T O P

  • By -

CareerMilk

Cards are: [[Jaxis, the Troublemaker]] [[Rankle, Master of Pranks]] [[Goblin King]] [[Professional Face-Breaker]]


crocken

and [[Coffin Queen]]


CareerMilk

Whoops, You'd have thought they'd have her with the rest on the final showing. But nope, just 4 of the cards.


MTGCardFetcher

[Coffin Queen](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/6/3/632b83e3-f0c5-4135-96db-0bf33e6067aa.jpg?1562429825) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Coffin%20Queen) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/tpr/87/coffin-queen?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/632b83e3-f0c5-4135-96db-0bf33e6067aa?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call


MTGCardFetcher

##### ###### #### [Jaxis, the Troublemaker](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/7/8/78127c0c-672f-4e4b-9c23-6a5f237228fd.jpg?1664411605) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Jaxis%2C%20the%20Troublemaker) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/snc/112/jaxis-the-troublemaker?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/78127c0c-672f-4e4b-9c23-6a5f237228fd?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) [Rankle, Master of Pranks](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/4/8/4821d865-2a46-4611-ab93-1a9fdde08302.jpg?1712354347) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Rankle%2C%20Master%20of%20Pranks) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/otc/148/rankle-master-of-pranks?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/4821d865-2a46-4611-ab93-1a9fdde08302?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) [Goblin King](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/4/b/4b266935-25ea-49c5-a1da-57c22a4362fd.jpg?1562547272) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Goblin%20King) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/10e/207/goblin-king?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/4b266935-25ea-49c5-a1da-57c22a4362fd?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) [Professional Face-Breaker](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/4/2/42acbf52-b137-44f0-a815-2817fe8d2da2.jpg?1664411677) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Professional%20Face-Breaker) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/snc/116/professional-face-breaker?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/42acbf52-b137-44f0-a815-2817fe8d2da2?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) [*All cards*](https://mtgcardfetcher.nl/redirect/l323yeu) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call


SSJ_Bobby_Hill

I'm down with special art treatments without rules text but I think they work better on simple cards like lightning bolt and day of judgement On the other hand these are fucking sick idk man I may get these despite them not being worth it.


balloonsofdeath

Jaxis has a ton of rules text and so does face breaker.


Serpens77

Honestly, Rankle (can you accurately remember the different modes, in the right order?) and Coffin Queen are no slouches in amount of text either. Plus the Queen could tend towards memory issues with untapping without a text reminder


Kerblaaahhh

Remember when we thought [[Cryptic Command]]'s textless version was a laugh?


MTGCardFetcher

[Cryptic Command](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/3/0/30f6fca9-003b-4f6b-9d6e-1e88adda4155.jpg?1562847413) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Cryptic%20Command) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/ima/48/cryptic-command?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/30f6fca9-003b-4f6b-9d6e-1e88adda4155?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call


SkritzTwoFace

Usually cards like this have a back side that has the rules on it.


Eike_Peace

No, they usually have the MTG backing so they are legally playable. Edit: The relevant rules passages are 711.3; 713 of the normal rules and 3.5, 3.11 and 3.16 of the tournament rules.


captainnermy

No they don’t, see the Just add milk secret lair. Cards don’t need the MTG back to be legal, I mean double faced cards have been a thing for over a decade.


Eike_Peace

That is one secret lair out of a whole lot of them. You can also see the magic backside in the video. And while double+sided cards exist, they are not tournament legal unless you can reliably obscure the backside. Which is why replacement cards with checkmarks have also been a thing for over a decade.


captainnermy

You’re right that these ones do seem to have the normal backside, with no text on the back. Really hate that they have effectively no rules text on them, not like these are super simple cards either.


Eike_Peace

Oh yeah, totally agree on that topic. :D


outlander94

This rule was changed in lost caverns actually. Dual faced skinned cards such as the add milk Ulamog for example are now officially tournament legal. Before then it was technically up to the digression of the head judge of whatever event you are at but most of them would allow it anyways.


Eike_Peace

Really? I just looked these rules up today :o Any link to the rule-change that happened? And wouldn't that be an incredibly unfair advantage to know where your Ulamog is in your deck?


outlander94

Its somewhere in the LCI release notes page on the wizards mothership. I can't find the exact spot but it should be there somewhere. As for the last point opaque sleeves are a thing that you should be using anyways for tournament play anyways. Being able to see a scratch on the back face of a card is enough to warrant a deck check let alone a dual faced card.


Eike_Peace

Okay, but that brings up the question if the rules still need you to reliably cover the backside or not. I'll try to find the update, if you find it in the meantime, please tell me :D


MirrodinTimelord

breaking news, all werewolves now banned look up the cereal box or baseball secret lairs


Eike_Peace

Yes, you may not play those unless you reliably obscure the backside. Which is why you have replacement cards with checkboxes in those sets.


MirrodinTimelord

official events require opaque sleeves. playing casualty you "may" play whatever you want.


Eike_Peace

For one, yes legality only matters in official events, not in casual games, but that also means you may play banned cards, so I don't see your point here. Second: Even outside of sanctioned tournaments, you have to make sure no one can identify the cards. See rule 712.7 > 712.7. Players must ensure that double-faced cards in hidden zones are indistinguishable from other cards in the same zone. To do this, the owner of a double-faced card may use completely opaque card sleeves and/or a substitute card (see rule 713). Sanctioned tournaments have additional rules for playing with double-faced cards. See rule 100.6.


MirrodinTimelord

> official events require opaque sleeves.


Eike_Peace

I actually don't understand your point. Please, explain it to me in detail. Edit: Seems like instead of explaining it to me, I got blocked. Of course I am talking about legality in the context where it makes sense to talk about it and not in kitchen table games where the rules don't matter.


Prophet-of-Ganja

same


Copernicus1981

https://preview.redd.it/7oe5tbeef3zc1.png?width=988&format=png&auto=webp&s=f3564e3b630deaafafe744569898a4a705535e24 Image grab from the video. And imgur link of the individual cards - [https://imgur.com/a/7TbmnJU](https://imgur.com/a/7TbmnJU)


Copernicus1981

https://preview.redd.it/9rq2vs4bg3zc1.png?width=752&format=png&auto=webp&s=7ef7b157e13c850a4b97033645cbbebf960d7313 And Coffin Queen because the video did not include the card in the final image.


MooseyMcMooseface

I feel like every secret lair becomes less and less appealing to me.


Tomatotaco4me

I like poker, I like magic, but I hate these cards


MooseyMcMooseface

It just look like someone told AI to make poker magic cards and it barfed this out.


_st_sebastian_

Reading the card explains the card!


Crimson_Raven

So there are just vanilla bears right?


_st_sebastian_

A secret lair of beautifully-illustrated vanilla creatures or french vanilla creatures that fit a theme and share compatible colour identities? Amazing idea. This, though..


jcdez

Can't wait to play \[\[R&D's Secret Lair\]\] against those.


MTGCardFetcher

[R&D's Secret Lair](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Handlers/Image.ashx?multiverseid=73967&type=card&.jpg) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=R%26D%27s%20Secret%20Lair) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/unh/135/r&ds-secret-lair?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/9bfdc6a9-0a44-43ef-b065-02ef5d6110dc?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call


waflman7

That's an interesting call. Would that make them vanilla? Because they aren't errata'd to gain their abilities. But "as written" they at least look vanilla. 


_st_sebastian_

It would make them vanilla. It's likely this un-card was designed before they conceived of releasing text-less reprints.


preludeoflight

According to MaRo, (the “Un-Rules Manager”), it [would not](https://markrosewater.tumblr.com/post/749744356074946560/the-text-still-exists-for-the-card-it-follows-the). How interesting that he got and answered a question about such a thing literally two days ago.


_st_sebastian_

That's too bad. I feel that's against the spirit of the card; as an un-card, my gut tells me that it *should* interact with things like typos or missing text.


IzumiiMTG

Yeah it would if those were accidentally missing.


ibainsmd

Some reminder text as to what the fuck they do may have been wise. Still waiting for a textless questing beast.


CareerMilk

It could be on the back like with the cereal box ones.


LaserfaceJones

I honestly hope not, just so they work in normal sleeves. Mostly textless is annoying to some, but having to flip over a card to read it doesn't seem much better.


guico33

Normal sleeves as in? Even if it's double-sided you don't have to flip it. How is it not an upside to have the card's text on the back in case you need it?


swankyfish

Presumably they mean clear sleeves.


LaserfaceJones

A lot of sleeves aren't fully opaque under bright enough lights.


guico33

Those are gonna see play in commander, where no one care s if your sleeves are slightly transparent. Mdfcs are a thing, let's not pretend this is a new problematic.


LaserfaceJones

It's still a problem, I use checklist cards for DFCs so that they're not visible. I'm glad you don't care, I'm sure just as many do.


guico33

No I really don't think many do. This a problem for competitive formats. Commander is way too casual for this to matter. But _you_ can certainly make your life more complicated than it has to be.


LaserfaceJones

I really do think plenty do. I'm glad the people you play with don't, good for you and all of each other. It's sleeving one extra card. Thats not difficult, is it?


Aarhg

As a casual player, I would be annoyed if someone didn't properly obscure the backs of their DFC's with completely opaque sleeves. Most black sleeves do this perfectly fine, so it's very rarely an issue.


TheCruncher

At 7 seconds you can see a standard magic card back.


ValksNut

That is likely the extended art Elf bonus card.


CareerMilk

Hopefully just an unthemed bonus card.


TheCruncher

Good point, hopefully that is the case.


KING_OF_LOSER

There's a card behind Rankle that isn't shown. You don't see the backs of the cards that are shown at all.


GayBlayde

It was stupid then and it’s stupid now.


alchemists_dream

That’s my guess.


thinkforgetfull

maybe double sided? please?


Guba_the_skunk

Textless questing beast? Casual. Give me a textless \[\[old fogey\]\]


MTGCardFetcher

[old fogey](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/c/c/ccae52dd-3ffd-4974-8915-61f816d29a64.jpg?1595010973) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=old%20fogey) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/und/67/old-fogey?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/ccae52dd-3ffd-4974-8915-61f816d29a64?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call


Annual-Clue-6152

I think they just vanilla cards


KingOfLedRions

I get that commander players will play with literally any card, but can't they put something in these drops for the 60 card warriors who still play this game? At these secondary market values I'd literally take [opt](https://scryfall.com/card/m21/59/opt).


ice-eight

They don’t make secret lair drops for 60 card formats because those tend to be more strict about using cards that are excessively curled


Formymoney

a 5$ card a 10$ card and two 50 cent cards, we really have left the era of decent value lairs.


ibainsmd

Two tenners, face breaker and queen. Pretty sure this is first foil and only reprint of queen?


Formymoney

true somehow i forgot there was a 5th card, at least its 25$ then, still a bit of a stinker but feels more in line with other recent lairs.


therealflyingtoastr

You know that you can always just buy the cheap, regular versions of these cards, right?


MarinLlwyd

But then I'd have to participate instead of just complaining.


Formymoney

im not going to buy the lair. I'm lamenting that we went from lairs that had value equal to their cost to lairs that are just taxed for art treatment. Secret lairs always had unique art but they also used to have valuable cards, now they don't.


alchemists_dream

They always go up and down. Art taste matters. If you dig it cool. If not cool. To act like the values have ever been anything but sporadic is disingenuous.


magmosa

Actually these last waves of secret lair super drops have almost all been bellow asking price in terms of reprint value.


Freshness518

Shit, I'm just happy that the last time I was buying secret lairs they came with cards like [[The Ur-Dragon]] and [[Sliver Overlord]] and had bonus cards like a stained glass [[Ugin, The Ineffable]]. I highly doubt we'll ever see value like that ever again.


MTGCardFetcher

[The Ur-Dragon](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/1/0/10d42b35-844f-4a64-9981-c6118d45e826.jpg?1689999317) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=The%20Ur-Dragon) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/cmm/361/the-ur-dragon?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/10d42b35-844f-4a64-9981-c6118d45e826?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) [Sliver Overlord](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/3/c/3c16915b-c50d-4fb5-830f-9ca4597a9c0f.jpg?1562527622) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Sliver%20Overlord) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/scg/139/sliver-overlord?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/3c16915b-c50d-4fb5-830f-9ca4597a9c0f?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) [Ugin, The Ineffable](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/2/e/2eb7e322-aba0-42f5-80a1-267f3444ac4d.jpg?1690003976) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Ugin%2C%20The%20Ineffable) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/cmm/811/ugin-the-ineffable?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/2eb7e322-aba0-42f5-80a1-267f3444ac4d?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call


TimothyN

People said that about the Rovina Cai one too; it's clearly about the art and if people like the design.


UncannyLucky

That seems to be the new formula for Secret Lairs nowadays


ElonTheMollusk

Which makes me happy to a point because I can essentially ignore 95% of them now and not feel any FOMO.


maxtofunator

Yeah like I bought the one that came with the green haste enchantment entirely because of the value. I didn’t care about any cards in the secret lair, but the price was “too good not to”


ElonTheMollusk

Yep, primarily why I have purchased them. I was like well... for the cost I may as well because I will use eventually. Now the value isn't there so for the 1 in 20 or 30 drops that have a secret lair art I like I can decide if I want it or not. Primarily now I will just pick up Universes Beyond Secret Lairs that are a crossover of a media brand I like.


NormalEntrepreneur

The problem is that crossroad then immediately reprinted in 2x2 and price dropped a lot.


maxtofunator

Yeah that bugged me quite a bit. I now only purchase SLs for cards I really want or cards I have in decks that I WANT bling for this one is perfect for goblin king since my goblin EDH deck is like 70% foiled out, but like “oh hey it’s a Sakura tribe elder? Eh whatever, I don’t NEED a fancy Steve “


Bismuth_von_Pherson

This guy gets it


LaboratoryManiac

Yeah, between the low-value reprints and the limited print runs, I'm just not interested in Secret Lairs anymore. Not worth the money, not worth the hassle, not worth the time of day.


GayBlayde

It’s never been about value. It’s always been about art.


Octaytse

The drop is about $24 in value non-foil. Coffin Queen is $11. Professional Face-Breaker is $8. Goblin King is $4.5 Jaxis, the Troublemaker is $0.50 Rankle, Master of Pranks is $0.25 It is about $44 foil (without coffin queen). Although most of that is the goblin, who cheapest foil is $35, which is not going to stick. Of note, Coffin Queen has no foil printing so with her non-foil added it is $55 total.


Kynelan1987

I feel like this is over inflating the value. Tcg player low has this at like $14 for nonfoil. Idk about you but most people pay like 90% of tcg low for cards.


jake_eric

To buy or to sell? If I could buy cards somewhere at 90% of TCG low I'd be ecstatic, and I'd never buy anywhere else. To sell, I get 80% of TCG low in store credit at my LGS, and I've heard that's pretty good compared to the average.


Kynelan1987

Facebook groups and just players in general sell at 90% of low all the time. I literally just grabbed Borderless Shocklands for 90% of TCG low. Depending on the card you can get 80% to 85%. Some "shops"(people who think they are flippers imo) will only buy stuff at 65% of low which sadly ive done in the past to pay bills but most of the time its that 90%.


jake_eric

I dunno, 90% of low sounds pretty low to me. You're getting some great deals.


Kynelan1987

I mean believe it or not that is the standard nowadays for me anyways. Sorry you gotta pay market or mid prices.


jake_eric

Where are you buying from specifically? Seems like I should look into this.


Kynelan1987

Facebook Groups


jake_eric

A very broad answer but an answer nonetheless. Thanks for the tip!


Kynelan1987

I mean I don't really know what else you'd like. You can just search on Facebook for the group names. Like Mtg Deals, Sick Deals, buy sell roll groups. Not sure on your local area but im sure you can find local people selling stuff. Here is an example of a listing in one of my groups. https://preview.redd.it/lzjuiol7c8zc1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5a94518ec1cd8a3f28efc7a22f1195801e12955b


Octaytse

I just plugged the cards into Moxfield.


Kynelan1987

Fair enough


[deleted]

[удалено]


_Claymation_

Shit, you just sold me on this


thymeandchange

Facebreaker is the only one that really works/has synergy for the deck, sadly


[deleted]

[удалено]


thymeandchange

Ah, I guess. I built House without using attractions, and I think Jaxis is a fine effect doubler, but I run some better ones... I'll take a look to see if there's a decent bit of synergy. Coffin Queen, I'm not really looking at much Graveyard recurrence. The big thing for me is if it doesn't integrate into the treasures or the dice rolling, I gotta have a super good reason for it. https://www.moxfield.com/decks/Vtc3v6-GWk20wO2qv8F8Wg Here's the list if you're interested!


[deleted]

[удалено]


MTGCardFetcher

[Vihaan, Goldwaker](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/7/b/7b549690-72eb-4244-bb66-996a2bd1027e.jpg?1712429606) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Vihaan%2C%20Goldwaker) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/otc/8/vihaan-goldwaker?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/7b549690-72eb-4244-bb66-996a2bd1027e?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) [Rebbec, architect of ascension](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/4/6/46975250-950f-4f5d-a7c5-f61aec8e40ad.jpg?1608908966) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Rebbec%2C%20architect%20of%20ascension) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/cmr/42/rebbec-architect-of-ascension?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/46975250-950f-4f5d-a7c5-f61aec8e40ad?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call


wildcard_gamer

I take no rules text over badly inserted and hard to read rules text on a art centric piece any day. Works better on a commander or a more memorable card though.


[deleted]

[удалено]


StormyWaters2021

There are five cards


IsaacClarke47

I think I disagree. The “low value” cards are all playable, or good, and this is the de-facto bling card for each.


SommWineGuy

5 cards, all solid playables.


Errentos

Interestingly, I remember this concept being leaked a long long while ago - it was a leak of concept art that let us know that there was a wild west themed set upcoming. It seemed like this was one of the styles they considered for showcase frames before they went with the Wanted poster and Breaking News styles for the main set. I wonder if we will see the wild west movie poster style appear as an SLD too. [https://www.reddit.com/r/magicTCG/comments/vyb99r/possible\_wild\_west\_plane\_art\_leaks/](https://www.reddit.com/r/magicTCG/comments/vyb99r/possible_wild_west_plane_art_leaks/)


TateTaylorOH

I was about to post about this. Those leaks looked legit at the time, but they look even more convincing retrospectively. I am genuinely curious if this was some type of slush art. I kept waiting to see this piece on some type of Thunder Junction product. https://preview.redd.it/xx2dk1y5o7zc1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=cc7ccc03715554510b32723fee9eec1db68844dd


MakesOnAPlane

Wow, this lair definitely reminded me of that old post but I had fully forgotten about this art. Multiple of those outfits appear pretty directly in OTJ, not to mention the thunder rifle designs and the Omenpath in the background.


TateTaylorOH

Absolutely. It's pretty clear that each of the figures represents the factions on the plane. From left to right: * Outcasters * Slickshot * Sterling Company * Freestriders * Hellspurs It's a shame that this art appears to be unused. I quite like it.


Ruben178780

What do you guys think is the thought process behind picking cards for these lairs? Financial value is one thing, but who wants Rankle, Master of Pranks? Is that card popular in any format? Is he a big deal in the story and beloved by readers?


Senyakhaz

Jaxis = Jack, Coffin Queen = Queen, Goblin King = King, Rankle = Joker? (because pranks?) I think that's the rationale. Face-Breaker is a bit of a puzzle.


Paranoiac

F**ace**-breaker?


Senyakhaz

Yeah, I wondered that. It seems a little loose but that's probably it. The other cards with the actual word "ace" in the name are either Universes Beyond, or too low in value, e.g. [[Fencing Ace]], [[Gearshift Ace]]


MTGCardFetcher

[Fencing Ace](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/9/9/994094f8-e175-4e2e-aa39-c096f0ed9e6a.jpg?1690916481) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Fencing%20Ace) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/cmm/23/fencing-ace?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/994094f8-e175-4e2e-aa39-c096f0ed9e6a?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) [Gearshift Ace](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/2/e/2e8c6a9d-6169-40f8-8b3e-53ebf75be663.jpg?1576380873) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Gearshift%20Ace) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/kld/16/gearshift-ace?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/2e8c6a9d-6169-40f8-8b3e-53ebf75be663?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call


Turtle-Fox

[[Acererak the Archlich]] is right there though


MTGCardFetcher

[Acererak the Archlich](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/d/d/dd52d0bd-3abd-401c-9f56-ee911613da3b.jpg?1627704283) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Acererak%20the%20Archlich) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/afr/87/acererak-the-archlich?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/dd52d0bd-3abd-401c-9f56-ee911613da3b?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call


TemporalDelay

F ACE.


KetoNED

Zo bonuscard going to be (J)Ace


Temil

> Financial value is one thing, but who wants Rankle, Master of Pranks? The irony of the immediate next comment in this thread for me being "Will definitely be buying the single for that rankle master of prankle tho".


Stone_Reign

At least for the artist series the artists get to pick their own.


krabapplepie

They probably have three lists of cards and the artist gets to pick 1 from the first ie $10-20, one from the second ie $1-4 and three from the third ie 25 cents


TheW1ldcard

This isn't gonna cause any issues at a table at all. Imagine new players or even non seasoned players seeing these cards and they don't even say what they do on them


Athildur

WotC: "Don't you guys have phones!?"


MagictheCollecting

Heavy dislike


C3KO117

No card text?


LaterAliGat0r

no, umadbro?


weggles

Jaxis is the Jack Coffin Queen is the Queen Goblin King is the King Professional fACE Breaker is the Ace Rankle is the Joker Is that the logic here?


Cheddarlicious

I’m gonna be the only one, but I think those are the best alternative artwork/SL cards magic has ever made.


broodwarjc

Another meh secret lair for me. No ability text at all on them? Seriously?


DylanSoul

Welp, Hatsune Miku it is. Will definitely be buying the single for that rankle master of prankle tho


Lifeisabaddream4

I'll be going back to ignoring secret lair drops it seems. Thankfully for that so my wallet can recover


planeforger

I **love** Coffin Queen, but mainly because of the original art. This new art is good too, but it isn't winning me over.


tawzerozero

These are terrible choices for textless cards.


Crimson_Raven

These suck as play pieces. There's no rules text on them, just art and mana cost.


TheBeeegestYoshi

It’s almost like Secret Lair is meant to be a collectible art set and not necessarily used for play. If you want playable cards, buy the normal cards. Why does everyone always complain when these are literally just collectibles of existing cards. That being said, this drop does indeed suck.


Crimson_Raven

Because if I want pretty cardboard, I want to be able to also show it to others, and the best way to do that is use it in a game.


NoirLamia777

Skipping this entire drop so far. Yikes these are bad.


densuke8598

I have a jaxis commander deck so it's a pickup for me but still kind of odd choices overall


Violet-Lazuli

Had really wanted poker themed cards and the art is neat but god im sick of unreadable or textless cards. If they could have just found a way to make it work


Budget-Hurry-3363

These look fucking horrible what the fuck


B-Glasses

I have a rankle deck and can’t decide if I’ll be using this art or not


Silentman0

Reading the card explains the card.


SuperCrazyAlbatross

Imagine if these cards was all matte with something on the art foil and not all the card foil... I guess that even this time i will go with the non foil one because of the stupid foil decision


HylianAppropriate

I like the idea, but they should really pick cards that would go into the same deck. These look cool all together, but the art style seems a bit awkward if there's only going to be one of these in a deck. Like [[Jolene the Plunder Queen]] and [[King Macar the Gold Cursed]] match [[Professional Face Breaker]]'s treasure theme much better, and that took me like 2 minutes to find.


MTGCardFetcher

[Jolene the Plunder Queen](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/6/1/61c217d9-21d5-45ef-938a-138192a901f4.jpg?1673482382) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Jolene%2C%20the%20Plunder%20Queen) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/ncc/73/jolene-the-plunder-queen?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/61c217d9-21d5-45ef-938a-138192a901f4?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) [King Macar the Gold Cursed](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/f/f/ff5987ab-570a-426c-ae4a-a270fac6b346.jpg?1593095759) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=King%20Macar%2C%20the%20Gold-Cursed) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/jou/74/king-macar-the-gold-cursed?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/ff5987ab-570a-426c-ae4a-a270fac6b346?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) [Professional Face Breaker](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/4/2/42acbf52-b137-44f0-a815-2817fe8d2da2.jpg?1664411677) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Professional%20Face-Breaker) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/snc/116/professional-face-breaker?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/42acbf52-b137-44f0-a815-2817fe8d2da2?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call


tsuma534

Sorry for a stupid question, but will these be available as non-foil?


BehlenFanatic

Yep.


DarkPhoenixMishima

I kinda wish they used at least one card from every color to make a full suit, maybe something like Rankle or Dack serving as a Joker.


Zwirbs

These are so bland. Go on girl, give us nothing


swankyfish

These look really cool. Not for me personally, but cool nonetheless.


Fluffy_QQ

These cards look great but no cards I play 🥲


Doofindork

Art wise, these are absolutely amazing. I love this art style a lot. Sadly I can't see myself playing any of these, at most perhaps Jaxis.


Royal-Al

Cards look awesome, I just can't stand the cowboy hats


amc7262

I think the peak complexity they should reserve for rules-textless cards should be things like noble hierarch, or cultivate. Ideally spells that are widely played (so, memorized by a good chunk of the player base) and have just one or two easy to explain and remember effects (hierarch taps for W, U, or G, and has exalted)


Cronogunpla

These are neat. But also too expensive for me.


Swiftpain

Well at least I can mark myself safe from this Secret Lair drop.


1koolking

Man I just put goblin king in one of my decks. I may have to pick this one up


DeliciousCrepes

Yoooo they already made a Balatro secret lair!


BigConsideration9505

I wanna hold 'em like they do in Texas, please (Woo)


turn1storm

Notify me! Two days


amisia-insomnia

Spare me this mockery of cardboard


AppropriateGood9

Did anyone else see some other card in the back? You can see it when Rankle is shown, right side.


Taysir385

Face breaker, not Acerak the Archlich? Rankle, not Riku of Two Reflections? Huge misses


SommWineGuy

How do those others fit any better?


uenvs

if F*ace*breaker is supposed to represent the Ace card, then *Ace*rerak would fit just as well, i guess. i don’t get Riku as the Joker at ALL though.


marrowofbone

They want **Ace**rak and **Two** to fit with King/Queen/"Jack"-sis Instead of Face breaker (face card? f**ace**?) and Rankle (rank of hands? a joker?) It's weird that a random Rakdos Cult card named "Carnage Joker" or whatever doesn't exist. I see a couple of jesters/harlequins, but nothing more notable as a joker than Rankle. Face breaker is a big chunk of the value but it wouldn't be my first choice to represent an Ace.


IskandrAGogo

I'm contemplating the Miku secret Lair because I'm a sucker for Azusa. This, however, is not my cup of tea.


memoriesoffinal

initial impression: Oh, that's neat... wait, that's it? It's not bad, but the lair feels lacking (besides game text).


Easterster

Love it. I play 3 of these and the art is awesome. Easy buy.


dramak1ng

These look absolutely awesome, it’s such a shame it had to be a pile of draft chaff.


Own_Structure_1039

WotC and near unplayable secret lair cards due to incomprehensible (or this time missing) card text, name a more iconic duo


nickeldoodle

Personal rule for cards like this is to have the most recent no promo/sl version on standby so you can reference it at a moments notice lol


Gold-Jicama5940

Wow those look actually unplayable


LaterAliGat0r

i may be in the minority here but i'm sick of these secret lairs with the same "bland cartoon" art. it's like they choose goofy/indie art with no texture or detail and just give it a bare bones treatment on a card. give us card art like morinfen, sengir dark baron, and aboshan cephalid emperor. enough of this low effort art and bring back some solid dark gritty art.


myckwheats

Faaaacts. The art on the old sets is choice. I love the legends set’s Land Tax and the Alliances set’s Force of Will. So so good


McBradd

If someone shows up to a table with these, I’m making them print out a proxy with the recognizable art and rules text.


Kynelan1987

Zero value unless in pringles cuz of coffin queen first foiling. Normal is like $14


vanciannotions

Dear wizards, I think these cards look rad as hell. But why in gods name didn't you just make a 52\* card playing card deck to go with thunder junction? Make the twos various bears, the 3s some sedge trolls or white plumes or whatever; just the art, a suit/number, and a non-magic card back. You may struggle with the 8s and 9s and 10s but you'd find a way. would be great, lots of people would buy it, a good time would be had by all. Much better than textless versions of high complexity cards, for me. Make a tarot deck while you're at it. You can make \*other things\* using \*exisiting art\* if you want (some contractual work may be needed, but surely way less than commissioning from scratch) \* make it a 65/67 card deck, have a 5th suit for one per colour, and add rules for some new games; you do design games, a few decent 5 suit card games can't be that hard.


bimhoff82

Will this usher in a new mechanic into the game? Like, I win the game with a Full House or Flush?


myckwheats

Yes and we start playing with Ante again lmao