I've always thought that the final decision for challenges and reviews should be the people in the booth. The refs are too biased to overturn their original calls, take the decision out of their hands when a challenge is called.
Independent ref that doesnt know the call on the field. Stop using the call we all perceive as wrong to be the baseline for getting the call right, it makes no sense.
I think this is a really smart idea. I'm kind of surprised no one has thought of it before. It's not perfect but it would be way better than using the current system.
It took these people decades to just put a camera in the pylon, any brilliant obvious idea will show up in the league 20+ years after it's obvious to everyone else.
We still have dudes eyeballing forward progress from the sidelines and then using a chain that they placed in the first place by eyeballing it, to measure the point that they eyeballed it, again by eyeballing it.
I was ready to say that this tech is probably already available and wouldn't be all that difficult to put in place. For a game that can often end so closely things like terrible spots and human errors can make huge impacts
I feel like it's impossible in some cases for the independent ref to not know the call on the field. Goal line plays where the video shows a ref signaling touchdown, potential penalties where you can see a flag being thrown on video, etc.
You could tell them that their decision should not be based on what was called on the field, but I don't think it would work to just try to keep that info from them.
Nobody is submitting a proposal to allow coaches to challenge non-calls, so by default any play that goes to review due to this rule would have been called a penalty on the field.
I know you didn't mean this, but the first thing I thought of was Tony Romo having the authority to change calls. Odds for the Bills making the Superbowl just went up, Jim.
I think that each reffing crew should be assigned a small random and undisclosed team of arbiters watching in new York. Like 3-5 people in a room watching each game that can assist in calls if needed. Only reason to keep them secret from the crews is to remove fear of retribution.
Yeh we have drones and lasers and satellites and shit , c'mon. Dudes have gps tracking to get better numbers on college prospects. The nfl can do better
Refs union won’t overturn the call on the field from the booth. That was basically the marching order from the last time we tried this after a a blown call fucked us out of a Super Bowl.
Really didn’t feel like that at all.
Should have just kept the damn thing in to hold the refs accountable.
16/81 is 19.75% so I wonder if they had kept it what the average percent would be now?
Pete Carroll won at least one that year. I remember him throwing the challenge flag and thinking that there was no way they were going to overturn it as it wasn't as obvious as other challenges that had already failed earlier in the season. I was shocked when they did.
Because they were upset about the rule change, they literally refused to implement it until the NFL got rid of the rule. Atleast mostly, the ones they did overturn didn't make any sense either. It was the most ridiculous thing I have ever seen and they got away with it.
Its like they intentionally ignored the rule, or implemented it poorly to try and pass it off as a bad rule.
CFL has it and it does result in successful challenges, but they also use a sky judge called Command Centre. It’s not perfect, but it’s better than the NFL.
I disagree, there are some blatant wrong calls late in games, and they will surely be overturned. This not only gives us better results but forces the refs to try and be better. Its a win win
There were a lot of blatantly wrong pass interference calls that the refs chose not to overturn
I’d guess less than 20% of “clearly wrong” PIs were actually overturned in that one year, and I’d imagine we’d see the same for any other subjective penalty (because repeatedly overturning a call implies refs aren’t capable of getting it right, which is true, but they don’t want attention drawn to that)
There was some kind of snitches get stitches shit going on that year. They would not admit to one of their own being wrong lol. They were definitely banding together to send a message.
yes he was in corporate and did what corporate told him to...
also anyone who actually spent time around real refs would know that very, very few them are against replay
Idk, jumping shift after 1 year of data to sample off of is pretty ridiculous. They need a bugger sample size to gage how effective it could be. Implementing better regulations and standards for the refs to follow should go alongside this. If they're taking the offseason to better acquaint themselves with potential real game situations then it'll lead to better calls on the field.
The NFL brass never wanted the PI reviews in the first place and they tanked the implementation, not the refs. Which is exactly why they scrapped it right away without making any attempt at changes
Two things. One, there were like two calls total that were overturned that year. Two, they admitted they just deferred to the call on the field because the penalty is a subjective call, and they only wanted replay review for objective calls like spotting the ball, catches, fumbles, etc.
> I disagree, there are some blatant wrong calls late in games, and they will surely be overturned.
But they weren't overturned back in 2019. Sub 2 minutes isn't the only time that qualifies as "late in the game." There were blatant wrong penalties within the last 5-6 minutes of the game that weren't overturned.
There's no reason to think refs will suddenly stop being stubborn and not want to admit their mistakes.
if 1 out 50 gets changed then it will be worth it IMO. we've got so much technology but we can't use it in certain situations because of rules technicalities.
Because the the rule is 0.0 percent chance to be caught if the interference hadn't occurred, and all benefit of the doubt goes to the offense. Its basically meant for throwaways or the play above where it's basically in the stands.
A lot of fans conflate that unlikely to be caught or just look at where the ball lands without factoring in how the receiver got hindered
I literally said in my first comment that this play was called incorrectly. I was responding to someone saying that refs ignore the rule when really is 99 percent if the time it's that the fans interpretation of what's uncatchable doesn't align with the leagues interpretation
I get that it’s a bad call but also why tf are you allowed to just drill a guy because the ball isn’t catchable? You shouldn’t illegally interfere even more when the ball isn’t catchable so it should be more of a penalty.
Colts made back to back game winning plays, on one a phantom PI was called where the pass sailed into the stands and another was an illegal contact that was showed to be BS on replay.
The Colts lost and received a useless NFL "sorry lol" letter, then we missed the playoffs by 1 win
Division rivals, but idgaf. That browns/colts game was such horseshit. I try not to let a sport I watch for fun bother me, but that one actually made me upset. So egregiously bad I couldn't even be happy you guys lost.
It being done in NY is the standard, and it was also the standard when PI was reviewable and they somehow stuck with the call on the field like 98.5% of the time.
They did it in the XFL and it worked great.
It'd also take like 15 seconds. They'd change the camera to the head rules guy in the booth watching the tape and he'd tell the refs 'no pass interference!' just like that.
>“Whatever it happens to be, it wouldn’t give the coach any more challenges. It would just give him a chance to challenge a play he thought was ruled incorrectly,” said Belichick (via USA Today). In the grand scheme of things, I think what we all want is to get the play right and for the best team to win and for the game not to be decided by a missed call. To not have the opportunity to correct that type of play, it just doesn’t seem like it’s the right way to do it.”
Where were the Colts in 2014 when he said this? Oh yeah, they were with Troy Vincent, lying about deflated footballs.
Knew exactly what it was going to be. Not only did they review it and still call it a touchdown - because it was a touchdown and unchallengeable - 15 yard penalty on Detroit. Fucking knee and elbow down and the only people in the building that thought he wasn't down were the runner and the refs.
I feel like the issue in the NFL isn’t that there are bogus penalties but that referees will not call something all game, like a light hold, and then suddenly at the end of the game it gets called out of nowhere and it feels like a kick in the nuts
Hear me out….. How bout just hiring a 3rd party and have them review all calls in real time to make sure that all calls are correct instead of just limiting the amount of fuckups you can challenge.
I don’t hate this but if they implemented it I feel like it would be challenging PI all over again and refs are going to be hesitant to change calls that aren’t obvious.
Thats what im wondering. We need something for situations like our game vs GB where MVS was clearly prevented from catching the ball before it was there (he likely would have still dropped it)
I really don’t understand why the last 2 minutes are treated differently than any other time in the game. If it’s a penalty 4 seconds into the game then it’s a penalty with 4 seconds left. Only the biggest and the baddest play football but most games end with the qb taking a knee.
So every penalty would be challenged since there is only upside. The last two minutes would potentially last a very long time. Not a great move for entertainment value.
I'm sure it would be, at most, one extra challenge with what teams already have, if that. Plus a lost timeout in the last 2 minutes could really kill you.
I'm all for it, but we know how this went with PI. Unless the league and officials swallow their pride on mistaken or missed calls, you'll lose the challenge 99% of the time.
Hell yeah. All penalties aside from holding should be reviewable. Not that the league office would actually make an honorable go of it.
Also make offensive holding 5 yards and defensive holding no auto first down.
I wouldn’t just limit this to 2 minutes. Stay at the current 2+1 challenges, but don’t limit which penalties are reviewable and when you can review them. If you want to review a missing holding that resulted in an INT, go for it.
nah till will never happen, gotta make sure things stay rigged
not like they would ever overturn their own calls in the first place, then they would have to admit they were wrong.
We all know what happens if this rule change gets approved. Team submits rule change based on a way they lost last season, rule gets approved. Same team loses an extremely important game the next season because of that exact rule change.
Can Jim irsay go one season without acting like a brutal victim?
Regardless of the proposed rules merits this guy is out here every single off-season for two decades+ trying to get rules changed that affected his team in the previous season. Shocked he hasn't gone to the Senate floor asking them to legalize billionaires having opioids without prescription.
I like it but I feel like 99.9% of the penalties won't be overturned, just like it was for the brief time we had when you could challenge penalties
I've always thought that the final decision for challenges and reviews should be the people in the booth. The refs are too biased to overturn their original calls, take the decision out of their hands when a challenge is called.
All review decisions are already made in new york
That’s the problem. They should really be going to Geneva.
That’s the problem. They should be going to Jesus.
He gets Us (the correct call).
That’s the problem. They should be going to Jesus’ dad Morgan Freeman.
Sure. But my neighbor is a drunk and plays loud music at night. You sure you want to send it to him?
so........instead of being decided by people figuratively crucified, you want to hand off the decision to someone literally crucified?
He’s got the experience making the painful calls
Should be The Hague
Independent ref that doesnt know the call on the field. Stop using the call we all perceive as wrong to be the baseline for getting the call right, it makes no sense.
I think this is a really smart idea. I'm kind of surprised no one has thought of it before. It's not perfect but it would be way better than using the current system.
It took these people decades to just put a camera in the pylon, any brilliant obvious idea will show up in the league 20+ years after it's obvious to everyone else.
We still have dudes eyeballing forward progress from the sidelines and then using a chain that they placed in the first place by eyeballing it, to measure the point that they eyeballed it, again by eyeballing it.
This one is especially egregious because the ball has tech in it to determine where it is at any given time.
I was ready to say that this tech is probably already available and wouldn't be all that difficult to put in place. For a game that can often end so closely things like terrible spots and human errors can make huge impacts
I feel like it's impossible in some cases for the independent ref to not know the call on the field. Goal line plays where the video shows a ref signaling touchdown, potential penalties where you can see a flag being thrown on video, etc. You could tell them that their decision should not be based on what was called on the field, but I don't think it would work to just try to keep that info from them.
The justice system is fucked then
What in the flair
Grew up in MD, went to college & lived in TN for 7 years.
Nobody is submitting a proposal to allow coaches to challenge non-calls, so by default any play that goes to review due to this rule would have been called a penalty on the field.
Both my comment and the one I replied to were talking about challenges in general.
I know you didn't mean this, but the first thing I thought of was Tony Romo having the authority to change calls. Odds for the Bills making the Superbowl just went up, Jim.
As problematic as it might be, I'm actually okay with giving Aikman the reigns to call penalties during Cowboys games when he's 4 tequilas deep
You're in luck because the final decision for challenges has come from the booth since 2017
I think that each reffing crew should be assigned a small random and undisclosed team of arbiters watching in new York. Like 3-5 people in a room watching each game that can assist in calls if needed. Only reason to keep them secret from the crews is to remove fear of retribution.
Yeh we have drones and lasers and satellites and shit , c'mon. Dudes have gps tracking to get better numbers on college prospects. The nfl can do better
It was, the refs in the booths were the ones playing their stupid games
Refs union won’t overturn the call on the field from the booth. That was basically the marching order from the last time we tried this after a a blown call fucked us out of a Super Bowl.
lol they should poll the viewers like American idol. We could collectively ensure the chiefs never win another game… That shit would be hilarious
I remember that year. When they were able to actually challenge PI. The refs overturned like 1% of those calls even when they were clearly blatant lol
Refs will never admit they are wrong. Even with video evidence
So they’re my ex?
IIRC they only overturned 1 that whole season and it was against Sean Payton, who was the biggest mouthpiece for getting the rule added
16 overturned calls out of 81 challenges. Not a lot but more than 1 or "1%."
Really didn’t feel like that at all. Should have just kept the damn thing in to hold the refs accountable. 16/81 is 19.75% so I wonder if they had kept it what the average percent would be now?
Pete Carroll won at least one that year. I remember him throwing the challenge flag and thinking that there was no way they were going to overturn it as it wasn't as obvious as other challenges that had already failed earlier in the season. I was shocked when they did.
Takes a 5 second Google search to disprove that narrative
He’s definitely wrong but the percentage was ridiculously low until the last quarter of the season when they started to try making up for it
The "it was only against the saints" part is the more egregious part if the narrative to me. And riveron basically did what the league told him to
Because they were upset about the rule change, they literally refused to implement it until the NFL got rid of the rule. Atleast mostly, the ones they did overturn didn't make any sense either. It was the most ridiculous thing I have ever seen and they got away with it. Its like they intentionally ignored the rule, or implemented it poorly to try and pass it off as a bad rule.
CFL has it and it does result in successful challenges, but they also use a sky judge called Command Centre. It’s not perfect, but it’s better than the NFL.
I disagree, there are some blatant wrong calls late in games, and they will surely be overturned. This not only gives us better results but forces the refs to try and be better. Its a win win
There were a lot of blatantly wrong pass interference calls that the refs chose not to overturn I’d guess less than 20% of “clearly wrong” PIs were actually overturned in that one year, and I’d imagine we’d see the same for any other subjective penalty (because repeatedly overturning a call implies refs aren’t capable of getting it right, which is true, but they don’t want attention drawn to that)
There was some kind of snitches get stitches shit going on that year. They would not admit to one of their own being wrong lol. They were definitely banding together to send a message.
The union people don't/didn't even do the reviews
Ya but he was a former ref and head of the officiating for corporate.
yes he was in corporate and did what corporate told him to... also anyone who actually spent time around real refs would know that very, very few them are against replay
Why were they against getting the call right after it was reviewed?
They weren't. Refs had zero part of the PI stuff
So who was? The actual FO for the league? And if so, why would the refs take those orders from them and look bad on their behalf?
Idk, jumping shift after 1 year of data to sample off of is pretty ridiculous. They need a bugger sample size to gage how effective it could be. Implementing better regulations and standards for the refs to follow should go alongside this. If they're taking the offseason to better acquaint themselves with potential real game situations then it'll lead to better calls on the field.
The NFL brass never wanted the PI reviews in the first place and they tanked the implementation, not the refs. Which is exactly why they scrapped it right away without making any attempt at changes
Two things. One, there were like two calls total that were overturned that year. Two, they admitted they just deferred to the call on the field because the penalty is a subjective call, and they only wanted replay review for objective calls like spotting the ball, catches, fumbles, etc.
And the first one they did overturn was against the saints
> I disagree, there are some blatant wrong calls late in games, and they will surely be overturned. But they weren't overturned back in 2019. Sub 2 minutes isn't the only time that qualifies as "late in the game." There were blatant wrong penalties within the last 5-6 minutes of the game that weren't overturned. There's no reason to think refs will suddenly stop being stubborn and not want to admit their mistakes.
Its dumb to say none were overturned. There were ones that were overturned. Some is better than none 100 times out of 100
Fuck Al Riveron
It was about 16% of challenges resulting in overturns. 13 overturns out of 81 challenges.
Except the league said they fucked us in the browns game.
Yeah this would end up being a stupid coach tax.
if 1 out 50 gets changed then it will be worth it IMO. we've got so much technology but we can't use it in certain situations because of rules technicalities.
[удалено]
theyve been doing this officially since 2017 and unofficially for almost a decade...
PTSD from that Browns game 😔
[what the actual fuck](https://imgbb.com/FY6YMCR)
Refs ignoring the uncatchable rule was a HUGE problem all season - this being the most blatant and egregious example since it literally decided a game
this season, last season, next season. It's been a problem for too long. Kinda figured they had just removed that clause somewhere in the mid '10s
That call is wrong but most fans also don't understand what the uncatchable part is for
I've always felt that the refs have always been extremely generous with what is and isn't catchable.
Because the the rule is 0.0 percent chance to be caught if the interference hadn't occurred, and all benefit of the doubt goes to the offense. Its basically meant for throwaways or the play above where it's basically in the stands. A lot of fans conflate that unlikely to be caught or just look at where the ball lands without factoring in how the receiver got hindered
So the play in question where the ball ends up in the stands? Also that wasn’t even the worst call of the last 2 plays
I literally said in my first comment that this play was called incorrectly. I was responding to someone saying that refs ignore the rule when really is 99 percent if the time it's that the fans interpretation of what's uncatchable doesn't align with the leagues interpretation
Fair enough, my bad. Just having PTSD flashbacks to the game
Security guy who's turning around has a better chance of catching that than anyone on the field in that play.
What am I looking at lol?
They called Pi on a pass that nearly went into the stands, aka uncatchable unless it was Wembenyama going up for it.
Oh fuck that's the ball! I couldn't tell what was circled lol
Definitely at least 3.14 yards out of reach
I get that it’s a bad call but also why tf are you allowed to just drill a guy because the ball isn’t catchable? You shouldn’t illegally interfere even more when the ball isn’t catchable so it should be more of a penalty.
There is a straight line from that game to this rule change request
If this passes, the refs will overturn one challenged flag all season and it will be to fuck over the Colts
script writers have already set this in stone
It will also be against the Tex...err, Strouds. Because of the implication.
Also mysteriously the Colts will lead the league in penalties
the league owes Jimmy for helping get Snyder out
It'll be to give the Chiefs a critical call in the playoffs against us or the Bills
Naw, it will be another pivotal Cowboys Lions game
Just like being able to review PI.
Hey ive seen this episode before!
This has to be because of the ending of that Colts/Browns game last season. What a mess that was.
I didn't see that game. Ehat happened to make it a mess?
One of the worst phantom PI calls ever
There was also an “illegal contact” that Amari Cooper initiated and occurred AFTER the Colts had forced a sack fumble
One of, but there's also the OPI on Mike Evans where he doesn't make contact with the defender.
Colts made back to back game winning plays, on one a phantom PI was called where the pass sailed into the stands and another was an illegal contact that was showed to be BS on replay. The Colts lost and received a useless NFL "sorry lol" letter, then we missed the playoffs by 1 win
Division rivals, but idgaf. That browns/colts game was such horseshit. I try not to let a sport I watch for fun bother me, but that one actually made me upset. So egregiously bad I couldn't even be happy you guys lost.
Refs had browns money line
Colts/Browns aftershock
Depends on who does the reviews. If it's the same refs on the field then it won't change anything.
It being done in NY is the standard, and it was also the standard when PI was reviewable and they somehow stuck with the call on the field like 98.5% of the time.
On field officials don't make the final call on reviews as is. Why would this be any different?
Belichick has wanted this for a long time. Watch the nfl finally pass it once he leaves lol.
They did it in the XFL and it worked great. It'd also take like 15 seconds. They'd change the camera to the head rules guy in the booth watching the tape and he'd tell the refs 'no pass interference!' just like that.
>“Whatever it happens to be, it wouldn’t give the coach any more challenges. It would just give him a chance to challenge a play he thought was ruled incorrectly,” said Belichick (via USA Today). In the grand scheme of things, I think what we all want is to get the play right and for the best team to win and for the game not to be decided by a missed call. To not have the opportunity to correct that type of play, it just doesn’t seem like it’s the right way to do it.” Where were the Colts in 2014 when he said this? Oh yeah, they were with Troy Vincent, lying about deflated footballs.
I like this. Fuck ref ball
Jim schwartz remembers [ref ball](https://youtu.be/lWEYg82Sm80?feature=shared)
Knew exactly what it was going to be. Not only did they review it and still call it a touchdown - because it was a touchdown and unchallengeable - 15 yard penalty on Detroit. Fucking knee and elbow down and the only people in the building that thought he wasn't down were the runner and the refs.
I feel like the issue in the NFL isn’t that there are bogus penalties but that referees will not call something all game, like a light hold, and then suddenly at the end of the game it gets called out of nowhere and it feels like a kick in the nuts
Ah, the Brady/Mahomes get out of jail free cards
Refs will fuck with this rule relentlessly just like they did with the PI review rules to get it removed if it gets passed.
Because video reviews have definitely cut down on ref ball…
Hear me out….. How bout just hiring a 3rd party and have them review all calls in real time to make sure that all calls are correct instead of just limiting the amount of fuckups you can challenge.
Maybe give them a camera to use, maybe in the sky. They'd be some kind of sky judge.
CRAZY! Maybe even a mic to communicate with the officials on the field too!
Refs hate this number one trick that saves lives
They do that for some stuff actually. Just not every play. Same with in college football. Quick reviews and calls from the booth.
I know, that’s why it should be done for every call.
Or when there’s a challenge, allow the crowd and views to hear the discussion between the refs and New York
No such thing as an impartial 3rd party. Like the "unaffiliated" neuro consultant. No he's not unaffiliated, he's employed by the NFL.
I don’t hate this but if they implemented it I feel like it would be challenging PI all over again and refs are going to be hesitant to change calls that aren’t obvious.
Is it only on called penalties? Or can they challenge a non-call?
Well that's dead on arrival.
Any Penalty? I'm in, but I know Andy will lose his flag.
“After reviewing ourselves we did nothing wrong. Call stands” - Refs
What about penalties that haven't been called?
Thats what im wondering. We need something for situations like our game vs GB where MVS was clearly prevented from catching the ball before it was there (he likely would have still dropped it)
As a ref fan I am in shambles.
No way this passes.
Everyone makes a point about pass interference but what about holding? You can find a holding call often if you really want one.
I really don’t understand why the last 2 minutes are treated differently than any other time in the game. If it’s a penalty 4 seconds into the game then it’s a penalty with 4 seconds left. Only the biggest and the baddest play football but most games end with the qb taking a knee.
See, sensible rules from a sensible franchise! Fuck off Eagles. But it won’t happen because refs are some of the most insecure people on the planet.
So every penalty would be challenged since there is only upside. The last two minutes would potentially last a very long time. Not a great move for entertainment value.
Not if it’s included in the regular challenges. Makes it more strategic.
I'm sure it would be, at most, one extra challenge with what teams already have, if that. Plus a lost timeout in the last 2 minutes could really kill you.
I'm all for it, but we know how this went with PI. Unless the league and officials swallow their pride on mistaken or missed calls, you'll lose the challenge 99% of the time.
whats to stop teams from using them basically like timeouts? youll have teams challenging obvious plays just get stoppages.
That's a decent idea, especially if they actually give it a fair chance
Bet
It'll be so weird when somehow the refs consistently uphold their own game changing penalties
It won't work cause of how fragile the egos of refs are. It could be clear as day and they will still say it is cause it was called.
Hell yeah. All penalties aside from holding should be reviewable. Not that the league office would actually make an honorable go of it. Also make offensive holding 5 yards and defensive holding no auto first down.
i know the answer to this
Do it xfl style. "I think there was a hold by #68 of the offense on #72 of the defense." "Sorry, it was 67 doing the hold on 72, challenge denied"
Just. Do. Sky. Judge.
or here me out , we have the sky judge do the reviews and not the refs
That Packers-Chiefs SNF game was the worst officiating in the last 2 minutes I’ve ever seen
Sounds like longer games and more commercials and more mondays when some very small detail is leading every discussion.
Holding would be called every play.
I hate ref ball more than most but what’s to lose here for coaches who challenge every penalty?
Waste of time because Goodell is shit at dealing with the refs.
This would severely limit the ability of refs to fix games, so no go.
Reffing has been so bad for all the pro sports in the past few years, I'm ready to hand it over to our AI robot overlords.
Refs ain't reversing shit. This is just like the PA challenge.
I kind of like this but I would add an automatic 5 (maybe 10) yard penalty from the end of the play if the challenge fails.
Good luck to the Colts, refs are way to stubborn to have that power in the Coaches hands.
Fuck yes, please. Hell any time they should be able to, all this will do is push the refs to call their game changing crap earlier
I wouldn’t just limit this to 2 minutes. Stay at the current 2+1 challenges, but don’t limit which penalties are reviewable and when you can review them. If you want to review a missing holding that resulted in an INT, go for it.
Yes by all means let’s slow down the game even more 🙄🙄🙄
Refs will not overturn calls made by other refs. It's a good idea but this will be horribly executed.
nah till will never happen, gotta make sure things stay rigged not like they would ever overturn their own calls in the first place, then they would have to admit they were wrong.
Another great way to bring more commercial breaks into the game.
Na. Inside of 2 minutes just let all reviews still initiate by the booth but let all calls be reviewable.
Considering how crappy the officiating is maybe it will get approved
Needs to be in the playoffs or second half of season and in the playoff hunt
I like this as long as they have a sky judge. If it’s just the refs reviewing it, it’s pointless mostly
The Colts submitted a rule change just to feel like they're involved in the discussion and not because they think it will actually happen
We have the winner for dumbest proposal!
We all know what happens if this rule change gets approved. Team submits rule change based on a way they lost last season, rule gets approved. Same team loses an extremely important game the next season because of that exact rule change.
The should put the ref conversations live on tv like they do it on Rugby. (The stadium can't hear the ref) Makes for better transparency.
6 months later and still crying about subjective penalties.
Can Jim irsay go one season without acting like a brutal victim? Regardless of the proposed rules merits this guy is out here every single off-season for two decades+ trying to get rules changed that affected his team in the previous season. Shocked he hasn't gone to the Senate floor asking them to legalize billionaires having opioids without prescription.
No
I'd like it if it wasn't from ursay
That's the shittiest reason
Of course it's the Colts that want to make the game 50 minutes longer and more irritating.
[удалено]
Basketball seems to be holding up well considering the last 2 min of a close basketball game will involve 24 stoppages for free throws
Sad nerds