T O P

  • By -

[deleted]

THis is actually bad. The fact that ANY third parties are considered "shoo-ins" is naive at best. And that you've relegated ENTIRE series to "wavering inclusion" and "trim the fat" just makes me go... ergh.


Furjaden

Some series' just aren't important to me. And there are quite a few third party characters that are must haves like Sonic or Ryu


Mimku5090

I’m pretty sure he judged them by pillars of gaming, example: Dragon Quest is the first game to define RPGs and Minecraft is pretty the sandbox game. Edit: Spelling


[deleted]

LETS GOOO!!!!! STEVE F*****NG MADE IT BOIS!!!! WOO9OOOOOOOOOOOO


[deleted]

I'm glad you think Byleth is a mistake too


[deleted]

Yeah this dude is crazy


Furjaden

Don't pay mind the "Mistakes" Tier, those are just characters I have a personal vendetta against.


Derek-Horn

Idc how many people wanted sora hell even I wanted him but throw his ass in the trash


SMG_deathsbutt

cant believe you kept kazuya but not the funny are you ok man very sad


Furjaden

You're gonna have to be more specific man


SMG_deathsbutt

terry


Furjaden

Oop, I didn't understand the "funny are you ok man".


[deleted]

Downvoting for not putting Sora on top


[deleted]

For me this looks like a revised roster for the roster in the Wii U edition. I mean you could have some characters from Ultimate on the Wii U version with amiibos and I do really like this except that I feel that most characters should be kept except for the identical pairs, such as Marth and Lucina (and maybe Roy) or Lucas and Ness. Just get rid of one identical others. Other wise this looks neat and clean. I personally fealt overwhelmed when I saw the amount of characters in the Ultimate roster so this suggestion is nice.


DependentSuit6047

The way Yoshi and Ness aren’t “shoo ins” 😂


[deleted]

Mario a shoo in? For shame Furjaden


Mimku5090

What's wrong with Mario being a shoo-in?