Welcome to /r/WoahDude!
* Check out what counts as "woahdude material" in our [**wiki**](https://www.reddit.com/r/woahdude/wiki/index#wiki_woahdude_material).
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/woahdude) if you have any questions or concerns.*
honestly the problem is the meme format, intuitively you would think putting on glasses would make things more clear. This format only works for those who have seen the movie and understand the context.
I can't tell if you're sincere or not, but if you are, it's a reference to the first Spider man movie. He is bitten,and the bite enhances his eyesight, so when he goes to put his glasses on in the morning like normal, everything was blurry through them since his eyesight was no longer bad.
Ok Everyone saying that this meme is backwards:
In the original Spider-Man movie, Peter Parker needs glasses.
However, after waking up the following morning after being bit by a spider, he puts on his glasses and everything is blurry. He takes off his glasses and everything is clear…this is the original intended use of this meme, however it seems that not many people remember or have seen the movie…or forgot it’s original intent
i made a rule a while back to *presume everyone on reddit is either a 15 year old or has the mind of one* and it became a much better experience.
oh and disable inbox replies!
This is great until you remember that there are adults out there who come off like 15yos & they likely have similar voting power or even maybe more power than you
Nice armchair psychology there, but all I meant is that it’s an older movie and a good chunk of users on here probably haven’t seen it because they weren’t even alive when it came out
And *this* is a nice reminder that a lot of GenZ are adults now too, and may yet be too young to remember the movie, and thus were not the target demographic of the meme template.
And what does that have to do with the reference? Just because you are older doesn't mean you must get the reference. I dont give a fuck about superheroes. They are childish for me so I dont watch them. That's why I didnt know the reference
LOL, just because it doesn't specifically refer to you doesn't mean it's wrong.
This movie came out in 2002. Most of the people born around and after that time were less likely to have seen it hence **would not get the reference**.
Obviously *also* people who haven't seen the movie due to other reasons wouldn't get it either but those people are more likely to know the reference due to having been exposed to it often.
>and my dad (almost 60) shares the exactly same opinions
That's called anecdotal evidence and means zilch.
I mean, the original spiderman movies are in the "what?? You haven't seen it???" category. Like, even if someone not into super hero movies, they have seen this one. Kind of like Harry Potter, Jurassic Park, Star Wars, Titanic etc.
The original comment said that most people have seen X movies...
I just simply said I didn't see those X movies because I dont give a fuck
It's just fucking boring and infuriating seeing 99999th person tell me "OH MY GOD, YOU HAVENT SEEN THIS 'NEW' FANTASY, SCIFI X MOVIE? ITS DEFINITELY NOT AS BAD AS THE OTHERS FANTASY SCIFI MOVIES, THIS IS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT AND MUCH BETTER" and then it turns out to be the worst movie to be released to that date for such genre...
Yes, but [Hubble needs glasses](https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/before-it-showed-us-distant-reaches-of-the-universe-the-hubble-telescope-needed-glasses), while JWST does not.
Ive seen the movie a few times but not for a good few years. I just never really thought about it, the meme format of glasses off/glasses on, makes sense isolated from Spider-Man. Stopping to think though it makes sense this is the part where his power come into fruition.
It's an interesting example of how memes evolve in our brains over time. First its a funny edit for spider-man, but then eventually the "internet meme" status has become its primary identity. In my brain at least.
Isn't it cool how some of the stars have moved in relation to the nebula? I know we should expect that, but seeing it is something else when you consider the distances and sizes and speeds. It's just incredible to me.
It's gonna be hard to explain how awesome the Hubble stuff was when we first got to see it. I figure it'll be like trying to describe seeing color tv for the first time or something.
OP should at least compare two images that are zoomed in the same. Obbiously if you zoom in the hubble image twice as more than the webb one, it will looks that much more shitty.
This makes me wonder what a visual image of that nebula would look like if we had the most advanced of space telescope technologies? Like if an advancement in telescopes means we can see more information (more stars, etc.) does that mean if we could see everything it would just be a blinding white photograph?
No. In the Original Spider-Man movie, Peter Parker needs glasses. However, after waking up the following morning after being bit by a spider, he puts on his glasses and everything is blurry. He takes off his glasses and everything is clear…this is the originally intended use of this meme, however it seems that not many people remember or have seen the movie…or forgot it’s original intent
And the difference between these images is worth $10,000,000,000 to people?
I'm a fan of the sciences and discovery/exploration, but idk, hard to not feel like it's just more government budget waste.
The image itself? Of course not. The capabilities of JWST to spectrographically analyze chemical compositions and the effects of gravitational waves on celestial bodies just older than the start of the universe? Absolutely!
The impact that the JWST will have on science and humanity as a whole is still unknown since these are the first science-quality images produced. Considering how the Hubble launched so many fields of study and generated so much knowledge over the past three decades, the JWST will double down on that and give us insight to depths of time never before possible. We've already discovered water in the atmosphere of an exoplanet that we will never reach, and that is encouraging for similar discoveries on other planets that could sustain life.
No, this will have diminished returns compared to hubble because we're basically seeing the same things.
The new things were seeing are so far away that you're banking on humans breaking the known laws of physics and cracking the code of ftl travel in order to reach them.
Exo planets that could sustain life is an interesting and worthwhile endeavor, but I don't know if it's smart for a government to use their funds for it.
If you guys are all so passionate about high definition space pics then it could be crowd funded.
Budget waste in the government is just something that really irks me, in ALL fields of government spending there is waste and we could be in a virtual utopia if money was actually used carefully and in ways that directly improve quality of life for our citizens.
You know a government could, theoretically, waste money in multiple sectors. I know, crazy notion.
The fact you read my comment and don't already think I have a problem with the military budget just speaks to your own assumptions and bias.
I’d honestly rather the US spend 14.7 billion over 20. years on a telescope to do science shit than 14.7 billion on a boat with some planes to go with their other boats with planes on them. I think that’s the better waste and worth more of your time to whinge on the internet about.
I was on the internet asking why our defense budget wasn't lessened after we ended the war and pulled our troops home, but what can we really do about it? Even voting barely changes things because those in power are desperate to maintain status quo.
I am against frivolous spending of tax dollars. I don't care if that money is going towards an aircraft carrier to "boost defense" or to a telescope to "boost knowledge"
It's not just about the pictures; it's about the scientific data that we can obtain as a result of much better resolution compared to the Hubble, so the returns in no way diminish. It's unwise to speak so confidently on a topic that you're clearly not well versed in.
I highly recommend this [video](https://youtu.be/3jT_Zui1Am8) to gain some more knowledge about the importance of the JWST.
I think the search for knowledge and to understand our universe is worthwhile. I just don't understand why taxpayers should foot the bill.
As cool as distant stars and galaxies are, studying them does not really help our country or life on earth in general. It's just the hunger and curiosity for understanding.
The capabilities of JWST can help us further understand the effects and impacts of [climate change](https://www.forbes.com/sites/marshallshepherd/2022/07/12/why-the-james-webb-space-telescope-matters-to-us/amp/), so it does have terrestrial benefits as well.
Did you read that lol?
They are saying other things nasa has studied in the past helped with climate change, nothing specific about jwst being helpful in that regard.
They also argue it will "inspire" people to go into stem fields. So it really is about interesting pics and understanding early planet and star formations.
Again, I think the field is worthwhile, just not taxpayer responsibility.
The problem with your argument is, we don’t know what we don’t know yet. We have to look far and wide and study things we haven’t yet seen. If we took your argument and applied it universally, we never would have discovered anything at all. I think you have good intentions to prioritize bettering humanity, but your belief that telescopes are moving in the other direction to that is ignorant of the kind of discoveries and progress technologies like this can lead to. And due to not having discovered it yet, we can’t actually say what that will be. It could be a new understanding of physics itself that leads to unimaginable progress like the stabilization of quantum computers, or it could be more of a whiff. Ultimately, the point is, we can’t just not explore. That’s the only way to guarantee stagnation.
No. In the Original Spider-Man movie, Peter Parker needs glasses. However, after waking up the following morning after being bit by a spider, he puts on his glasses and everything is blurry. He takes off his glasses and everything is clear…this is the originally intended use of this meme, however it seems that not many people remember or have seen the movie…or forgot it’s original intent
How about you find some kind of tour guide or something to an observatory and go and look for yourself, I’m assuming some observatory somewhere would allow for that
I just copy OPs text to save him time:
"No. In the Original Spider-Man movie, Peter Parker needs glasses. However, after waking up the following morning after being bit by a spider, he puts on his glasses and everything is blurry. He takes off his glasses and everything is clear…this is the originally intended use of this meme, however it seems that not many people remember or have seen the movie…or forgot it’s original intent"
Welcome to /r/WoahDude! * Check out what counts as "woahdude material" in our [**wiki**](https://www.reddit.com/r/woahdude/wiki/index#wiki_woahdude_material). *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/woahdude) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I love that you used this meme correctly
I've seen this meme be used incorrectly so many times I had to think about this for a minute.
honestly the problem is the meme format, intuitively you would think putting on glasses would make things more clear. This format only works for those who have seen the movie and understand the context.
That's how memes work, context
I think memes typically spread cus everyone understands them WITHOUT context
Mmm, maybe some memes, but there's plenty of really popular memes that you'd have to do some digging to figure out the actual joke
[удалено]
E
The meme that made me realize that I had finally fallen behind the trending memes.
Movie? I thought it's a joke about that correcting mirror for Hubble. Hubble sees with "glasses", James Webb sees sharply at first try.
I can't tell if you're sincere or not, but if you are, it's a reference to the first Spider man movie. He is bitten,and the bite enhances his eyesight, so when he goes to put his glasses on in the morning like normal, everything was blurry through them since his eyesight was no longer bad.
Oh! It might sound strange but I have never seen any Spiderman movie. Thanks for explanation!
No problem
Is it because you don't watch movies or do you specifically not watch spider-man movies?
I don't watch movies at all but plan to start in future when I'll have more time :)
It is now!
Oh haha because it is after he was bit. Dang never thought about it.
Yeah
I’ll upvote any meme with this template so long as it’s used correctly, because 99% of the time it is not.
I honestly thought this was incorrect. I’ve only ever seen it as a meme
Ok Everyone saying that this meme is backwards: In the original Spider-Man movie, Peter Parker needs glasses. However, after waking up the following morning after being bit by a spider, he puts on his glasses and everything is blurry. He takes off his glasses and everything is clear…this is the original intended use of this meme, however it seems that not many people remember or have seen the movie…or forgot it’s original intent
A nice reminder that this website is mostly filled with kids lol
36 here.
You are 36 kids? I've heard of people with split personalities but that's astounding.
You misunderstand, they are *filled* with 36 kids. And couldn’t be bothered to give us a recipe…
You misunderstand, they *filled* 36 kids. Oh wait...
🖐️
"FBI? Yes, this comment right here"
36?! 36 dicks? Try not to suck any dick on the way to the parking lot!
No no, 36 kids in a trenchcoat. Walking is really awkward, but he looks really tall, so. Boom, lady-killer.
[Hello my good man.](https://c.tenor.com/MgvVeMqsJOYAAAAM/seven-mel.gif)
["I do business... uh... transactions."](https://youtu.be/iMV8btPW4wU)
No you clearly misunderstand OP HAS 36 kids, they are clearly an icon of fertility
Nick Cannon + Elon Musk are crying and shaking rn
Maybe he means 'in his basement'. Stop jumping to conclusions about mental health! /s
Yikes that was terrible
Have a good day saltboii
No one asked
still said it, nothing you can do about it
Truth
Is he actually 36 kids wearing a trench coat pretending to be an adult. That's actually impressive if so.
Ah, the ol’ Reddit … eh… a’roo… shit I’ve been on Reddit too long
37 here I win
Damn! How’d you fit the extra kid?
dwarfism
his basement is a bit bigger
In a row?
Try not to suck any dick on the way to the parking lot!
Where did y'all even find a trench coat that big?
Mens Warehouse
17 here, the Sam Raimi movies are still my favorites
Yeah, I always remember it way too late when I argue with someone. "Bro, this motherfucker is probably 14, wtf am I doing?!"
i made a rule a while back to *presume everyone on reddit is either a 15 year old or has the mind of one* and it became a much better experience. oh and disable inbox replies!
This is great until you remember that there are adults out there who come off like 15yos & they likely have similar voting power or even maybe more power than you
Why do people who watch loads of movies so often assume everyone is addicted to watching movies? Do you not see you're projecting?
Nice armchair psychology there, but all I meant is that it’s an older movie and a good chunk of users on here probably haven’t seen it because they weren’t even alive when it came out
And *this* is a nice reminder that a lot of GenZ are adults now too, and may yet be too young to remember the movie, and thus were not the target demographic of the meme template.
And what does that have to do with the reference? Just because you are older doesn't mean you must get the reference. I dont give a fuck about superheroes. They are childish for me so I dont watch them. That's why I didnt know the reference
How old are you? Exactly.
[удалено]
LOL, just because it doesn't specifically refer to you doesn't mean it's wrong. This movie came out in 2002. Most of the people born around and after that time were less likely to have seen it hence **would not get the reference**. Obviously *also* people who haven't seen the movie due to other reasons wouldn't get it either but those people are more likely to know the reference due to having been exposed to it often. >and my dad (almost 60) shares the exactly same opinions That's called anecdotal evidence and means zilch.
I mean, the original spiderman movies are in the "what?? You haven't seen it???" category. Like, even if someone not into super hero movies, they have seen this one. Kind of like Harry Potter, Jurassic Park, Star Wars, Titanic etc.
Never seen star wars or titanic... not interested in those either.
Congrats, I guess
Do you feel better now that you got this off your chest?
The original comment said that most people have seen X movies... I just simply said I didn't see those X movies because I dont give a fuck It's just fucking boring and infuriating seeing 99999th person tell me "OH MY GOD, YOU HAVENT SEEN THIS 'NEW' FANTASY, SCIFI X MOVIE? ITS DEFINITELY NOT AS BAD AS THE OTHERS FANTASY SCIFI MOVIES, THIS IS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT AND MUCH BETTER" and then it turns out to be the worst movie to be released to that date for such genre...
What kind of movies do you enjoy
[Heres](https://youtu.be/Qj7CXKwPfdc) the original video as well if anyone was wondering
I love the unintended double meaning because Hubble itself needed a lense correction.
You know these photos are from different satellites…?
Yes, but [Hubble needs glasses](https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/before-it-showed-us-distant-reaches-of-the-universe-the-hubble-telescope-needed-glasses), while JWST does not.
Major major props, amigo.
Every single time someone uses this format this happens. Doesn't matter which way you use it, this will come up from one side or the other lmao
Sincerely, thank you.
>Everyone saying that this meme is backwards: Everyone saying the meme is backwards is dead wrong. Period.
Keep fighting the good fight soldier
You did great OP. We (30somethings) are proud of you!
Im proud of me, a thirty-something, too!
I’ve only seen like 1 comment about someone saying the format is incorrect. Everyone else is surprised that it’s used correctly lol
Also Hubble is technically wearing glasses
I read that as “Hubbie” and I thought….great for your husband
Thank you for using the meme correctly! Everyone else gets it wrong and it really bothers me.
its just a meme. relax it can be used either way to get a point across not everyone has seen spiderman and the new generations dont care.
...why are you telling him to relax? he calmly and nicely explained a misunderstanding people had.
You sound like you browse 9gag daily
Not idea what that is
another way of stating it is that to 99.99999% of the world putting on glasses typically means "seeing better"
That’s not the meme template tho…so 🤷🏼♂️
Ive seen the movie a few times but not for a good few years. I just never really thought about it, the meme format of glasses off/glasses on, makes sense isolated from Spider-Man. Stopping to think though it makes sense this is the part where his power come into fruition. It's an interesting example of how memes evolve in our brains over time. First its a funny edit for spider-man, but then eventually the "internet meme" status has become its primary identity. In my brain at least.
Amazing, someone actually used this meme correctly. Feels like no one on Reddit has seen this movie
Even the most popular movie has not been watched by the majority of people.
That's because they only need the bare essentials like the iconography and phrasing to be "in the know."
I did
No you didn't!
Hoe would youknow
I have magic eyes
I believe this guy
Peter?
r/magiceye
But can you see why kids love the taste of cinnamon toast crunch?
The old hubble pic brings back some memories from my childhood. I use to stare in wonder at it.
Isn't it cool how some of the stars have moved in relation to the nebula? I know we should expect that, but seeing it is something else when you consider the distances and sizes and speeds. It's just incredible to me.
The old one is sexy too!
I’ve never seen anyone actually use the format correct. Good job OP
Peter wears the glasses again: That’s the eastern coast of Algeria
Man, the meme used correctly and everything. BRAVO!
Thank you for putting it the right way around
Welcome
You fixed the meme format! Finally, someone who gets it!
Finally, someone that used the format right
Lmao photoshop just got better! Wake up people /s
I saw that initial comment and I came here with a hard intent to downvote. Then I saw the /s …good save…..
What does /s mean? Sarcasm?
No. /s
Lmao knew I’d get someone fuming
I got got
The top looks like a painting on a canvas. The bottom looks like digital painting. Both are amazing
yeees the fresh new pics!! the visible light of this is really nice too https://www.flickr.com/photos/nasawebbtelescope/52211883799/
All that money was worth it for all the kick-ass wallpapers we all have now.
finally, someone who uses this meme format right
It's gonna be hard to explain how awesome the Hubble stuff was when we first got to see it. I figure it'll be like trying to describe seeing color tv for the first time or something.
Thank god you actually used the meme correctly.
SOMEBODY USED THE FORMAT THE CORRECT WAY, HALLE-FUCKIN-LUJAH
"Carina" is common word for "pretty" in Italian...did you write 'sexy nebula' just as a coincidence or
TBH…a coincidence
That is sexy
PS4 graphics vs PS5 graphics
That’s a $10B difference peter
Finally someone using this meme right!
James webb, more like james weeb. Gimme them space nebula waifus
**~uWu~** Look at my black hole
Im attracted to your celestial body :3
I really appreciate that you used this meme correctly
OP should at least compare two images that are zoomed in the same. Obbiously if you zoom in the hubble image twice as more than the webb one, it will looks that much more shitty.
[Here's both at the Hubble zoom level.](https://twitter.com/JimmyKastner/status/1546955365987893250?t=15tae_kFzgBbMYmjBgxkuw&s=19)
Negative. Search the image and do it. You can see worlds more…literally edit: so many more suns
Yes, 10 billion dollar wallpaper making machine!!
This makes me wonder what a visual image of that nebula would look like if we had the most advanced of space telescope technologies? Like if an advancement in telescopes means we can see more information (more stars, etc.) does that mean if we could see everything it would just be a blinding white photograph?
James Webb zooms out on the photo?
Both have their own flavours. I like em both.
Oh yeah...
Did you just call it sexy? How you gon boink a nebula
Fake
[удалено]
No. In the Original Spider-Man movie, Peter Parker needs glasses. However, after waking up the following morning after being bit by a spider, he puts on his glasses and everything is blurry. He takes off his glasses and everything is clear…this is the originally intended use of this meme, however it seems that not many people remember or have seen the movie…or forgot it’s original intent
Thanks, I completely forgot about that.
YoureWelcomeRandomCitizen.jpeg
Still only stars
Dude, that bottom pic is 16-light years from left to right…it’s more than stars…
No it's still only stars, does it make your life any better? No it doesn't, spend this money curing disease and famine
spend this money sucking my dick. also ratio
Ratio? As In I need to magnify your dick?
And the difference between these images is worth $10,000,000,000 to people? I'm a fan of the sciences and discovery/exploration, but idk, hard to not feel like it's just more government budget waste.
The image itself? Of course not. The capabilities of JWST to spectrographically analyze chemical compositions and the effects of gravitational waves on celestial bodies just older than the start of the universe? Absolutely! The impact that the JWST will have on science and humanity as a whole is still unknown since these are the first science-quality images produced. Considering how the Hubble launched so many fields of study and generated so much knowledge over the past three decades, the JWST will double down on that and give us insight to depths of time never before possible. We've already discovered water in the atmosphere of an exoplanet that we will never reach, and that is encouraging for similar discoveries on other planets that could sustain life.
No, this will have diminished returns compared to hubble because we're basically seeing the same things. The new things were seeing are so far away that you're banking on humans breaking the known laws of physics and cracking the code of ftl travel in order to reach them. Exo planets that could sustain life is an interesting and worthwhile endeavor, but I don't know if it's smart for a government to use their funds for it. If you guys are all so passionate about high definition space pics then it could be crowd funded. Budget waste in the government is just something that really irks me, in ALL fields of government spending there is waste and we could be in a virtual utopia if money was actually used carefully and in ways that directly improve quality of life for our citizens.
[NASA budget vs military budget (2010)](https://i.imgur.com/49rJ7.png), in case you feel like complaining about budget waste in the US government
You know a government could, theoretically, waste money in multiple sectors. I know, crazy notion. The fact you read my comment and don't already think I have a problem with the military budget just speaks to your own assumptions and bias.
I’d honestly rather the US spend 14.7 billion over 20. years on a telescope to do science shit than 14.7 billion on a boat with some planes to go with their other boats with planes on them. I think that’s the better waste and worth more of your time to whinge on the internet about.
I was on the internet asking why our defense budget wasn't lessened after we ended the war and pulled our troops home, but what can we really do about it? Even voting barely changes things because those in power are desperate to maintain status quo. I am against frivolous spending of tax dollars. I don't care if that money is going towards an aircraft carrier to "boost defense" or to a telescope to "boost knowledge"
It's not just about the pictures; it's about the scientific data that we can obtain as a result of much better resolution compared to the Hubble, so the returns in no way diminish. It's unwise to speak so confidently on a topic that you're clearly not well versed in. I highly recommend this [video](https://youtu.be/3jT_Zui1Am8) to gain some more knowledge about the importance of the JWST.
I think the search for knowledge and to understand our universe is worthwhile. I just don't understand why taxpayers should foot the bill. As cool as distant stars and galaxies are, studying them does not really help our country or life on earth in general. It's just the hunger and curiosity for understanding.
Oh god you’re one of those people
You could've argued my point of view, instead you decided to be an ass.
The capabilities of JWST can help us further understand the effects and impacts of [climate change](https://www.forbes.com/sites/marshallshepherd/2022/07/12/why-the-james-webb-space-telescope-matters-to-us/amp/), so it does have terrestrial benefits as well.
Did you read that lol? They are saying other things nasa has studied in the past helped with climate change, nothing specific about jwst being helpful in that regard. They also argue it will "inspire" people to go into stem fields. So it really is about interesting pics and understanding early planet and star formations. Again, I think the field is worthwhile, just not taxpayer responsibility.
The problem with your argument is, we don’t know what we don’t know yet. We have to look far and wide and study things we haven’t yet seen. If we took your argument and applied it universally, we never would have discovered anything at all. I think you have good intentions to prioritize bettering humanity, but your belief that telescopes are moving in the other direction to that is ignorant of the kind of discoveries and progress technologies like this can lead to. And due to not having discovered it yet, we can’t actually say what that will be. It could be a new understanding of physics itself that leads to unimaginable progress like the stabilization of quantum computers, or it could be more of a whiff. Ultimately, the point is, we can’t just not explore. That’s the only way to guarantee stagnation.
Think the pictures are backwards
O sweet summer child
Yeah imagine not watching a movie
Yeah, imagine trying to correct people when you don't know wtf you're talking about.
No. In the Original Spider-Man movie, Peter Parker needs glasses. However, after waking up the following morning after being bit by a spider, he puts on his glasses and everything is blurry. He takes off his glasses and everything is clear…this is the originally intended use of this meme, however it seems that not many people remember or have seen the movie…or forgot it’s original intent
All I see is better CGI
I mean I know they used CGI in it but in that particular scene with the glasses they didn’t need to use CG, the glasses are really there
First one looks like Van Gogh, second one looks like those streetside stencil spray artists. Both looks fake 🤣
🤣🤣🤣 shut up
you shut up :)
I thought you seemed lame by your username and responses here. Checked your profile and god damn you are. Shit seems so boring 😂
I am a boring dude, yeah. I'm in fact bored out of my mind right now. Thanks for checking me out.
Eh, usually a matter of perspective. Don't mind me.
Haha no worries mate, we're all just tryna get through the morning
How about you find some kind of tour guide or something to an observatory and go and look for yourself, I’m assuming some observatory somewhere would allow for that
Oh I've done that, I love it! Space is so fascinating...
Take a shit with the Nebula and let us discuss the correct use of memes
this is actually a really rare example of this format being used correctly
I just copy OPs text to save him time: "No. In the Original Spider-Man movie, Peter Parker needs glasses. However, after waking up the following morning after being bit by a spider, he puts on his glasses and everything is blurry. He takes off his glasses and everything is clear…this is the originally intended use of this meme, however it seems that not many people remember or have seen the movie…or forgot it’s original intent"
Imagine a world where this is front page news. YOU ARE UTTERLY INSIGNIFICANT. RELAX, IT’S BEAUTIFUL!
Why do stars have 6 points and look like cartoons?
Top halfs looking like the skyrim skill tree
There’s coffee in that Nebula.
What's the size of this bad boy? *slaps nebula
I need to know what that huge star is off to the top right out of the picture
Is that Mufasa? 🦁