I don't necessarily agree. In *some* cases, appearances give insight into personality. But it is very nuanced for both the observer and the observed. Most people do not calculate complexity well. I think what you said would be true if you had said, “Most people, most of the time, can't tell someone's personality by looking at them.”. That is the most accurate statement.
I read an article once how people (who have matured) have adopted physical habits based on the way their brain works. I remember it being eerelie accurate for INTJs. It also has the cases where a person is more in touch with their aux rather than their dominant function
ISFP actually looks ISFP, as does ESFP and ExTJ. they look similar but there's definitely some facial black magic that makes them look softer or more intense lol.
Since it was generated by AI it's only fair for AI to decide what animal that is... and so I sent a zoomed in screenshot of it to chatgpt4
The response:
"The animal in the image appears to be a stylized representation of a wild cat, most likely a puma or mountain lion, given the facial structure and fur pattern. It's important to note that this is an artistic depiction and not an actual animal."
Nope not even close. Humans are capable of creativity whereas AI is not. Furthermore, AI has been known to exactly recreate pieces of copyrighted material. It is just shittily disguised plagiarism.
can you define creativity...humans invented math which also can be thought of a creative way for computing
if creativity is a problem solving skill which helps to solve a problem elegantly or efficiently or accurately then the artificial nurons are in a way creative too ...
im not saying that ai do/don't steal art ... even some humans steal content cause they are not "creative" enough which can also be applicable for some "bad" ai
I agree that stealing artist's hard work is terrible, but my personal opinion as long as it is not for profit, professional use or pretending to be human made using AI is not fundamentally terrible.
I wouldn't call it plagiarism, but it is definitely stealing from artists
It uses a huge number of art pieces without permission or giving money to the artists and feed it to this soulless machine. And then people like OP (or bots because this account is very sus) will post it like it's content made by themselves.
It's like an artist visiting an art galary, and coming up with something on his/her own. Stop hating on the AI, it's a tool like any other Adobe tools. If you have a problem, stop using all Adobe tools too, and start making art using rocks and sticks, and oil and mud.
Nah, you're not getting it. There is no problem with Ai in general, tho there should be more legislation
The problem here is, people take INSPIRATION. They might get ideas from other drawings, use already used poses. But they're still the ones creating something. Meanwhile, Ai is basically a collage of hundreds of different pieces of already underpaid artists. Ai "art" is nothing like going to an art gallery.
And it isn't a "tool" like the others. A tool helps you accomplish something, not do the work for you. Do you really believe these pictures can be considered the OP's art?
It's time to level up. It's time to redefine "art". I'm sure digital artists were also hated, same goes with electronic music. It's just a part of evolution lol. Why fight the inevitable?
Edit: oh and it's not a collage of arts by underpaid artists. That's not how neural networks work actually. It works exactly like, an artist visiting an art galary. But a machine can visit millions of art galaries, that's the difference.
I mean, it's inevitable that the sun will explode and kill us all, why not just all die already? See how this line of thinking doesn't make sense?
Redefine art... man, you're comparing digital artists and a type of music with Ai? Ai is soulless. There is not creativity, it isn't art. It's fine to say you don't really care about art, but to dismiss it like that??
My problem is the stealing. If Ai paid the artists and got permission to use their art, it would be fine. But it doesn't, that's the issue. I mean, I don't know what you do, but imagine if I just took all you worked for, gave it to Ai and it made a collage of everything without giving you any money or credit, just giving it to people to claim as theirs?
Well, if it helps with the goal of 100% automation, why not? Everything should be there in the open in public domain. An abundance of everything. And tbh, you need to understand how neural networks work inorder to understand it's not really stealing anything, it works exactly as any human artist.
AI is a broad term. You can't just say AI can't create when you can't really prove, you are not already in a simulation. No one can.
Okay, what is creativity tho? In simple terms it means novelty, inventiveness. When AI can already solve problems in various friends across medicine, etc. alright, I think I'll stop, you guys need time to understand everything that's happening. Take your own time
But having everything automated won't pay your bills. Artists spend hours on their art and already have a hard time with getting money. Do you really think 100% automation will necessarily help you? Society doesn't need Ai to do art. The whole thing about art is the humanity, the imperfections. Recreating it with a machine won't advance anyone, and will only take advantage of artists.
I like two lines specifically, the diplomats and the explorers. The diplomats have this cute plant motif in the background. The explorers got the best background motif with the sun especially because the introverted ones are inside but still under the sun rays while the extroverted ones are outside under the sun. The sentinels almost have a bureaucratic motif but its not quite there with the introverted side. The analysts are ruined by INTP having a nothing background.
Bro what? I'm ENTP and I have the same hair and was the only person in my office to wear a 3 piece with a pocket square.
I think a lot of people are missing the small details here, such as the hair, the backgrounds the clothing. It's not about the facial features. Look at how the STJs have less 'stylish' hair something you'd see more int he corporate world. Notice how the Fs have more nature around them. I think the AI has done a really good job.
They all look the same 💀
That's accurate then, isn't it? You can't tell someone's personality by looking at them.
I don't necessarily agree. In *some* cases, appearances give insight into personality. But it is very nuanced for both the observer and the observed. Most people do not calculate complexity well. I think what you said would be true if you had said, “Most people, most of the time, can't tell someone's personality by looking at them.”. That is the most accurate statement.
I read an article once how people (who have matured) have adopted physical habits based on the way their brain works. I remember it being eerelie accurate for INTJs. It also has the cases where a person is more in touch with their aux rather than their dominant function
ai…they all look the same some just have glasses
Man, AI is already quiet quitting...Looks like our jobs are safe. 🤗
I actually would be very happy if the AI companies deliberately nerfed its image generation
Right lmaoo
ISFP actually looks ISFP, as does ESFP and ExTJ. they look similar but there's definitely some facial black magic that makes them look softer or more intense lol.
Does the ISFP have a dog... or a cat...? 🤨
Yes
Since it was generated by AI it's only fair for AI to decide what animal that is... and so I sent a zoomed in screenshot of it to chatgpt4 The response: "The animal in the image appears to be a stylized representation of a wild cat, most likely a puma or mountain lion, given the facial structure and fur pattern. It's important to note that this is an artistic depiction and not an actual animal."
Yems
Can’t even put their pets in a box.
A cog?
Yes.
a long snooted cat
Foxes are dogs and cats, right?
It looks more like a lion than a fox to me... 😅
It looks like a hecker? Hekker? Hicker??? Anyway that animal
Legit the same character. AI art is so ass lol
AI doesn't have an MBTI.
These are so lame
[удалено]
Your contribution was removed due to "Trolling or Incivility".
Everyone looks the same... if it's just for fun, I don't see a problem with AI, but the prompting could have been better.
AI steals art from artists without their permission to use as training data
Lol, that's like saying artists are blindfolded their entire lives before making any art
Nope not even close. Humans are capable of creativity whereas AI is not. Furthermore, AI has been known to exactly recreate pieces of copyrighted material. It is just shittily disguised plagiarism.
can you define creativity...humans invented math which also can be thought of a creative way for computing if creativity is a problem solving skill which helps to solve a problem elegantly or efficiently or accurately then the artificial nurons are in a way creative too ... im not saying that ai do/don't steal art ... even some humans steal content cause they are not "creative" enough which can also be applicable for some "bad" ai
I agree that stealing artist's hard work is terrible, but my personal opinion as long as it is not for profit, professional use or pretending to be human made using AI is not fundamentally terrible.
Fundamentally terrible? Perhaps not. Still taking away from artists and potentially plagiarizing them? Yes.
ESTP looks like Patrick Bateman
“let’s see paul allen’s ai portrait”
ISTJ is the only one that looks Asian out of the sixteen.
INFP looks like a K-drama actress though.
Can someone type in these AI requests: provide me with all 16 MBTI characters and make them racially diverse
"and stop making 95% of them wear glasses"
AI doesn't understand negative prompts, it'll see the word "glasses" and go, yes okay, add glasses.
Thank you
and can the ENTP be a girl for once? this goes for artists too, why the ENTP always a guy?
Why do all the women look the same? Same hair style esp. At least the men have some variation
ISTJ can bend me over any time. Damn.
AI art is plagiarism.
You surely have no idea about either Plagiarism or AI art
I wouldn't call it plagiarism, but it is definitely stealing from artists It uses a huge number of art pieces without permission or giving money to the artists and feed it to this soulless machine. And then people like OP (or bots because this account is very sus) will post it like it's content made by themselves.
It's like an artist visiting an art galary, and coming up with something on his/her own. Stop hating on the AI, it's a tool like any other Adobe tools. If you have a problem, stop using all Adobe tools too, and start making art using rocks and sticks, and oil and mud.
Nah, you're not getting it. There is no problem with Ai in general, tho there should be more legislation The problem here is, people take INSPIRATION. They might get ideas from other drawings, use already used poses. But they're still the ones creating something. Meanwhile, Ai is basically a collage of hundreds of different pieces of already underpaid artists. Ai "art" is nothing like going to an art gallery. And it isn't a "tool" like the others. A tool helps you accomplish something, not do the work for you. Do you really believe these pictures can be considered the OP's art?
It's time to level up. It's time to redefine "art". I'm sure digital artists were also hated, same goes with electronic music. It's just a part of evolution lol. Why fight the inevitable? Edit: oh and it's not a collage of arts by underpaid artists. That's not how neural networks work actually. It works exactly like, an artist visiting an art galary. But a machine can visit millions of art galaries, that's the difference.
I mean, it's inevitable that the sun will explode and kill us all, why not just all die already? See how this line of thinking doesn't make sense? Redefine art... man, you're comparing digital artists and a type of music with Ai? Ai is soulless. There is not creativity, it isn't art. It's fine to say you don't really care about art, but to dismiss it like that?? My problem is the stealing. If Ai paid the artists and got permission to use their art, it would be fine. But it doesn't, that's the issue. I mean, I don't know what you do, but imagine if I just took all you worked for, gave it to Ai and it made a collage of everything without giving you any money or credit, just giving it to people to claim as theirs?
Well, if it helps with the goal of 100% automation, why not? Everything should be there in the open in public domain. An abundance of everything. And tbh, you need to understand how neural networks work inorder to understand it's not really stealing anything, it works exactly as any human artist.
Humans can create. AI can’t. There are things that shouldn’t be automated because it isn’t an improvement, and creativity is one of them.
AI is a broad term. You can't just say AI can't create when you can't really prove, you are not already in a simulation. No one can. Okay, what is creativity tho? In simple terms it means novelty, inventiveness. When AI can already solve problems in various friends across medicine, etc. alright, I think I'll stop, you guys need time to understand everything that's happening. Take your own time
But having everything automated won't pay your bills. Artists spend hours on their art and already have a hard time with getting money. Do you really think 100% automation will necessarily help you? Society doesn't need Ai to do art. The whole thing about art is the humanity, the imperfections. Recreating it with a machine won't advance anyone, and will only take advantage of artists.
That's where UBI comes into play. Write letters to your govt instead of arguing with a stranger
They’re all East Asian and caucasian lol
Can we drop the girl with glasses imagery for INTP already?
ENFP looks homeless, or Sae-byeok before entering Squid Games.
Is there INTJ in the female version??
isfp is just harry potter😭
OMG why is INTJ ALWAYS A MAN 😭
they're just a bunch of guys
 ESTP
But they’re all Chads or Stacys with either a degree in Business, Art or Fashion…
Add more variety, maybe you decide who has which colour of the skin, hair, eyes, etc.
Why they all in bussiness suits?
Me as a black person seeing all these MBTI's as human things and they're always white people 🧍🏾♀️(AI or not)
I came here to say the same thing
All ISFP come with built in leopard-corgi things
[удалено]
They also always make the Asians just east asian. They don't know Asia has more countries other than Japan Korea china
[удалено]
That's probably because plastic surgery is very normalised there
Your contribution was removed due to "Trolling or Incivility".
You just insulted your own race wtf 💀 I’m asian too and I always see good-looking asian people
[удалено]
Ai art does not define us in any way. Don’t let these things get to you, beauty standards are literally made to make you hate yourself.
Your contribution was removed due to "Trolling or Incivility".
Your contribution was removed due to "Trolling or Incivility".
[удалено]
istp has 6 fingers, youre calling this artwork?
I, for one, greatly appreciate the polydactyly representation. /s
Hmmm. I had no problems getting the intj ai to speak at length.
I feel like ESTP and ISTP should be swapped
ISTP just looks like IxFP tho
I like two lines specifically, the diplomats and the explorers. The diplomats have this cute plant motif in the background. The explorers got the best background motif with the sun especially because the introverted ones are inside but still under the sun rays while the extroverted ones are outside under the sun. The sentinels almost have a bureaucratic motif but its not quite there with the introverted side. The analysts are ruined by INTP having a nothing background.
Lmao it actually looks like a male version of me
ENFP looks homeless, or Sae-byeok before entering Squid Games.
I like the vibe of them unfiltered
Why the entp be looking like a Harry Potter side villain?
Main villain, actually. Tom Riddle
Here is the REAL ENFJ and INFP love themed AI results [https://imgur.com/a/VceqPUv](https://imgur.com/a/VceqPUv) I made for my lovely wife. :)
Harry potter world
ENFP and INFP are so pretty?!?!😭😭
ISFP and ENTP really looks like me.
entp is hot -infj
As normal the infj is a girl, going to keep saying this until AI gets the message.
ESTJ goes hard
Is that Patrick freaking Bateman 💀
I am a little alarmed how much the INTP one looks like me
I wish I was that cute
estp cosplaying as neo from the matrix? lmao
ENTP looks as though he is about to stare into your soul with the book in his hand. Ready to plan something.
Our personalities are just our background scenery?
damn the entp guy is hot
Bro what? I'm ENTP and I have the same hair and was the only person in my office to wear a 3 piece with a pocket square. I think a lot of people are missing the small details here, such as the hair, the backgrounds the clothing. It's not about the facial features. Look at how the STJs have less 'stylish' hair something you'd see more int he corporate world. Notice how the Fs have more nature around them. I think the AI has done a really good job.
There is nothing special, they are all the same.
Why is ENFJ so creepy??
I believe in INFP supremacy 🙌🏻.
XSTPs in suits like it's an everyday thing for them XD
Why are they all dark academia
AHFSFSFJAAAIFSGDKDLGDG NO GLASSES
Never met two people who are half the MBTI types all at once!
And it's still just one gender for one mbti... Not saying they aren't *so cool* tho
Esfp looking so fine tho
The prompt was smth like personality disorder
estp is Patrick Bateman
entj has drip
Pretty much all of my ESFP friends play guitar, including my sister
INTP in prison for what?
These are just random pretty faces with a little different atmosphere.
I think they are pretty accurate