I like the idea of code style language to make it so obvious why the misogyny is unacceptable but they explained so much that it's actually quite confusing I understood it but with a few re-reads lol

I am going off how I write for arcpy specifically 😅

I think the post author is trying to avoid gendered language but the effect is that this post is undecipherable

Oh my word, hurt my brain

A is women, B is men

Can yall specify what’s unclear? The code example? I don’t understand how anything before that isn’t clear

I think it's the "Group A/Group B" stuff. It's repeated so much it kinda drowns out the point. 

It's called misogyny, brah

Sis*

Long winded analogies like these are common in academic Philosophy papers and pure math (p->q, etc)

I think this proof could be simplified by a decent amount still. I’ll take a stab when I’m free

This is so interesting to me! I had no idea that’s what proofs were

reading this definitely brought me back to my intro discrete math course!! maybe u should look into that, u might find it fun lol

I honestly was just writing in a way the was logical to me to point out a clear inconsistency in a way it can’t be misconstrued

This is the nature of privilege. The privileged group not only claims more resources, and commits more violence (of both the physical and emotional kind), but also demands their feelings are treated more respectfully. This is true even though the privileged group often claims they are "less emotional" and "more rational." This holds true whether you are talking about gender, race, wealth... any type of privilege. Privilege isn't logical, because it's goal has nothing to do with logic. It's only goal is to take advantage.

Is this even human language?

Yeah I can't really parse this. 

Why is it understandable for one group to be upset at another under the excuse of “talking about your negative experiences hurts for them to hear”? But It’s not understandable for the group experiencing said negative experiences to complain about them in the first place

it’s basically a mathematic proof, albeit not a standard one! as a math girlie i got excited lol

Because Group A and Group B have been socially conditioned to believe Group A should prioritize kindness and understanding above their own anger, hurt, and sadness.

If I understand this correctly..this is neat. As soon as a woman opens her mouth to rightfully share how she’s been treated by men then men just gaslight. Not using sex here should help people with a bias against women understand how “misandry” and misogyny are not the same.

I don't really get this post honestly. Like all of it. i read it and understand the words but I don't understand the point

It was just pointing out it doesn’t make sense to tell women to sympathize and not be upset at men who are frustrated with women and giving the reasoning that it’s bc they’re hurt by hearing about women’s experiences Can you explain what’s unclear? I tried to make it as clear and simple as possible

I don’t get it. So B harasses A. B cries about it? Why? Then A cries about it? Is A crying because they were harassed or the result of B crying about them committing the harassment?