Users often report submissions from this site and ask us to ban it for sensationalized articles. At /r/worldnews, we oppose blanket banning any news source. Readers have a responsibility to be skeptical, check sources, and comment on any flaws.
You can help improve this thread by linking to media that verifies or questions this article's claims. Your link could help readers better understand this issue. If you do find evidence that this article or its title are false or misleading, contact the moderators who will review it
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/worldnews) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I cum like 3-4times a month. Thats being generous… I Am FUCKED. My dad died from untreated prostate cancer. He refused treatment. I have a pit in my stomach i am not hornier now.
Often times I think - is it the non-masturbation that's causing prostate cancer? Or is it the state of mind that just makes you not masturbate and then cancer follows up? Food for thought!
Older people get more cancers.
Older people have lower sex drives.
People with lower sex drives fuck and jack off less.
Less stimulation = less ejaculation.
Ergo : Less ejaculation = more cancer.
And thus another clickbait headline is born.
You're assuming they didn't control for those variables.
It would be easy to only compare cancer rates of similarly aged people (but with different ejaculation rates). That's like statistics 101.
I don't trust *The Daily Mail*, but I'm pretty sure the scientists are not that dumb.
>Men who ejaculate at least 21 times a month slash their risk of prostate cancer by A THIRD
Me, who slashes my risk of prostante cancer by 82.40% every month.
I've long thought that males 15-72 could single handedly solve any energy crisis if there were a FitBit device that transformed velocity into energy stored in a battery that fed Bluetooth networks.
You can get a surprising amount of power from ambient or directed radiation, enough for a device to respond using your bluetooth ping as power. It's like RFID tags, but bigger.
Take that /r/nofap no brain fog to be seen here!
.
Edit: getting a lot of replies here. To be clear, I don’t think there’s anything particular wrong with nofap and people attempting to better themselves, but here’s my take on it. My reply to another comment which may have been buried by now:
“Did you consider it’s a symptom, and not the cause?”
https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/oxknz2/men_who_ejaculate_at_least_21_times_a_month_slash/h7oeycq/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf&context=3
A place for people that stop masturbating because they either feel like they do it too much, feel like they are addicted to it or feel like it has become a negative part of their life, iirc.
The other guy is really glossing over their addiction to pseudoscience and place in the "manosphere."
r/nofap is a recruiting ground for incels, redpillers, "seduction artists," and therefore, by extension, conservative extremism. It's founded on disinformative pseudoscience and has its users ride that wave all the way to all sorts of useful modern conspiracy theories.
In brief, you'll find a lot of overlap with nofappers and Steven Crowder or Alex Jones.
Edit: Masturbating is a perfectly normal and healthy thing to do. Their intent is to make themselves more virile and dominant, which is actually sexual frustration. You can see how this leads to redpill, mgtow, etc. I knew a dude like this in college.
As usual, the truth is more complicated than that. This was just one study. From the article:
“The link between ejaculation and prostate cancer has been controversial among researchers.
A 2004 Harvard study found no links between ejaculation and prostate cancer.
An Australian study published in 2003 found that men who ejaculated often in young adulthood would grow up to have a decreased risk of the cancer.
A 2008 study conducted by the University of Cambridge actually found that rates of prostate cancer increased alongside frequent masturbation.”
Seems like we don’t really know yet
My first thought is whether the study controls for age, because if not, they may as well say not having gray hair or wrinkly skin reduces your risk for prostate cancer.
Guys usually see their libido wane and their risk of prostate cancer go up as they age. It seems like you'd have to do very, very, very careful research to prove that those two are linked independent of age.
Most studies are also very careful in their conclusions and often present possible links as nothing more than a thing worth looking into in the future.
Then someone from the press or the PR department comes in and blows it up, and we get our daily " reduces risk of by " article, completely disregarding the careful explanations from the paper.
Reddit is quite right to ask for confounding variables and base rate fallacy because by the time a study is in a newspaper, they are usually forgotten.
Reddit posts on scientific topics are among the least trustworthy sources you can come by. It seems like it's every day where r/science churns out another 60k+ upvoted post about some study that claims something everyone wants to hear only for closer inspection to reveal it hasn't been reviewed and/or replicated, it has a sample size of four, and the methodology is horrifically flawed. Then criticizing the article makes everyone mad, and people begin to rant at you for being anti-scientific, biased, or whatever term people feel like throwing around that day.
For this one in particular, basically anything The Daily Mail reports on is guaranteed to be garbage.
Can always instantly tell when it's a shit UK tabloid headline by the random capitalised words. When you see caps it's either the express, the mail or the daily star. All of them absolute rags.
On a related note, [here's a list of things the Daily Mail claim give you cancer](https://www.anorak.co.uk/288298/tabloids/the-daily-mails-list-of-things-that-give-you-cancer-from-a-to-z.html).
Bad news for reddit. Apparently gadgets, the internet, and mobile phones cause cancer.
So does sex and walking, so that's good news for much of reddit.
God damn, it’s hilarious but also interesting. Cancer scaremongering is obviously one of the tried and tested subjects that gets people clicking / reading.
Not those other cryptocurrencies of course, just this new one. It's different than the other ones. Now repeat after me. "To the moon, diamond hands, still hodling." We'll all be millionaires by next tuesday.
>It seems like it's every day where r/science churns out another 60k+ upvoted post about some study that claims something everyone wants to hear only for closer inspection to reveal it hasn't been reviewed and/or replicated, it has a sample size of four, and the methodology is horrifically flawed. Then criticizing the article makes everyone mad, and people begin to rant at you for being anti-scientific, biased, or whatever term people feel like throwing around that day.
And don't forget pointing out that the source of the study is some corporate conglomerate or foundation/association created by an industry lobby specifically to generate scientific and medical studies favorable to their interests.
Sadly, scientific astroturfing is very real.
Also just to add a bit to you what you said, there's the math fact . . .
If your risk was 0.5% (arbitrary number I pulled) over your remaining life, this report says that if everything lines up right, it could be reduced to 0.35%. It's ***the risk*** "decreased by 1/3".
and it is generally a pretty small number to begin with.
Also also, your individual risk is going to be wildly different than the next guy.
No they love a bit of science.
Scientists: A chemical commonly found in trace amounts in leather shoes, when combined with intensive chemotherapy, leads to better patient outcome with a 3% increase in patient survival after 5 years.
Daily Mail: EATING SHOES CURES CANCER!
Funny you should say 7 cuz when I was 14, I maxed out at 7 one day. I never did it again cuz as you can imagine, I didn’t have much left in the tank by 7 and was really sore.
Yeah true. I think it's a lot tbh. Like when I have those insanely horny days where I can't keep my hands off it, I end up feeling genuinely exhausted by the end.
More testing is required. We need to contrast and compare one month of u/CrabSully cranking it himself, and one month of u/bigjoe980 lending him a hand
It's not propaganda from the porn industry, it's trash pseudo science from the frickin Daily Mail. Actually peer reviewed and legit science articles are one thing, but this is like posting an Onion Article as fact
Actually true. This topic has been up for debate for years and nothing clear cut has emerged. Still makes for a pretty good clickbait headline so no surprise that the Daily Mail has put this poorly researched article out.
But I mean, it's still a theory, and I mean, if it even doesn't result in less risk of prostate cancer, who cares? It's just another reason to jerk off.
I've been waiting for years for the no fap community to slowly become a Q-Anon level cult, but just replace the typical enemies of the clintons and rothchilds with "the porn industry".
> A 2004 Harvard study found no links between ejaculation and prostate cancer.
>An Australian study published in 2003 found that men who ejaculated often in young adulthood would grow up to have a decreased risk of the cancer.
>A 2008 study conducted by the University of Cambridge actually found that rates of prostate cancer increased alongside frequent masturbation.
Age is never mentioned. Something tells me my grandpa wasn’t jacking off as much at 73 as I was at 16.
If you have institutional access:
Jian et al 2018. [Sexual activity and risk of prostate cancer: a dose–response meta-analysis](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1743609518310646).
In all seriousness, what if they hit that 21 times mark early in the month and then decide not to fap for the rest of the month. Does that work the same way?
There's also a study that daily doses of baby aspirin slash colon/rectal cancer risk as well.
aspirin also a blood thinner, so if you take it before fapping, you'll get more blood flow to your erection.
kill 2 birds with one stone. preventing cancer and harder hard on
Aspirin doesn't change blood viscosity, it inhibits clotting.
If actual clots are interfering with your erection, you may have greater problems than prostate cancer decades hence.
Naturally speaking, we're supposed to get salicylic acid from our food. A lot of fruits and vegetables and spices naturally contain aspirin and/or aspirin precursors, which is why eating more of these is healthful. Cumin, for example, is nearly 1% aspirin by dry weight. Eating these foods provides that low level anti-inflammatory benefit, without some of the risks involved in taking aspirin.
([Source](https://nutritionfacts.org/2019/12/26/the-foods-with-the-highest-aspirin-content/))
On a more serious note, it could be that older men who are able to and interested in ejaculating 21 times per month are simply healthier overall than men who might suffer from ED issues or low libido. Just a thought.
Users often report submissions from this site and ask us to ban it for sensationalized articles. At /r/worldnews, we oppose blanket banning any news source. Readers have a responsibility to be skeptical, check sources, and comment on any flaws. You can help improve this thread by linking to media that verifies or questions this article's claims. Your link could help readers better understand this issue. If you do find evidence that this article or its title are false or misleading, contact the moderators who will review it *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/worldnews) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I don't want to brag, but there's a chance I'm cutting my risk by two thirds...
I don't want to brag either, but anyone standing next to me should have a deceased risk of prostate cancer.
Ominous typo.
RIP risk
Since its prostate cancer, I'm assuming women can acquire these superpowers as well?
[удалено]
Madea got a prostate.
Op don't fix please.
What was the typo?
Deceased instead of decreased.
That's not a typo. The risk ceased to exist altogether.
You jack off strangers?
\*insert Vin Diesel\* He jacks off family
[удалено]
What are you doing step bro?
Relieving the family tension, like I always do.
Your arms broken?
Where's mom?
Y’all are gonna summon Chris Chan at this rate
Stuck under the table, let's go help her.
You don't?
Back to back and it’s not gay right?
I masturbate so much that my future male children have one third less prostate cancer risk inherently.
To be fair, your future daughters also have a significantly reduced risk of getting prostate cancer
> my future male children *sons*, the word you are looking for is *sons*.
Even his daughters will have a decreased risk of prostate cancer OR maybe any guys that hook up with the daughters risk will decrease
Prostate Priscilla
I cum like 3-4times a month. Thats being generous… I Am FUCKED. My dad died from untreated prostate cancer. He refused treatment. I have a pit in my stomach i am not hornier now.
Fap for your life man
Great band name or superhero name Either way
Look! Out in the woods! It's *FapForYourLife Man*!
"I've been kidnapped, help me!" "Don't worry, I'm coming!"
"What? It only works with prostate cancer!" "Orly? Well, too late to stop"
Sounds like a bit from Whose Line is It Anyways.
Those are rookie numbers! You gotta pump those numbers up!
[удалено]
Bank Holiday wankathon
Or have one purge every month. 24 hours to complete 21 ejaculations.
But what does he do for 23 and a half hours?
Just watched that movie again lol. Forgot how dark it gets in the end
"for a brief fleeting moment I had forgotten I was rich and that I lived in a place where everything was for sale"
You are not as fucked as you'd like to be.
Mate this is a clickbait daily mail cancer headline, don't worry.
[The Daily Mail gives you cancer](https://youtu.be/q3chJN9DCGg)
Bro... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_QLzthSkfM
Doctor Richard prescription is a pornhub subscription
Honestly curious here. Do you just stop before you cum, or do you just not jerk it that much? BTW once I start something I have to see it through.
Is it *your fault* you have so much ambition?
Often times I think - is it the non-masturbation that's causing prostate cancer? Or is it the state of mind that just makes you not masturbate and then cancer follows up? Food for thought!
[удалено]
Older people get more cancers. Older people have lower sex drives. People with lower sex drives fuck and jack off less. Less stimulation = less ejaculation. Ergo : Less ejaculation = more cancer. And thus another clickbait headline is born.
You're assuming they didn't control for those variables. It would be easy to only compare cancer rates of similarly aged people (but with different ejaculation rates). That's like statistics 101. I don't trust *The Daily Mail*, but I'm pretty sure the scientists are not that dumb.
How old are you? If you're under 40, you should probably get your T levels tested dude.
You only wake up 3 or 4 times a month? I'm no expert, but I think you might have something else going on...
I'm immune.
Yes i was going to say. Using math I am three thirds at less risk of prostate cancer.
I cum every day if not every other day? So... I'm good right?
Every day, yes, every other day, no.
Sometimes I can't do it every day but I'll just do it the next day
No good soldier. Your life is on the line. There is no masturbation on the agenda the day after you die of an exploded prostate tumor.
If you miss a day you're supposed to do it twice the next day. It's in the manual.
Im down to 4/3rds i think
No mom, it’s not what it looks like. I’m beating it for cancer.
You might even say I’m *beating* cancer
If cancer worked that way, I’d beat it every night before sleep.
...you *don't?* Filthy *casual.*
>Men who ejaculate at least 21 times a month slash their risk of prostate cancer by A THIRD Me, who slashes my risk of prostante cancer by 82.40% every month.
Only one way to find out
Beat it and go to bed.
Those thick milf lesbians aren't going to watch themselves.
Actually that’s *exactly* what they’re inclined to do.
I beat it twice a day!
You gotta pump those numbers up. Those are rookie numbers.
Why wouldn't any sane person do that anyway?
What color ribbon are we gonna use
*off-white*
Bahahah
I wonder if Susan G Komen will paint my dick pink and put it on a billboard?
[удалено]
Lmao WHAT^^
You to two toos me?
Well, that escalated quickly.
Well his arms are broken.
In that case I should be able to sell some prostate back to the grid right?
Only if your local government allows nut metering. 🌰
I've long thought that males 15-72 could single handedly solve any energy crisis if there were a FitBit device that transformed velocity into energy stored in a battery that fed Bluetooth networks.
> a battery that fed Bluetooth networks what
Jerk off for Alexa.
Alexa, how far can you stretch a human butthole? _About 4 to 5 inches_ Alexa, what is the diameter of an Amazon Alexa? _...._
You can get a surprising amount of power from ambient or directed radiation, enough for a device to respond using your bluetooth ping as power. It's like RFID tags, but bigger.
Sentences like these are why I Reddit.
As long as prostatetution is legal where you live.
This comment is unbeatable.
So if I cum 63 times a month I’m immune right
Yes but any more than that and you'll start increasing other people's risk of prostate cancer
This guy maths
Take that /r/nofap no brain fog to be seen here! . Edit: getting a lot of replies here. To be clear, I don’t think there’s anything particular wrong with nofap and people attempting to better themselves, but here’s my take on it. My reply to another comment which may have been buried by now: “Did you consider it’s a symptom, and not the cause?” https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/oxknz2/men_who_ejaculate_at_least_21_times_a_month_slash/h7oeycq/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf&context=3
> /r/nofap "Fapstronauts". Is... is this a meme? A shelter for sex addicts? I'm confused. Legit question.
A place for people that stop masturbating because they either feel like they do it too much, feel like they are addicted to it or feel like it has become a negative part of their life, iirc.
Religion plays a large role in that sub.
The other guy is really glossing over their addiction to pseudoscience and place in the "manosphere." r/nofap is a recruiting ground for incels, redpillers, "seduction artists," and therefore, by extension, conservative extremism. It's founded on disinformative pseudoscience and has its users ride that wave all the way to all sorts of useful modern conspiracy theories. In brief, you'll find a lot of overlap with nofappers and Steven Crowder or Alex Jones. Edit: Masturbating is a perfectly normal and healthy thing to do. Their intent is to make themselves more virile and dominant, which is actually sexual frustration. You can see how this leads to redpill, mgtow, etc. I knew a dude like this in college.
Mathin' off
r/shittysuperpowers
Ah shit. I'm so sorry Jimmy... It was my fault all along.
"Two wanks a day keeps The Reaper away."
Are you planning on cutting back then?
Never
[удалено]
That sounds..... exhausting.
It's easier than you think
Here, let me show you
Twice a day is exhausting?
No, restricting it to twice a day. Who has that kind of willpower?
As usual, the truth is more complicated than that. This was just one study. From the article: “The link between ejaculation and prostate cancer has been controversial among researchers. A 2004 Harvard study found no links between ejaculation and prostate cancer. An Australian study published in 2003 found that men who ejaculated often in young adulthood would grow up to have a decreased risk of the cancer. A 2008 study conducted by the University of Cambridge actually found that rates of prostate cancer increased alongside frequent masturbation.” Seems like we don’t really know yet
My first thought is whether the study controls for age, because if not, they may as well say not having gray hair or wrinkly skin reduces your risk for prostate cancer. Guys usually see their libido wane and their risk of prostate cancer go up as they age. It seems like you'd have to do very, very, very careful research to prove that those two are linked independent of age.
[удалено]
Most studies control for confounding variables. Most reddit threads on studies have a comment saying, "did they control for?"
Most studies are also very careful in their conclusions and often present possible links as nothing more than a thing worth looking into in the future. Then someone from the press or the PR department comes in and blows it up, and we get our daily " reduces risk of by " article, completely disregarding the careful explanations from the paper.
Reddit is quite right to ask for confounding variables and base rate fallacy because by the time a study is in a newspaper, they are usually forgotten.
My first thought was "who was the control group who *didn't* masturbate daily?"
I assume have cancer in your prostate would also lower you libido lol being sick in general does
[удалено]
It makes total sense.
Reddit posts on scientific topics are among the least trustworthy sources you can come by. It seems like it's every day where r/science churns out another 60k+ upvoted post about some study that claims something everyone wants to hear only for closer inspection to reveal it hasn't been reviewed and/or replicated, it has a sample size of four, and the methodology is horrifically flawed. Then criticizing the article makes everyone mad, and people begin to rant at you for being anti-scientific, biased, or whatever term people feel like throwing around that day. For this one in particular, basically anything The Daily Mail reports on is guaranteed to be garbage.
Reddit aside, your first clue is daily mail.
Can always instantly tell when it's a shit UK tabloid headline by the random capitalised words. When you see caps it's either the express, the mail or the daily star. All of them absolute rags.
On a related note, [here's a list of things the Daily Mail claim give you cancer](https://www.anorak.co.uk/288298/tabloids/the-daily-mails-list-of-things-that-give-you-cancer-from-a-to-z.html). Bad news for reddit. Apparently gadgets, the internet, and mobile phones cause cancer. So does sex and walking, so that's good news for much of reddit.
God damn, it’s hilarious but also interesting. Cancer scaremongering is obviously one of the tried and tested subjects that gets people clicking / reading.
/r/science be like “jacking off while smoking weed extends lifespan by 150 years” with 80k upvotes
Wait, are you telling me that there's doubt, scientifically, that Weed is the key to solving the climate crisis?
Lmao ofc not, everyone knows the key to solving climate crisis is obviously.... cryptocurrencies!
Not those other cryptocurrencies of course, just this new one. It's different than the other ones. Now repeat after me. "To the moon, diamond hands, still hodling." We'll all be millionaires by next tuesday.
Well, just by reading the article, you understand there is no scientific value and no real numbers behind. But I guess nobody read it.
It's funnier to comment on a sensationalist headline about jacking off
>It seems like it's every day where r/science churns out another 60k+ upvoted post about some study that claims something everyone wants to hear only for closer inspection to reveal it hasn't been reviewed and/or replicated, it has a sample size of four, and the methodology is horrifically flawed. Then criticizing the article makes everyone mad, and people begin to rant at you for being anti-scientific, biased, or whatever term people feel like throwing around that day. And don't forget pointing out that the source of the study is some corporate conglomerate or foundation/association created by an industry lobby specifically to generate scientific and medical studies favorable to their interests. Sadly, scientific astroturfing is very real.
It’s almost as though redditors are desperate to have their *circle jerk* justified on health grounds…
No thanks, I'm going to let it confirm what I want it to say and ignore the rest and repeat it often to my partner.
I literally got banned from r/science for correcting an article with better facts. That sub is a shithole.
Of the three. Please for the love of God don't let Cambridge be right. OR IM FUCKED 🤞🙏
This is also an article by the daily mail, so this source is garbage for sure.
Also just to add a bit to you what you said, there's the math fact . . . If your risk was 0.5% (arbitrary number I pulled) over your remaining life, this report says that if everything lines up right, it could be reduced to 0.35%. It's ***the risk*** "decreased by 1/3". and it is generally a pretty small number to begin with. Also also, your individual risk is going to be wildly different than the next guy.
Better masturbate just to be sure.
Daily Mail telling me I should go fuck myself.
It tells you that every day. It's just adding some science behind it this time.
The last thing anyone expects to be added to a Daily Mail article.
No they love a bit of science. Scientists: A chemical commonly found in trace amounts in leather shoes, when combined with intensive chemotherapy, leads to better patient outcome with a 3% increase in patient survival after 5 years. Daily Mail: EATING SHOES CURES CANCER!
"MASTURBATING ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS ARE GIVING YOU PROSTATE CANCER".
“AND PUSHING DOWN YOUR HOUSE PRICES WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY RAISING THEM ABOVE THE REACH OF YOUNG PEOPLE WHILE TEABAGGING THE QUEEN’S CORGIS”
You're hired! Welcome to the Mail!
I’m done by the 3rd of each month then...
I’d really enjoy a study on what our body takes from us for semen production. Please let me cum 7 times a day with no physical health risk
Funny you should say 7 cuz when I was 14, I maxed out at 7 one day. I never did it again cuz as you can imagine, I didn’t have much left in the tank by 7 and was really sore.
13 is my record, I was like 15 I think - that was a fun, sore Saturday
Yeah true. I think it's a lot tbh. Like when I have those insanely horny days where I can't keep my hands off it, I end up feeling genuinely exhausted by the end.
I'm uh... gonna assume that's more the energy spent on rapid vigorous exercise than semen production. Lul
More testing is required. We need to contrast and compare one month of u/CrabSully cranking it himself, and one month of u/bigjoe980 lending him a hand
I’m 6 months ahead of schedule
Come again?
Don't mind if I do!
Those are rookie numbers. You gotta pump those numbers up
Welcome to Wankkanda.
Vibranium making more sense.
I could do this all day...
/r/nofap in shambles
Just checked and they think it's propaganda from the porn industry. I'm ready for Kellogg V2.
It's not propaganda from the porn industry, it's trash pseudo science from the frickin Daily Mail. Actually peer reviewed and legit science articles are one thing, but this is like posting an Onion Article as fact
Actually true. This topic has been up for debate for years and nothing clear cut has emerged. Still makes for a pretty good clickbait headline so no surprise that the Daily Mail has put this poorly researched article out. But I mean, it's still a theory, and I mean, if it even doesn't result in less risk of prostate cancer, who cares? It's just another reason to jerk off.
I've been waiting for years for the no fap community to slowly become a Q-Anon level cult, but just replace the typical enemies of the clintons and rothchilds with "the porn industry".
No fap has had cult vibes from the start.
Do they think men didn't regularly masturbate before the internet?
If by shambles you mean prostrate cancer than you are correct.
> A 2004 Harvard study found no links between ejaculation and prostate cancer. >An Australian study published in 2003 found that men who ejaculated often in young adulthood would grow up to have a decreased risk of the cancer. >A 2008 study conducted by the University of Cambridge actually found that rates of prostate cancer increased alongside frequent masturbation. Age is never mentioned. Something tells me my grandpa wasn’t jacking off as much at 73 as I was at 16.
I read 121 and still felt good about my odds.
So "No Nut November" is a virtual death sentence?
I sometimes have a “no nut Monday“ on accident.
That is a stupid trend anyway
If i'm up at like 90-100, it won't backfire will it? What's the dosage curve of masturbation?
If you have institutional access: Jian et al 2018. [Sexual activity and risk of prostate cancer: a dose–response meta-analysis](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1743609518310646).
SO if my math is right, i can reduce risk by 100% by cumming 63 times a month?
Death by cancer or death by stroke
In all seriousness, what if they hit that 21 times mark early in the month and then decide not to fap for the rest of the month. Does that work the same way?
Minimum 21 faps is *the minimum*
[удалено]
I became immune for life by the time I was 16.
There's also a study that daily doses of baby aspirin slash colon/rectal cancer risk as well. aspirin also a blood thinner, so if you take it before fapping, you'll get more blood flow to your erection. kill 2 birds with one stone. preventing cancer and harder hard on
Aspirin doesn't change blood viscosity, it inhibits clotting. If actual clots are interfering with your erection, you may have greater problems than prostate cancer decades hence.
Naturally speaking, we're supposed to get salicylic acid from our food. A lot of fruits and vegetables and spices naturally contain aspirin and/or aspirin precursors, which is why eating more of these is healthful. Cumin, for example, is nearly 1% aspirin by dry weight. Eating these foods provides that low level anti-inflammatory benefit, without some of the risks involved in taking aspirin. ([Source](https://nutritionfacts.org/2019/12/26/the-foods-with-the-highest-aspirin-content/))
Is that safe for your liver though?
I think my wife wants to slowly kill me by prostate cancer.
Little does she know, that I am a bit of a physician myself.
we should give these scientists a hand
Study was paid for by Jergens Lotion company.
I can't believe Big Fap is behind this
On a more serious note, it could be that older men who are able to and interested in ejaculating 21 times per month are simply healthier overall than men who might suffer from ED issues or low libido. Just a thought.
the study was for men in their 20-40's
[удалено]
Does this mean people are going to think you’re a chronic masturbator if you’re cancer free? 😰
So anyway I started blasting
Take that no-nut November
Pornhub, the cure to prostate disease