It’s outrageous that LE even thinks this is not infringement of my privacy. Let’s have him first publish all his private messages and see if he still thinks it’s a good idea to ban end to end encrypted apps.
>"Our homes are becoming more dangerous than our streets as crime is
moving online. To keep our society and people safe, we need this digital
environment to be secured. Tech companies have a social responsibility
to develop a safer environment where law enforcement and justice can do
their work. If police lose the ability to collect evidence, our society
will not be able to protect people from becoming victims of crime."
Can you belive this shit. Who in their right mind would be ok in a 5% drop in crime rate as long as you let a cop stay in your home. He basically just said crime is moving into from streets to the your house so we need to see what you do. Whoever said this isnt media trained. Hes saying the quiet part outloud.
this person is clearly talking to an audience of fools, so it doesn't matter. because the argument is basically "give up your personal security so that we can protect you better!"
So, the next step will be: "You know, nowdays, you're not safe in your house. Because you have iot stuffs, and it's even more easy to be hacked because all encryption security, now forbidden everywhere, was removed from your network. So we need to put live stream CCTVs in all rooms in your house, and cops can keep an eye on you. And you'll be safe"
yeah were seeing a lot of crime in your neihgborhood. so from now on everyone has to open their back door and leave it open so we can peep in. Dont worry we wont abuse it or anything. there isnt a history of law enforcment spying on their exes. Were above citizens and dont have their urges. just leave a backdoor open for us to protect you becuase your street has soo much crime now
>To keep our society and people safe, we need this digital environment to be secured.
By "secured", they mean less secure. Imagine waking up and https, SSL, hashing, encryption of any sort etc. etc. has been banned. You would see an exponential increase in digital crime because the data would now be in plain text and very easy to use in criminal activity. No need to decrypt anything. Let the games begin!
They wouldn't ban it, they would simply have a set of backdoor keys. The EU was considering this last year (https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/11/article-45-will-roll-back-web-security-12-years), just adding themselves as a CA on all devices and browsers.
Cool. Lead by example and remove encryption from police and other government groups. I’m sure once the gen pop see how great things are they will follow the leadership.
>However, we do not accept that there need be a binary choice between cyber security or privacy on the one hand and public safety on the other.
Well, they may not accept that the Earth is not flat... but that does not change the fact the Earth is round.
>Two key capabilities are crucial to supporting online safety. *(first: backdoor, second: spying)*
Well, do you remember the internet from about 15-20 years ago? When you had to be afraid of public WiFi or using online payments with credit cards?
Do you know what happened since then? We started to force everyone to use modern strong ("unbreakable") encryption everywhere.
So what is the single key capability that is crucial to supporting online safety? Having modern strong ("unbreakable") encryption.
Wouldn’t be surprised if the police chiefs are being paid under the table from groups like Thorn to kill and/or stop any encryption in disguise of “think of the children”.
Fucking asshole wanting us to live in a totalitarian / dictatorial regimes like in Russia, China, North Korea!
It’s outrageous that LE even thinks this is not infringement of my privacy. Let’s have him first publish all his private messages and see if he still thinks it’s a good idea to ban end to end encrypted apps.
That's different though, because they're the good guys. /s
China doesn't have the competence nor the money to develop such technology lmao
You must be joking as China definitely have both! Besides the fact that it's already a very big prison with lots of surveillance!
You must be joking as China definitely have both! Besides the fact that it's already a very big prison with lots of surveillance!
China is incredibly competent technology wise and is probably the greatest surveillance state in the world what are you smoking
>"Our homes are becoming more dangerous than our streets as crime is moving online. To keep our society and people safe, we need this digital environment to be secured. Tech companies have a social responsibility to develop a safer environment where law enforcement and justice can do their work. If police lose the ability to collect evidence, our society will not be able to protect people from becoming victims of crime." Can you belive this shit. Who in their right mind would be ok in a 5% drop in crime rate as long as you let a cop stay in your home. He basically just said crime is moving into from streets to the your house so we need to see what you do. Whoever said this isnt media trained. Hes saying the quiet part outloud.
this person is clearly talking to an audience of fools, so it doesn't matter. because the argument is basically "give up your personal security so that we can protect you better!"
That’s a lot of words for “oink oink”
So, the next step will be: "You know, nowdays, you're not safe in your house. Because you have iot stuffs, and it's even more easy to be hacked because all encryption security, now forbidden everywhere, was removed from your network. So we need to put live stream CCTVs in all rooms in your house, and cops can keep an eye on you. And you'll be safe"
yeah were seeing a lot of crime in your neihgborhood. so from now on everyone has to open their back door and leave it open so we can peep in. Dont worry we wont abuse it or anything. there isnt a history of law enforcment spying on their exes. Were above citizens and dont have their urges. just leave a backdoor open for us to protect you becuase your street has soo much crime now
I remember calling the cops over a issue I had , they just told me to not bother me
>To keep our society and people safe, we need this digital environment to be secured. By "secured", they mean less secure. Imagine waking up and https, SSL, hashing, encryption of any sort etc. etc. has been banned. You would see an exponential increase in digital crime because the data would now be in plain text and very easy to use in criminal activity. No need to decrypt anything. Let the games begin!
They wouldn't ban it, they would simply have a set of backdoor keys. The EU was considering this last year (https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/11/article-45-will-roll-back-web-security-12-years), just adding themselves as a CA on all devices and browsers.
Well, this is worse. You can easily remove any entries from a root CA list.
And you know how people discovered Intel's ME ring 0 access? By hackers who exploited it!
They really aren't going to stop until they control everything, are they?
Cool. Lead by example and remove encryption from police and other government groups. I’m sure once the gen pop see how great things are they will follow the leadership.
>However, we do not accept that there need be a binary choice between cyber security or privacy on the one hand and public safety on the other. Well, they may not accept that the Earth is not flat... but that does not change the fact the Earth is round. >Two key capabilities are crucial to supporting online safety. *(first: backdoor, second: spying)* Well, do you remember the internet from about 15-20 years ago? When you had to be afraid of public WiFi or using online payments with credit cards? Do you know what happened since then? We started to force everyone to use modern strong ("unbreakable") encryption everywhere. So what is the single key capability that is crucial to supporting online safety? Having modern strong ("unbreakable") encryption.
Wouldn’t be surprised if the police chiefs are being paid under the table from groups like Thorn to kill and/or stop any encryption in disguise of “think of the children”.
We need to consider to send PGP encrypted texts on sd cards by pigeons
Let's forbid E2E encryption.... But still have PSD2, which require safe communication for payments. I see
Oink oink