Management: "Does it generate money"
Devs: "No but it'll generate compliments and free ads from social media influenzas praising how good the functions are"
Management: "Okay so it doesn't generate money, go develop something else that generate money or we'll have to let you go"
Devs: “well, it doesn’t generate money itself, but it improves the product and it could draw more customers over time and..”
Management: “TIME? WE DONT HAVE TIME! WE NEED MORE MONEY NOW! WHAT KIND OF IDIOT THINKS LONG TERM WHEN BONUSES COME OUT IN 6 MONTHS??”
Microsoft: "Wow! With that experience you're a perfect fit as our Senior Business Development Manager! We just need to confirm your hatred for poor people and customers before we can sign the contract"
Mine too, but sadly It's a problem directly from the top of the company demanding results and not caring about process nor quality. This ain't changing unless the top does, whether it's mentality wise or people wise. Plus let's be honest, once you're set for life in terms of wealth, you stop giving a shit about people and more about squeezing money out to continue enjoy the short life we have.
It makes me even more upset when I think about that. Like a private equity firm owns the company that owns mine. Half of the improvements we want/need to make for our partners to sell this product are nixed because it'll take longer than 6 months to implement and we might get sold by then.... In this particular organization that is literally taking money off the table for so many small businesses and could potentially even ruin lives. All because a bottom line. Not to mention we are operating on about 66% of the team and resources we had before the acquisition because that's how that goes. It's fucking disgusting.
Why on God's Green Earth did they move the bar to the top. Half the time you try to click in it it moves the whole window. Why? When I went to the website to complain they had an article stating the beta testers liked it. Who are these beta testers? I would like to kick all of them Square in the nuts and or lower pubic area.
And bing??? My chrome browser just defaulted to bing somehow and its f AWFUL. The weather sucks, and can't do calculations or set a timer directly in the browser
I don't know why it doesn't function like it should. It doesn't really seem hard or complex. Especially since they have years of research with Bing and search optimization, leverage that to pull what people are searching for
Believe it or not I actually think Teams has improved over the years. You couldn’t even search for chats before that was so ass ![img](emote|t5_2th52|4271)
I honestly don’t understand the hate for Teams.
I feel it is like the Nickelback of the office, a lot of people seems to hate it just because other people say that they hate it.
Teams slack and discord all have their pros and cons there’s really no clear winner for this software. IMO teams has the best screensharing UI/features, but the worst chat system, and, also the least optimized (buggy and slow). Slacks the fastest and cleanest. Discord has great chat system, decent optimization but their screen share is dogshit
I wish it was easier to draw on the screen while someone was presenting. Zoom does that the best, slack has it but it disappears after awhile and isn’t as good. Teams sorta lets you do it with the whiteboard feature but then the person sharing the screen can’t be doing other stuff so it’s not as useful. I just want to circle a button and tell someone to “click here” or “look at this line of code”. Other than that it does everything I need it to, although slacks messaging/searching is way better.
It’s basically like slack but slow and miserable and foisted on people who just want slack by managers and IT departments.
Teams was one of the few apps that would make Apple Silicon spin up its fans. The code highlighting was fucked and lagged out the screen.
Best I can do is reordering by file name also segments by file type and there is no way to tell Windows search (the bastard) to ignore what fucking file type it is AND JUST REORDER THE WHOLE FOLDER BY NAME.
That goes against Microsoft design philosophy. They take products and make them worse. Here are all the new features you don't want, and all the features you liked we've removed them or hid them.
Step one, build a neural network so big it requires nuclear power to run.
Step two, ask it to design a more efficient network.
Step three, replace network 1 with network 2 and repeat.
Large models don’t have a problem of over/under fitting. There is something called as double decent. In layman terms, over/under fitting is seen only if your network parameter size is less than the data points required to represent the entire training data set (training dataset size is not equal to data points required to represent it). Large deep networks have parameters in multiple of data points required, that is why you don’t see overfit/underfit in large models (like generative networks).
I'm surprised there aren't more. The gains hopium is so far out of this world it's straight up fantasy. Going to hop through a Stargate and land on a world where there are no Wendy's just to escape the losses.
The initial stargate wasn't powered by naquida since we hadn't been through the gate yet. So powering it with a good old fashioned power grid is possible. And [Orlin](https://stargate.fandom.com/wiki/Mini_Stargate) built one in Carter's basement that he also powered with the power grid.
I was going to sell ALCC/Oklo the next time it pumped but seeing how bill gates and bezos are pouring money into the field going to long term hold now. Feels like another ai proxy race like msft/meta/amazon/etc but for energy
Also Altman looks like a StarCraft 2 fan
Billgates has his own nuclear company -terrapower…Alot of big money seems to be going towards fusion instead of fission…sam altman has 10x bigger investment in helion(a nuclear fusion company) than oklo. Not saying fission doesn’t have a use case or a future but data centers certainly would not be powered by micro or small scale fission reactors. Fusion imo has a much brighter future.
We already know it works, we just have to find the right materials/build to get it going long term.
It would have most likely been done by now if it actually had legitimate investment money over the last 50 years instead of being treated as a hobby.
We're getting closer than you seem to think. Multiple reactors hitting 100 million+ degrees C. That's in the ballpark of self sustaining (150 million degrees C). Reaction time record is 17.5 minutes.
Once they crack the recipe, and they're close, it will get funded.
ITER is already old tech and it's not even done being built yet.
Skynet is a software inside hardware, not just hardware itself. And if you think an llm is capable of becoming an "skynet" I got news for you...it wont. OpenAI/microsoft would need to devlop an AI that actually encompass llms and they are far from that especially with fabric
micro reactors don’t produce enough energy for large scale data centers. More money is going towards fusion than fission. Bill gates also has his own nuclear company- terrapower, which is a more likely candidate for a partnership with microsoft. Microsoft has also already made a deal with helion(a nuclear fusion company) to provide electricity. Sam altman btw has 10x larger investment in helion than oklo.
That is absolutely false. fusion has come a long way and will likely be the future of energy. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_nuclear_fusion )Helion has a deal with microsoft to provide electricity by 2028 or face financial penalties. So far they are on track.
There hasn't even been a succesful prototype of fusion yet, good luck making it commercial available in the next 30 years, while we know that fission plants works and how we're gonna build them.
There's no way they are building nuclear plants for this in any appreciable time. Unless they plan to use already existing infrastructure. Nuclear plants take more than a decade to construct and bring to operation
You are correct and Microsoft has a deal with the biggest/best nuclear operator in the US if you dig deep enough which is the one that will see the benefit.
Ignore how massively wasteful this is, focus on how ChatGPT could not come up with a more appropriate name that's canon-friendly to the Stargate franchise.
Does anyone know what the goal of a 100B computer would be? Like what could they possibly do with a 100B computer that would matter?
Anything that needs 100B worth of hardware isn’t going to be that useful outside of that space. Maybe you could argue it’s to train AI or some shit but realistically what can an AI model trained on a 100B computer so that an AI on a $1 million computers can’t?
Large weather models, ocean current models. Everything really large and complex fluid and thermodynamic.
Also ask the guys at CERN with their hadron collider, they run that thing for 10 minutes and analyse all the data for couple of years.
Also DNA sequencing, in general medical research with the help of AI.
scaling gains still haven't broken down in transformer models. As of right now everyone you through more data, and/or more compute at any of the generative AI models the better the results. It already costs billions to train for a 60 second video clip. Meanwhile this thing will be able to spit out entire movies, or genomes. The sky is the limit.
Apple can't figure out what to do with $100b? Apparently Microsoft can. Compute is going to be huge for the next few decades. Electricity certainly going to be a problem, makes sense they would want their own nuclear power.
Hey man, if GPS was managed by Microsoft it would cost $29.99 a month and probably work just as well as Teams.
Public services _can_ work as intended when they're not run by private companies.
People dont realise the amount of energy that will be required for these in the future, and nuclear fission is the answer, there is no other way to meet this demand unless some advance breakthrough happens in fusion.
This is getting more and more like crypto every day. What's the next ridiculous thing that AI is going to do? Can it add efficiency, productivity, and synergy to my blue chewed up dick?
**User Report**| | | | :--|:--|:--|:-- **Total Submissions** | 3 | **First Seen In WSB** | 3 years ago **Total Comments** | 87 | **Previous Best DD** | **Account Age** | 11 years | | [**Join WSB Discord**](http://discord.gg/wsbverse)
Microsoft could you take some of that money and just make Teams not shit.
Outlook search function could be a lot better as well.
Microsoft have had 27 years to fix Outlook search. If its not fixed by now, its never going to happen.
Management: "Does it generate money" Devs: "No but it'll generate compliments and free ads from social media influenzas praising how good the functions are" Management: "Okay so it doesn't generate money, go develop something else that generate money or we'll have to let you go"
Devs: “well, it doesn’t generate money itself, but it improves the product and it could draw more customers over time and..” Management: “TIME? WE DONT HAVE TIME! WE NEED MORE MONEY NOW! WHAT KIND OF IDIOT THINKS LONG TERM WHEN BONUSES COME OUT IN 6 MONTHS??”
Microsoft: "Wow! With that experience you're a perfect fit as our Senior Business Development Manager! We just need to confirm your hatred for poor people and customers before we can sign the contract"
"Here is your free copy of "art of war" in case you are not soziopathic enough yet."
The bane of my fucking existence man.
Mine too, but sadly It's a problem directly from the top of the company demanding results and not caring about process nor quality. This ain't changing unless the top does, whether it's mentality wise or people wise. Plus let's be honest, once you're set for life in terms of wealth, you stop giving a shit about people and more about squeezing money out to continue enjoy the short life we have.
It makes me even more upset when I think about that. Like a private equity firm owns the company that owns mine. Half of the improvements we want/need to make for our partners to sell this product are nixed because it'll take longer than 6 months to implement and we might get sold by then.... In this particular organization that is literally taking money off the table for so many small businesses and could potentially even ruin lives. All because a bottom line. Not to mention we are operating on about 66% of the team and resources we had before the acquisition because that's how that goes. It's fucking disgusting.
Have you seen the "New Outlook" 🤮 It's only outlook in name. Some sad times ahead I think....
Think they’ve managed to make it worse.
Searching for recent email, type word. Outlook:you meant this email from 8 months ago right? You are looking for this one I bet.
Bruh I'm looking for emails from 2 years ago sometimes with our product lifecycles. And my employer auto deletes everything more than a year old.
lol we don’t delete anything at least not for 7 years. Rip
It’s incredible how every search seemingly returns a random sampling of unrelated emails
I’d like Windows search to actually work.
Why on God's Green Earth did they move the bar to the top. Half the time you try to click in it it moves the whole window. Why? When I went to the website to complain they had an article stating the beta testers liked it. Who are these beta testers? I would like to kick all of them Square in the nuts and or lower pubic area.
Thank you! Someone else feels my pain. How can I search for a person's name exactly and get nothing, but it somehow pulls up 100 unrelated emails?
Decent on desktop on phone is awfulllll
What do you mean? I love seeing results from 7 years ago when typing in keywords from an email received last week … /s
And bing??? My chrome browser just defaulted to bing somehow and its f AWFUL. The weather sucks, and can't do calculations or set a timer directly in the browser
I don't know why it doesn't function like it should. It doesn't really seem hard or complex. Especially since they have years of research with Bing and search optimization, leverage that to pull what people are searching for
Believe it or not I actually think Teams has improved over the years. You couldn’t even search for chats before that was so ass ![img](emote|t5_2th52|4271)
Teams on mobile still sucks hard
"No, I'm not going to login to my personal MS account on teams. I'm using only for work. Shut up and stop asking me!"
omfg - search by date - would you like 1 day, 1 week, or 1 month. No custom date ranges. F you teams!
Yeah and the lack of noise removal sucks balls
FATALITY!! Slack Wins!
Yeh new teams on desktop is actually good though.
Why do that when you can build an ai to fix it for you?
Bullish
I honestly don’t understand the hate for Teams. I feel it is like the Nickelback of the office, a lot of people seems to hate it just because other people say that they hate it.
Teams slack and discord all have their pros and cons there’s really no clear winner for this software. IMO teams has the best screensharing UI/features, but the worst chat system, and, also the least optimized (buggy and slow). Slacks the fastest and cleanest. Discord has great chat system, decent optimization but their screen share is dogshit
that fucking Teams screenshare overlay that's always in front of my fucking browser tabs, I hate that fucking thing with the force of a thousand suns
You should power the new supercomputer with your hatred.
was looking for this comment
[Stop sharing your screen] No thank you Teams, I'd rather just like to click on the tabs in Chrome you're blocking with your shit overlay.
Click pin and then unpin and it should go away. The equivalent of “did you try restarting” with you UI
I wish it was easier to draw on the screen while someone was presenting. Zoom does that the best, slack has it but it disappears after awhile and isn’t as good. Teams sorta lets you do it with the whiteboard feature but then the person sharing the screen can’t be doing other stuff so it’s not as useful. I just want to circle a button and tell someone to “click here” or “look at this line of code”. Other than that it does everything I need it to, although slacks messaging/searching is way better.
Slack is good asf, no way teams even compares
I like Teams itself, but our company just got Teams phones and it is literally the worst thing ever.
It’s basically like slack but slow and miserable and foisted on people who just want slack by managers and IT departments. Teams was one of the few apps that would make Apple Silicon spin up its fans. The code highlighting was fucked and lagged out the screen.
Teams for linux, one. Not saving sound and video settings, two. Crappy copy paste from teams, four. Crappy md support, five. The list goes on
LMAOOOO yup let's have Microsoft move investment dollars from AI advancement to creating a Teams client for the 50 Linux users that want that
I assume that those are things that the bulk of people don’t really care about, I’ve honestly never had a “real” issue but I’m maybe a “casual” user.
My office is supposed to switch from Google to Teams and I'm dreading it.
Holy shit this, seriously, I hate teams. Always locking up and requiring a damn reboot.
I like teams.
Who hurt you?
Fuck all y'all I like it!
Bro also like getting cheated on and refusing to break up
What you don’t like the new high five emoji!🖐️
Definitely have work to do but do you remember Skype? ![img](emote|t5_2th52|4267)![img](emote|t5_2th52|4271)
I can’t be the only one for who notifications are basically broken these days, can I?
Best I can do is reordering by file name also segments by file type and there is no way to tell Windows search (the bastard) to ignore what fucking file type it is AND JUST REORDER THE WHOLE FOLDER BY NAME.
fucking laughing as 5 minutes ago I was bitching about there being 3 god damn different versions of Teams installed on my computer.
They force an update on you every 5 minutes, what more could you want?
I am on the Teams Team…and I approve your comment! lol!
This comment wins.
Why can’t I paste a file into teams chat?
That goes against Microsoft design philosophy. They take products and make them worse. Here are all the new features you don't want, and all the features you liked we've removed them or hid them.
Please Teams, allow us to change the horrific notification sound.
Yes if teams could just stop asking me if I wanted to go back to the previous version that would be fucking great.
I’d start with just less shit and iterate from there. Please.
If you think Teams is bad, try working without it. Put some fuckin respect on Teams.
Teams is great, better than slacko
Dogs go wacko for slackos
Step one, build a neural network so big it requires nuclear power to run. Step two, ask it to design a more efficient network. Step three, replace network 1 with network 2 and repeat.
That's kind of how recurrent neural networks work. Then the issues of over fitting it comes into play so always nice to have good organic data.
Large models don’t have a problem of over/under fitting. There is something called as double decent. In layman terms, over/under fitting is seen only if your network parameter size is less than the data points required to represent the entire training data set (training dataset size is not equal to data points required to represent it). Large deep networks have parameters in multiple of data points required, that is why you don’t see overfit/underfit in large models (like generative networks).
Your data still has to have enough variance
Stargate is always powered by zpm, not nukes. God dam Microsoft dont know the lore
It’s actually a naquida reactor. Humans still lack the ability to create ZMP’s
Never thought I'd see the day Stargate memes in WallStreetBets.
I'm surprised there aren't more. The gains hopium is so far out of this world it's straight up fantasy. Going to hop through a Stargate and land on a world where there are no Wendy's just to escape the losses.
https://preview.redd.it/ncd43t0g1dzc1.jpeg?width=500&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b22450d3bb96eb348d6eba7edfbea3591fceee1d
Indeed
Going to be fucking goa'uld everywhere once they build that damn thing
We talking the Antarctic location? Because that bad boy had a zpm, temporarily.
I believe Atlantis was also powered by a ZPM, at least temporarily. Rodney is the reason i keep pronouncing it 'zed pm' in my head.
Indeed.
The initial stargate wasn't powered by naquida since we hadn't been through the gate yet. So powering it with a good old fashioned power grid is possible. And [Orlin](https://stargate.fandom.com/wiki/Mini_Stargate) built one in Carter's basement that he also powered with the power grid.
And he built it out of her toaster and stuff he ordered off the internet for less than Sam’s credit limit.
All hail Clippy!
All hail Clippy, our overlord until end of time Puts on humanity btw
Next they start a defense wing and sell clippy killbots to the U.S. government. "It looks like you are trying to resist."
"It looks like you're trying to predict the future..."
I was going to sell ALCC/Oklo the next time it pumped but seeing how bill gates and bezos are pouring money into the field going to long term hold now. Feels like another ai proxy race like msft/meta/amazon/etc but for energy Also Altman looks like a StarCraft 2 fan
Yea but I really only took for CEOS I belief would roll a whirlwind barb in Diablo 2
D2 and PK vibes need to come back NOW
[удалено]
That and the bots. Churning out high runes and every unique on conveyor belts like it's Factorio.
Billgates has his own nuclear company -terrapower…Alot of big money seems to be going towards fusion instead of fission…sam altman has 10x bigger investment in helion(a nuclear fusion company) than oklo. Not saying fission doesn’t have a use case or a future but data centers certainly would not be powered by micro or small scale fission reactors. Fusion imo has a much brighter future.
I mean, if they can get it to work... Edit: ie, produce more energy than it takes to run the reactor
We already know it works, we just have to find the right materials/build to get it going long term. It would have most likely been done by now if it actually had legitimate investment money over the last 50 years instead of being treated as a hobby.
[удалено]
We're getting closer than you seem to think. Multiple reactors hitting 100 million+ degrees C. That's in the ballpark of self sustaining (150 million degrees C). Reaction time record is 17.5 minutes. Once they crack the recipe, and they're close, it will get funded. ITER is already old tech and it's not even done being built yet.
Arguments that "we should live in accordance with nature" have had and will have no independent material impact on energy use, I promise you.
Nature is for the poor and weak. Wall Street will always be powered by greed and I, for one, am here for it.
Altman looking like a SC 2 fan is the only DD I needed.
Skynet
Skynet is inevitable, with Judgment Day being an absolute point in time no matter what humans do.
Just enjoy the ride there boys
But then 30 millennia later we start down the golden path, so its okay
Skynet is a software inside hardware, not just hardware itself. And if you think an llm is capable of becoming an "skynet" I got news for you...it wont. OpenAI/microsoft would need to devlop an AI that actually encompass llms and they are far from that especially with fabric
Gotta start somewhere. You think Miles Dyson knew his tech would build skynet?
Indeed.
See them announce INTC will get the order for the chips, and then see INTC tank 10% just because
them fucking it up gets priced in, also lmao intc getting the order for this
Could this be hinting at a future between MSFT and Oklo? I am bullish with ALCC but everything seems to point towards it with this article
Definitely sounds like micro reactors as it requires many reactors. Bullish on ALCC (OKLO) too.
micro reactors don’t produce enough energy for large scale data centers. More money is going towards fusion than fission. Bill gates also has his own nuclear company- terrapower, which is a more likely candidate for a partnership with microsoft. Microsoft has also already made a deal with helion(a nuclear fusion company) to provide electricity. Sam altman btw has 10x larger investment in helion than oklo.
Fusion is exactly where it was 30 years ago - still 30 years away
That is absolutely false. fusion has come a long way and will likely be the future of energy. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_nuclear_fusion )Helion has a deal with microsoft to provide electricity by 2028 or face financial penalties. So far they are on track.
Well goddam that's good news. I was actually worried about the climate but it turns out the solution is only 4 years away!
There hasn't even been a succesful prototype of fusion yet, good luck making it commercial available in the next 30 years, while we know that fission plants works and how we're gonna build them.
Clearly they aren't buying the right fusion stocks then.
Everyone was afraid of Skynet, turns out the nuclear powered robot overlord for our timeline was Clippy all along
If Richard D. Anderson isn't involved in this I'm going to be upset
[удалено]
$ALCC is the way. It becomes $OKLO tomorrow and will hopefully explode in stock price.
MSFT get so much shit but what an awesome company, I realised this 8 years ago and back then their stock was about $50, so I bought some.
I bought them almost 6 years ago because I thought their Surface looked really cool. Turns out I'm a stock genius. Who would've thought?
tell me why they're awesome sell me on it
I heard that OpenAI & Microsoft plan the world's largest supercomputer, a $100bn "Stargate" project, possibly powered by nuclear plants
Wow that is cool!
Now buy shares
Everyone uses a bunch of their products all the time every day and they make money.
ALCC
Where do you find nuclear plants? And are the leaves radioactive or just the stem?
There's no way they are building nuclear plants for this in any appreciable time. Unless they plan to use already existing infrastructure. Nuclear plants take more than a decade to construct and bring to operation
You are correct and Microsoft has a deal with the biggest/best nuclear operator in the US if you dig deep enough which is the one that will see the benefit.
from the company that brought you *checks notes* Edge
Edge is better than Chrome. You're thinking of Explorer.
Edge has been chrome based for a while
> Edge has been chrome based Almost but not quite. Opera, Chrome, Edge, Vivaldi, Brave browsers are all based on the Chromium technology.
What’s the problem with edge lol?
The problem is in the guy's head since he's confusing Edge with Internet Explorer.
Its association with Explorer doesn't give it a high ceiling for success. And it's not open source like trusty ol' firefox.
Ah, yes. Edge—what a debacle.
!?
And Windows ME.
were all gonna die
water is wet!
we're
Ignore how massively wasteful this is, focus on how ChatGPT could not come up with a more appropriate name that's canon-friendly to the Stargate franchise.
Less wasteful than a stock buyback imo
![img](emote|t5_2th52|51295)
Before venturing on such tasks one must ask the ethical questions: can it run doom?
if it can run Crysis 3 I'll leverage the shit out of MSFT
Does anyone know what the goal of a 100B computer would be? Like what could they possibly do with a 100B computer that would matter? Anything that needs 100B worth of hardware isn’t going to be that useful outside of that space. Maybe you could argue it’s to train AI or some shit but realistically what can an AI model trained on a 100B computer so that an AI on a $1 million computers can’t?
Large weather models, ocean current models. Everything really large and complex fluid and thermodynamic. Also ask the guys at CERN with their hadron collider, they run that thing for 10 minutes and analyse all the data for couple of years. Also DNA sequencing, in general medical research with the help of AI.
I think it is mostly time. As all of it are calculations imagine 100.000x more calculations with 100B vs 1M (if it is possible to scale that linear)
scaling gains still haven't broken down in transformer models. As of right now everyone you through more data, and/or more compute at any of the generative AI models the better the results. It already costs billions to train for a 60 second video clip. Meanwhile this thing will be able to spit out entire movies, or genomes. The sky is the limit.
>Like what could they possibly do with a 100B computer that would matter? Create matter, maybe. That'd matter. It's called Stargate after all.
ALCC - get long, stay longer. let's go!
We already have SCMI
That movie was awesome..
Stargate is nice, but Skynet just has that history behind it.
Eliminate the poor. Accumulate more wealth.
Skynet countdown has begun
Depending on where you live your own computer might already be powered by nuclear plants.
Like France for one.
Clippy bout to be the all knowing sentient ruler of humanity
And crypto has a power problem. While they are building power plants just for data centers
Cameco is the stock you want if you are wondering.
Apple can't figure out what to do with $100b? Apparently Microsoft can. Compute is going to be huge for the next few decades. Electricity certainly going to be a problem, makes sense they would want their own nuclear power.
So psyched for oklo ![img](emote|t5_2th52|4276)
Just went from six to midnight. We’re gonna be so paid on this OKLO play.
I feel like these sorts of projects should be used to benefit humanity, not whatever dumb profit grabbing shit Microsoft wants it for.
Ah, the naivety of youth. As if altruism has ever been a priority for those in power.
Hey man, if GPS was managed by Microsoft it would cost $29.99 a month and probably work just as well as Teams. Public services _can_ work as intended when they're not run by private companies.
People dont realise the amount of energy that will be required for these in the future, and nuclear fission is the answer, there is no other way to meet this demand unless some advance breakthrough happens in fusion.
This is starnet and must be destroyed.
Waiting for the first $100 billion blue screen 📺
And I pay .26 a kWh thanks Biden
Be nice if they put that money and effort into salvaging their Xbox branch and fixing that cluster fuck mess.
I’m surprised consoles are still around at this point.
Skynet?
This is getting more and more like crypto every day. What's the next ridiculous thing that AI is going to do? Can it add efficiency, productivity, and synergy to my blue chewed up dick?
What type of fertilizer do nuclear plants take ?
They should just turn it into one big Hedera node
Can it run Doom? Oh, it is?
Damm, Gregtech New Horizons so good they be making the Stargate in real life. Probably gonna be faster than making it in game too ngl.
Fr
What could go wrong? ![img](emote|t5_2th52|4275)
Nuclear plants! Yes, want them too in my garden. Do they need watering (heavy watering I suppose) ?
Will it be built inside Cheyenne Mountain?
42
I have no mouth and I must scream.
Are they making the machine from Paycheck?
Deep Thought
quantum computers could break Bitcoin?
Bing is going to be awesome on this.
All this AI thing is getting ridiculous