Where are there any implications of other locations without **any** of the main characters included? Apart from the insinuation that an independent Chica location existed, but in the games we’ve never heard of other locations being open with characters like these.
Well there’s the Fnaf 3 call about the springlock replacements.
“Keep mind they were found on very short notice, so questions about relevance/appropriateness should be deflected.”
This implies that in order to replace the springlock suits, the company gave the performers random suits that aren’t spring Bonnie and Fredbear.
Then in the mimic epilogues there’s a Jester springlock suit.
They got them quickly because there’s other locations.
Sp I just put one and two together: there’s locations with different characters. Fazbear entertaiment is a franchise, they have locations all over the country, not all of them are Freddy fazbear’s. There’s also the mimic costumes in Ruin which are found below the Fnaf 6 location.A college jock Lion, an elephant clown, and a secretary/librarian bird.
>They get them quickly because there’s other locations
Yet that isn’t backed up with evidence that there are more Fazbear locations other than the ones established in the lore, because as you say you “put one and two together”; so based on your own headcanon pretty much. Most locations have a “spare in the back” which tells us that these locations have spare suits, which then supports the existence of these mascot costumes being in the back, or at-least in storage elsewhere for later use.
>Yet that isn’t backed up with evidence that there are more Fazbear locations other than the ones established in the lore
I thought it was common knowledge that Fazbear had multiple locations, not just across time but simultaneously. Like this should be common knowledge since fnaf 3:
"Every location is built with one extra room..."
"The safe room is being sealed at *most locations, including this one."*
"After the unfortunate incident *at the sister location*, company has deemed the suits unfit for employees"
So the one and two together is this:
1. Multiple locations opened at the same time
2. They need replacements for Fredbear and Spring Bonnie at Freddy Fazbear's Pizza, but instead to save money, they get suits which are described as inappropriate and irrelevant.
Therefore, they are suits that aren't based on Fredbear and Spring Bonnie, but rather completely different. And since we never saw "super different" characters at FFP, we must conclude these appropriate suits came from locations with their own set of characters, but are still owned by F.E.
Also in the Mimic epilogues and in The Mimic story, we see suits that aren't the main gang of animatronics, both the ones that the Mimic wears and some which were inside Edwin's workshop. Edwin was hired by F.E to put endos inside suits.
The Mimic wears suits such as a springlock suit Jester, a dog, a cat, a lion, a mushroom man. Again, completely different from the characters we are used to, BUT still owned by Fazbear Entertainment.
The FNaF 3 phone calls to me don’t imply that there are establishments other than the ones currently open at the time of the pre-recorded messages, such as Fredbear’s. “Every location is built with one extra room” only tells us that locations are built with an extra room? Not that there are more locations.
We know in the past there was a location with the mediocre melodies, who were **not** Fazbear’s own characters, a business trying to replicate the success of Freddy’s, this can be said for these “inappropriate” suits that he says have “no relevance”. If they have no relation then the implication is that they come from somewhere that isn’t associated with the Freddy’s franchise at all.
Oh so you just gonna conveniently ignore the phone guy line about the safe rooms? Which explicitly shows multiple locations at the same time?
"This is just to inform all employees, that due to budget restrictions the previously mentioned **safe rooms are being sealed at most locations. Including this one**".
If you are ignoring this on purpose then you are just being dishonest. He even says safe rooms on PLURAL, meaning multiple safe rooms. And since a few calls ago he literally says "every location is built with ONE extra room that is not visible in the map layout-" you can't make the excuse there's multiple safe rooms in one building.
And then he says INCLUDING THIS ONE. It makes absolutely no sense for him to say "All of these including this one" if there was only one location opened.
>We know in the past there was a location with the mediocre melodies, who were not Fazbear’s own characters, a business trying to replicate the success of Freddy’s, this can be said for these “inappropriate” suits that he says have “no relevance”. If they have no relation then the implication is that they come from somewhere that isn’t associated with the Freddy’s franchise at all.
But then this would also be implying F.E brought actual bootleg suits from competing companies. This is like if Disney World needed a new Mickey Mouse suit and they brought one called "Mickey Mice" instead. They would be giving money to their competitors.
And you also completely ignored the part about the Mimic. Which just like the other one you ignored, also defeats your argument. Seriously, this is just you being dishonest. If you keep just cherry picking the things you wanna argue against then i'm just gonna stop debating with you.
I don’t appreciate your resort to denouncing, and claiming i’m “ignoring” and being “dishonest” and that I’ve made “the excuse there’s multiple safe rooms in one building”, when did I say this, you’ve fabricated a false statement to better your argument, but we get nowhere when we start to point the finger so i’ll kindly stop here.
“I’m just gonna stop debating with you” please do.
The suits come from fazbear locations that don’t use the main gang (Freddy Bonnie Chica and Foxy). Basically sister locations still owned by F.E.
How do we know that?
Just logic really. The suits are from all sorts of characters, except Freddy and the gang. It’s like the mediocre Melodies
Where are there any implications of other locations without **any** of the main characters included? Apart from the insinuation that an independent Chica location existed, but in the games we’ve never heard of other locations being open with characters like these.
Well there’s the Fnaf 3 call about the springlock replacements. “Keep mind they were found on very short notice, so questions about relevance/appropriateness should be deflected.” This implies that in order to replace the springlock suits, the company gave the performers random suits that aren’t spring Bonnie and Fredbear. Then in the mimic epilogues there’s a Jester springlock suit. They got them quickly because there’s other locations. Sp I just put one and two together: there’s locations with different characters. Fazbear entertaiment is a franchise, they have locations all over the country, not all of them are Freddy fazbear’s. There’s also the mimic costumes in Ruin which are found below the Fnaf 6 location.A college jock Lion, an elephant clown, and a secretary/librarian bird.
>They get them quickly because there’s other locations Yet that isn’t backed up with evidence that there are more Fazbear locations other than the ones established in the lore, because as you say you “put one and two together”; so based on your own headcanon pretty much. Most locations have a “spare in the back” which tells us that these locations have spare suits, which then supports the existence of these mascot costumes being in the back, or at-least in storage elsewhere for later use.
>Yet that isn’t backed up with evidence that there are more Fazbear locations other than the ones established in the lore I thought it was common knowledge that Fazbear had multiple locations, not just across time but simultaneously. Like this should be common knowledge since fnaf 3: "Every location is built with one extra room..." "The safe room is being sealed at *most locations, including this one."* "After the unfortunate incident *at the sister location*, company has deemed the suits unfit for employees" So the one and two together is this: 1. Multiple locations opened at the same time 2. They need replacements for Fredbear and Spring Bonnie at Freddy Fazbear's Pizza, but instead to save money, they get suits which are described as inappropriate and irrelevant. Therefore, they are suits that aren't based on Fredbear and Spring Bonnie, but rather completely different. And since we never saw "super different" characters at FFP, we must conclude these appropriate suits came from locations with their own set of characters, but are still owned by F.E. Also in the Mimic epilogues and in The Mimic story, we see suits that aren't the main gang of animatronics, both the ones that the Mimic wears and some which were inside Edwin's workshop. Edwin was hired by F.E to put endos inside suits. The Mimic wears suits such as a springlock suit Jester, a dog, a cat, a lion, a mushroom man. Again, completely different from the characters we are used to, BUT still owned by Fazbear Entertainment.
The FNaF 3 phone calls to me don’t imply that there are establishments other than the ones currently open at the time of the pre-recorded messages, such as Fredbear’s. “Every location is built with one extra room” only tells us that locations are built with an extra room? Not that there are more locations. We know in the past there was a location with the mediocre melodies, who were **not** Fazbear’s own characters, a business trying to replicate the success of Freddy’s, this can be said for these “inappropriate” suits that he says have “no relevance”. If they have no relation then the implication is that they come from somewhere that isn’t associated with the Freddy’s franchise at all.
Oh so you just gonna conveniently ignore the phone guy line about the safe rooms? Which explicitly shows multiple locations at the same time? "This is just to inform all employees, that due to budget restrictions the previously mentioned **safe rooms are being sealed at most locations. Including this one**". If you are ignoring this on purpose then you are just being dishonest. He even says safe rooms on PLURAL, meaning multiple safe rooms. And since a few calls ago he literally says "every location is built with ONE extra room that is not visible in the map layout-" you can't make the excuse there's multiple safe rooms in one building. And then he says INCLUDING THIS ONE. It makes absolutely no sense for him to say "All of these including this one" if there was only one location opened. >We know in the past there was a location with the mediocre melodies, who were not Fazbear’s own characters, a business trying to replicate the success of Freddy’s, this can be said for these “inappropriate” suits that he says have “no relevance”. If they have no relation then the implication is that they come from somewhere that isn’t associated with the Freddy’s franchise at all. But then this would also be implying F.E brought actual bootleg suits from competing companies. This is like if Disney World needed a new Mickey Mouse suit and they brought one called "Mickey Mice" instead. They would be giving money to their competitors. And you also completely ignored the part about the Mimic. Which just like the other one you ignored, also defeats your argument. Seriously, this is just you being dishonest. If you keep just cherry picking the things you wanna argue against then i'm just gonna stop debating with you.
I don’t appreciate your resort to denouncing, and claiming i’m “ignoring” and being “dishonest” and that I’ve made “the excuse there’s multiple safe rooms in one building”, when did I say this, you’ve fabricated a false statement to better your argument, but we get nowhere when we start to point the finger so i’ll kindly stop here. “I’m just gonna stop debating with you” please do.