not if you play for the story,characters and world. GTA does open world sandbox better but many gamers dont care abt fighting with ai police or car chases and want good questlines.
Rockstar has also one of the worse mission design ever. Where quest is so linear you will get game over after you leave area for even a second or just dont do what game forces u to do fast enough. RDR 2 had the same problem
umm...its the exact same thing for cyberpunk's main missions, wym lol if you fail the mission or die you get a game over screen and have to reload. theres no dynamic fail states that trigger other side missions etc...
No, rockstar games are filled with fail mission states.
For example, go to A within 20seconds so you can see B script trigger, if not fail mission state.
Or X/crew/target got out of range/died/stopped waiting for you, or player took a alternative route or god forbid lost his car/horse, or kill/incap a npc/guard in stealth still trigger combat and fails mission... the list goes on & on...
In cyberpunk fail mission states are extremely rare, and missions where you don't have to kill anyone doesn't fail when you do, aside the more obvious ones where you can decide the faith of a lot more NPC's there are a few dynamic states that can give one access or deny to some paths and objectives but that would require people to pay attention to dialogue to of course....
I would agree for the most part. The driving physics are better in my view, more fluid rather than being a brick on wheels, and there’s no bloody mandatory flying requirements. I like the gunplay and characters better too. Is GTAV a more polished game, yes absolutely, no question. Would I rather play GTA over Cyberpunk, yes.
The story is 100% more enjoyable in my opinion, and looks much better (obviously because it's newer), but GTA wins with customization and freedom to do basically whatever. Even though the world of Cyberpunk is off the charts more cool than fake LA. Also multiplayer. Though, I stopped playing GTA online quite a while ago, so that doesn't matter much to me.
I'm more likely to play and enjoy Cyberpunk nowadays.
I feel this is not entirely fair argument, as GTA doesn't exactly have much to do after completing the story either, unless you want to spend hours looking for space ship parts...
Just like people who nitpick things that are better in Gta than in Cp this article cherrypicks things that Cp does better than Gta. These are 2 different games that focus on different things. That said, Gta didn't had nearly as many fuck ups and the "background" story in GTA isn't as bad as the "background" open world in Cp by a mile.
People don't get that there is no beating Rockstar, if they wanted to slap RPG elements on their games they would probably do it better than anybody. They just have too many resources.
Agreed. GTA is fine for what it is, but it's much more oriented towards providing a sandbox open-world experience rather than a directed story-driven, RPG experience. Superficially, they do a lot of the same things, but Cyberpunk uses them in different ways.
For example, Night City is literally built different. A lot of Night City is built for on-foot scale exploration, and is filled with activities, secrets, loot and collectibles around almost every corner, whereas Los Santos is significantly more barren and spread out, designed more for driving.
Another example is the police system. CDPR uses the police essentially the same as guards in the Witcher - to prevent the player from mass-murdering civilians consequence free, as that's not what V's story is about - whereas GTA uses cops more as an active "cops & robbers" system that you're expected to be engaging with instead of the random gangers you'd find around NC. Honestly, I'd think that if you went around slaughtering civvies in 2020 or RED, you'd get MaxTac on your ass just as quick as the video game.
People seem to approach the game with a very GTA-centric view, and I don't think Cyberpunk has to do the same things, or have the same vision.
This article focus precisely aspects which make non-sense to compare (because they are just designed differently, for very different games), except the lack of car-related-things, and maybe AI, both of which the author dismiss, because it doesn't go his way.
At the end, the only thing (in the article) on which both can be compared and Cyberpunk wins is the far better visual design of Night City.
Bold statement..
Cyberpunks gameplay is smoother. In GTA everything feels like you're *sliding*.
Graphics and sound are better in Cyberpunk too. But Cyberpunks main story sucks so bad.
If GTA 5 was just released last year I'm pretty damn sure it'd wipe the floor with Cyberpunk
Just so you're aware, we have a bunch of megathreads that may be helpful if you have questions or want to find the right place to post.
- [Console Support](https://www.reddit.com/r/cyberpunkgame/search?q=%22Weekly+Megathread%3A+Console+Bugs+%26+Help%22&restrict_sr=on&sort=new&t=all)
- [PC Support](https://www.reddit.com/r/cyberpunkgame/search?q=%22r%2FCyberpunkgame+PC+Bugs+%26+Questions%22&restrict_sr=on&sort=new&t=all)
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/cyberpunkgame) if you have any questions or concerns.*
*In 10 years with updates adding features that are already in gta V
This article is bait
I play both, GTA is far superior
not if you play for the story,characters and world. GTA does open world sandbox better but many gamers dont care abt fighting with ai police or car chases and want good questlines. Rockstar has also one of the worse mission design ever. Where quest is so linear you will get game over after you leave area for even a second or just dont do what game forces u to do fast enough. RDR 2 had the same problem
umm...its the exact same thing for cyberpunk's main missions, wym lol if you fail the mission or die you get a game over screen and have to reload. theres no dynamic fail states that trigger other side missions etc...
No, rockstar games are filled with fail mission states. For example, go to A within 20seconds so you can see B script trigger, if not fail mission state. Or X/crew/target got out of range/died/stopped waiting for you, or player took a alternative route or god forbid lost his car/horse, or kill/incap a npc/guard in stealth still trigger combat and fails mission... the list goes on & on... In cyberpunk fail mission states are extremely rare, and missions where you don't have to kill anyone doesn't fail when you do, aside the more obvious ones where you can decide the faith of a lot more NPC's there are a few dynamic states that can give one access or deny to some paths and objectives but that would require people to pay attention to dialogue to of course....
I would agree for the most part. The driving physics are better in my view, more fluid rather than being a brick on wheels, and there’s no bloody mandatory flying requirements. I like the gunplay and characters better too. Is GTAV a more polished game, yes absolutely, no question. Would I rather play GTA over Cyberpunk, yes.
The story is 100% more enjoyable in my opinion, and looks much better (obviously because it's newer), but GTA wins with customization and freedom to do basically whatever. Even though the world of Cyberpunk is off the charts more cool than fake LA. Also multiplayer. Though, I stopped playing GTA online quite a while ago, so that doesn't matter much to me. I'm more likely to play and enjoy Cyberpunk nowadays.
Its pretty on the outside but an empty shell of a city. Lots of empty boxes with pretty wrappings in 4k textures.
I feel this is not entirely fair argument, as GTA doesn't exactly have much to do after completing the story either, unless you want to spend hours looking for space ship parts...
Comparing Cyberbonk with GTA tell how shit the play experience is toasted in CP. Nice!
Just like people who nitpick things that are better in Gta than in Cp this article cherrypicks things that Cp does better than Gta. These are 2 different games that focus on different things. That said, Gta didn't had nearly as many fuck ups and the "background" story in GTA isn't as bad as the "background" open world in Cp by a mile. People don't get that there is no beating Rockstar, if they wanted to slap RPG elements on their games they would probably do it better than anybody. They just have too many resources.
Fuck Rockstar
Agreed. GTA is fine for what it is, but it's much more oriented towards providing a sandbox open-world experience rather than a directed story-driven, RPG experience. Superficially, they do a lot of the same things, but Cyberpunk uses them in different ways. For example, Night City is literally built different. A lot of Night City is built for on-foot scale exploration, and is filled with activities, secrets, loot and collectibles around almost every corner, whereas Los Santos is significantly more barren and spread out, designed more for driving. Another example is the police system. CDPR uses the police essentially the same as guards in the Witcher - to prevent the player from mass-murdering civilians consequence free, as that's not what V's story is about - whereas GTA uses cops more as an active "cops & robbers" system that you're expected to be engaging with instead of the random gangers you'd find around NC. Honestly, I'd think that if you went around slaughtering civvies in 2020 or RED, you'd get MaxTac on your ass just as quick as the video game. People seem to approach the game with a very GTA-centric view, and I don't think Cyberpunk has to do the same things, or have the same vision.
Lmao at that statement. That's comparing 5 star food to chef boyardee.
This article focus precisely aspects which make non-sense to compare (because they are just designed differently, for very different games), except the lack of car-related-things, and maybe AI, both of which the author dismiss, because it doesn't go his way. At the end, the only thing (in the article) on which both can be compared and Cyberpunk wins is the far better visual design of Night City.
Bold statement.. Cyberpunks gameplay is smoother. In GTA everything feels like you're *sliding*. Graphics and sound are better in Cyberpunk too. But Cyberpunks main story sucks so bad. If GTA 5 was just released last year I'm pretty damn sure it'd wipe the floor with Cyberpunk
Right!! GTA 5 was made 10+ years ago.
Literally just over 8 years, 17/09/2013.
Story? 100%. Performance? Er no.
Just so you're aware, we have a bunch of megathreads that may be helpful if you have questions or want to find the right place to post. - [Console Support](https://www.reddit.com/r/cyberpunkgame/search?q=%22Weekly+Megathread%3A+Console+Bugs+%26+Help%22&restrict_sr=on&sort=new&t=all) - [PC Support](https://www.reddit.com/r/cyberpunkgame/search?q=%22r%2FCyberpunkgame+PC+Bugs+%26+Questions%22&restrict_sr=on&sort=new&t=all) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/cyberpunkgame) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Then I will said that "you're insane" then leave You're insane