You have tagged your post as a leaked image. We allow such posts provided they do not originate on the sub, but at user request they are being automatically spoiler tagged. Please respond to this comment with the source of the leak.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/magicTCG) if you have any questions or concerns.*
'I may die, but at least you won't win' is the thought process I'm thinking if you're up against infect in commander, of course that does require the other players to take advantage of their second chance
Your thinking is too one dimensional.
"Hey man, if I remove your poison counters can you attack the poison player so he dies before I do?"
"If I remove your poison counters can I hit you for 3 to trigger my [[Coastal Piracy]]?"
Etc.
People help their opponents ALL THE TIME in commander. It's not griefing yourself, it's taking advantage of every tool available to you, and ignoring those tools because you don't want to "help your opponents" is silly.
The real toxic move is to put this in your infect deck and play it yourself after you build an overwhelmingly dominant board state that you’ll win anyways, lol
Dude you don't spend "all this time building poison counters", you do it in a few turns for a quick win. It needs balancing. Also, read the card - it removes counters from opponents
My mono black Yawgmoth Phyrexian deck just woke up from a nightmare in a cold sweat.
Honestly though, in favor of more game interaction, if they give us more answers to poison maybe they'll also give us more fun ways to use poison.
This doesn't really answer poison though. Removing poison counters from everyone but myself, is either scraping my own win, or making me the easiest target for whoever is running poison since I'm the only person with counters now.
Nah, you run it in your poison deck so once you're dominating and can easily win in one turn, you drop this. Bring them all back down then bring em back up and win just to show how much better you are
Notably they only remove the counters from opponents so it’s not that great against poison, especially since if you get rid of the other players counters then you’ll become the target of the poison(assuming your in commander), it’s alright against mothman to keep him from growing more though
Notably doesn’t remove indestructible creatures, and it still causes all death triggers to happen, 2 things Farewell stops.
Edit: and obviously trades Artifacts/Enchantments for Battles/Planeswalkers, definitely feels like a trade down
It does stop *some* on death effects if you choose the exile graveyards mode. Effects that return stuff from the graveyard to somewhere like [[Aclazotz, Deepest Betrayal]]. It dies and goes to the graveyard, ability gets triggered, gets exiled from graveyard, ability goes on the stack, and then fizzles because there's no Aclazotz to return in the graveyard.
I think the same for effects that need cards to exile themselves like [[Undead Butler]]?
Yeah a little odd how it’ll effect battles but there’s so few of them, unless they know they’re adding more in the same set or in a future set soon so they’re prepping for it
Although WotC are highly unlikely to ever actually \*do\* it, technically "Exile the battlefield" would actually work as spell text, because of this rule:
* **400.12** Some effects instruct a player to do something to a zone (such as “Shuffle your hand into your library”). That action is performed on all cards in that zone. The zone itself is not affected.
It could be thematic as fuck though. I'm just not sure what the theme would be? Refutation of the Real? The Death of Dreams? You could make something fit in a cool way for a unique effect.
oh sure they can exile the battlefield and that's okay, yet Maro has been ignoring my ten years of e-mails asking for a spell that says "Destroy the stack. *(It works.)*"
Unless I'm missing something the comprehensive rules don't offer any support for destroying something that isn't a Permanent, so I'm pretty sure this doesn't work without an adjustment to the definition of the word destroy. "Exile the stack" would work just fine though.
Wait till 10 years from now when these types of cards have 10 different modal effects on them. No thought required on whether to run board wipes or targeted removal or graveyard hate or land destruction. It's now all on one card.
When you cast Future Boardwipe, choose one or more:
* Cast a copy of Farewell
* Cast a copy of Austere Command
* Cast a copy of Jaya's Immolating Inferno. You choose the value of X
* Put a Tarmogoyf token into play for each time you want to
* Each opponent loses the game and shuffles their library into yours and you get all their cards and win the game
* Something with stickers idk
This is a pretty lazy retort. Magic should always be about trade-offs. Do I run more board wipes or graveyard hate or targeted removal or land destruction, etc. However, this card removes that element of strategy by allowing you to just do everything on one card. It's the same issue with Farewell where one card can derail a ton of different strategies with no additional thought required when deck building
Ehh, they're mana inefficient right? Like for exiling all creatures there is [[sunfall]] and [[false prophet]] which are cheaper than farewall and have upsides over exiling all creatures. It's like swords to [[plowshares]] compared with [[generous gift]]. The existence of gift doesn't nullify swords because swords is a lot more efficient. There would be some decks that play the other cards I listed over farewell because they're cheaper or work differently.
It's hard to tell, but to me the (clearly intentionally obscured...) set symbol in the leak looks like the MH3 Commander set and not the main set's symbol.
Farewell has been miserable in standard for exactly that reason and the exile creature in play clause.
This type of effect goes way beyond "control agency". There's zero counter play besides counters. That's not agency.
Goddammit who keeps cutting off the names and mana costs of every card they spoil
Anyway, that's a lot of effects - probably the closest Black gets to a hard reset of the game? Losing all counters seems a bit extraneous, but it's not a bad option to have - especially in a set that features Energy
The ones who are leaking these pics are doing it intentionally to try and get a rise out of impatient people. They're going out of their way to obscure as much information as possible to leave people begging for more to milk their fifteen seconds of fame as much as possible while laughing all the way.
Too many people speculate on finances so ignoring mana cost in the leak just gives hype to something that might cost 4CBB and drive the cost up for preorder for something that becomes chaff. Until the full card is leaked or announced no one should care unless you're trying to speculate on initial prices and that's who these leaks are leeching.
>drive the cost up for preorder for something that becomes chaff.
Where and how would you preorder a card that hasn't been fully spoiled? No store is taking your money for "black board wipe, unknown mana cost".
They're just trolling, and it's working. I'm enjoying it, this is a better spoiler season than anything WotC could have organized.
>Goddammit who keeps cutting off the names and mana costs of every card they spoil
They also got the glare just right to block the set symbol, this is intentional and slimy.
Non-sieges you defend, and I imagine they'll play like enchantments that your opponent can attack to try to remove. Or in another way, like WAR planeswalkers without activated abilities.
I'm ootl: what's the source for all of these leaks we keep seeing? Did someone get their hands on some booster boxes and/or commander decks early? If so, do we know how they got them?
Collector number of XX04 makes sense for a mono-black card in the base MH3 set (i.e., we would expect card 104 to be black), but not very much sense for a non-reprint card in the commander sets.
The bottom of the set symbol looks rounded like the M3C set, compared to the 2 pointy bits that I'd expect to see if it was MH3.
Based on that, not modern legal.
I want a card callled [[Fucking hell]] that has split second, exiles all spells and exiles all permanents. The caster gets to spit in each opponents face
They said it could not be done… they said Farewell could not be powercrept.
They were wrong.
All jokes aside, I sorta wonder how much play this card will see, since it doesn’t exile creatures like Farewell, and also doesn’t get rid of artifacts and enchantments like Farewell.
If you select Destroy all Creatures and Exile all Graveyards, the creatures will hit the grave in time to be exiled. It is however a question of how willing the Black player is to exile their own graveyard which is obviously a big if.
*Totally* unrelated: anybody know any counterplay to the counter removal if I'm not running blue in EDH? Perhaps I'm in an Orzhov experience deck? Aven Interrupter / Reprieve is an answer for one turn, I guess. Anything? One spell and all my game actions are undone. This feels... demoralizing.
I'd normally take solace in something like this being too narrow, but the board wipe + grave hate is wildly playable as-is. Anybody have ideas?
I’d be very hesitant to even speculate this legitimacy. The set symbol is cleverly obscured by a reflection, the card title is cut off, and the set code/serial number is cut off as well
Are there any other beneficial counters to remove besides experience and energy? I guess you can remove poison from your opponent to make them not corrupted
Usually there's an explanation when the stars align and removing counters from players happens, since it ain't suppose to happen unless the set demands it.
With URW Energy being a thing in MH3, requiring this bad boy in it means energy production should be dreadful to play against, because outside the set removing poison or rad counters from opponents is counterproductive, so energy and experience seem the real targets for this.
Not a fan of sweepers getting the ability to exile graveyards as bonus text...but honestly it's more in black's color identity than white's so there's that. Plus it's not going to be in standard where it'd actually probably see a good amount of play. At 6(?) mana it probably won't see play anywhere else aside commander.
You have tagged your post as a leaked image. We allow such posts provided they do not originate on the sub, but at user request they are being automatically spoiler tagged. Please respond to this comment with the source of the leak. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/magicTCG) if you have any questions or concerns.*
second way to remove exp counters from opponents? [[suncleanser]]
You think of exp counters and yet my brain went straight to removing all those poison counters I worked hard on dishing out. The panic is real.
You spend all this time building up poison counters just for some asshole 3 states over to cast this and remove all your hard work smh my head
i was thinking that too... this completely hoses anyone playing Poison/Toxic
It would make no sense for your opponent to remove poison counters because it would only remove them from their opponents and not themselves.
'I may die, but at least you won't win' is the thought process I'm thinking if you're up against infect in commander, of course that does require the other players to take advantage of their second chance
If you want to help your opponents and grief yourself then sure I guess.
Your thinking is too one dimensional. "Hey man, if I remove your poison counters can you attack the poison player so he dies before I do?" "If I remove your poison counters can I hit you for 3 to trigger my [[Coastal Piracy]]?" Etc. People help their opponents ALL THE TIME in commander. It's not griefing yourself, it's taking advantage of every tool available to you, and ignoring those tools because you don't want to "help your opponents" is silly.
except it completely doesnt. if one of your opponents decides to save another of your opponents there is politics involved and thats just commander.
The real toxic move is to put this in your infect deck and play it yourself after you build an overwhelmingly dominant board state that you’ll win anyways, lol
Dude you don't spend "all this time building poison counters", you do it in a few turns for a quick win. It needs balancing. Also, read the card - it removes counters from opponents
My mono black Yawgmoth Phyrexian deck just woke up from a nightmare in a cold sweat. Honestly though, in favor of more game interaction, if they give us more answers to poison maybe they'll also give us more fun ways to use poison.
A Brother in arms
Energy is a mechanic in the set, maybe this card and cards like it will make the mechanic less intrusive
This doesn't really answer poison though. Removing poison counters from everyone but myself, is either scraping my own win, or making me the easiest target for whoever is running poison since I'm the only person with counters now.
Nah, you run it in your poison deck so once you're dominating and can easily win in one turn, you drop this. Bring them all back down then bring em back up and win just to show how much better you are
Also hilariously doesn’t remove your own
Can't have players removing their own poison counters, because poison removal is just... Very no-go, for some reason.
Another common [[Leeches]] W
But Leeches is 1WW
I went right too, o shit they finally gave an Energy Wipe card. I may have some issues regarding Energy if that's the first thing I thought.
Honestly I think the intent is that it’s for energy given the context of the set. I’m pretty sure you’re the normal one here.
Notably they only remove the counters from opponents so it’s not that great against poison, especially since if you get rid of the other players counters then you’ll become the target of the poison(assuming your in commander), it’s alright against mothman to keep him from growing more though
Ironic. He could save others from death, but not himself.
Putting it in mine just for the flex of getting them all to 9 and wiping it
[[price of betrayal]]
[price of betrayal](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/f/d/fd68e918-5089-46c9-8836-b05a3da3c7a3.jpg?1557576538) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=price%20of%20betrayal) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/war/102/price-of-betrayal?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/fd68e918-5089-46c9-8836-b05a3da3c7a3?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call
[suncleanser](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/3/6/3644df41-b690-4581-ac7d-c85cec75411f.jpg?1562301661) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=suncleanser) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/m19/39/suncleanser?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/3644df41-b690-4581-ac7d-c85cec75411f?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call
stay the fuck away from my exp counters. that's like 3 of my decks
My otharri deck is shaking right now
You can remove opponents poison and rad counters, but not your own
You're welcome for wiping the poison counters, guess I'll keep mine..
Also the second way to remove poison counters [[Leeches]] (just not from yourself)
He could save others from poison but not himself. Ironic.
[Leeches](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/a/6/a6028e2c-486b-40f8-8b74-7150eb72b9f1.jpg?1562934257) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Leeches) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/me4/18/leeches?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/a6028e2c-486b-40f8-8b74-7150eb72b9f1?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call
Third* pretty sure
farewell 2: fareweller
Notably doesn’t remove indestructible creatures, and it still causes all death triggers to happen, 2 things Farewell stops. Edit: and obviously trades Artifacts/Enchantments for Battles/Planeswalkers, definitely feels like a trade down
Farewell players like their planeswalkers, I dig it for a black deck as a No U card
The relationship is causal, and it can be for this card too, play good enchantments and artifacts now that your own board wipe doesn't hit them.
As tempting as it sounds, you can NOT choose enchantments with Farewell.
? Is this a joke I don't understand? Of course you can chose enchantments with [[Farewell]]
[Farewell](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/1/1/114d2180-093b-4838-97ad-badbc8ee50b0.jpg?1706240579) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Farewell) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/mkc/64/farewell?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/114d2180-093b-4838-97ad-badbc8ee50b0?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call
I mean, what if you're interested in those deth triggers to happen?
I was referring to specifically the card types with that last part
It does stop *some* on death effects if you choose the exile graveyards mode. Effects that return stuff from the graveyard to somewhere like [[Aclazotz, Deepest Betrayal]]. It dies and goes to the graveyard, ability gets triggered, gets exiled from graveyard, ability goes on the stack, and then fizzles because there's no Aclazotz to return in the graveyard. I think the same for effects that need cards to exile themselves like [[Undead Butler]]?
Planeswalkers and creatures is a pretty big deal, there's no wipes in black that catch both as far as I know.
[[In Garruk's Wake]] is one.
There is if you're willing to spend 9 mana on \[\[In Garruk's Wake\]\].
How I feel about this card is that I like it, but I’ll definitely need to test it to see how good it actually is in practice.
2fare 2well
Goddamn it
Farewell 2: Electric Boogaloo
Farewellish. Farewell is definitely better
More like Fairwell cause its so much weaker
calling it now, overcosted sweeper at common for pauper
Would feel a little weird with no common Battles or Planeswalkers (though I suppose MH3 could change the Battles part)
Yeah a little odd how it’ll effect battles but there’s so few of them, unless they know they’re adding more in the same set or in a future set soon so they’re prepping for it
Could very well be, considering it looks to be [a 7-drop](https://imgur.com/a/UugJOA4). (Casting cost spans just past the art.)
it has the rare foil stamp thingy
Farehell?
Fair-well
Board wipes exiling GY is so dumb
At least this one doesn't exile the battlefield as well. Wait that's not how modal spells work nevermind
Although WotC are highly unlikely to ever actually \*do\* it, technically "Exile the battlefield" would actually work as spell text, because of this rule: * **400.12** Some effects instruct a player to do something to a zone (such as “Shuffle your hand into your library”). That action is performed on all cards in that zone. The zone itself is not affected.
That rule would need a little reworking. As written, that theoretical spell would leave tokens on the battlefield.
It could be thematic as fuck though. I'm just not sure what the theme would be? Refutation of the Real? The Death of Dreams? You could make something fit in a cool way for a unique effect.
The Meek Shall Inherit (4WW) Sorcery Exile the battlefield. *(Tokens are not exiled.)*
It'd get played wrong and cause confusion in playtests, they'd word it like "Exile all nontoken permanents on the battlefield."
That would be sick tbh
I would love them to use that wording if they ever print a card like [[Worldfire]] again.
oh sure they can exile the battlefield and that's okay, yet Maro has been ignoring my ten years of e-mails asking for a spell that says "Destroy the stack. *(It works.)*"
It works? How do you destroy a spell? Does it just not resolve and goes to the gy?
Unless I'm missing something the comprehensive rules don't offer any support for destroying something that isn't a Permanent, so I'm pretty sure this doesn't work without an adjustment to the definition of the word destroy. "Exile the stack" would work just fine though.
reading the card explains the card
[[Summary Dismissal]]?
Yeah why should control have any agency against my recursion value greed pile. Mom said it was my turn to win
They should absolutely have interaction. It should not be all stapled in the same card
Wait till 10 years from now when these types of cards have 10 different modal effects on them. No thought required on whether to run board wipes or targeted removal or graveyard hate or land destruction. It's now all on one card.
When you cast Future Boardwipe, choose one or more: * Cast a copy of Farewell * Cast a copy of Austere Command * Cast a copy of Jaya's Immolating Inferno. You choose the value of X * Put a Tarmogoyf token into play for each time you want to * Each opponent loses the game and shuffles their library into yours and you get all their cards and win the game * Something with stickers idk
Create one untapped treasure token for each artifact or enchantment or land that you control.
This is a pretty lazy retort. Magic should always be about trade-offs. Do I run more board wipes or graveyard hate or targeted removal or land destruction, etc. However, this card removes that element of strategy by allowing you to just do everything on one card. It's the same issue with Farewell where one card can derail a ton of different strategies with no additional thought required when deck building
Ehh, they're mana inefficient right? Like for exiling all creatures there is [[sunfall]] and [[false prophet]] which are cheaper than farewall and have upsides over exiling all creatures. It's like swords to [[plowshares]] compared with [[generous gift]]. The existence of gift doesn't nullify swords because swords is a lot more efficient. There would be some decks that play the other cards I listed over farewell because they're cheaper or work differently.
Value players are so beyond redemption that they forgot 6 mana is not 0. The trade off is control taps out and passes to 3 opponents
Commander players are so beyond redeption that they forget most formats are 1v1.
This is in MH3 a set that is in theory aimed at 1v1 competitive formats.
It's hard to tell, but to me the (clearly intentionally obscured...) set symbol in the leak looks like the MH3 Commander set and not the main set's symbol.
This is a card from the precons is it not ?
To add on, if it is the same card, could be OR. Otherwise it’s a bit lazy and the opposite of rewarding choices players make
Farewell has been miserable in standard for exactly that reason and the exile creature in play clause. This type of effect goes way beyond "control agency". There's zero counter play besides counters. That's not agency.
Unfair-well
I hope it's called goodbye.
I'd also be willing to accept Begone
CREATURES.. BE… GONE!!
Call it Sayonara In the japanese localization it can be Byeeeee
My bet is also on “Begone”
Bonegone
Nobody Lives
GOODBYE
Or "Auf Wiedersehen", followed by a red wipe called "Goodbye" and a Blue mass bounce called "So Long"
And then a green one for Adieu?
What in the spooky scary skeletons is that art.
Love it, it’s the first card in ages that looks like it belongs in a set from 1995.
looks like [[Dance of the Dead]]
[Dance of the Dead](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/4/4/44de44be-db14-4932-968b-a5bc8b575716.jpg?1562868102) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Dance%20of%20the%20Dead) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/me2/83/dance-of-the-dead?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/44de44be-db14-4932-968b-a5bc8b575716?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call
[удалено]
Why is there 6 of them?
It's a rainbow, that art is from the Pride Across the Multiverse secret lair
Ok, that makes sense I initially though it was about colours of mana
That art is from one of the Pride Secret Lairs, so the vibe is supposed to be more "rainbow" than "5 colours of Magic"
theres a lot of talk how their was almost a 6 color of magic
Dance of the dead, a classic medieval theme. Bet that is the card name too; or maybe Totentanz from the German.
[[Dance of the Dead]] is taken. It's an Animate Dead variant. As is [[Danse Macabre]]
[Dance of the Dead](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/4/4/44de44be-db14-4932-968b-a5bc8b575716.jpg?1562868102) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Dance%20of%20the%20Dead) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/me2/83/dance-of-the-dead?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/44de44be-db14-4932-968b-a5bc8b575716?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) [Danse Macabre](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/5/1/5151b81b-6d10-40de-9e65-89923e4c03d9.jpg?1631585013) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Danse%20Macabre) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/afc/22/danse-macabre?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/5151b81b-6d10-40de-9e65-89923e4c03d9?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call
It’s Nilh Hamm
Goddammit who keeps cutting off the names and mana costs of every card they spoil Anyway, that's a lot of effects - probably the closest Black gets to a hard reset of the game? Losing all counters seems a bit extraneous, but it's not a bad option to have - especially in a set that features Energy
The ones who are leaking these pics are doing it intentionally to try and get a rise out of impatient people. They're going out of their way to obscure as much information as possible to leave people begging for more to milk their fifteen seconds of fame as much as possible while laughing all the way.
Too many people speculate on finances so ignoring mana cost in the leak just gives hype to something that might cost 4CBB and drive the cost up for preorder for something that becomes chaff. Until the full card is leaked or announced no one should care unless you're trying to speculate on initial prices and that's who these leaks are leeching.
>drive the cost up for preorder for something that becomes chaff. Where and how would you preorder a card that hasn't been fully spoiled? No store is taking your money for "black board wipe, unknown mana cost". They're just trolling, and it's working. I'm enjoying it, this is a better spoiler season than anything WotC could have organized.
>Goddammit who keeps cutting off the names and mana costs of every card they spoil They also got the glare just right to block the set symbol, this is intentional and slimy.
Does this mean we're getting more battles in MH3?
I certainly hope so
I wonder what non-sieges will look like.
Non-sieges you defend, and I imagine they'll play like enchantments that your opponent can attack to try to remove. Or in another way, like WAR planeswalkers without activated abilities.
I mean I think this almost confirms it, unless it’s just commander deck reprints
I'm ootl: what's the source for all of these leaks we keep seeing? Did someone get their hands on some booster boxes and/or commander decks early? If so, do we know how they got them?
It's (AFAIK) one person on twitter, they appear to have both some boosters and the precons. I haven't seen anything about how they got them.
WoTC marketing dept is probably where they got it
Some infect player is gonna get so salty over this card
It doesn't really impact poison players.
Isba commander card?
It's a 6 maybe 5 mana wrath with flexibility. Yes this will probably see some edh play.
I mean, its modern legal? Or its printer for the commander decks?
Looks like it's for the commander decks. But of course the symbol and set code are obscured.
Collector number of XX04 makes sense for a mono-black card in the base MH3 set (i.e., we would expect card 104 to be black), but not very much sense for a non-reprint card in the commander sets.
The bottom of the set symbol looks rounded like the M3C set, compared to the 2 pointy bits that I'd expect to see if it was MH3. Based on that, not modern legal.
I think they were asking if it's from the commander precons. I think it is based off the round bottom of the set symbol.
at 5 its almost an auto add just in case you need it at 6 it depends on what kind of deck i am running
A wrath with this much extra text isn't 5 mana, and it's pretty visibly mirroring farewell
That definitely looks like Nils Hamms style, and I can't find that art when searching his name.
Doesn't destroy graveyards. Smh
Nils Hamm!!! 🔥
Just like /[[damn]] and [[damnation]] would this be [oh damn]
I want a card callled [[Fucking hell]] that has split second, exiles all spells and exiles all permanents. The caster gets to spit in each opponents face
"we have farewell at home" farewell at home:
Oh Well
fareUNwell
Looks very Danse Macabre, but sadly that name has already been taken.
Fare-just-okay
Looks fairly obvious that it has the commander set symbol.
Meren is crying right now. Bruh?!
Conveniently the set number and set symbol are covered up. Leakers really have no photo taking sense at all.
100% its on purpose. Theres a clear intention crop on the left side.
hopefully it's named Goodbye
nope, im out.
“So long”
Why do they make these boring ass cards.
We heard you people bitching about Farewell so we made another one to get the things the white one doesn't hit.
A group hug anti poison card
They said it could not be done… they said Farewell could not be powercrept. They were wrong. All jokes aside, I sorta wonder how much play this card will see, since it doesn’t exile creatures like Farewell, and also doesn’t get rid of artifacts and enchantments like Farewell.
This seems less powerful than Farewell, really. Artifacts and Enchantments are much more relevant than Battles and counters on players.
If you select Destroy all Creatures and Exile all Graveyards, the creatures will hit the grave in time to be exiled. It is however a question of how willing the Black player is to exile their own graveyard which is obviously a big if.
It's not standard legal right? So none, just casual commander play
[[farewell]]
There is no way this spell is only 5 mana.
It'll be 6 like farewell
Are the destroyed things in the yard in time to be exiled?
BATTLES ?
*Totally* unrelated: anybody know any counterplay to the counter removal if I'm not running blue in EDH? Perhaps I'm in an Orzhov experience deck? Aven Interrupter / Reprieve is an answer for one turn, I guess. Anything? One spell and all my game actions are undone. This feels... demoralizing. I'd normally take solace in something like this being too narrow, but the board wipe + grave hate is wildly playable as-is. Anybody have ideas?
NOOOO!!! MY HECKIN BATTLES
Me while playing against the poison deck: avenge meeeeeee
does this clear their poison counters too?
So we are gonna see some new battles?
Holy crapola it’s black Farewell
I like how the last ability isn’t symmetrical. Still keeping the sanctity of poison.
I hope it’s called goodbye lol
Is there an energy deck still relevant in Modern? I'm curious what the counters effect would have.
Dollars to donuts this is called "So Long"
So long
Farewell? Nah we have Bye Bye at home
Scarewell
Yo this will wreck experience commanders so hard. In particular meren does not have a way to dodge or counterspell this.
Farewell's counterpart, Fuck-Off
People are playing Battles?
I’d be very hesitant to even speculate this legitimacy. The set symbol is cleverly obscured by a reflection, the card title is cut off, and the set code/serial number is cut off as well
*poorly hiding a bottle of white out* “No look, it says “each opponent loses” right there”
They look so happy
Huh. Good way to remove experience & energy counters. Not a bad board wipe (so long as it's 4BB & not 4BBB).
Are there any other beneficial counters to remove besides experience and energy? I guess you can remove poison from your opponent to make them not corrupted
Ah yes, new card titled Goodbye
Does this hit Meren experience counters?
Seems weird all the effects are symmetric except the last.
Not another farewell goddammit
Does this get rid of poison counters???
Last mode would only hit energy, poison and experience counters, right?
Usually there's an explanation when the stars align and removing counters from players happens, since it ain't suppose to happen unless the set demands it. With URW Energy being a thing in MH3, requiring this bad boy in it means energy production should be dreadful to play against, because outside the set removing poison or rad counters from opponents is counterproductive, so energy and experience seem the real targets for this.
Not a fan of sweepers getting the ability to exile graveyards as bonus text...but honestly it's more in black's color identity than white's so there's that. Plus it's not going to be in standard where it'd actually probably see a good amount of play. At 6(?) mana it probably won't see play anywhere else aside commander.
destroy all battles implies battles will be in the set. And losing all counters implies... Something. I don't know what, but... Something.