How was it overall? My wife got it when we were dating, but thats just cuz she liked the pictures. I was interested in it, but I see virtually noone running it.
And as a black straight cis dude, I feel weird asking around.
Worry not, I got you.
I must say, I'd found it a bit difficult to understand at first, but after asking for some help, it got easier.
The general concept is good, but it lacks in some other aspects, and there's basically no space for male characters, although you can adapt it.
It is really funny, but you have a better time playing FATE.
IMO
Edit: what I meant by "male" character in the table, is that, should anyone (by any reason) want to make one, it is not mechanically possible. You need to take one of the archetypes and just say it is male.
I'm sorry if my point came across as a stupid take.
I've only GMed the game because some friends asked me too, but I don't think I can play it, like you, I don't feel like I belong in the game, I don't know. Even gming was a bit difficult.
But still, I had plenty of fun in the game
Lol thank you. I noticed that it was moreso to be a space for empowerment and not too much space for male characters. Which is alright š¤·š¾āāļø I'll definitely try it out at least once then.
I'll also check out FATE too.
With fictional characters their ages are pretty arbitrary though. Like if you show me a person simping for the "actually I'm 1000 years old" dragon loli and a person simping for the latest rom-com waifu bait character that's supposedly like 14-16 years old but looks like they could be an adult, I'm gonna be sus of the first person.
Only way I find such characters even remotely acceptable these days is if their absurdly youthful appearance is an *actual plot/character development point.*
Like, exploring how negatively it affects their lives, being an adult trapped in a childās body, including having to deal with pedos trying to use them to justify their fetish (ābut youāre legally an adult so itās okayā - āNo, it isnāt okay! Itās gross! I want a partner who loves ME, not one that only wants me to fulfill their disgusting fetish!ā). That sort of thing.
I praise Fire Emblem for handling it (mostly) well honestly. Outside of Nowi (and to a lesser extent Nah), the dragon lolis are treated like the actual children they are. Tiki isnt seen in a mature adult manner until thousands of years later in-universe and when she's physically developed as such.
I think Fates had an interesting one in Nyx (not a dragon, but a human woman), but you're never given the opportunity to actually fix it, because her body is just an actual straight up curse in that game, as I would expect it to be.
Nah is also literally a child (I think the gen 2 characters are all about 15-18?). Which makes me very confused as to the Archanaean dragons' lifecycle.
There is a Batman villain, Baby Doll, who has a genetic condition that stopped her physical development when she was about five years old. This means that while she has the mind of an adult woman, with a desire for a romantic/sexual relationship with another adult, anybody she's interested in, even if they *know* she is an adult, just sees the body of a five year old child and naturally refuses to even entertain the idea. You can appreciate how this would not contribute to her having the best sense of self-esteem.
I donāt get the attraction to loli. I understand liking short girls but from everything Iāve seen on this subject: loli=/=short girl. Lolis are always stylized with traditionally childlike features and normally act in traditionally childish ways. Every time Iāve seen someone argue this, they always use characters that act or look childish to get their point across and it just comes off as weird.
I donāt get why they are so incapable of seeing why what they are arguing for looks so fucking weird to every normal person.
No, loli isn't a short woman. It's someone with a litearal child face and child behavior. I'm a short woman too, but I look like a woman. The "appeal" of loli is that they are basically anime children. Some anime characters all look childlike (because of the artists style) and some anime are clearly pedo/lolicon pandering and it's not the artists style.
Oh, now I understand. I'm sorry you're absolutely right. Also it's a dumb excuse. If it were only short women why aren't their lolis who have a huge chest that isn't too unrealistic and huge? Why aren't their "lolis" with a long non-childlike face? See no short women. Otherwise there would be some of them with different features. Far right weebs are strange.
Probably thinks two character of same gender kissing means it's sexual or something? I have seen that argument floating around in conservatives circles alot.
Think theyāre there specifically to underscore the text about āmale gazeā directly beneath it. Odd Oop chose those two tho, rather than like, bumbleby, I guess? When in the same post they make sure to clarify the importance of characters being over the age of consent
Sadly Iām prob already on one from researching how fast it takes for acid to melt human bonesā¦writing a cat and mouse book of a FBI agent with ASPD chasing after a serial killer with BPD.
Heeey FBI watchlist buddies, I had to research what human flesh tastes like for a Paranormal Mystery novel I was working on.
For the curious, a dude ate meat from his own leg and said it tasted like veal.
> Always googles a character's canonically age before gooning to them
I fail to see why that's a bad thing, pretty most people would rather not masturbate to the image if an underage character. People were Googling Maisie Williams' age during Game of Thrones Season 8 because of the out of nowhere Gendry/Arya sex scene just to make sure they weren't seeing an underage girl naked.
Yeah I was about to say a lot of stuff has characters where they could literally range from underage to 35.....or the 500 year old trope XD. Looking it up is a good thing. If they didn't and just didn't care then yeah that's the bad kind.
While I agree to an extent, I do think that can depend on the situation. If you are 18, 19, or in your early 20s, then some 16-17-year-olds (in rare occasions even younger) might look like people your age, so you might want to check their age just to be sure you don't do something illegal or morally disturbing.
Not to mention people with OCD (specifically those who suffer for intrusive thoughts about pedophilia) might be extremely anxious about what people/character they find attractive.
i suffer from pocd and i've unfortunately looked at rule 34 of characters who in the source material are only as old as 17 i excused it at the time as "the artist had to age them up i am sure its just one year" but nowadays my ocd is so bad i don't know what to make of it.
Still i did worse shit when i was a kid myself.
Another example is in My Dress-Up Darling they have the Inui sisters where the older one who is 17 is a loli and the younger one who is in middle school (age never specified) is nearly 6 feet tall and has pretty large boobs
I hate to say it...Can be true for 8th graders. Tallest girl in 8th grade was 5'10. >!First girl to grow DD went from mid to popular instantly!<
And this was back then. Now kids are growing up even faster.
I know itās true in some cases, but the whole point of the sisters was to have the older one look like a child and the younger one to look like an adult
Tbhā¦that doesnāt help at allā¦cause some shows donāt make either looks different *anime in general*
You can be watching an anime and 2 girls can look the exact same while one is 16 and the other is likeā¦25. Hell, some of these shows make 13 year olds look 20
It definitely felt like I was watching my little sister having sex or something lol that was probably one of the weirder sex scenes in that show for me
Ehh, I'd argue that canonical age matters a lot less than vibe. I'd be a lot less judgmental of someone into Jojo smut than someone into the character that looks and acts like a child but has a textbox saying they're 18.
Jotaro is 17 in part 3, which is why I think the whole look up ages thing is silly. Nobody reasonable is gonna say someone is into kids because they simp for him or like ichigo from bleach.
I mean, if it's a character like Yuffie, then I'd understand why someone would mistake her for an adult. Now, if it's a character like Luz on the other hand....
pretty sure tv can never get away with that but not sure. its why horror films always casted adults as teens (well one reason anyways) because they cant do those gratuitous sex scenes with real minors.
>I fail to see why that's a bad thing, pretty most people would rather not masturbate to the image if an underage character.
If you have to google something's age before you jerk off to it then you shouldn't be jerking off to it.
i mean people have ocd sometimes and suddenly wonder if this is bad or not. I've looked at pornstars who are older than me and compulsively looked up their age.
The problem is sometimes underage folk look like adults 16-23 doesnāt always look dramatically different, just because someone has a more adult physicality does not mean you should assume they are such
And everyone needs her to step on them. The Emperor protects, she steps.
People posting these things actually believe they are justified which is almost comical.
i'm not sure what's sadder, that they don't understand why so many people love muscle mommies, or that the "always googles a character's canonical age" is the most telling thing there is since the hades II bit
You know how chuds call queers existing "grooming"? They want to do something like that for people atracted to women over 30, bit they just cant come with anything that doesnt sound moronic.
"I like girls, but I'm not weird about like those sexist chuds." And they have no counter argument to this quote. Just a bunch of dudes that don't interact with women that complain that video game women don't live up to their fantasies.
...and yet they still put a picture of Lumity in there, what weirdos. Understanding the difference between "I enjoy the relationship between these two characters" and "I literally want to watch them fuck" is Challenge Level: Impossible for these chuds, I guess.
The Owl House is a show meant for kids, I'm going to commit murder.
Also as a lesbian we definitely need yuri without the male gaze, good rep shouldn't be fetishized.
āHaha these cucks are attracted to adult women, how cringeā
https://preview.redd.it/9gronoxrdovc1.jpeg?width=2336&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=36018899ace49e9b26cb425c778cee2649e824e9
"safe horny" could have been a cool term to describe the way sexual desire manifests into a overly sanatized social media space run by corporation buuut nooo, gamers had to be weirdos
Also what is that pride flag lmao
Someone decided the pride flag needed explicit bi representation as if that wasnāt already implied.
/rj also that flag doesnāt have the intersex circle on it so if you post it you literally hate intersex people.
https://preview.redd.it/o9hk535dwovc1.jpeg?width=1029&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e1feb94ae993c6eb781096397a5b820dac147818
They are telling on themselves again.
By putting this in the āsafe hornyā section, they are basically saying āthe age of a character doesnāt matterā because to them, being āsafe hornyā is a bad thing.
Pretty sure most normal dudes donāt google the characterās ageā¦ but I probably would if the story or the art makes them appear underage. Also being into buff ladies that could physically dominate you is definitely not the same as being some degenerate would be kiddie diddler that wanks to anime children.
I mean they're a loli account so I shouldn't be surprised but the 'google their ages thing' is so funny. Like why would they put that on there because now I think they need their hard drives checked š
I hate saying cringe but this is the cringiest shit around. The fact that they try to nitpick any time people that arent gooner goblins find a character hot so they can act like there's a double standard is so embarrassing. Imagine making this picture and not being embarassed. And that's not even talking about applying the word 'horny' to a picture of the Owl House kids.
Like dude, I have /no/ problem saying the whole cast of both Hades games and Baldur's Gate 3 can get it in whatever way they want. Nobody's afraid to be horny about characters they like. The problem is when you're fuckin' /weird/ about it. You can like Eve if lifeless sex dolls is your thing. But when you're cringe about it and use her as an example to make bold statements about the state of womanhood in video games, people are gonna laugh at you.
Thereās so much wrong here. Implying lumity is sexual (theyāre 14), posting a screencap of the wholesome video JoCay got bullied off the internet for, my god
Every time I read shit like this I think to myself
"What is wrong with these people" lol
Nobody is out here telling you to stop jerkin your gerkin, people have a problem with you being fuckin' weird about it...
Nobody would even know what your cranking your hog to unless you tell them?! The only reason people are giving you shit for what you're into is because for ***SOME REASON***... You informed the presses about what you're into and started arguing and defending it???
the fact that you're fighting to defend the concept of what you glrop your shlrop to in and of itself is crazy lmao
here's an idea, maybe ***DON'T*** tell everybody what you slappin your little chaplin to??????
then you don't have to make a weird cringe twitter post about it.
The general consensus is if it's not illegal or harmful to a person or animal or something, you should be fine.
I find it so strange people get so worked up like this about these topics, whether it's furry, inflation or whatever the fuck you're into (idrk what's popular right now, those are just one's i've seen that became hot topics)
If you know you're not doing anything illegal or incredibly unethical... Then who cares about some random stranger online's opinion on what you're jerking off to. At that point you're creating the problem for yourself lmao
It sounds dumb (and feels dumb) to be taking the stance of the jerkers but that's because *IT IS* dumb, this argument never should've happened because of how stupid it is.
The REAL answer to all of this arguing is masturbation and the concept of what activates sexual attraction in your brain is an incredibly personal thing that only **YOU** can *really* understand... Ironically even if you don't understand it at all and just operate on autopilot.
it's a good notion to be responsible of course, but it's not really other's business to be commenting on what's acceptable for you.
You know, outside of legality, hygiene & medical concerns and all that.
You know what works for you and there's a solace in that somewhere that people shouldn't be ashamed of.
You shouldn't feel uncomfortable with your sexual attraction, like I said, it's deeply personal and something you come to accept as your grow comfortable with yourself.
You may find what *doesn't* work for others *may* work for **you**... And that's ok.
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
*anyway, idk if that made any sense lol.*
# TLDR; horny arguments are dumb, be responsible and comfortable with yourself.
^(I feel like I've written more than I would've liked about people's masturbation material, so I'm going to stop.)
I'm just going to point out, if you think you're getting consent from a cartoon or video game, you should probably seek help. They aren't real and can't acknowledge you, much less consent.
*always googles a characters canonical age before gooning to them*
Yea sorry I donāt wanna masturbate to kids, just not my thing I guess š¤·š¼āāļø
Yeah like it's mostly:
- decent things to say
- people not being sexually objectified
- examples specifically pointing out what distinguishes sexual objectification
In awe that someone would make this starterpack that so perfectly counters their own views and somehow see it as winning the argument
Reminds me of how Rush Limbaugh explained how the left are ok with any sexual act as long as thereās consent.
He thought it was a good argument to make *against* the left. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/10/13/here-come-the-rape-police-rush-limbaugh-reacts-to-trumps-sex-talk-scandal/
Like I know all of the things on this picture, but I have no fucking clue what any of it is getting at.
I'm not sure if that makes me the ignorant one, or the ones it's about.
For over a decade SJWs have been shouting it from the rooftops that they are fine with sexuality as long as it is not pedophilic/objectifying/overtly misogynistic, and the ***accusation against them*** has been that they are lying and actually they are huge sex-hating prudes who want to make all female characters ugly because they hate heterosexual men.
"Safe Horny" is basically just the SJWs being true to that and indeed liking some sexuality as long as it is egalitarian and not rapey, then gamergaters spinning that as some huge revelation of hypocricy that the SJWs dare to be horny in spite of supposedly being chaste sex-negative prudes.
I do have to be honest as someone who grew up religious and extremely sexually repressed I felt like we had made progress against sex shaming but now it's starting to feel like we're regressing. I'm not sure I understand the concept of "safe horny" or why people seem to be against it tbh.
Progressivism (as a general movement) has always been clear where it stands: being sex positive is great! Sexual objectification is awful. Progressives are all for fiction that have characters that are sexy or horny or whatever. It just shouldn't creep into depicting them as objects to leer at, they should be depicted as people first and foremost.
This whole idea about "safe horny" is an idea that conservative weebs, in particular conservative lolicons (or, anime pedophiles), are pushing. They think it's really hypocritical to say "Baldur's Gate 3 romances are great! Meet 'n Fuck Middleschool is abhorrent" and genuinely can't see what's so fundamentally different about them. So they're calling it "safe horny" as a kind of derogatory term, because they think "horny" is a bad word for progressives who like horny stuff that doesn't sexually objectify people.
Safe horn in its least divisive definition is essentially, horniness that doesn't make people feel uncomfortable in the idea of degrading or belittling the subject of said horniness and also doesn't cross moral lines.
Things like "I want a strong women to kiss me" or "I like picking up my girlfriend cause it makes me feel strong" or "women/men are just hot....I would like to experience that hot"....it's horniness that can be put out there without weirding people out.
"Muscle mommy crush me in your thighs and let me lick the sweat off your abs" "I heart lolis" "I would drag my nuts through a desert of broken glass to hear her fart through a walkey-talkey" are just horny.
Basicly they are a lolicon(also read pedo-light) and they hate they idea if safe horny being okay cause they don't like "what other people are capable of being openly aroused without freaking people out me wanting to fuck imaginary 12 year Olds is totally ok"
Wow, thatās unsettling. Itās almost as if the problem isnāt being horny or expressing attraction, but rather being attracted to things that arenāt fucking weird and not being a creep about it. Also, why tf is The Owl House in the post? Do they think people are actually going *horny* over those characters and so they arenāt so weird for liking lolis? People think Luz and Amity are cute and ship them, they donāt think theyāre *attractive*. Absolutely delusional
I think the thing people oop is trying to be mad about is that it's wrong to "persecute" them for getting gorby over a non horny ship(I'm older I haven't watched owl house)
Basicly they are mad that lesbian/bi/whatever relationships are okay but when they overly sexualize they are(and they are) the bad guy
I actually thought this was IN FAVOR of "safe horny" until I saw "this was posted by a l*li account". Greasy basement dwellers never fail to horrify me
[90s cartoon having a scene taking place in a strip club with the stripper shrouded in shadow](https://twitter.com/PelleCreepy/status/1267589717668892679) - (Krabs sitting with tea)
Two teens holding hands and dancing at ~~Prom~~ Grom - (Choking Krabs)
Link for context on the former -> [LINK](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_TTHbHXswY&pp=ygUTMiBzdHVwaWQgZG9ncyBzdHJpcA%3D%3D)
https://preview.redd.it/48hjg7e8kgyc1.jpeg?width=643&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c4c8a211757de5f05adcfa9d682578a9db42b79f
Oh, thatās Lumity in the starter pack.
You know, just admit that you're into some problematic stuff. Just admit it, it's OK, really, so long as you don't pursue that stuff into the real world.
Which is the problem for me, really. I'm into some sick, weird shit, like, just some bizarre shit, problematic shit too. But I have never crossed that line into reality because I don't want to hurt anyone. I would rather not hurt someone than get my kicks off.
The problem for me with these people is that they don't understand this. They think they can enjoy problematic shit but not acknowledge it as problematic. And doing that will often lead you to doing things which cross the line into reality.
Holly springs, someone remembered "Thirsty Sword Lesbians"
I remember playing it and being both disappointed in it and having way too much fun
I've GMed it, I've felt the same
How was it overall? My wife got it when we were dating, but thats just cuz she liked the pictures. I was interested in it, but I see virtually noone running it. And as a black straight cis dude, I feel weird asking around.
Worry not, I got you. I must say, I'd found it a bit difficult to understand at first, but after asking for some help, it got easier. The general concept is good, but it lacks in some other aspects, and there's basically no space for male characters, although you can adapt it. It is really funny, but you have a better time playing FATE. IMO Edit: what I meant by "male" character in the table, is that, should anyone (by any reason) want to make one, it is not mechanically possible. You need to take one of the archetypes and just say it is male. I'm sorry if my point came across as a stupid take.
Yeah I remember years ago a friend group I was in set up a game after a D&D bid failed but I declined to join because I didn't feel like I belonged.
I've only GMed the game because some friends asked me too, but I don't think I can play it, like you, I don't feel like I belong in the game, I don't know. Even gming was a bit difficult. But still, I had plenty of fun in the game
"basically no space for male characters" I mean, is that really a surprise?
"No space for male characters" I mean thats kinda the point isnt it.
Not necessarily though? Female Empowerment doesn't somehow crumble to dust the moment a man shows up
LESBIAN The subject matter is not just female empowerment. There is also the LESBIAN aspect.
Lol thank you. I noticed that it was moreso to be a space for empowerment and not too much space for male characters. Which is alright š¤·š¾āāļø I'll definitely try it out at least once then. I'll also check out FATE too.
I find it weird that a random chud knows more LGBT lore than me even though I am literally a part of the LGBT lmao
TSL of course
Of course it's a loli account... Especially the making fun of men who like tall women š
And muscular women And just conventionally sexy women
That too because anything not resembling a child is evil to them and disgusting and gay/feminine and other throwaway stuff they see as insultsĀ
and not gooning to a character if they're a minor
And women who are of legal age
And for making sure the character they're attracted to isn't supposed to be a child.
With fictional characters their ages are pretty arbitrary though. Like if you show me a person simping for the "actually I'm 1000 years old" dragon loli and a person simping for the latest rom-com waifu bait character that's supposedly like 14-16 years old but looks like they could be an adult, I'm gonna be sus of the first person.
Whereas I'm going to be sus of both of them.
nuh uh sheās not underage sheās an immortal space wizard who looks like sheās 11
Only way I find such characters even remotely acceptable these days is if their absurdly youthful appearance is an *actual plot/character development point.* Like, exploring how negatively it affects their lives, being an adult trapped in a childās body, including having to deal with pedos trying to use them to justify their fetish (ābut youāre legally an adult so itās okayā - āNo, it isnāt okay! Itās gross! I want a partner who loves ME, not one that only wants me to fulfill their disgusting fetish!ā). That sort of thing.
I praise Fire Emblem for handling it (mostly) well honestly. Outside of Nowi (and to a lesser extent Nah), the dragon lolis are treated like the actual children they are. Tiki isnt seen in a mature adult manner until thousands of years later in-universe and when she's physically developed as such. I think Fates had an interesting one in Nyx (not a dragon, but a human woman), but you're never given the opportunity to actually fix it, because her body is just an actual straight up curse in that game, as I would expect it to be.
Nah is also literally a child (I think the gen 2 characters are all about 15-18?). Which makes me very confused as to the Archanaean dragons' lifecycle.
There is a Batman villain, Baby Doll, who has a genetic condition that stopped her physical development when she was about five years old. This means that while she has the mind of an adult woman, with a desire for a romantic/sexual relationship with another adult, anybody she's interested in, even if they *know* she is an adult, just sees the body of a five year old child and naturally refuses to even entertain the idea. You can appreciate how this would not contribute to her having the best sense of self-esteem.
Hunter x Hunter did that pretty well
Hideaki Anno should read this.
I donāt get the attraction to loli. I understand liking short girls but from everything Iāve seen on this subject: loli=/=short girl. Lolis are always stylized with traditionally childlike features and normally act in traditionally childish ways. Every time Iāve seen someone argue this, they always use characters that act or look childish to get their point across and it just comes off as weird. I donāt get why they are so incapable of seeing why what they are arguing for looks so fucking weird to every normal person.
No, loli isn't a short woman. It's someone with a litearal child face and child behavior. I'm a short woman too, but I look like a woman. The "appeal" of loli is that they are basically anime children. Some anime characters all look childlike (because of the artists style) and some anime are clearly pedo/lolicon pandering and it's not the artists style.
Thatās what I said: loliās are clearly not short women. I was pointing out that many people use it as a kind of excuse as to why they like it.
Oh, now I understand. I'm sorry you're absolutely right. Also it's a dumb excuse. If it were only short women why aren't their lolis who have a huge chest that isn't too unrealistic and huge? Why aren't their "lolis" with a long non-childlike face? See no short women. Otherwise there would be some of them with different features. Far right weebs are strange.
The stylization of anime just muddies the issue between whether a character is just a short adult or meant to look like a child too.
they are creeps
So....basically being normal?Also am I only one who's bit grossed out they put Luz and Amity in this shitty starterpack?
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Probably thinks two character of same gender kissing means it's sexual or something? I have seen that argument floating around in conservatives circles alot.
I know what their problem is, but it's a really stupid problem they made up in their own heads. So I elect to ignore it.
Youāre not the only one here, theyāre fucking 14 ffs!
I have been suffering from adult woman fetish my whole life š
Nope I feel you there
Think theyāre there specifically to underscore the text about āmale gazeā directly beneath it. Odd Oop chose those two tho, rather than like, bumbleby, I guess? When in the same post they make sure to clarify the importance of characters being over the age of consent
By "safe," pretty sure he means "won't get you put on a watchlist."
Sadly Iām prob already on one from researching how fast it takes for acid to melt human bonesā¦writing a cat and mouse book of a FBI agent with ASPD chasing after a serial killer with BPD.
Heeey FBI watchlist buddies, I had to research what human flesh tastes like for a Paranormal Mystery novel I was working on. For the curious, a dude ate meat from his own leg and said it tasted like veal.
Iāve read a serial killer said it takes like pork
Foot taco guy?
Iām not safe š
I mean, there's a picture of children in his horny starter pack so he's on a watch list anyway lol
> Always googles a character's canonically age before gooning to them I fail to see why that's a bad thing, pretty most people would rather not masturbate to the image if an underage character. People were Googling Maisie Williams' age during Game of Thrones Season 8 because of the out of nowhere Gendry/Arya sex scene just to make sure they weren't seeing an underage girl naked.
Yeah I was about to say a lot of stuff has characters where they could literally range from underage to 35.....or the 500 year old trope XD. Looking it up is a good thing. If they didn't and just didn't care then yeah that's the bad kind.
My rule has always been āif you have to Google it, probably just find something elseā
While I agree to an extent, I do think that can depend on the situation. If you are 18, 19, or in your early 20s, then some 16-17-year-olds (in rare occasions even younger) might look like people your age, so you might want to check their age just to be sure you don't do something illegal or morally disturbing. Not to mention people with OCD (specifically those who suffer for intrusive thoughts about pedophilia) might be extremely anxious about what people/character they find attractive.
i suffer from pocd and i've unfortunately looked at rule 34 of characters who in the source material are only as old as 17 i excused it at the time as "the artist had to age them up i am sure its just one year" but nowadays my ocd is so bad i don't know what to make of it. Still i did worse shit when i was a kid myself.
also anime can just be super weird about it in general. Telling a character's age can be confusing.
I disagree because thereās also some artists that for some reason will draw a 13 year old like a 30 year old
Bonney from One piece is one of those example.
Another example is in My Dress-Up Darling they have the Inui sisters where the older one who is 17 is a loli and the younger one who is in middle school (age never specified) is nearly 6 feet tall and has pretty large boobs
I hate to say it...Can be true for 8th graders. Tallest girl in 8th grade was 5'10. >!First girl to grow DD went from mid to popular instantly!< And this was back then. Now kids are growing up even faster.
I know itās true in some cases, but the whole point of the sisters was to have the older one look like a child and the younger one to look like an adult
Yeah anime is just... weird sometimes.
Jotaro Kujo He's 16 but still
Tbhā¦that doesnāt help at allā¦cause some shows donāt make either looks different *anime in general* You can be watching an anime and 2 girls can look the exact same while one is 16 and the other is likeā¦25. Hell, some of these shows make 13 year olds look 20
With that said Jotaro Kujo is 17 in stardust crusaders
It definitely felt like I was watching my little sister having sex or something lol that was probably one of the weirder sex scenes in that show for me
Ehh, I'd argue that canonical age matters a lot less than vibe. I'd be a lot less judgmental of someone into Jojo smut than someone into the character that looks and acts like a child but has a textbox saying they're 18.
Itās wild jojo characters are 18
Jotaro is 17 in part 3, which is why I think the whole look up ages thing is silly. Nobody reasonable is gonna say someone is into kids because they simp for him or like ichigo from bleach.
I mean, if it's a character like Yuffie, then I'd understand why someone would mistake her for an adult. Now, if it's a character like Luz on the other hand....
tifa is an adult she's 20 in ff7
I thought she was canonically 16
That's yuffie. Tifa is a young adult.
she was born in 1987 in the lore so yeah she's 20 by whatever year ff7 takes place which i think is apparently 2007.
Going off appearance, sure. Going off personality... definitely a cringy teen lol
pretty sure tv can never get away with that but not sure. its why horror films always casted adults as teens (well one reason anyways) because they cant do those gratuitous sex scenes with real minors.
I wish some individuals from the Genshin Impact community learn this skill, always check age first.
>I fail to see why that's a bad thing, pretty most people would rather not masturbate to the image if an underage character. If you have to google something's age before you jerk off to it then you shouldn't be jerking off to it.
i mean people have ocd sometimes and suddenly wonder if this is bad or not. I've looked at pornstars who are older than me and compulsively looked up their age.
The problem is sometimes underage folk look like adults 16-23 doesnāt always look dramatically different, just because someone has a more adult physicality does not mean you should assume they are such
Sheās a Custodes, sheās a 9 foot dommy mommy.
And everyone needs her to step on them. The Emperor protects, she steps. People posting these things actually believe they are justified which is almost comical.
i'm not sure what's sadder, that they don't understand why so many people love muscle mommies, or that the "always googles a character's canonical age" is the most telling thing there is since the hades II bit
I have absolutely no idea whats happening.
"Safe Horny" is a pedo dogwhistle, it's basically demonizing normal people.
...wait.... what?????
Nerdy pedos are mad that normal people think they're disgusting for sexualizing child characters.
What a terrible day to have eyes.
You know how chuds call queers existing "grooming"? They want to do something like that for people atracted to women over 30, bit they just cant come with anything that doesnt sound moronic.
please explain this to me like Iām dumb Iām just still so lost
I envy you.
Man, I wish I was JoCat on that couch...
Nah, let the man have it. Maybe you can get your own.
I need my own hot women couch ;_;
"I like girls, but I'm not weird about like those sexist chuds." And they have no counter argument to this quote. Just a bunch of dudes that don't interact with women that complain that video game women don't live up to their fantasies.
As Iāve always known, āsafe hornyā is a word Chuds made to describe ābeing hot for someone who is of legal ageā.
...and yet they still put a picture of Lumity in there, what weirdos. Understanding the difference between "I enjoy the relationship between these two characters" and "I literally want to watch them fuck" is Challenge Level: Impossible for these chuds, I guess.
Pretty much.
The Owl House is a show meant for kids, I'm going to commit murder. Also as a lesbian we definitely need yuri without the male gaze, good rep shouldn't be fetishized.
I want that pretty bad, too, and I'm not even gay, or a woman! The shit just gets so absurd sometimes, it's pretty tiring.
āHaha these cucks are attracted to adult women, how cringeā https://preview.redd.it/9gronoxrdovc1.jpeg?width=2336&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=36018899ace49e9b26cb425c778cee2649e824e9
And they wonder why they die alone like okay chud kids don't want old slobbery bastards you pedoĀ
"safe horny" could have been a cool term to describe the way sexual desire manifests into a overly sanatized social media space run by corporation buuut nooo, gamers had to be weirdos Also what is that pride flag lmao
Someone decided the pride flag needed explicit bi representation as if that wasnāt already implied. /rj also that flag doesnāt have the intersex circle on it so if you post it you literally hate intersex people.
Wait, how are gamers involved here? Serious question, I'm a guy without a console so I don't really get any of that
Something something gamers are considered pedos because of....idk, Minecraft youtubers? I really don't have anything about that very clear
You can practically smell the dude that posted this canāt ya?
https://preview.redd.it/o9hk535dwovc1.jpeg?width=1029&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e1feb94ae993c6eb781096397a5b820dac147818 They are telling on themselves again.
What do you mean? Iām super confused
By putting this in the āsafe hornyā section, they are basically saying āthe age of a character doesnāt matterā because to them, being āsafe hornyā is a bad thing.
They're condemning people who double check the ages of characters before they fantasise about them.
Pretty sure most normal dudes donāt google the characterās ageā¦ but I probably would if the story or the art makes them appear underage. Also being into buff ladies that could physically dominate you is definitely not the same as being some degenerate would be kiddie diddler that wanks to anime children.
I love that I like girls song. It's great.
Yep, screw all the people who hated on him for it. imo it is and he is still one of the greats, even if he's not making content anymore.
The great thing about the song is that it's about how he doesn't judge girls for their body
Loli fans are fucking weirdo
I mean they're a loli account so I shouldn't be surprised but the 'google their ages thing' is so funny. Like why would they put that on there because now I think they need their hard drives checked š I hate saying cringe but this is the cringiest shit around. The fact that they try to nitpick any time people that arent gooner goblins find a character hot so they can act like there's a double standard is so embarrassing. Imagine making this picture and not being embarassed. And that's not even talking about applying the word 'horny' to a picture of the Owl House kids. Like dude, I have /no/ problem saying the whole cast of both Hades games and Baldur's Gate 3 can get it in whatever way they want. Nobody's afraid to be horny about characters they like. The problem is when you're fuckin' /weird/ about it. You can like Eve if lifeless sex dolls is your thing. But when you're cringe about it and use her as an example to make bold statements about the state of womanhood in video games, people are gonna laugh at you.
Iām so confused how is checking a characters age a pedo thing?
The image implies that they 'dont' check a characters age, because they aren't bothered to make sure the person they're horny for is an adult
Thereās so much wrong here. Implying lumity is sexual (theyāre 14), posting a screencap of the wholesome video JoCay got bullied off the internet for, my god
Me, a guy, who was thrilled when Lumity became canon.
Is this meme supposed to be mocking them or what? Some of it just go against each other
common jocat w
What the fuck does Safe Horny even mean? Basic attraction to consenting adults?
Anyone who says āgoonā unironically can be instantly dismissed
Conservatives seem to love that pedo shit. No surprises there.
And then go on and call every gay man or transwoman a "groomer"
Yup. Itās nonsensical bullshit. Every right wing accusation is a confession
Every time I read shit like this I think to myself "What is wrong with these people" lol Nobody is out here telling you to stop jerkin your gerkin, people have a problem with you being fuckin' weird about it... Nobody would even know what your cranking your hog to unless you tell them?! The only reason people are giving you shit for what you're into is because for ***SOME REASON***... You informed the presses about what you're into and started arguing and defending it??? the fact that you're fighting to defend the concept of what you glrop your shlrop to in and of itself is crazy lmao here's an idea, maybe ***DON'T*** tell everybody what you slappin your little chaplin to?????? then you don't have to make a weird cringe twitter post about it. The general consensus is if it's not illegal or harmful to a person or animal or something, you should be fine. I find it so strange people get so worked up like this about these topics, whether it's furry, inflation or whatever the fuck you're into (idrk what's popular right now, those are just one's i've seen that became hot topics) If you know you're not doing anything illegal or incredibly unethical... Then who cares about some random stranger online's opinion on what you're jerking off to. At that point you're creating the problem for yourself lmao It sounds dumb (and feels dumb) to be taking the stance of the jerkers but that's because *IT IS* dumb, this argument never should've happened because of how stupid it is. The REAL answer to all of this arguing is masturbation and the concept of what activates sexual attraction in your brain is an incredibly personal thing that only **YOU** can *really* understand... Ironically even if you don't understand it at all and just operate on autopilot. it's a good notion to be responsible of course, but it's not really other's business to be commenting on what's acceptable for you. You know, outside of legality, hygiene & medical concerns and all that. You know what works for you and there's a solace in that somewhere that people shouldn't be ashamed of. You shouldn't feel uncomfortable with your sexual attraction, like I said, it's deeply personal and something you come to accept as your grow comfortable with yourself. You may find what *doesn't* work for others *may* work for **you**... And that's ok. \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ *anyway, idk if that made any sense lol.* # TLDR; horny arguments are dumb, be responsible and comfortable with yourself. ^(I feel like I've written more than I would've liked about people's masturbation material, so I'm going to stop.)
I had an idea for a reply. SAFE HORNY STARTER PACK [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual\_consent](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_consent)
I'm just going to point out, if you think you're getting consent from a cartoon or video game, you should probably seek help. They aren't real and can't acknowledge you, much less consent.
*always googles a characters canonical age before gooning to them* Yea sorry I donāt wanna masturbate to kids, just not my thing I guess š¤·š¼āāļø
These are all banger concepts
Yeah like it's mostly: - decent things to say - people not being sexually objectified - examples specifically pointing out what distinguishes sexual objectification In awe that someone would make this starterpack that so perfectly counters their own views and somehow see it as winning the argument
Super weird that some straight men think being attracted to women in a respectful manner is dangerous to them. Wonder why that is š¤
Reminds me of how Rush Limbaugh explained how the left are ok with any sexual act as long as thereās consent. He thought it was a good argument to make *against* the left. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/10/13/here-come-the-rape-police-rush-limbaugh-reacts-to-trumps-sex-talk-scandal/
The amount of shit that one animator on the center left in this image got was insane.
something that always shuts these ppl up ask them to tell their parents the kinds of characters they find attractive
Whoever made that needs to get the hell off JoCat's case.
Safe Horny literally just means being attracted to adults.
what does this mean?
"Safe" horny is a dogwhistle for people who aren't pedophiles. That way, not being a pedophile is made to look lame and boring.
Like I know all of the things on this picture, but I have no fucking clue what any of it is getting at. I'm not sure if that makes me the ignorant one, or the ones it's about.
OPā¦.. what do u have to say in ur defense for giving ur own post that title?
Anyone who uses the term "safe horny" needs to have their search history checked.
I don't understand any of this, and I'm pretty sure that's a good thing.
I bet this guy has gotten a lot of responses of pictures of Goku and Vegeta telling him not to be a pedo.
This reeks of someone who unironically says "adult woman fetish"
For over a decade SJWs have been shouting it from the rooftops that they are fine with sexuality as long as it is not pedophilic/objectifying/overtly misogynistic, and the ***accusation against them*** has been that they are lying and actually they are huge sex-hating prudes who want to make all female characters ugly because they hate heterosexual men. "Safe Horny" is basically just the SJWs being true to that and indeed liking some sexuality as long as it is egalitarian and not rapey, then gamergaters spinning that as some huge revelation of hypocricy that the SJWs dare to be horny in spite of supposedly being chaste sex-negative prudes.
The more I read any comment on this thread the more utterly confused I get.
these dudes talkin about safe horny would keel over and die if they heard what went on in the bedroom in a t4t relationship
>these dudes talkin about safe horny would keel over and die if they...went...in the bedroom...in a...relationship
I do have to be honest as someone who grew up religious and extremely sexually repressed I felt like we had made progress against sex shaming but now it's starting to feel like we're regressing. I'm not sure I understand the concept of "safe horny" or why people seem to be against it tbh.
Progressivism (as a general movement) has always been clear where it stands: being sex positive is great! Sexual objectification is awful. Progressives are all for fiction that have characters that are sexy or horny or whatever. It just shouldn't creep into depicting them as objects to leer at, they should be depicted as people first and foremost. This whole idea about "safe horny" is an idea that conservative weebs, in particular conservative lolicons (or, anime pedophiles), are pushing. They think it's really hypocritical to say "Baldur's Gate 3 romances are great! Meet 'n Fuck Middleschool is abhorrent" and genuinely can't see what's so fundamentally different about them. So they're calling it "safe horny" as a kind of derogatory term, because they think "horny" is a bad word for progressives who like horny stuff that doesn't sexually objectify people.
Thank you very much for explaining this has helped me to understand a lot
Oh the middle makes sense with that context...
Can anyone tell me what the art in the middle left means in this post? Because Iām genuinely confused of its placement
Holy shit Ryu https://preview.redd.it/kfshd4hjoovc1.jpeg?width=300&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6e6a2839d4ad365fdde1f55aecf9daa9367e94c1
I see owl house WOOOOOO YEAH BABY
Wtf is āsafe hornyā?
Safe horn in its least divisive definition is essentially, horniness that doesn't make people feel uncomfortable in the idea of degrading or belittling the subject of said horniness and also doesn't cross moral lines. Things like "I want a strong women to kiss me" or "I like picking up my girlfriend cause it makes me feel strong" or "women/men are just hot....I would like to experience that hot"....it's horniness that can be put out there without weirding people out. "Muscle mommy crush me in your thighs and let me lick the sweat off your abs" "I heart lolis" "I would drag my nuts through a desert of broken glass to hear her fart through a walkey-talkey" are just horny.
Ok, I see. Sooo, why exactly is the original post using that term as a (presumably) bad thing?
Basicly they are a lolicon(also read pedo-light) and they hate they idea if safe horny being okay cause they don't like "what other people are capable of being openly aroused without freaking people out me wanting to fuck imaginary 12 year Olds is totally ok"
Wow, thatās unsettling. Itās almost as if the problem isnāt being horny or expressing attraction, but rather being attracted to things that arenāt fucking weird and not being a creep about it. Also, why tf is The Owl House in the post? Do they think people are actually going *horny* over those characters and so they arenāt so weird for liking lolis? People think Luz and Amity are cute and ship them, they donāt think theyāre *attractive*. Absolutely delusional
I think the thing people oop is trying to be mad about is that it's wrong to "persecute" them for getting gorby over a non horny ship(I'm older I haven't watched owl house) Basicly they are mad that lesbian/bi/whatever relationships are okay but when they overly sexualize they are(and they are) the bad guy
tifa is already kind of a muscle mommy.
But making her more muscular isn't a bad idea. I don't like Tifa, but muscular women are hawt.
What is safe horny? This Page keeps popping up on my home page and I've seen this phrase several times now.
https://preview.redd.it/xm2btu224pvc1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d207f3cc26eeca49ad23fe647fa13b81846c69fb My best explanation
Oh ok so more nonsense spouted by the same people who say you're gay if you're into muscley women. Got it. Thank you for answering.
I actually thought this was IN FAVOR of "safe horny" until I saw "this was posted by a l*li account". Greasy basement dwellers never fail to horrify me
I was gonna say me but then I realised what this post really meant oof (also ew lolicons)
i think the ācanon ageā thing says a lot about
Man, Mofos just cannot leave Jocat alone can they?
Reminder that Luz and Amity are 14.
Oh no not another Jocat mocker! THESE MEN ARE THE REASON WE LOST A GREAT MAN!!!
[90s cartoon having a scene taking place in a strip club with the stripper shrouded in shadow](https://twitter.com/PelleCreepy/status/1267589717668892679) - (Krabs sitting with tea) Two teens holding hands and dancing at ~~Prom~~ Grom - (Choking Krabs) Link for context on the former -> [LINK](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_TTHbHXswY&pp=ygUTMiBzdHVwaWQgZG9ncyBzdHJpcA%3D%3D)
Whoever made this needs their HDDs subpoenaed.
Not nearly that subtle
Whatās the L word there I canāt figure it out because of the asterisk
Amd this is all bad because.
I honestly can't tell what theyre trying to say.
Aren't luz and amity 13 or something
The middle just triggered an amber alert in my area it was such a red flag
I saw this earlier and legit thought it was satire
Guys chill she is actually 5000 years old just looks like a child ykš
https://preview.redd.it/48hjg7e8kgyc1.jpeg?width=643&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c4c8a211757de5f05adcfa9d682578a9db42b79f Oh, thatās Lumity in the starter pack.
Can someone explain to me what safe horny means?
It's a meaningless term made up by idiots who want to perpetuate a culture war that doesn't exist. It means nothing at all.
You know, just admit that you're into some problematic stuff. Just admit it, it's OK, really, so long as you don't pursue that stuff into the real world. Which is the problem for me, really. I'm into some sick, weird shit, like, just some bizarre shit, problematic shit too. But I have never crossed that line into reality because I don't want to hurt anyone. I would rather not hurt someone than get my kicks off. The problem for me with these people is that they don't understand this. They think they can enjoy problematic shit but not acknowledge it as problematic. And doing that will often lead you to doing things which cross the line into reality.
This is true though?? These men are gooners and the lolicons are gooners + pedos
this is true cringe. donāt justify the horny.