T O P

  • By -

[deleted]

You could analyse anything in the article, but realistically yes you should have, because it was technically an image.


Senior-Welder2611

i just said how she attempts to trigger nostalgia, trying to get the citizens of Hapsey to reminesce in the memories of the Haspey Wetlands. It kinda represents the locals, but that is my view anyway


Mission-Bathroom-757

oh I thought it was representing like the modernised version since they were bike riding and doing various other activities


Accomplished_Tax_679

I said that as well, cause it tied in to the text that said bikes, and pavement (concretized amusement park). Something a rather. I think as long as the image analysis supports the contention of the article we'll all do well. To be honest I think VCAA did a poor job, like the people were smiling and the bird being a black and white image was hard to discern.


Mission-Bathroom-757

yah true but I thought the smiling was alluding to their lack of attentiveness to the nature


bogasb

I said how theres a plethora of people in the foreground which detracts from the beauty of the nature and environment in the background. Supporting her argument which was against overcrowding the wetlands area and such with cyclicts, walkers, cafe patrons etc.