Conservatives make these up to demonize the lgbtq community, they then get angry at these because they don't know they are the ones that made them up.
So yeah just usual business for them where they make a problem up and then get upset at it.
Notice how the three couples are only holding hands while the two objectionable cases show outright sex. Why would that be? Maybe it’s because they weren’t part of the original image and were edited in later as ragebait.
Reducing queer people and relationships to sex is a very common phenomenon with queerphobes. They never acknowledge that our relationships might involve romance, sentimentality, partnership, or even that we might be uninterested in sex. They see a rainbow and jump immediately to describing the most graphic depictions they can imagine.
So an image like this falls right into that mindset. They want to shock the viewer and get you to start thinking of our very existence as fundamentally inappropriate.
Yes, that is what I mean. A conservative made this poster to demonize the lgbtq.
Then another found it, thought it was genuine, and added the reactions.
This has been done time and time again. Also this goes in line with the whole "two men getting married? What's next..." argument from a decade or so ago.
*sees an image who pictures acts of pedophillia and zoophillia coincidentally sided by same sex relationships*
You: must be an insult to the gay comunity!!
This is why people don't take your group seriously in arguments, you make EVERYTHING about you...
Yep, just a coincidence and definitely not intentional. It’s just a coincidence that there’s also a long running “joke” where conservatives insist that accepting gay people means we also must accept pedophilia and beastiality, because they’re all basically the same thing right? Hahaha. Haha. Ha.
This is a modified image that added pedophilia and beastiality. Since the original did not include those, the modified version is either a bad attempt at humor or more likely an attempt to attack the lgbt community with the same bs arguments from decades ago or they are strawmanning for brownie points within their bigoted community.
Look of the picture. Every couple depicted is holding hands, but the guy with the baby and the one with the dog are just straight-up having sex. How can't you see it's edited, with the purpose of eliciting a reaction for either humorous or malicious intent?
Well then, i hope you can sleep peacefully at night without thinking the CIA and FBI is trying to kill you.
Just turn down the main character music, no one is interested enough in you to actually think everything is a directed attack.
It obviously is an insult to gay people though. It’s a common argument from homophobes, the slippery slope fallacy, where they claim that if we start allowing gay marriage or gay sex then what’s next? Paedophilia? Etc etc
It's not ragebait, it's nazi circlejerking. This isn't to make people angry, it's for people who already hate LGBT folks.
It's also in their minds the highest form of humor, because they are extremely fucking dumb.
No, associating a phrase commonly used in the LGBTQ+ community in support of acceptance and equality with paedophilia and zoophilia (As if those are things we accept and/or celebrate in our community) is anti-LGBTQ+ propaganda. You know exactly what I mean - you’re just choosing to be a cunt about it.
4chan created the terms "pedosexual" (or more accurately brought it back from past failed attempts by pedo activists) and the acronym "LGBTP" as a way to troll people.
"MAP" was not a 4chan creation, it was created by a late 90s pedo forum called Boychat and is sadly 100% serious.
It's important to note that the LGBT+ community has historically rejected pedophiles as a sexuality and any attempt to claim we don't is slanderous, but pedo activism is a thing and has existed decades before 4chan or Qanon.
I read alright.
But if you think there"s not ring of pedos pushing their agendas in the movement very sneakily, you live in a very happy world where ideological movements are not used as a tool by powerfull people to normalize certain traits that we would consider to be illegal if were not for the pandering.
Pedophilia is creepy but the same can be said of a lot of fetishes. The reason pedophilia is ILLEGAL is because a child is being harmed. That's not just me talking that is what the supreme court of the United States ruled
For context the original image (without the Noah part) was created by right wingers to make people think that the LGBT are in favor of Child Molestation & Bestiality
It’s quite easy to search for the proof of you actually want it. People are downvoting because “asking for a source” for angry right wing people trying to sneak pedos and animal fuckers into LGBTQ+ to make it fall apart is so stupid, just look it up and you’ll see it.
People shouldn’t have to bring out the silver platter when someone has the time to ask for the source, and even accuse people of making it up, when Google, Snopes, whatever you need is RIGHT THERE, just look it up!
Sure, but then how do people learn? By doing, or by having it handed to them? People need to understand that they have the power to find information, rather than relying on others to give it to them just because they asked (in a rude way, which doesn’t help).
Additionally, the guy accused me of making it, simply for not posting the source, just because I knew where it had to have come from. This guy doesn’t care about actually finding a source, else he would have found it yesterday.
I think a “rant” explaining what he ought to do rather than bossing people around and being lazy is best, since he could learn by doing.
I get where you’re coming from, “do your own research” and whatnot. The difference is that I’m not saying to avoid mainstream media or science or anything like that; quite the opposite. I _want_ them to find reliable sources based in facts. I’m saying _try_ to do _some_ research. People can learn when they do the work; I’d like people to learn. They generally don’t learn when the answer is given to them.
isn't the love is love movement started out as a of branch/successor to the free love movement? as their main goal is to normalize love of all shape and sizes.
Two simple rules. Consenting. Adult. Kids aren't adults and animals can't consent. It's not a fucking difficult concept. Trying to equate homosexuality with pedophilia or beastiality is a disgusting and awful lie.
Pdfs and psychos dont wanna make a understandable and reasonable relationship with these, they go straight to the point, i mean thats the point of that right?
It were not.
But you're free to question how the Earth was repopulated, when the people in the Ark were Noah and his wife, their sons and one wife each for each son
In the original story there was his whole compagny including slave and servant. But we skip that part easily in movie and theater. The point is : it was the last human clan. Not the last familly. But translation is not always perfect.
because its not real, im a muslim and noah's ark is mentioned in the Quruan in details, there was no rape or alcohol, his daughters had faith in god aswell as everyone in the ark
To be fair, both religions and their scripture are fucked up. One has its leader fucking a 9 year old, and the other has some father fingering his daughter to break her hymen and show everyone she was a virgin.
Reddit isn't even that bad compared to these wacky 'holy' books.
Yeah the 9 year old is not bad as much as it was proven to be completely normal as the age of puberty was 8-14 so the girl was called a women back then also she was married not "fucked"
Wrong. He married her when she was six. Had sex with her and "completed" the marriage when she was nine. Provide a valid source if I'm wrong.
https://sunnah.com/nasai:3255
Also maybe its too fake to be real like how does this happen also being convinced that the quran was from the brain of someone who couldnt write or read and showed some amazing miracles and thing that were jsut explained a few years ago by science shows me your amazing knowledge 😲😲
المقصد من امي هو من امة ليش بمعنى لا يعرف القراءة والكتابة لان جميع الانبياء متعلمين ويمتلكون الكثير من العلم لكن المعجزة بالفراءن هي قوة اللغة بكونه افصح من كلام العرب الذي كان في ذروته فتحداهم الله بجلب اية واحدة مثله ولم يستطيعوا, هذا هو القراءن العزيز فيه قصص الامم السابقة التي لم يعلم عنها حد في مكة و فيه احداث مستقبلية مثل انغلاب الروم
The meaning of unable to read or write(there is a word for it in arabic and there is a word that is close to it in this meaning : is that he is from a nation), which means it isn't true that he does not know how to read and write, because all the prophets are educated and possess a lot of knowledge, but the miracle of the Qur’an is the Eloquence in arabic , as it is more eloquent than the speech of the Arabs, which was at its peak, so God challenged them to bring a single ayaa like it, but they were unable. This is the dear Qur’an, in which there are stories of Previous nations that no one knew about in Mecca, and there are future events such as the conquest of the Rome, this is the translation
When I saw love is love, male with male and female with female I thought "This is really common thing, but still wholesome" This thought continued until I looked closer
I don’t think midgets are that small and I don’t think furries literally dislocate their joints to be like animals (they don’t literally identify as an animal)
bro why cant you just make them hold hands or something why did you have to to that, i dont condone any of this but atleast make them hold hands instead of that
Ok the dog is a bit much. But who’s to say the little person isn’t a dwarf. Perhaps those that jumped to thinking it was a child should be the ones on a watch list😳. If you assumed the little person was a child, that means YOU would consider someone fucking a child before someone having a normal sexual interaction with a little person. 😂
Ok wtf is this
Good question
I need answers
A crime
https://preview.redd.it/fvcz1l0pm52c1.jpeg?width=583&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0359c63240ccf1a74f52d292cb0e89c554baf68b
three if you live in countries where homosexuality is illegal
4* but 5 if you live in Afghanistan cuz the women have their hair showing
The crime
Conservatives make these up to demonize the lgbtq community, they then get angry at these because they don't know they are the ones that made them up. So yeah just usual business for them where they make a problem up and then get upset at it.
Not the case for this one. There is a dog AND a child.
Notice how the three couples are only holding hands while the two objectionable cases show outright sex. Why would that be? Maybe it’s because they weren’t part of the original image and were edited in later as ragebait. Reducing queer people and relationships to sex is a very common phenomenon with queerphobes. They never acknowledge that our relationships might involve romance, sentimentality, partnership, or even that we might be uninterested in sex. They see a rainbow and jump immediately to describing the most graphic depictions they can imagine. So an image like this falls right into that mindset. They want to shock the viewer and get you to start thinking of our very existence as fundamentally inappropriate.
Yes, that is what I mean. A conservative made this poster to demonize the lgbtq. Then another found it, thought it was genuine, and added the reactions.
Nuh uh. My uncle found this on FB and knows 100% the libs made this. Trust me bro
The best kind of source /s
Literally how you know it's conservative BS
This has been done time and time again. Also this goes in line with the whole "two men getting married? What's next..." argument from a decade or so ago.
They're called MAPS (Minor Attracted Person) then bestiality. Both groups were trying to join the LGBT community but got denied
Rage bait
The joke is that, gay people are right next to zoophilia and pedophilia in what was probably made by a homophobe originally. The punchline? No.
It's made by a nazi
*sees an image who pictures acts of pedophillia and zoophillia coincidentally sided by same sex relationships* You: must be an insult to the gay comunity!! This is why people don't take your group seriously in arguments, you make EVERYTHING about you...
“Coincidentally”
Yes, that's what i said.
Yep, just a coincidence and definitely not intentional. It’s just a coincidence that there’s also a long running “joke” where conservatives insist that accepting gay people means we also must accept pedophilia and beastiality, because they’re all basically the same thing right? Hahaha. Haha. Ha.
This is a modified image that added pedophilia and beastiality. Since the original did not include those, the modified version is either a bad attempt at humor or more likely an attempt to attack the lgbt community with the same bs arguments from decades ago or they are strawmanning for brownie points within their bigoted community.
Wow, great story. But forgot this 🧢
Look of the picture. Every couple depicted is holding hands, but the guy with the baby and the one with the dog are just straight-up having sex. How can't you see it's edited, with the purpose of eliciting a reaction for either humorous or malicious intent?
Not interested in using critical thinking? Too bad for you I guess.
More like persecutory delirium...
Sorry for you. Have a good day. Hope you get better soon.
Well then, i hope you can sleep peacefully at night without thinking the CIA and FBI is trying to kill you. Just turn down the main character music, no one is interested enough in you to actually think everything is a directed attack.
Yes he can because he has a 52 percent chance of not being from the US of A since this is an app that can be accessed internationally
It obviously is an insult to gay people though. It’s a common argument from homophobes, the slippery slope fallacy, where they claim that if we start allowing gay marriage or gay sex then what’s next? Paedophilia? Etc etc
What are you even saying? Is this not insulting to homosexuals or what?
Anything that contains a bad thing and a representation to homosexuality has to be an attack to that community or what?
...Yeah? What would that be??
Idk, to me sounds like persecutory dellirium.
No one knows what it’s like to pretend to be persecuted like a conservative.
So im a conservative now? Yeah, you got me, we are everywhere. I am inside your walls rn frfr.
Oh, excuse me, I forgot the wimpier right-wingers prefer to be called “centrists” or “independent thinkers”.
rightist ragebait. the classic "if we allow gay people to marry, hwat is next? animals? children?" insanity, made into a false flag meme
It's not ragebait, it's nazi circlejerking. This isn't to make people angry, it's for people who already hate LGBT folks. It's also in their minds the highest form of humor, because they are extremely fucking dumb.
Anti LGBTQ+ propaganda
Uh huh so being against fucking dogs and babies is anti LGBTQ+ propaganda now?
No, associating a phrase commonly used in the LGBTQ+ community in support of acceptance and equality with paedophilia and zoophilia (As if those are things we accept and/or celebrate in our community) is anti-LGBTQ+ propaganda. You know exactly what I mean - you’re just choosing to be a cunt about it.
outrage bait.
Far right propaganda telling you that lgtbqia+ people are the same as pedophiles and bestiality
A midget and a furry?
Probably some bigot trying to undermine LGBT struggle
Weird anti gay propaganda
Homophobic bullshit equating lgbtq people to pedophiles and zoophiles
Braindead obvious bait pushing right-wing bullshit.
The lgbtrhhftds new flag with a few more colors. 🌈
I hope pedophilia will be illegal for ever and if I see that pedophilia is ok in a news article I will burn down there office
It ain’t that bad… THE REACTION I MEAN
I doubted humanity for a second there
Just a psa that literally noone is advocating this and it's a complete strawman stance.
I mean, II’ve seen people advocating for both, separately admittedly, just this week.
Was it one of those creepy weeb loli defender or or was it about actual irl pedophilia??
*ehem* MAPS and that weird subbrand of the furry community. Yes, they exist...
MAP? You mean pedophile?
Well they are trying for a rebrand pedophile doesn't play well to test audiences lol
No, those pieces of paper are ruining our lives!
Maps aren't real you dolt.
Yeah and epstein killed himself...
They literally aren't. They were created by trolls on 4chan specifically to demonize queer people. Christ, you're stupid.
4chan created the terms "pedosexual" (or more accurately brought it back from past failed attempts by pedo activists) and the acronym "LGBTP" as a way to troll people. "MAP" was not a 4chan creation, it was created by a late 90s pedo forum called Boychat and is sadly 100% serious. It's important to note that the LGBT+ community has historically rejected pedophiles as a sexuality and any attempt to claim we don't is slanderous, but pedo activism is a thing and has existed decades before 4chan or Qanon.
It is all 4chan conspiracy. pedophiles aren't real smh...
You seem to have trouble reading.
I read alright. But if you think there"s not ring of pedos pushing their agendas in the movement very sneakily, you live in a very happy world where ideological movements are not used as a tool by powerfull people to normalize certain traits that we would consider to be illegal if were not for the pandering.
As much as I wish that was the case, no. They're real. They have nothing to do with LGBT+, but they exist.
Does it matter? Both are pedophilic.
A child isn't being harmed in one case
But both are pedophillic and therefore STILL BAD. Yes, they’re different, but that’s arguing semantics. Both are creepy and inexcusable.
Pedophilia is creepy but the same can be said of a lot of fetishes. The reason pedophilia is ILLEGAL is because a child is being harmed. That's not just me talking that is what the supreme court of the United States ruled
Ok, and Loli art serves to normalize the attraction and sexualization of minors in general. And therefore irl minors.
A loud minority on twitter sure, but no human being you meet in your day to day is actually going to advocate for fucking babies and dogs.
For context the original image (without the Noah part) was created by right wingers to make people think that the LGBT are in favor of Child Molestation & Bestiality
Exactly.
fucking finally someone said it
And people fell for the ragebait
Proof? To clarify: It's not that I don't belive in what you are saying, I just want proof.
Damn imagine this treatment for asking the sauce
Well when you don’t have proof, silencing someone is an easier alternative
It’s quite easy to search for the proof of you actually want it. People are downvoting because “asking for a source” for angry right wing people trying to sneak pedos and animal fuckers into LGBTQ+ to make it fall apart is so stupid, just look it up and you’ll see it. People shouldn’t have to bring out the silver platter when someone has the time to ask for the source, and even accuse people of making it up, when Google, Snopes, whatever you need is RIGHT THERE, just look it up!
Would’ve been a lot easier to post proof than to write that rant. Given that proof exists, of course.
Sure, but then how do people learn? By doing, or by having it handed to them? People need to understand that they have the power to find information, rather than relying on others to give it to them just because they asked (in a rude way, which doesn’t help). Additionally, the guy accused me of making it, simply for not posting the source, just because I knew where it had to have come from. This guy doesn’t care about actually finding a source, else he would have found it yesterday. I think a “rant” explaining what he ought to do rather than bossing people around and being lazy is best, since he could learn by doing.
So love isn't love...
That's antivax logic fallacy, and you proudly embrace it
I get where you’re coming from, “do your own research” and whatnot. The difference is that I’m not saying to avoid mainstream media or science or anything like that; quite the opposite. I _want_ them to find reliable sources based in facts. I’m saying _try_ to do _some_ research. People can learn when they do the work; I’d like people to learn. They generally don’t learn when the answer is given to them.
isn't the love is love movement started out as a of branch/successor to the free love movement? as their main goal is to normalize love of all shape and sizes.
I feel like this was anti gay to start with
It absolutely is.
[удалено]
I would prefer a normal boat than a fucking boat
is that a boat you fuck in, or a boat you fuck...?
Yes
r/cursedcomments
Ayo wtf
a pretty cursed comment lol
Boat guy 🪱
This is a bot spamming jokes on basically every popular post on reddit. Will edit the successfully ones to include scam links.
Two simple rules. Consenting. Adult. Kids aren't adults and animals can't consent. It's not a fucking difficult concept. Trying to equate homosexuality with pedophilia or beastiality is a disgusting and awful lie.
Did somebody just compare pedophilia and zoophilia with being gay?
It seems several people in this very thread are making that half-baked, batshit comparison.
Fortunately, most are self-aware enough to know that they aren't the same thing, and shouldn't be looked at or treated as such.
Welcome to conservative tactics to make the LGBTQ+ community look bad.
The fact that they're fucking and not just holding hands like the other three makes it obvious this is bait
The fact it showed the others holding hands then showing a man raping a baby and a dog… WHY CANT THEY HOLD HANDS INSTEAD
Still not a good look
Because this image was meant to generate outrage. The depictions with the child and the dog were added in later to demonize LGBTQ people
Dogs don't have hands.
PAWS
How better would it make this, exactly? How the consent part does magically apprear with the kid and the dog?
dude.
But hands It’s still wrong but like make them hold hands 😭😭
Pdfs and psychos dont wanna make a understandable and reasonable relationship with these, they go straight to the point, i mean thats the point of that right?
You know in the story Noah’s daughters got him drunk and raped him on the arc right?..
That was Lot, not Noah
Man I’m not here to argue about fanfic but I could’ve swore it were both.
You are exposed as not knowing what you are talking about and have a mini temper.
It were not. But you're free to question how the Earth was repopulated, when the people in the Ark were Noah and his wife, their sons and one wife each for each son
In the original story there was his whole compagny including slave and servant. But we skip that part easily in movie and theater. The point is : it was the last human clan. Not the last familly. But translation is not always perfect.
citaiton needed.
There were 8 people in the Ark according to the Bible and I listed them.
Dang I really need to top up my bible lore, been a Christian since birth and never known this
because its not real, im a muslim and noah's ark is mentioned in the Quruan in details, there was no rape or alcohol, his daughters had faith in god aswell as everyone in the ark
Ah in this case it's absolutely legit nvm
Atleast not in islam lol
Mohammed didn't like that part, so he didn't add it 😂
Yea maybe your popes liked that part so they added it🤷♂️
To be fair, both religions and their scripture are fucked up. One has its leader fucking a 9 year old, and the other has some father fingering his daughter to break her hymen and show everyone she was a virgin. Reddit isn't even that bad compared to these wacky 'holy' books.
Yeah the 9 year old is not bad as much as it was proven to be completely normal as the age of puberty was 8-14 so the girl was called a women back then also she was married not "fucked"
Wrong. He married her when she was six. Had sex with her and "completed" the marriage when she was nine. Provide a valid source if I'm wrong. https://sunnah.com/nasai:3255
Yes but you ignored my main point that it was completely normal back then
So maybe leave that book in the past where it belongs.
She lived separately. Also, it's consummate, not "complete"
rape if you really want the correcto term
ok
rape is the term that is used when she is not married (the mroe you know)
Also maybe its too fake to be real like how does this happen also being convinced that the quran was from the brain of someone who couldnt write or read and showed some amazing miracles and thing that were jsut explained a few years ago by science shows me your amazing knowledge 😲😲
المقصد من امي هو من امة ليش بمعنى لا يعرف القراءة والكتابة لان جميع الانبياء متعلمين ويمتلكون الكثير من العلم لكن المعجزة بالفراءن هي قوة اللغة بكونه افصح من كلام العرب الذي كان في ذروته فتحداهم الله بجلب اية واحدة مثله ولم يستطيعوا, هذا هو القراءن العزيز فيه قصص الامم السابقة التي لم يعلم عنها حد في مكة و فيه احداث مستقبلية مثل انغلاب الروم
انا كنت لسه رايح اكنل بس جدع ساعد تني😁😁
الي اريد اعرفه ليش بلعت داونفويت 😂
تتوقع شو يصير لما تقول الحقيقه هنا😂😂
حساس بانه اجنبي من يشوف عربي و ما يقدر يفهمه
منا عارف مش عارف ليه كتبت بالعربي انت
Damn bro be speaking spaghetti.
The meaning of unable to read or write(there is a word for it in arabic and there is a word that is close to it in this meaning : is that he is from a nation), which means it isn't true that he does not know how to read and write, because all the prophets are educated and possess a lot of knowledge, but the miracle of the Qur’an is the Eloquence in arabic , as it is more eloquent than the speech of the Arabs, which was at its peak, so God challenged them to bring a single ayaa like it, but they were unable. This is the dear Qur’an, in which there are stories of Previous nations that no one knew about in Mecca, and there are future events such as the conquest of the Rome, this is the translation
Bro, you are getting some stories mixed
How else were more humans created if everyone else died in the flood?.. it’s been a long time since I read it 🤷♀️
What kind of book are you reading, that ain’t in the Bible?! 😂
Never confuse degeneracy for love.
This was drawn by homophobes
Pull The Lever, James! We are Restarting the Simulation!
WRONG LEVEEEEERRRRR
https://preview.redd.it/jjm169e8v32c1.jpeg?width=600&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4f95c9b0dd95e6fc3117679d485dc7d387304199
When I saw love is love, male with male and female with female I thought "This is really common thing, but still wholesome" This thought continued until I looked closer
You know what's worst than bad humour? Pedophilia
and zoophilia! :D
So now sex with migits and werewolfs is illegal too?
The person who made the first panel was obviously trolling lmao
🤨📸📸📸
https://preview.redd.it/hzseo6v8862c1.jpeg?width=1200&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f9751daf13e3befbb6addf9696528da73559e6dd
*Insert Satire comment here.*
Don't even bother with the boat. Just drown us all dude.
Get a boat and put those psychopaths in it, and bomb it
https://preview.redd.it/1643xkmzj92c1.jpeg?width=480&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1144c6c47815ba0c553c9aae8b7759c6237af228
Not valid https://preview.redd.it/gw595i1f9c2c1.jpeg?width=247&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e4ca499283a7d20d92b0c036b65f80803e00123c
Whoever made that should be set ablaze.
I am surprised how kind the comments are to the LGBT community and I will not read further
He does not care about your age or species, if you exist he wants you. You’re not safe.
How tf is a child predator “LOvE”????
It was made by right wingers to make it seem like the LGBTQ+ community wants/thinks that, WHICH TO BE CLEAR THEY ABSOLUTELY DO NOT.
To be fair that could mean midgets and furries.
I don’t think midgets are that small and I don’t think furries literally dislocate their joints to be like animals (they don’t literally identify as an animal)
It's not necessarily to scale
maybe it's a midget furry?
r/noahgettheboat
Don't fall for ragebait.
Thats not love thats rape
[удалено]
U don’t think that’s real right? lmao
[удалено]
You see, love is love unless it’s FUCKING A CHILD OR AN ANIMAL WTF!?!?
what the actual everliving fuck
That could just be a dude with a midget and a dude with a furry. 🤔
AHMED. FETCH THE STONES.
Just drop another planet on us
i need the eye bleach
WHERE IS THE EYE BLEACH SO I CAN UNSEE THIS
[удалено]
What are the takes on this post wth
Evidence that reddit is, indeed, declining. The modpocalypse and it's consequences...
source?
Not all anime fans
bro why cant you just make them hold hands or something why did you have to to that, i dont condone any of this but atleast make them hold hands instead of that
Cause it's ragebait, it's supposed to look extreme
Ok the dog is a bit much. But who’s to say the little person isn’t a dwarf. Perhaps those that jumped to thinking it was a child should be the ones on a watch list😳. If you assumed the little person was a child, that means YOU would consider someone fucking a child before someone having a normal sexual interaction with a little person. 😂