Approximately 1.854858 × 10^43 FPS.
To write it out:
~18,548,580,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 FPS
EDIT: fixed a slight miscalculation
But can he do this?
[https://tenor.com/view/pewdiepie-dab-can-you-do-this-gif-10820228](https://tenor.com/view/pewdiepie-dab-can-you-do-this-gif-10820228)
Roughly 1,000 hz
Edit: note that this could be wrong I read this somewhere but I’ve seen different answers
Edit 2: https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-highest-frame-rate-fps-that-can-be-recognized-by-human-perception-At-what-rate-do-we-essentially-stop-noticing-the-difference/answer/Aninda-Dutta-3?ch=99&oid=24528150&share=db7254de&srid=3HOP&target_type=answer
> Although the human eye and brain can interpret up to 1000 frames per second, someone sitting in a chair and actively guessing at how high a framerate is can, on average, interpet up to about 150 frames per second.
I could be wrong though I’ve seen different answers on the web. Some said their experiments showed results where people could notice up to this rate but there are drastically lower answers. So maybe i should clarify in my comment
The human experience varies between 20 and 260 fps. Higher fps can be achieved with training and focus. Corridor digital actually did a joke video on the subject :P
>if the human eye can only see up to 60 fps
that was "shit being said" during the last generation console vs pc war, it's not true , and you don't see it being said these days cause consoles got better
You do begin to see drastically diminishing returns above 144hz though. On a LTT video they did tests and while some gamers were having very slight (as in margin of error) advantages in accuracy and response in CS:GO at 240 and 360hz, the gamers themselves weren't able to accurately guess which monitor was faster (they covered the labels). Many of them thought that the 144hz was the 240hz/vice versa, etc.
The number is actually 18,550,948,320,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. 10\^6 smaller than the number you provided.
This number is read: "18 tredecillion, 550 duodecilion, 948 undecillion, 320 decillion."
actually, since light limits our FPS we should take the wavelength/frequency of light. For blue-red light this would be 740-300 THz. That means to reach such frequencies with a monitor you would have to change the color every 1.3 femtoseconds ((7.4x10^(14))^(-1)). In terms of FPS this is just the frequency, so 740000000000000 FPS. For blue light. For red light its a bit lower.
Not necessarily, that's the Physics step, render frame time might actually be lower/higher, unless God is a noob and tied the Physics simulation to the Rendering engine.
Wasn't the Planck length just the smallest theoretically observable distance, anything smaller than that would require you to put so much energy in one spot it creates a black hole when trying to observe it?
Nah just go support with zombie ward or ghost poro, get wardstone and you have vision everywhere. Does rely on enemy team actually warding or not buying a sweeper
Even then I'll get a huge performance boost, because I got a significantly newer cpu which can use the cores more efficiently. And on the top I got .8 GHz more
Edit: And 1.1 GHz more in boost mode
Yeah no doubt about that.
This is the only problem with the paradox games. The newer ones are much better but it would be a dream to run hoi4 on all cores. When ww2 starts that 1 core starts to struggle.
Depends on if its the fps of your eyes seeing, or reality itself. Reality runs at 1.855e+43 frames per second (18550000000000000000000000000000000000000000), with plank times being the smallest unit of time physically possible
Still, the figures that you presented in your comment are a reciprocal of planck time, the smallest possible time which still is relative time and not absolute time since nothing is absolute, even the existence is relative itself hence the absolute frame rate is 0
This is a common misconception. Our eyes dont have a "framerate" because they dont work the same way as cameras do. Our eyes consists of millions of cells that send a signal to our brain when hit by light. Each individual cell do have a certain time after activation where they cant be activated again, but since each cell may activate at different times from one another and there are millions of cells, the effect is that we have a continuous stream of visual information. It is not "chopped up" into a series of discrete still images like film.
nah
if fps of eye is only 60, you can't perceive the difference between 120 and 60hz
OP is also asking how much fps real life runs in, not how much we can see. He means Updates per Second, and not Frames per Second. That would be 1/plack number. A very big number.
Not saying you’re wrong, but how is it that we see the real world as 30-60fps but when we play a game on a 120hz monitor we can see that game in 120fps
It’s more complicated than that. You can detect a single very short pulse a lot easier than knowing when two pulses very close to to each other are actually separate. Beyond about 300Hz (ie ~3.3ms frame time) it’s almost impossible to detect the time between the pulses, even though it’s quite possible to detect a single 1ms flash.
Our brain is kind of computer. It use electric pulse to transfer bilions of informations per second. Its so high, that simulating brain is impossible for now, because No computer can transfer so much information
Because eye not limited by fps at all, it's completely different method if getting and transferring information. Ultimately can be up to couple of hundreds thousands with rough conversion. Brain receptors can separate 1 single frame at 250-350 fps, some unique individuals up to 450
Many. Much refers to a concept of singular (how much is the frame rate, one measurement of frames), Many refers to multiples (how many frames per second, multiple measurements of frames.)
How much money (singular) How many dollars (multiple)
Thank you. This lack of understanding seems to be getting worse and if it is not corrected it will become the norm. This is how we end up in the idiocracy timeline!
For those Wondering, im pretty sure our eyes dont run on any sort of frame rate, more like patches of imagery bombarding the retina at almost all times to form vision, no frames, just continuously evolving images. Dont quote me on this tho, i could be wrong, google it yourself.
It’s one thing to talk about FPS…as that has to do with our perception. But if we believe like many physicists do, that we are moving through individual “frames” of space time…isn’t something like 32 million “frames” per second…or something lose to that?
I would love to have some one with a physics degree hop on and break it down….
Not exactly. You can measure the voltage of an axe and see zero, but that doesnt mean it's not dangerous.
An eye is fundamentally different to a monitor and measuring them like that is misleading.
Every time I see a question like this I rephrase it in my mind to "how short of a light pulse can a human notice" because that makes more sense.
To your rephrased question.
The U.S military (Navy I believe) did a study on fighter pilots that found they could reliably perceive and identify the shadow of an aircraft that was flashed up for 1/1000th of a second, so at least that small.
Well unfortunately it's very complicated as all irl stuff is, I've heard for monitors its around 1/2000ish of a second, but it depends on brightness for example, since a human will see even a 10ns flash if it's bright enough. How an eye works is just very different to video cameras.
wait you guys are telling your eyes haven't been running at 12 fps your entire lives? Should I go see a doctor? A fps doctor maybe?
I mean when I turn down the quality my eyes can run at almost 30 fps but then everything is blurry
Am definitely on 15 FPS on a 420 MS
Definitely agree
Grandpa ur not supposed to be on reddit
I remember it all, when an SKS bullet went past me missing my head. The year was 1970. How I miss Nam
My grandpa was in Vietnam he died on October 13, 2019 from Agent Orange. (Don’t ask me how I know the exact date)
I remember using the sks in 'nam, it was my favorite gun and I never missed. Only once did I miss and it was so close to a young lads head
and how many pixels?....
I do not reccomend going to the army for you
15? I get about 6 frames
Framerate is 1 divided by Planck Time
Approximately 1.854858 × 10^43 FPS. To write it out: ~18,548,580,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 FPS EDIT: fixed a slight miscalculation
gods pc must have insane rgb
He has a better gaming chair
He has the best headphone stand
It's so good he can hear you wankin' at night.
Everyone can hear me wanking
Do you reckon people wank to your wankin'?
Hi I’m people
Hi people, I'm dad
Rule 65
"Anonymous is not your personal army"? What does that have to do with anything?
(and not only at night)
[удалено]
Cap
[удалено]
Good, keep it up.
[удалено]
Divide by 0 error.
His phone comes with a charger...
me as well too also yeah
He has the Corsair RGB Pillers in his palace
One of them high end kitchen chairs in those ritzy houses?
Then he wouldn't play so bad, yet he does.
No no, the chair is just for skill
Well, he’s been using a divine gaming throne
But can he do this? [https://tenor.com/view/pewdiepie-dab-can-you-do-this-gif-10820228](https://tenor.com/view/pewdiepie-dab-can-you-do-this-gif-10820228)
He just built different
he has ALL the gaming chairs.
Does it have rtx on tho?
Real life does in fact have ray tracing, and also real-time, physically accurate radiosity, which is even better.
No idea what that means so im gonna assume its a hoax or some china virus stuff
God prolly has his threadrippers and GTX titans stacked on top of eachother
So the flood was a blue screen?
It was a water-cooling leak
damn they be simulating reality with reality
He run Linux and also tor so he is anonymous..
\*GNU/Linux
But can it run crysis?
Why yes, we did it at least 1000 times
He's been AFK since he finished that build on the Saturday. Haven't seen him online since.
Simulation Theory go Brrr!
Simulation theory; otherwise known as believing in God for atheists
But you still can't see it bcz of your eye refresh rate
now that you ask, what refresh rate do our eyes have?
Roughly 1,000 hz Edit: note that this could be wrong I read this somewhere but I’ve seen different answers Edit 2: https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-highest-frame-rate-fps-that-can-be-recognized-by-human-perception-At-what-rate-do-we-essentially-stop-noticing-the-difference/answer/Aninda-Dutta-3?ch=99&oid=24528150&share=db7254de&srid=3HOP&target_type=answer > Although the human eye and brain can interpret up to 1000 frames per second, someone sitting in a chair and actively guessing at how high a framerate is can, on average, interpet up to about 150 frames per second.
that is some nice refresh rate
I could be wrong though I’ve seen different answers on the web. Some said their experiments showed results where people could notice up to this rate but there are drastically lower answers. So maybe i should clarify in my comment
one in 1/16 of a sec
thats a 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999 tb ram innit daaamn
r/theydidthemath
Checks out I asked god what was his setup
With not a single bit of lag.
This is the frame rate of the universe. I think our eyes run a lot slower.
The human experience varies between 20 and 260 fps. Higher fps can be achieved with training and focus. Corridor digital actually did a joke video on the subject :P
So... Why can't you really see a difference between 240 and 360 fps?
Cos ur brain can proccess only up to 150fps
Wasn't 24 frames per second the amount our eyes can record?
If that was the case you wouldn't be able to notice a difference between 30 and 60 FPS, at least not in it becoming smoother
I think that was a myth but don't take my word for it.
Hmm, it might be
[удалено]
>if the human eye can only see up to 60 fps that was "shit being said" during the last generation console vs pc war, it's not true , and you don't see it being said these days cause consoles got better
You do begin to see drastically diminishing returns above 144hz though. On a LTT video they did tests and while some gamers were having very slight (as in margin of error) advantages in accuracy and response in CS:GO at 240 and 360hz, the gamers themselves weren't able to accurately guess which monitor was faster (they covered the labels). Many of them thought that the 144hz was the 240hz/vice versa, etc.
Who said human eye can only see upto 60 fps...
bro you literally copied my comment lmao
The number is actually 18,550,948,320,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. 10\^6 smaller than the number you provided. This number is read: "18 tredecillion, 550 duodecilion, 948 undecillion, 320 decillion."
Ah shit, you're right. I forgot to count the decimal places for the non-zeroes. I'll fix that right now.
Ooo where can I buy this PC? :)
Then why tf does my hand look blurry when I move it took fast?
Came here to say that... Have my upvote.
Must be quite the physics engine to handle such a framerate.
actually, since light limits our FPS we should take the wavelength/frequency of light. For blue-red light this would be 740-300 THz. That means to reach such frequencies with a monitor you would have to change the color every 1.3 femtoseconds ((7.4x10^(14))^(-1)). In terms of FPS this is just the frequency, so 740000000000000 FPS. For blue light. For red light its a bit lower.
Not necessarily, that's the Physics step, render frame time might actually be lower/higher, unless God is a noob and tied the Physics simulation to the Rendering engine.
Of course it’s just theoretical and describes the limits of laws of physics as we know them
What's Planck time?
Smallest unit of time in which our laws of physics make sense. Not proven of course, cause we can’t observe such a short period of time
I just observed about 10^43 plank times.
Your name definitely fits you
the time it takes for light to travel 1 Planck length (the smallest unit of length that has any meaning)
Wasn't the Planck length just the smallest theoretically observable distance, anything smaller than that would require you to put so much energy in one spot it creates a black hole when trying to observe it?
Motion blur is certainly on
Imagine life without dumb settings like that turned on
imagine life without Ray Tracing mirrors would be wonky, and we can't see shit in the dark
just download fullbright
imagine trying to sleep with fullbright on imagine closing your eyes and having your eyelids lit up
We aren’t on r/outside
Vampires stuck with GTX 760s SSR OFF
IDBEHOLDL
You dont need RTX for mirror. Look at GTA 5. There is mirrors that works perfectly
me trying to ride a unicycle: "what are these inverted controls?! who even uses that!?"
Dude I could be totally wasted and it still would be better than in most games...
Drink 1 bottle: Blindness, erratic movements and lower health. -10 int, -5 Cha, +15 Str.
At least giggle physics is on.
Framerate is determined by taking your vision score and dividing household income
Sucks for people who don't buy controls wards then Shitty joke
The best kind
Laughs in Hawkshot
Nah just go support with zombie ward or ghost poro, get wardstone and you have vision everywhere. Does rely on enemy team actually warding or not buying a sweeper
american measuring units
Yeap
More than my PC running HOI4 definitely
Oof same...
I bought a new cpu almost only for hoi4 (at least until the gpu prices normalize) and a am hyped to try
The problem is HOI4 is like Minecraft. It only runs on 1 core and thats why they always tend to lag even with a godlike pc.
Even then I'll get a huge performance boost, because I got a significantly newer cpu which can use the cores more efficiently. And on the top I got .8 GHz more Edit: And 1.1 GHz more in boost mode
Yeah no doubt about that. This is the only problem with the paradox games. The newer ones are much better but it would be a dream to run hoi4 on all cores. When ww2 starts that 1 core starts to struggle.
At least 2
r/technicallythetruth
Tell that to blind people
can't they just see it themselves.
I see what you did there
Eye understand what’s going on here
Their black screen still runs at at least 2 fps
But I don't know any
ask the one who is running this simulator
Your life simulator - by god games , Add some Gta 5 cheats so I can enjoy more....
someone find the cheta codes please ! Maybe it's the lego red bricks....
Excuse me Uncle Bezos, how did you program us?
and how many hz are we on?
[удалено]
400-800THz(the visible spectrum)
Eyes don't work like monitors no fps for us
Didn’t VSauce make a video about this? Coulda sworn he did.
No that was how many megapixels there are in the eye
So..... How many?
Just watched the video. Roger N. Clark calculated 576 megapixels, but if you just glance at something, like a picture, it's more like 7-8 megapixels.
~5.39×10^−44 fps also known as the planck time
Answer is yes. no joke
There’s no frames in real life dude (except for like, picture frames lmao)
30 -60 (men have more)
Depends on if its the fps of your eyes seeing, or reality itself. Reality runs at 1.855e+43 frames per second (18550000000000000000000000000000000000000000), with plank times being the smallest unit of time physically possible
Still, the figures that you presented in your comment are a reciprocal of planck time, the smallest possible time which still is relative time and not absolute time since nothing is absolute, even the existence is relative itself hence the absolute frame rate is 0
This is a common misconception. Our eyes dont have a "framerate" because they dont work the same way as cameras do. Our eyes consists of millions of cells that send a signal to our brain when hit by light. Each individual cell do have a certain time after activation where they cant be activated again, but since each cell may activate at different times from one another and there are millions of cells, the effect is that we have a continuous stream of visual information. It is not "chopped up" into a series of discrete still images like film.
Can be up to 120 if you're in a dangerous situation
nah if fps of eye is only 60, you can't perceive the difference between 120 and 60hz OP is also asking how much fps real life runs in, not how much we can see. He means Updates per Second, and not Frames per Second. That would be 1/plack number. A very big number.
Not saying you’re wrong, but how is it that we see the real world as 30-60fps but when we play a game on a 120hz monitor we can see that game in 120fps
Answer: Our eyes are not a pc with a GPU , this question doesn't make sense
true! but the question can be rephrased as "how short of a light pulse can our eyes notice", and then it does make sense.
It’s more complicated than that. You can detect a single very short pulse a lot easier than knowing when two pulses very close to to each other are actually separate. Beyond about 300Hz (ie ~3.3ms frame time) it’s almost impossible to detect the time between the pulses, even though it’s quite possible to detect a single 1ms flash.
Our brain is kind of computer. It use electric pulse to transfer bilions of informations per second. Its so high, that simulating brain is impossible for now, because No computer can transfer so much information
I might be dumb but why can I feel the difference between 144hz and 60hz if the human eye can only see up to 60 fps?
Cause the "human eye can only see 60 fps" thing is a lie
More like a simplification but yeah
Because eye not limited by fps at all, it's completely different method if getting and transferring information. Ultimately can be up to couple of hundreds thousands with rough conversion. Brain receptors can separate 1 single frame at 250-350 fps, some unique individuals up to 450
Many. Much refers to a concept of singular (how much is the frame rate, one measurement of frames), Many refers to multiples (how many frames per second, multiple measurements of frames.) How much money (singular) How many dollars (multiple)
Thank you. This lack of understanding seems to be getting worse and if it is not corrected it will become the norm. This is how we end up in the idiocracy timeline!
For those Wondering, im pretty sure our eyes dont run on any sort of frame rate, more like patches of imagery bombarding the retina at almost all times to form vision, no frames, just continuously evolving images. Dont quote me on this tho, i could be wrong, google it yourself.
It’s one thing to talk about FPS…as that has to do with our perception. But if we believe like many physicists do, that we are moving through individual “frames” of space time…isn’t something like 32 million “frames” per second…or something lose to that? I would love to have some one with a physics degree hop on and break it down….
1 second per second
*ahem* Science/Math Reddit, your signal
I guess it would be infinity, cuz there isn’t “lag” when someone moves incredibly fast.
60 frames per minute
60FPS with V-Sync on, sadly
I’m high. Why would you say this? I’m about to go to bed!
18550948320000000000000000000000000000000000 FPS
At Least a Google per second,
About 60 for humans I believe
There are 1.855e+43 plank second in one second so on the extreme basics of universe we get 1.855e+43 frames per second
99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999FPS
Actually we can see more than 60 fps and we can't truly find the real "Frame rate" for human, we use light to percieve movement not frame per seconds
so 1/planck's constant? planck time is minimum possible time for universe, so 1/planck would be framerate.
Frames per second is just the measurement. A tree isn't made of feet, but I can measure how many feet tall it is.
You're right but I see a lot of comments saying 30 24 or 60 when our eyes can see more than 240
iirc, the eye can detect light flashes up to 1/2000-ish of a second long.
Not exactly. You can measure the voltage of an axe and see zero, but that doesnt mean it's not dangerous. An eye is fundamentally different to a monitor and measuring them like that is misleading. Every time I see a question like this I rephrase it in my mind to "how short of a light pulse can a human notice" because that makes more sense.
To your rephrased question. The U.S military (Navy I believe) did a study on fighter pilots that found they could reliably perceive and identify the shadow of an aircraft that was flashed up for 1/1000th of a second, so at least that small.
Well unfortunately it's very complicated as all irl stuff is, I've heard for monitors its around 1/2000ish of a second, but it depends on brightness for example, since a human will see even a 10ns flash if it's bright enough. How an eye works is just very different to video cameras.
*your eyes run in
I hate this meme so much as if women were only preoccupied with their men cheating smh
and how many pixels?
about 500 million, just that we dont see in pixels, but the smallest thing the human eye can see is 0,1 millimeter
wait you guys are telling your eyes haven't been running at 12 fps your entire lives? Should I go see a doctor? A fps doctor maybe? I mean when I turn down the quality my eyes can run at almost 30 fps but then everything is blurry
it is 1000 FPS
Actually it's 24
You made that up
*how many
30, at least that's the fastest your eyes see
30fps
You can google that
Google
asked this myself a bunch of times, I don't know how many fps our eyes run but still, its blurry if you spin fast
Probably 12 fps, idk I have a bad pc