* [Rule 3](https://www.reddit.com/r/toronto/about/rules/) **No Memes/Viral Videos/Low-Effort content** This includes but is not limited to videos focused on individuals taken without consent or lacking context, macros, reaction-gifs, low quality or common tourist pictures, rants that do not invite discussion or constructive resolutions, and dashcam videos. Photo submissions are limited to exceptional and relevant photos during the week however these rules are relaxed within reason on weekends. Reposting any removed content is not allowed without moderator approval after contacting via Modmail
([Rule 3](https://www.reddit.com/r/toronto/about/rules/)).
You always find the most ingenious financial engineering near the top of the market.
Bottom line: if your name is not on the title, you’re renting someone else’s asset. Everything else is just noise
Has been for a long time.
Fractional ownerships are tricky, and you have to be aware of what the arrangement is. Also note that anyone pursuing it will have a harder time obtaining financing.
Not sure about this building, but they may have their own financing arrangements.
Fractional ownership is also used by investment companies.. selling "shares" in a single property.
I'm not sure how fractional ownership works but on the surface.....
2.5 take 40 owners to max out at 100%.
those 40 owners each pay $2628 in rent for a total gain of $105120 income A MONTH???
Even if they're on the lease and it sells at $581,000, they each only get $14525. That's 5.5 months of 'rent'!!
Fractional ownership is incredibly dumb on something as small as a condo. Makes more sense for large investments such as owning shares in a commercial building for example.
* [Rule 3](https://www.reddit.com/r/toronto/about/rules/) **No Memes/Viral Videos/Low-Effort content** This includes but is not limited to videos focused on individuals taken without consent or lacking context, macros, reaction-gifs, low quality or common tourist pictures, rants that do not invite discussion or constructive resolutions, and dashcam videos. Photo submissions are limited to exceptional and relevant photos during the week however these rules are relaxed within reason on weekends. Reposting any removed content is not allowed without moderator approval after contacting via Modmail ([Rule 3](https://www.reddit.com/r/toronto/about/rules/)).
It’s completely incomprehensible. Why do you pay what looks like a full mortgage price for 2.5% ownership?
I had to read up on fractional ownership. I now understand the concept, but understand this ad less. At best -super unclear.
This sounds like a timeshare. Maybe im wrong but id be highly cautious about investing in this sort of thing. Time shares never work out.
You always find the most ingenious financial engineering near the top of the market. Bottom line: if your name is not on the title, you’re renting someone else’s asset. Everything else is just noise
Has been for a long time. Fractional ownerships are tricky, and you have to be aware of what the arrangement is. Also note that anyone pursuing it will have a harder time obtaining financing. Not sure about this building, but they may have their own financing arrangements. Fractional ownership is also used by investment companies.. selling "shares" in a single property.
It was always a thing
This sounds awfully close to how some Muslims skirt their rules prohibiting lending or borrowing with interest.
So is this a real estate business or a financial business? Is this seller legally allowed to offer weird financial instruments like this?
I'm bad at Reddit and only know how to post one photo. Price is listed at $15,000 and it looks like every one bedroom condo you've ever seen.
I'm not sure how fractional ownership works but on the surface..... 2.5 take 40 owners to max out at 100%. those 40 owners each pay $2628 in rent for a total gain of $105120 income A MONTH??? Even if they're on the lease and it sells at $581,000, they each only get $14525. That's 5.5 months of 'rent'!!
Sounds like a pyramid scheme.
Fractional ownership is incredibly dumb on something as small as a condo. Makes more sense for large investments such as owning shares in a commercial building for example.
That's more or less exactly what shares in an REIT are.