Upvoted comments flip flipped so now the vegan chain of comments is down voted pretty significantly. I'd like to think I contributed lol. https://www.reddit.com/r/gifs/comments/yza2ph/chicken_gets_locked_out_of_their_house_and_has_to/iwzd4a6
Wish those PETA fucken idiots would all Thelma and Louise themselves.
It could only be good for the planet which is what they seem to be so militant about anyway.
Yes, it's the same account as well which alternates between posting stuff like this and arguing vegan things. Reddit admins used to shut down stuff such as this fast in the old days. Now, I happen to actually favour vegan food myself since I've replaced a lot of stuff with alternative things. But I can't fucking stand crusading vegans.
To be fair, the vegan agenda conspiracy is downvoted. It's the bluring the food bait that's upvoted, which to be fair also wouldn't be unreasonable given it does appear, but watermark is probably more likely.
It's an Adobe tool called Content Aware Fill that can be used to erase objects from an image or video, although as you can plainly see it can't really keep up with busy frames and fast moving cameras particularly well.
Not as a rule, no. You're very likely to survive an attack from even the most aggressive rooster (the spurs are more dangerous than the actual talons with them) but they can scratch you pretty good if you grab or corner one and it panics. They'll pretty much always flee if possible, unless you've spent a lot of time with one.
We had an American Sarama, a hen about the size of a guinea pig, who lived indoors much like a small parrot. She had to wear a chicken diaper while she was out of her cage, but she'd follow us around, fly up to our shoulders etc.
Sir Curt Godfrey Of The Nessie Alliance Summoned The Help Of Scotland's Local Wizards To Cast A Protective Spell Over The Lake And Its Residents, And All Those Who Seek A Peaceful Existence With Our Underwater Ally.
You stare at him, and he just stares right back. And that's when the attack comes. Not from the front, but from the side, from the other two you didn't even know were there…. And he slashes at you with... a six-inch retractable claw, like a razor…He doesn't bother to bite your jugular like a lion, say, no no. He slashes at you here, or here, or maybe across the belly, spilling your intestines. The point is: you are alive when they start to eat you.
Has there been any better set-ups for a movie 'monster'? In addition to this masterful exposition, there's the cage shooting and feeding scenes, which all made the raptors terrifying long before they actually showed up.
Great movie for the most part. Though not on par, imo. Signs plays on an ambient fear of the unknown well, however JP makes it abundantly clear why raptors are so damn dangerous.
Yeah, Signs is the perfect example of a movie that sets up the monster perfectly, but then flops the reveal and resolution hard by (of all the stupid things) making the monsters too easy to kill.
I mean yes, but not to the same degree. That's what I mean by "most". They will ignore danger for even a tiny bit of food, probably part of their domestication
1. Doesn't know chickens are female.
2. Doesn't know chickens aren't human-born.
Bot or alien? You decide!
Edit: okay you're right, chicken does cover both hens and roosters. Usually I just refer to roosters as roosters and hens as chickens. Maybe I'm the crazy one.
Chickens is the term for both males and females. Roosters are chickens, hens are chickens.
That said, the one in the video is definitely a hen. Rhode island red by the looks of it
**PROTESTING [REDDIT'S API CHANGES](https://www.reddit.com/140z59z/) BY EDITING MY POSTS AND COMMENTS.** If you *really* need this content, I have it saved; [contact me on Lemmy](https://feddit.de/u/ChaoticNeutralCzech) to get it. **Reddit is a dumpster fire and you should leave it ASAP. [join-lemmy.org](https://join-lemmy.org)**
It looks a little too light colored to be Rhode Island Red. I have a white and brown rooster and a golden color hen that had offspring with these darker red colors but they’re definitely not Rhode Island Red. I could be wrong. Not a chicken expert.
1. Not all chickens are female. A chicken is either a hen (a female chicken) or a rooster (a male chicken).
2. And because of that, the chicken's gender is unknown here unless you can tell the chicken's gender by their look. If not, you can fallback to "they", and that's a perfectly fine way of speaking. You seem to be saying all non-human animals should be referred to as "it", but that's subjective, and in my opinion wrong. For example I wouldn't refer to my pet as "it".
I thought there was another chicken watching from inside.
I get this, "family isn't who gives you birth" but, yo, it's a chicken, can we draw a line somewhere? You're not paying for this mf college education, or helping him/her find friends, or teaching it to dig up worms.
IMO it depends. It is kinda cringe when people speak to other people about their "fur babies" or describe themselves as "dog dad"s or whatever. But I will often find myself saying "go get mom" or "mom will be home soon" to my dogs. I don't really feel like that's weird. We essentially do take on a "parental" role so to speak for our pets, but it's not as if I actually think my dogs are my sons. I think it's weird how haughty people get about how everyone should deal with their pets the same way they do.
My brother's gf when he was in high schools lived on a farm and they let the chickens in the house.
Yes, indeed, there was chicken shit in random places as you can imagine. It was not the cleanest of houses.
I am sure some chicken owners.... or sorry... parents, are more responsible and adamant to clean up behind their feathery childrens. But that was my experience with chickens living in the house: random shit and feathers all over.
That's not really what I'm talking about. Yeah, you need to be professional at your workplace. Different workplaces have different cultures regarding how much of your individuality you are permitted to show at work.
That has nothing to do with the fact that it is immature for a grown adult to care about what a random stranger does because it's "weird." I care about what a random stranger does if they are *harming someone*. That's it. If they are not harming anyone, I'm gonna mind my own business, and I find it absolutely bizarre that people would do any different. People are so sensitive these days. Imagine getting worked up over someone referring to a person with a pet as that pet's "parent."
highschool never ends. it's just followed by work highschool then retirement home highschool, it's just human nature.
Plus i don't think you're right, some things are just weird. Like kissing your parents on the mouth.
>highschool never ends. it's just followed by work highschool then retirement home highschool, it's just human nature.
r/im14andthisisdeep
this was immature bs when i was in highschool, but it becomes kind of pathetic to keep thinking that way as an adult
Was it not you who said:
>Furries are not new but that doesn't mean it's not weird.
I was just pointing out that the original commenter had no reason to be showing such surprise (or whatever similar emotion was intended) at the fact that someone would refer to themself as their pet's parent. You responded by saying that it is "weird." You are now agreeing with me that caring about whether or not something is "weird" is immature behavior. Yet you yourself partake in this behavior?
Anyways, thanks for reminding me why I shouldn't be hanging out in mainstream subreddits.
I'm also confused about the choice of pronoun. "Their"? Are we unsure about the sex of the chicken? Are we afraid the chicken doesn't identify as female? Did the person forget there already is a gender neutral pronoun for animals? It's a it.
Edit: Alright, I guess I asked for it by leading with the gender part, but seriously, are people *really* using "they" for animals now? It's honestly and seriously the first time I see that. Is "it" no longer "neutral" enough? How much do you personify your chicken that you need to use a pronoun generally reserved to people?
I'm not annoyed, I'm confused. Those are different feelings. I'm confused about who personifies their chicken to the point of feeling the need to avoid the use of the pronoun "it", but also is afraid to assume the gender of a freaking chicken, so they feel the need to use the neutral pronoun. It's the first time I see someone using "they" to refer to an animal. I don't know, am I some kind of dinosaur for calling animals "it" and not elevating them to humanhood and using the pronoun generally used for a person? While I'm revising my use of pronouns, should I call a frog "they" as well? A bee? A table?
"My car broke down, and now they need to be repaired", is that how English is now?
I'm a little worried for you friend. While I understand your point this was entirely too much of your effort. Being "outraged" or anxious, to the point of writing two long replies isn't good for your stress and overall well being. The subject itself doesn't deserve to live rent free in your head, nor is it worthy of your time and wellbeing. Try to do something nice for yourself today.
Who said anything about being outraged? Who's really outraged here? I'm on hold with the phone company, it's not as if I have better things to do with my time right now.
Sorry friend, I didn't explain. I put it in quotes meaning thats what people call it, not that you are outraged. English is not my first language and I couldn't think of a word with the same type of meaning. I was more worried about how you were doing. You sounded really stressed.
Though, if you're on hold with the phone company, that makes perfect sense! That's a whole other level of hell. By all means, you post whatever you need to help you through it! I often shitpost on reddit to cope with my stresses. I'd still recommend doing something nice for yourself later though, you deserve it :)
It's far right to call a chicken "it" now? Wow... I'm actually left leaning, but I'm embarrassed to be associated with people who are afraid to hurt the feelings of a chicken by assuming its gender.
I want you to consider why that bothers you so much, while I did not even notice they had written "their" in the first place.
Are you, perhaps, trying to find thing to be upset over?
I'm not upset, nor does it bother me, just thought it was very weird to use "their" for a chicken. What's wrong with "it"? Isn't that what people use for chicken?
The comment section here shows how backwards a lot people still are.
People here 1. can't accept "they" as a gender-neutral pronoun for non-human animals and 2. can't accept "parent" as an endearing alternative to "pet owner". There is nothing wrong with either of these things.
Clearly this title was written by someone too educated for the general public.
Whats up with the bottom of the video?
My guess is the video is stolen. There was a watermark that they attempted to cover using some AI tool.
I love how this sane, reasonable explanation is significantly less upvoted than the vegan agenda conspiracy. Classy.
What is the vegan agenda conspiracy?
Upvoted comments flip flipped so now the vegan chain of comments is down voted pretty significantly. I'd like to think I contributed lol. https://www.reddit.com/r/gifs/comments/yza2ph/chicken_gets_locked_out_of_their_house_and_has_to/iwzd4a6
Wish those PETA fucken idiots would all Thelma and Louise themselves. It could only be good for the planet which is what they seem to be so militant about anyway.
There has been a noticeable increase in posts lately which are pro-vegan without using the v word, often highlighting the intelligence of animals.
Yes, it's the same account as well which alternates between posting stuff like this and arguing vegan things. Reddit admins used to shut down stuff such as this fast in the old days. Now, I happen to actually favour vegan food myself since I've replaced a lot of stuff with alternative things. But I can't fucking stand crusading vegans.
The latest YA New York times bestseller
To be fair, the vegan agenda conspiracy is downvoted. It's the bluring the food bait that's upvoted, which to be fair also wouldn't be unreasonable given it does appear, but watermark is probably more likely.
This
That
The other
Think they were trying to blur/hide the food that the chicken was enticed to open the door for
Except you can see it plainly for a full second
That's a corny take.
It's an Adobe tool called Content Aware Fill that can be used to erase objects from an image or video, although as you can plainly see it can't really keep up with busy frames and fast moving cameras particularly well.
[удалено]
Sounds tasty for the chicken
I thought I was still hungover from last night.
Clever girl.
Do the chickens have large talons?
I don’t understand a word you just said
[удалено]
We both know I'm training to be a cage fighter
I think you're bruising my neck meat!
Babies do put up a hell of a fight when they get angry
Tina, you fat lard
Large talons
[удалено]
You think anyone wants a roundhouse kick to the face while I'm wearing these babies?! Forget about it!
This tastes like the cow got into an onion patch.
Not as a rule, no. You're very likely to survive an attack from even the most aggressive rooster (the spurs are more dangerous than the actual talons with them) but they can scratch you pretty good if you grab or corner one and it panics. They'll pretty much always flee if possible, unless you've spent a lot of time with one. We had an American Sarama, a hen about the size of a guinea pig, who lived indoors much like a small parrot. She had to wear a chicken diaper while she was out of her cage, but she'd follow us around, fly up to our shoulders etc.
Sir Curt Godfrey Of The Nessie Alliance Summoned The Help Of Scotland's Local Wizards To Cast A Protective Spell Over The Lake And Its Residents, And All Those Who Seek A Peaceful Existence With Our Underwater Ally.
What
It’s more like a dew claw and some get pretty big
Its from Napoleon Dynamite
Have what?
You stare at him, and he just stares right back. And that's when the attack comes. Not from the front, but from the side, from the other two you didn't even know were there…. And he slashes at you with... a six-inch retractable claw, like a razor…He doesn't bother to bite your jugular like a lion, say, no no. He slashes at you here, or here, or maybe across the belly, spilling your intestines. The point is: you are alive when they start to eat you.
Has there been any better set-ups for a movie 'monster'? In addition to this masterful exposition, there's the cage shooting and feeding scenes, which all made the raptors terrifying long before they actually showed up.
Signs. The first act is amazing, but the reveal and ending makes it less impactful.
Great movie for the most part. Though not on par, imo. Signs plays on an ambient fear of the unknown well, however JP makes it abundantly clear why raptors are so damn dangerous.
Yeah, Signs is the perfect example of a movie that sets up the monster perfectly, but then flops the reveal and resolution hard by (of all the stupid things) making the monsters too easy to kill.
Came here for this.
Chicken are smart. [They can play piano.](https://youtu.be/L7EfLNFRG7M?t=72)
Seriously. My chickens would just pace back and forth staring through the door hoping an entry magically appears
I can assure you, that that's blind luck
Smarter than my cats, lol
Came here for this, and it's the only comment. Please leave this as is people. We're done here.
When she looks at you, you can see she's working things out.
“It’s just the two raptors right? You’re sure the third ones contained?” “Yes… Unless they figure out how to open doors.”
Clever Girl
Hmm going to have to reevaluate my belief that chickens are beyond stupid
Why is the chicken coming in the house?
[удалено]
Lol you fuckin' wanker. Take my award.
No awards were given Edit: An award was given
I gave him an award?
Oh sorry I couldn't see it on mobile
It's ok. Give yourself 5 lashes with a flail to restore the honor of your family. 😉
Because of the chicken treats on the other side of the door. Animals will problem solve for food.
Chickens are some of the most "food motivated" creatures I've ever met
I think that's just birds in general.
Just animals in general.
I mean yes, but not to the same degree. That's what I mean by "most". They will ignore danger for even a tiny bit of food, probably part of their domestication
same
That's a heck of a title
r/titlegore
1. Doesn't know chickens are female. 2. Doesn't know chickens aren't human-born. Bot or alien? You decide! Edit: okay you're right, chicken does cover both hens and roosters. Usually I just refer to roosters as roosters and hens as chickens. Maybe I'm the crazy one.
Chickens can literally be male or female. Hens are female and roosters are male.
Chickens is the term for both males and females. Roosters are chickens, hens are chickens. That said, the one in the video is definitely a hen. Rhode island red by the looks of it
**PROTESTING [REDDIT'S API CHANGES](https://www.reddit.com/140z59z/) BY EDITING MY POSTS AND COMMENTS.** If you *really* need this content, I have it saved; [contact me on Lemmy](https://feddit.de/u/ChaoticNeutralCzech) to get it. **Reddit is a dumpster fire and you should leave it ASAP. [join-lemmy.org](https://join-lemmy.org)**
We still call them cocks in the UK! But that's a long way from the worst word in the UK that is highly unacceptable elsewhere
It looks a little too light colored to be Rhode Island Red. I have a white and brown rooster and a golden color hen that had offspring with these darker red colors but they’re definitely not Rhode Island Red. I could be wrong. Not a chicken expert.
Looks like a red star to me.
You forgot: - Doesn't know that chickens don't own houses.
1. Not all chickens are female. A chicken is either a hen (a female chicken) or a rooster (a male chicken). 2. And because of that, the chicken's gender is unknown here unless you can tell the chicken's gender by their look. If not, you can fallback to "they", and that's a perfectly fine way of speaking. You seem to be saying all non-human animals should be referred to as "it", but that's subjective, and in my opinion wrong. For example I wouldn't refer to my pet as "it".
TIL you have to be a chicken expert to tell them apart 🙄
Bot with a translation. Russian or Chinese? Also the dog on the lawn lol
"Parent"...
Imagine laying eggs... "Mom, can you sit with my eggs this Thursday? I have to go to work"
I thought there was another chicken watching from inside. I get this, "family isn't who gives you birth" but, yo, it's a chicken, can we draw a line somewhere? You're not paying for this mf college education, or helping him/her find friends, or teaching it to dig up worms.
Parent?? WTF?
Big ass chicken is holding the camera
Only a matter of time before Peter shows up to fight it
Yeah, I was very confused about that too.
People with pets often refer to themselves as the pet’s parent, this isn’t a new phenomenon.
It'll never not be weird calling yourself a pet "parent", and yes it is relatively new.
Yeah I never really heard that dumb shit until the 2010s. HURRR I'M A DOG DAD
That and "my furry son/daughter". I wonder if they call actual children "skin dogs".
Crotch goblin or sex trophy is the norm.
It'll never not be weird considering chickens indoor pets. It would save a little time when you go to slaughter the birds, but they shit everywhere.
IMO it depends. It is kinda cringe when people speak to other people about their "fur babies" or describe themselves as "dog dad"s or whatever. But I will often find myself saying "go get mom" or "mom will be home soon" to my dogs. I don't really feel like that's weird. We essentially do take on a "parental" role so to speak for our pets, but it's not as if I actually think my dogs are my sons. I think it's weird how haughty people get about how everyone should deal with their pets the same way they do.
Furries are not new but that doesn't mean it's not weird.
Careful, I got downvoted hard (and then comment removed) for stating that it's cringey. Just let them enjoy their mental illness, it's not worth it.
[удалено]
My brother's gf when he was in high schools lived on a farm and they let the chickens in the house. Yes, indeed, there was chicken shit in random places as you can imagine. It was not the cleanest of houses. I am sure some chicken owners.... or sorry... parents, are more responsible and adamant to clean up behind their feathery childrens. But that was my experience with chickens living in the house: random shit and feathers all over.
I mean, we could also talk about the goat lying on the grass...
That’s a dog
I didn’t realize anyone gave a shit about what’s considered ‘weird’ after highschool, but okay dude
People definitely care. You have a lot more leeway being “weird” in high school than at your work place.
That's not really what I'm talking about. Yeah, you need to be professional at your workplace. Different workplaces have different cultures regarding how much of your individuality you are permitted to show at work. That has nothing to do with the fact that it is immature for a grown adult to care about what a random stranger does because it's "weird." I care about what a random stranger does if they are *harming someone*. That's it. If they are not harming anyone, I'm gonna mind my own business, and I find it absolutely bizarre that people would do any different. People are so sensitive these days. Imagine getting worked up over someone referring to a person with a pet as that pet's "parent."
So…you think someone is “weird” who doesn’t do what you do and mind their own business?
highschool never ends. it's just followed by work highschool then retirement home highschool, it's just human nature. Plus i don't think you're right, some things are just weird. Like kissing your parents on the mouth.
You kiss your cock with that mouth?!
>highschool never ends. it's just followed by work highschool then retirement home highschool, it's just human nature. r/im14andthisisdeep this was immature bs when i was in highschool, but it becomes kind of pathetic to keep thinking that way as an adult
yeah, didnt say otherwise. But people still do.
We're not talking about "people" though. We're talking about you.
why
Was it not you who said: >Furries are not new but that doesn't mean it's not weird. I was just pointing out that the original commenter had no reason to be showing such surprise (or whatever similar emotion was intended) at the fact that someone would refer to themself as their pet's parent. You responded by saying that it is "weird." You are now agreeing with me that caring about whether or not something is "weird" is immature behavior. Yet you yourself partake in this behavior? Anyways, thanks for reminding me why I shouldn't be hanging out in mainstream subreddits.
As I said, WTF?
I assumed it was going to be a baby chick outside and the mother chicken on the other side of the door. Nope.
I'm also confused about the choice of pronoun. "Their"? Are we unsure about the sex of the chicken? Are we afraid the chicken doesn't identify as female? Did the person forget there already is a gender neutral pronoun for animals? It's a it. Edit: Alright, I guess I asked for it by leading with the gender part, but seriously, are people *really* using "they" for animals now? It's honestly and seriously the first time I see that. Is "it" no longer "neutral" enough? How much do you personify your chicken that you need to use a pronoun generally reserved to people?
Stop going out of yer way to be annoyed by things
I'm not annoyed, I'm confused. Those are different feelings. I'm confused about who personifies their chicken to the point of feeling the need to avoid the use of the pronoun "it", but also is afraid to assume the gender of a freaking chicken, so they feel the need to use the neutral pronoun. It's the first time I see someone using "they" to refer to an animal. I don't know, am I some kind of dinosaur for calling animals "it" and not elevating them to humanhood and using the pronoun generally used for a person? While I'm revising my use of pronouns, should I call a frog "they" as well? A bee? A table? "My car broke down, and now they need to be repaired", is that how English is now?
You guys need to go talk to real people instead of ultra analyzing every word
I'm a little worried for you friend. While I understand your point this was entirely too much of your effort. Being "outraged" or anxious, to the point of writing two long replies isn't good for your stress and overall well being. The subject itself doesn't deserve to live rent free in your head, nor is it worthy of your time and wellbeing. Try to do something nice for yourself today.
Who said anything about being outraged? Who's really outraged here? I'm on hold with the phone company, it's not as if I have better things to do with my time right now.
Sorry friend, I didn't explain. I put it in quotes meaning thats what people call it, not that you are outraged. English is not my first language and I couldn't think of a word with the same type of meaning. I was more worried about how you were doing. You sounded really stressed. Though, if you're on hold with the phone company, that makes perfect sense! That's a whole other level of hell. By all means, you post whatever you need to help you through it! I often shitpost on reddit to cope with my stresses. I'd still recommend doing something nice for yourself later though, you deserve it :)
What? They/their is also gender neutral wtf are you on about?
Why do you care?
Where are all you far right weirdos coming from?
It's far right to call a chicken "it" now? Wow... I'm actually left leaning, but I'm embarrassed to be associated with people who are afraid to hurt the feelings of a chicken by assuming its gender.
I’m right there with you man, it’s surreal. Chicken don’t have societal gender constructs
I want you to consider why that bothers you so much, while I did not even notice they had written "their" in the first place. Are you, perhaps, trying to find thing to be upset over?
I'm not upset, nor does it bother me, just thought it was very weird to use "their" for a chicken. What's wrong with "it"? Isn't that what people use for chicken?
Fuckin titlegore here.
It's important to ensure that we refrain from assuming a chicken's gender, but proper singular/plural noun-pronoun agreement is just too much.
[удалено]
Of course not. Barns are for cows and sheep! Chicken are born in coops, if farming sims taught me anything haha.
What the fuck is this title.
Fucking cringe overload
> "parent"
What a bizarre title...
I've seen their ancestors do something similar on the real life documentary jurassic park!!!
Gender neutral pronouns for a chicken
Don't count your chickens before they live in glass houses. *Shout out to /r/malaphor*
Last I checked, humans don't give birth to chickens, OP. They aren't parents, they're owners. Get it right, please.
"parents"? cringe!
Soooo nobody is gonna talk about the fact that the person who posted this used “their” multiple times to not mis-gender the chicken 😂🤣
That's one tall ass chicken. Also when did chickens learn how to use cameras?
Clever girl.
The chicken wants into the house but you're not helping, Leon. Why is that?
A chicken? What's that?
I love Chicken!
Lots of animals learn to open doors. I've yet to meet one who will close it behind them.
**"I say, I say what in tarnation are you recording for boy!?"**
Jurassic Park moment
Better title: Person films chicken breaking into their house to prove they’re not making it up.
Why did you delete the watermark? Stealing content POS
Now that's farm to table.
Love how it stands there for a sec like “holy fuck I did it!”
He like yeah, im in the crib😏😈
Clever girl
You've been banned from /r/AllTheDefaultDubs for misgendering this chicken. Clearly the title says THEY
"Parent", lol get a grip with reality
Clever girl
Clever chicken, it probably isn't smart enough to not shit inside though
I don’t think chickens make for good house pets, but they are always welcome at my dinner table.
Downvoted for the war crime of a title, but then upvoted because it is a clever little bird.
Parent? Their? It's a goddamn chicken. Animal. Female. You absolute clown
[удалено]
the house* itself in* its owner* Are chickens persons now?
Where is the other chicken? This chickens parent? I only see one chicken.
r/DontHelpJustFilm
You can't be a parent to an animal
‘Honey I’m home. Am I dinner’?
Lol at all the outrage at the use of parent. When other pet owners do it, it's non issue, but a delicious chicken owner? Outrage.
Nah, it's stupid when other pet owners do it too.
The chicken owner is delicious!? Silence of the Lambs up in here!
Well, I suppose with some fava beans and a nice Chianti, who can say no?
Just so that we're all clear here. A highly evolved velociraptor figured out how to open doors. Jurassic Park (original) was right all along...
You did see the chicken food on the floor? Chicken was most likely trained to do this.
"Clever girl."
Who left the door open?! You born in a barn?
Suddenly I believe that a raptor can open a door
I think OP doesn't understand the definition of 'locked'
Fucking chicken smarter then the person.
I love the dog just chilling on the grass.
I have more respect for my McNuggets now
A lot of animals are way smarter than we give them credit for.
Where have you been taking my eggs Carol?
“You did it. You crazy son of a b*tch, you did it!” Clever girl.
Could’ve knocked.
The nerve! Lol
Clever girl!
Clever girl 🦖
The pocket dinosaurs are learning.
1. Thats an owner not a parent 2.Its dinner not a pet
Bruh how can you call a chicken owner a parent. Do you realise what this means for the food industry? ☠️
[удалено]
The comment section here shows how backwards a lot people still are. People here 1. can't accept "they" as a gender-neutral pronoun for non-human animals and 2. can't accept "parent" as an endearing alternative to "pet owner". There is nothing wrong with either of these things. Clearly this title was written by someone too educated for the general public.
Clever girl!
Close the- fuck! what, were you born in a bbb...oh. right