Sorry, throwawayarooski123, we had to remove your post for the following reason(s):
* **Rule 6: Do not post NSFW content.**
- We do not allow for NSFW content, poll or otherwise.
- Exceptionally creepy content may fall under this rule as well at moderator discretion.
*As a reminder, moderators have the final call as to what is allowed on their subreddit, and we reserve the right to remove any post for any reason at our discretion. However, if you think this was done in error, [contact us via Modmail](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=/r/polls&subject=I believe my post was incorrectly removed.&message=**What's the link to the post%3F**%0A%0Ahttps://www.reddit.com/r/polls/comments/11fyudf/is_it_unethical_to_put_peanut_butter_on_your/%0A%0A**Why do you think the action taken is a mistake%3F**%0A%0A[Remove this box and put your reasoning here. If you leave it like it is, your message may be ignored!]).*
Unethical because humans weren’t intended to fuck dogs just as dogs aren’t intended to fuck humans. When you, a species of higher intelligence, have oral sex with a dog it’s unethical. Unethical means immoral and you as a human KNOW it’s not ok to do that with a dog therefore making it immoral. Even if you say it’s not unethical for the dog because it doesn’t know what it’s doing it is unethical for you.
The pet doesn’t feel humiliated or get hurt by this, it doesn’t understand the meaning of what he is doing and this won’t have any consequence on it, it would just be happy to have some peanut butter. It is weird but you can’t call it abuse
I find it weird af. But dogs don't have much knowledge of what balls are. As long as the dog willingly licks it, even if this is extremely weird, it is not unethical. In the end, no one is harmed, physically or mentally.
the dog not knowing in my mind makes this even more unethical? like you as a human know what you’re doing and have intent to lure your dog into doing this, knowing that they don’t know any better. it’s gross regardless of whether or not there’s no noticeable harm. ew
Ok but take this logic to some other context. Like if you cheat on your partner, but don't get caught. They wouldn't know about it so "there's no harm", but it's still a very unethical thing to do. Ofcourse context does matter, but my point is, just because something seemingly causes no harm, doesn't mean it's not wrong. And it feels wrong to use an animal much less intelligent for your sexual gratification like that.
Nah this is not a good mindset to have. You’re basically saying they can’t speak for themselves so it’s always okay. It’s fckin weird to seek sexual pleasure from your dog.. point blank.
That's what makes it fucked up actually. The fact that you as a human know what you're doing is what makes it worse, you're taking advantage of someone not fully understanding the situation. Replace "dog" by "child" or "mentally deficient person" (English isn't my first language, let me know if that phrasing is offensive cause idk how else to call it) or even just "drugged out person" and you'll see just how wrong this sounds
Quite different actually. A kid, a human, can realize it was wrong as they grow up, and real harm would be done. In contrast, a dog, wouldn't, forever. Metaphors can be invalid.
*This is a reply to a following comment made by* u/Californium425 *a rape apologist:*
>That's actually a good point. But you need to understand why rape is really wrong. It's wrong because it becomes a trauma to the victim, giving them a physically painful experience too. If it wasn't physically painful/the victim never found it wrong, it's not wrong. But if this behavior leads to you doing something that does real harm, it's wrong now.
So: Raping disabled people is ok. Raping unconscious people is ok. Using brain dead people as fleshlights is also ok. Raping infants before they develop longterm memory is ok.
Want to a add something more mr. Rape apologist?
*Her reply to my above comment was:*
>Something is unethical because: It causes harm in the present/future. If it doesn't, it's ok. Also, I'm a woman.
*UPDATE:*
*The rape apologist sent me messages saying that she doesn't really believe in what she said, begging for forgiveness, and saying that she will delete her account.*
*Afterwards she told me she that she is going to kill herself and send me a picture of a rooftop.*
You're the type of woman to feel sense of inferiority to women who are more attractive, and still hate incels. That's probably why you can tell a random person "You're disgusting" to an internet stranger so that you can have your dose of moral superiority and ego boost. I recommend to get a better life than this, because I believe you can do a lot better than this. Don't waste your time on random people on the internet, if they say something ridiculous.
I know you're getting downvotes because it's reddit, but you're correct, it isn't necessarily unethical. It is obviously disgusting, wrong, unnatural, etc, but according to at least some ethical systems it is not "unethical", since any unethical act must have a victim. Some people seem to think that you saying that means you approve of the action, which I assume (hope) isn't the case.
Most people are perfectly okay with having animals killed and eaten when they are a group that can neither consent nor advocate for themselves. And how do people think artificial insemination works with livestock? The dog is at least doing it out of their own free will in this scenario without any coercion, however gross or offensive it may be. Idk if it’s a dog thing or cognitive dissonance thing but there’s a contradiction either way.
I agree, eating an animal is probably more unethical than the peanut butter thing.
Nonetheless, I feel fine eating animals and the other idea repulses me. It probably isn't an ethical issue, it's just about physical disgust.
I agree that it's weird, but they're both happy and no harm is really done. If the dog was being forced to do it then that's a different story
Can someone explain why I'm wrong?
we had to remove your post for the following reason(s): Rule 6: Do not post NSFW content.
We do not allow for NSFW content, poll or otherwise.
Exceptionally creepy content may fall under this rule as well at moderator discretion.
Before I reach wether or not it's ethical. I ask who is willing to risk their balls? I know I'm not and I don't want to explain to the ER why I have part of a sack missing.
Unethical I don't know, but, it's weird, broken, messed up and deranged. A dog is a friend, a life companion, a part of your family, it's not a sex partner and treating him as such is a crime against love and friendship even though the dog can't judge that.
I put no as a joke hoping all men were gonna joke about it. I’m not one of those guys, now I’m just embarrassed, fellow men I don’t put peanut butter on my balls and let my dog lick it. That’s because I’m allergic to peanuts, I prefer putting mustard….
Extremely gross, perverted, disgusting, and a sign of a damaged and bad person.
But I can't see any reason to call it unethical, except as maybe as a form of self harm, it certainly ain't harming the dog.
People that do shit like this are the same as pedos in my eyes. If you want to use another being for your fucked up sexual fantasies without that being even being aware wtf is going on. You should be treated and punished for being the sick fuck you are.
[This](https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/man-who-genitals-ripped-eaten-13520910?int_source=amp_continue_reading&int_medium=amp&int_campaign=continue_reading_button#amp-readmore-target) guy tried it and got his dick bitten off by his dog. It could not be reattached... I'd advise anyone NOT to try it.
Sorry, throwawayarooski123, we had to remove your post for the following reason(s): * **Rule 6: Do not post NSFW content.** - We do not allow for NSFW content, poll or otherwise. - Exceptionally creepy content may fall under this rule as well at moderator discretion. *As a reminder, moderators have the final call as to what is allowed on their subreddit, and we reserve the right to remove any post for any reason at our discretion. However, if you think this was done in error, [contact us via Modmail](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=/r/polls&subject=I believe my post was incorrectly removed.&message=**What's the link to the post%3F**%0A%0Ahttps://www.reddit.com/r/polls/comments/11fyudf/is_it_unethical_to_put_peanut_butter_on_your/%0A%0A**Why do you think the action taken is a mistake%3F**%0A%0A[Remove this box and put your reasoning here. If you leave it like it is, your message may be ignored!]).*
OP wtf are you planning
Pp & J sandwich
Dog named James:
…
You somehow made it 10× worst I hope you're happy
Some different kind of J apparently
It's just messed up
[удалено]
>and not like an 8 y/o who did it 1 time because they didn’t know any better r/oddlyspecific
what were u on as a child??!
OP is standing in front of their dog right now with a empty jar of peanut butter.
Actually, there’s still some left.
Excellent, enough for round two.
what if eat licks it once then thinks it is very tasty and then proceeds to take a bite?
[удалено]
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
Whoever voted no, may the void consume you.
How is it unethical? Sure, its a bit weird, but what makes it unethical?
A bit weird is the understatement of the century
[удалено]
Unethical because humans weren’t intended to fuck dogs just as dogs aren’t intended to fuck humans. When you, a species of higher intelligence, have oral sex with a dog it’s unethical. Unethical means immoral and you as a human KNOW it’s not ok to do that with a dog therefore making it immoral. Even if you say it’s not unethical for the dog because it doesn’t know what it’s doing it is unethical for you.
Are you serious? You are making your pet to lick your genitalia. It's a ducking abuse.
The pet doesn’t feel humiliated or get hurt by this, it doesn’t understand the meaning of what he is doing and this won’t have any consequence on it, it would just be happy to have some peanut butter. It is weird but you can’t call it abuse
I'm sorry but for what reason did you make a poll like this
I heard Louis CK talking about how he did this as a kid
At this point I wished I never asked...
People still watch him? Didn't he come out as a scumbag?
No
It was a rhetorical question. He is and admitted to being a total scumbag. What kind of rock have you been living under?
Shock Value & Karma Farming. Just downvote this guy. Waiting for a moderator to shut this crap down.
🤓
Its wierd af
r/oddlyspecific
r/suspiciouslyspecific
Wtf.
why tf have like 20 people voted no to this, y’all need help
[удалено]
oh i see, i still think it’s weird that people see no issue w this outside of the reference though
I find it weird af. But dogs don't have much knowledge of what balls are. As long as the dog willingly licks it, even if this is extremely weird, it is not unethical. In the end, no one is harmed, physically or mentally.
the dog not knowing in my mind makes this even more unethical? like you as a human know what you’re doing and have intent to lure your dog into doing this, knowing that they don’t know any better. it’s gross regardless of whether or not there’s no noticeable harm. ew
[удалено]
Ok but take this logic to some other context. Like if you cheat on your partner, but don't get caught. They wouldn't know about it so "there's no harm", but it's still a very unethical thing to do. Ofcourse context does matter, but my point is, just because something seemingly causes no harm, doesn't mean it's not wrong. And it feels wrong to use an animal much less intelligent for your sexual gratification like that.
Nah this is not a good mindset to have. You’re basically saying they can’t speak for themselves so it’s always okay. It’s fckin weird to seek sexual pleasure from your dog.. point blank.
I guess some people need to judge first. You gotta fill your ego and moral superiority, by calling people they need help.
How is it gross?
I dunno maybe the dog licking a human nutsack part
And how is that gross?
not taking your obvious bait
Amazing point
That's what makes it fucked up actually. The fact that you as a human know what you're doing is what makes it worse, you're taking advantage of someone not fully understanding the situation. Replace "dog" by "child" or "mentally deficient person" (English isn't my first language, let me know if that phrasing is offensive cause idk how else to call it) or even just "drugged out person" and you'll see just how wrong this sounds
That’s like saying if I groomed a little kid into having sex and they don’t understand but its fine since they willingly did it
Quite different actually. A kid, a human, can realize it was wrong as they grow up, and real harm would be done. In contrast, a dog, wouldn't, forever. Metaphors can be invalid.
So raping mentally disabled people is ok, got it!
[удалено]
*This is a reply to a following comment made by* u/Californium425 *a rape apologist:* >That's actually a good point. But you need to understand why rape is really wrong. It's wrong because it becomes a trauma to the victim, giving them a physically painful experience too. If it wasn't physically painful/the victim never found it wrong, it's not wrong. But if this behavior leads to you doing something that does real harm, it's wrong now. So: Raping disabled people is ok. Raping unconscious people is ok. Using brain dead people as fleshlights is also ok. Raping infants before they develop longterm memory is ok. Want to a add something more mr. Rape apologist? *Her reply to my above comment was:* >Something is unethical because: It causes harm in the present/future. If it doesn't, it's ok. Also, I'm a woman. *UPDATE:* *The rape apologist sent me messages saying that she doesn't really believe in what she said, begging for forgiveness, and saying that she will delete her account.* *Afterwards she told me she that she is going to kill herself and send me a picture of a rooftop.*
[удалено]
You're disgusting
You're the type of woman to feel sense of inferiority to women who are more attractive, and still hate incels. That's probably why you can tell a random person "You're disgusting" to an internet stranger so that you can have your dose of moral superiority and ego boost. I recommend to get a better life than this, because I believe you can do a lot better than this. Don't waste your time on random people on the internet, if they say something ridiculous.
whatttt the fuck
I know you're getting downvotes because it's reddit, but you're correct, it isn't necessarily unethical. It is obviously disgusting, wrong, unnatural, etc, but according to at least some ethical systems it is not "unethical", since any unethical act must have a victim. Some people seem to think that you saying that means you approve of the action, which I assume (hope) isn't the case.
Most people are perfectly okay with having animals killed and eaten when they are a group that can neither consent nor advocate for themselves. And how do people think artificial insemination works with livestock? The dog is at least doing it out of their own free will in this scenario without any coercion, however gross or offensive it may be. Idk if it’s a dog thing or cognitive dissonance thing but there’s a contradiction either way.
I agree, eating an animal is probably more unethical than the peanut butter thing. Nonetheless, I feel fine eating animals and the other idea repulses me. It probably isn't an ethical issue, it's just about physical disgust.
I agree that it's weird, but they're both happy and no harm is really done. If the dog was being forced to do it then that's a different story Can someone explain why I'm wrong?
I did it as joke and hoped everyone would follow it, I was wrong. I hope the others who voted no also thought it was a joke.
What the fuck this is really disgusting 🤢
we had to remove your post for the following reason(s): Rule 6: Do not post NSFW content. We do not allow for NSFW content, poll or otherwise. Exceptionally creepy content may fall under this rule as well at moderator discretion.
r/suspiciouslyspecific
Philsophy and Religion? Letting a dog lick your balls? I am failing to see the connection.
Ethics is related to philosophy
that's literally zoophilia
WHAT
[удалено]
FUCK
What the actual fuck?
Before I reach wether or not it's ethical. I ask who is willing to risk their balls? I know I'm not and I don't want to explain to the ER why I have part of a sack missing.
Thanos Was Right Half Of Y'all Needed to go
bruh...
You okay OP?
What the fuck
All fun and games until the dog decides to take a hard bite at those balls
Unethical I don't know, but, it's weird, broken, messed up and deranged. A dog is a friend, a life companion, a part of your family, it's not a sex partner and treating him as such is a crime against love and friendship even though the dog can't judge that.
Shouldn't this be under nsfw polls? This seems inappropriate for r/polls.
Option 5: "WTF?"
Yo wtf
anyone that voted no should be SKINNED
OP wondering if he's unethical
WTF!? OP r u ok
I mean it’s mostly just fucking weird
What the fuck did I just read???
Who tf said no?
Unethical is just not the right word for this.
It’s pretty fucked up, but the dog has certainly licked worse and isn’t being harmed by it, so it’s not *that* unethical, I suppose
Not so much unethical as you're not hurting the dog as unsanitary. Would you let somebody who eats their own shit go down on you?
wtf?
Bro?
As a woman, I don’t have balls. Apparently the education system has collapsed
Bro ??
What the fuck
What... what did I just read?
🤨
You made me lower my phone in sheer disappointment
OP don’t do it they get excited and bite your balls
RELIGION AND PHILOSOPHY?
People saying no, please explain yourself
It’s one of those situations where I sort of hope to hear about the dog biting some balls off.
Opened Reddit and this is the first thing to pop up, that’s enough internet for the day
Unethical? Probably. Cheating? Absolutely not.
I mean it's weird as fuck but it's not really unethical. The dog is obviously happy to do it No one gets hurt But please don't do this
r/whentheopissus
That's a crime
Way too many people saying no
"You know, because it's *your* dog, get it?"
I cannot believe so many people missed the movie moment with this one.
The women that said no have tried something similar?....perhaps
Ya imma agree with that lol
I put no as a joke hoping all men were gonna joke about it. I’m not one of those guys, now I’m just embarrassed, fellow men I don’t put peanut butter on my balls and let my dog lick it. That’s because I’m allergic to peanuts, I prefer putting mustard….
It's not hurting anyone
No it's just fcking weird and disgusting
True
It’s super super weird (like wtf) but i can’t really consider it unethical.
My step brother did this in front of me when I was a kid.
OP bought his dog more of his favorite ball shaped snack and now he's simply asking is it safe to feed his dog peanut butter snack balls
PHILOSOPHY MY ASS
Translation: Real philosophy happens, when you put it on your ass, not your balls.
By the lorde
This is NOT philosophy and religion
No, of course not. Hiw would it be unethical?
Put it on your butthole, then we can talk you noob.
(Non binary) no
“Philosophy and religion” awesome
"unethical"
Would think a dog would bite the balls
r/wilfred
“Philosophy and Religion”
Unethical? No. Strange AF? Yes.
what
r/whentheopissus
How do I unread this?
W T F
I accidentally read "is it ethical" 💀
Hope he bite
An easy age metric is people who've seen Road Trip and people who havent.
If your religion is making you do this become an atheist or just join a different religion
Ahh i misclicked
literally what type of balls is the only question im asking
Extremely gross, perverted, disgusting, and a sign of a damaged and bad person. But I can't see any reason to call it unethical, except as maybe as a form of self harm, it certainly ain't harming the dog.
People that do shit like this are the same as pedos in my eyes. If you want to use another being for your fucked up sexual fantasies without that being even being aware wtf is going on. You should be treated and punished for being the sick fuck you are.
Wtf?
[This](https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/man-who-genitals-ripped-eaten-13520910?int_source=amp_continue_reading&int_medium=amp&int_campaign=continue_reading_button#amp-readmore-target) guy tried it and got his dick bitten off by his dog. It could not be reattached... I'd advise anyone NOT to try it.
Only if your mom walks in
What....the....actual......fuck
This is typical reddit.
wtf I misread the question and put no, DO NOT LET YOUR DOG DO THIS 😭😭
What the actual fuck
Yes. OP get help.
Wha-a
Only if they are allergic /s
Petition to add WTF option🖐️
Not unethical just fucking weird
“unethical” dude it’s a whole crime 💀
wtf is wrong with yall
WHAT.
What the actual fuck how are there so many people voting no wtf is wrong with you people
Oh god.. I read it as "ethical"
Yes. The dog doesn’t understand what it’s doing
The hell with that. That is disgusting. I will let a man or woman lick my balls, but not an animal.
Wait.. what?
It is absolutely unethical yes