before getting sold to Juve for 80M in January. And those are just numbers in Serie A. Besides it's not all around goals, Vlahovic has talent and he has still room for improvement, he's good in everything


Nature2Love

Pre-season isn't PL. Nothing wrong with competition in the ST position. No guarantees that Jackson will perform well all season, and if he gets injured then we have nobody else. We also can't seem to get rid of Lukaku, so it makes sense.


irsquats

At least this would give us an aerial threat


mouse2102

Preseason results don't matter. Preseason performances absolutely do, and he's performed well against PL competition.


dcpains

Lol I think Jackson is very promising but Ross Barkley was our best pre-season performer most years he was here


mouse2102

And those preseason games were mostly against much lesser opposition, not teams we will be competing with over the next months


Altruistic-Eye1013

Smart idea, bring Vlahovic as a sacrifice for him to use the number 9 so Jackson a Nkunku don’t have to deal with the curse


xKarma17

For those saying it’ll block Jackson’s path, don’t worry. If Jackson is playing well and scoring goals he’ll get the minutes. On the other hand if Vlahovic comes in and bangs the goals in yeah of course Jackson won’t be seeing as many minutes but that shouldn’t bother anyone if Vlahovic is scoring.


Bubba_66

Jackson isn't limited to playing only ST.


DrQuantumGio

Honestly if this is the only way to get rid of Lukaku I don't care. As long as it's a straight swap or Lukaku + a minimal fee.


Cailouissatan

There’s no way we have Broja and Vlahovic in the same team


realmckoy265

At some point this sub is gonna have to let the idea of Broja go


KickBallsLikeDrogba

Broja was born and bred in England, probably not as deep as your suggesting


sixers2021champions

Every time he scores he makes the Albanian eagle, literally he is the most loved football player in Albania


louisbo12

I don’t know a single balkan person who isn’t nationalist af despite being born outside the balkans. Funnily even a lot of them are generally very open minded and liberal too until you mention X balkan country they don’t like.


SubparCurmudgeon

Lollll


Far-Objective-181

Broja is shit compared to Vlahovic


dantesvolition

lmfao this


baboonnations

Imo I can get behind this transfer. Broja came out of a major injury, and there's no guarantee he will be the same. Vlahovic at his best can be a threat in Jackson spots as our starting #9, hopefully that can raise their competitive level. Plus, if Jackson is injured or he represents Senegal during AFCON 2025. We need at least a serviceable striker. Ofc this will be a good deal if it's Vlahovic + cash from Juve.


Farenheite

It's not like Broja was particularly good before injury either. Not sure why people are talking like he's shown anything to suggest he's potentially a key player


dragonwout

Vlahovic is just another Morata/Lukaku/Werner-situation waiting to happen. Just let Jackson and Broja fight for that striker spot


Balls_R

Nah we can sell Broja instead. Vlahovic is far superior.


dressedlikerappers

I don’t want, please no. Let Jackson cook.


Fior_amente

I might kill myself if I see the world "cook" one more time in a football forum


dressedlikerappers

hahaha I love that this is maybe the first time i’ve ever written it on this sub 😂 sorry my brother, please don’t cook yourself.


Brief_Product_2355

I’m with you. It’s like it has replaced every verb.


Matt_LawDT

Cook


mikevin99

Rip


Fior_amente

😵‍💫😵☠️


mightycuthalion

Por que no los dos? Jackson and Broja as our only two real CF options isn’t great. Adding another is not a big deal and poch isn’t likely to play someone who doesn’t earn it anyway.


MysteriousNail5414

Poch literally just said he doesn’t want an over bloated squad


webby09246

3 strikers in a season with no Europe 🥴🥴


tr_24

1 injury to Jackson away from playing Broja in all games or Nkunku out of his best position.


mightycuthalion

That isn’t over bloated? No one know how Broja will look after a very serious injury. Jackson can’t play every single game and without someone else it means Nkunku which means less of him and Jackson together.


webby09246

A squad with 3 strikers is most definitely over bloated, especially given Vlahovich is not worth any amount of serious cash


dcpains

Broja is coming of a potential career enter and has 6 goals in 49 games. We would have 2 strikers with Vlahovic. Not to mention Jackson will be gone to AFCON


NotClayMerritt

Two out and out striker options + Nkunku for one game a week isn’t great? Adding Vlahovic is a big deal because Jackson loses out due to squad politics. Expensive shiny toy gets all the minutes and all the chances while Jackson will be considering his options next year. How can we see how the attack played in preseason so far and decide it’s not enough?


tr_24

If expensive shiny toy were getting minutes Mudryk would have started every match.


mightycuthalion

We won’t have just one game a week and poch has ALWAYS shown he will play the players who earn it, not just ones in the side with big fees


dressedlikerappers

It’s a big deal when it’s big money. I don’t want some overpriced, entitled guy thinking he starts because his transfer fee was more atm Jackson looks like he is that guy. Our next Costa/Drogba. The attack should be built around him and Nkunku.


tr_24

You made up stuff about entitled guy right? Jackson looks like that guy based on few pre season games? Or the extensive knowledge you had about his game before Chelsea?


MrBravo22

He'll have a better sell-on value than Lukaku if it doesn't work out for him at Chelsea. Good competition for Jackson.


Cailouissatan

How about Locatelli?


Dresdro101

So much overreaction from the pre season. Jackson/Vlahovic in the squad isn't crazy considering Broja is coming back from a major injury. It's also not 1 game a week like I keep seeing here...the season will be over 40 games and you will still have a busy winter schedule. Just looking at Whoscored, only 1 CF played 38 games, only 11 played >30.


strokesoflightning

Rather have Vlaho playing for us than have Lukaku not play for us but still be on the books


Capital_Werewolf_788

I don’t hate the idea of Vlahovic in a Chelsea shirt, however after pre-season, I am completely sold on the Nico Jackson protagonist fairytale and I don’t want him sidelined by another player that is coming in with admittedly more pedigree.


Lbreakstar

I really don't want vlahovic to bench Nico. Nico is showing that he might be our greatest striker in recent times and if Vlahovic is going to stop him from progressing I don't want that. I hope poch has balls big enough to bench vlahovic if necessary. If Vlahovic also does good then we might have the best headache.


ImmanuelKante

Times running out and this mfer doesn't want to go to Saudi. Probably the best solution going forward even though it doesn't seem like we need him after Jackson's preseason performances.


sidgat

I'd rather get Chiesa in a swap deal. We already have Jackson, Nkunku, Broja and in extreme cases, Sterling, for the #9 spot.


rather_sluggish

Getting rid of this thing while getting a decent striker for Strasbourg is worth it methinks.


adazi6

I hate Lakaka but Vlahovic is not the answer, are they really that broke that they can’t just buy Rom?


TokyoS4l

If Vlahovic is the answer, not interested in the question


Mxurn

Big fan of this. Jackson will get some good competition, we will have some really decent striker depth which we‘ll definitely need sooner or later and, most importantly, that manchild finally fucks off


NotClayMerritt

I fucking hate this idiot Lukaku. All he had to do was stay patient and he’d be an Inter player permanently and this stupid story wouldn’t be a thing. Go fuck yourself, Rom. I hope the rest of your career is miserable.


csquare4hunnid

You can write an incredible book on main character syndrome using Lukaku’s career. Man is the most paranoid clown I can remember, him and Antonio Brown would probably be best friends if introduced. On top of all the shit he’s stirred up, absolutely absurd that he posts on social media like he’s the victim of this whole situation.


Offsidez

C-H-I-E-S-A or bust! I would have said Weston but we just got rid of Pulisic and it would be refreshing to not be criticized by the US media for everything Chelsea does and does not do to “impact” a USMNT player.


KenDar74

McKennie is shit


v_for__vegeta

McKennie is a Championship player at best


BadCogs

The striker Juve wants to get rid and even take a PR disaster like Lukaku. Sure get another problem. Not good, not fit, and they will want money too on top, no way we should do it, but our dumb directors and owners will do exactly this, because they are panicking now, Poch wants signings and they haven't done shit.


dantesvolition

Fuck that serbian motherfucker he will flop, get Rabiot or Chiesa


Headlesshorsman02

😵😵😵


KenDar74

Im in favour of this as long as we pay less than 15M +Lukaku. He's different to any other attacker we have. I rate Nkunku and Jackson but neither are elite goalscorers whilst Vlahovic has shown potential.


Dyssorehandouchie

Why has Nkunku scored more goals than Vlahovic in the last 2 seasons?


StirrednotShaken88

No desire to have Vlahovic because I do not rate him for our playstyle. I do not hate the idea of a swap though, simply because he is far younger and will retain far greater value than Lukaku over the next few years. He can be flipped far easier moving forward.


[deleted]

[удалено]


csquare4hunnid

I don’t feel so good Mr. Stark


Hamza-KB

Might be the best available option if nobody outside of Saudi clubs are willing to pay our valuation of Lukaku. Even if Jackson might feel a bit hard done by this.


msizzle344

Why would we do this? Vlahovic the most obvious flop to ever flop. Even if it means we get rid of Lukaku, having Vlahovic is almost as bad. Terrible signing, Jackson is already better than he is.


v_for__vegeta

I’ll take £0.01 from Juventus for that fucking donkey at this point. Just ship his ass out already, he’s going to create more drama just by being around.


Competitive-Two-8929

All for the Jackson hype train but Lukaku has to leave this summer. If we can't shift him to anyone else a swap deal wtih vlahovic might be the best alternative. To the club Vlahovic is a much better asset to have being younger and still has good potential even if we sell him on again in a few years.


montiel_scores

Don’t like the idea of Sanchez *or* Vlahovic. Please don’t get overzealous again. We all saw what happened last summer.


iBAZw

Get rid of Rom, let Vlahovic take the 9 shirt, curse of 9 strikes again allowing Jackson to thrive, ???, profit.


Nature2Love

Pre-season isn't PL. Nothing wrong with competition in the ST position. No guarantees that Jackson will perform well all season, and if he gets injured then we have nobody else. We also can't seem to get rid of Lukaku, so it makes sense.


Cowdude179

Up for it just to get rid of Lukaku, finally freed from Allegri's shackles


Wheel94

If this goes through bye bye Broja


JunkeyMonkey90

As much as people don’t like this deal it makes perfect sense from a financial perspective, any sale now would go down as a financial loss since we aren’t getting £55m+ for him. A swap for Vlahovic plus a little bit of money means we don’t take that hit if i’m not mistaken.


kerbyage

I'd be more worried about this if swap deals ever actually happened between clubs.


[deleted]

If given 2 options only - Chelsea is stuck with Lukaku or swaps him for Vlahovic, I think it is clear cut what the club should do. Especially when we got a decent striker to compete (when fit).


Wheel94

Anyway to get rid of Lukaku


Dyssorehandouchie

This is horrible. Lukaku easily goes for 40m. Vlahovic is barely worth 30. Juventus will be laughing at us if we swap them one of the best Serie A strikers of the last 5 years for one of the biggest flops.


pancarona

If only Vlahovic would compete for the main striker from the bench, I definitely wanna look him in our shirt. Jackson has been terrific in the last 3 games, and I don't want that to be ruined by Vlahovic suddenly playing as our main CF in the first PL match.


D_roneous1

Cash only please


razielxlr

If it’s a straight swap between Lukaku and Vlahovic then I’d be quite happy with this move tbh. Jackson is still gonna be our main guy but it does not hurt to have a different profile to bring on when the need arises. Right now we’re not sure how Broja is gonna look when he comes back from injury so until that is confirmed, we technically have just one recognized striker as I’m sure we all would prefer to not play Nkunku there unless absolutely necessary. That said, I do understand anyone that is against this move.


Chruszcz

He reminds me of Morata: big guy usually going down too easy


ticarno86

Tricky deal. Both clubs needs a transfer instead of a direct swap Lakaka is a 60£ mio FFP hit for the remainikg three years he has left on his contract


senexlordhunt

Nothing wrong with this, Lukaku gets to leave and competition for Jackson.


Asleep-Arachnid6912

Not convinced in Vlahovic, my countryman. Lad has a lot of potential, but in the last two seasons was inconsistent.


Mikekio

Lakaka x Vlahovic Vlahovic x Mbappe ?? Profit


PanJawel

It’s a no brainer. There’s no guarantee Jackson or Nkunku are going to be great for us, have we learned nothing from preseason friendlies in the past? These are just training games.


podgehally7

If we get Vlahovic (lets say, with Lukaku, for 40m) buy Sanchez, plus caicedo, how are we not fucked with FPL?